[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Author Thread
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/21/2006  8:26 AM
Posted by Silverfuel:
Posted by joec32033:

Then we both agree Frye can't play D yet. KMart would be a huge upgrade at the spot in the near future, and I agree that Artest is the only one I would trade him for under normal circumstances (normal being that it is a normal trade not a trade scenario like Indy went through with Artest). The only point I was trying to make was that Frye seems to have a big upside(to someone other than us) and that other teams are willing to trade top flight players for him.
If he isnt injured he is an upgrade but Kmart is injury prone. He is injured again! We had a conversation about this on AIM and I said the same thing. Kmart is injury prone. If he is injured, he is not an answer defensively. This could be McDyess all over again.

I agree that Frye has upside and even guns is not arguing that. He is however being overrated. I hope he adds more to his game than just a jumpshot. At this point, there is no way me or you can measure his upside and say he will become a great player or he wont. Using rumored trades to judge his ability like you were doing isnt at all conclusive. Mainly because the trade are rumored. Especially that Artest trade. Larry Bird will never trade with Isiah.

About Frye, from what I see, he had a good jumpshot and has the ethics to improve his game. Calling him anything better than that is overrating him. Hope he keeps improving and becomes a great PF for the Knicks.

Martin could be McDyess all over agin but the difference is we traded for McDyess when he was literally still out injured and he was older. Martin is putting up HUGE numbers and I tell you what, if he is a Chris Webber situation (every 10 or so games he has to rest a knee) that would be an almost ideal situation for us because we have Frye behind him and starting him every 10 games would make a great way to gage development and let him develop. By the time Frye is ready to move on, in a year or two, Martin will only be 30.

Overrating is a hugely quantititve term because to me, I can safely say I think Frye's ceiling is what Rasheed Wallace is doing now...15-17 pts, 7 or 8 rebs, maybe an assist or 2, great fundamental player...ability to play 3 positions (VERY lmited minutes at the 3 to expose mismatches)....the only real hole I see in Frye's game is his on the ball D and maybe his rebounding (the fact that he shoots from 15 feet out takes him out of the offensive rebounding picture. I think that if he played a little closer to the hoop he would be able to grab an offensive rebound or two per game upping his rebounding numbers to almost 8 per game.

If Frye develops a post up game and becomes an on the ball defender at an average to above average level, his ceiling is much higher to me.
~You can't run from who you are.~
AUTOADVERT
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
2/21/2006  9:30 AM
Oh definately. If Frye can play in the post, he will be a very good player. I am really high on his potential. Right now, i would only add him to a trade package for KG or Brand etc. Frye will be very good if he can rebound, block or play in the paint on offense and Defense.

Right now though, he cannot do all that. Lets give him some time to develop before we compare him/his potential to Rasheed. Thats what I am saying and I think thats what guns is saying. But I cannot be sure. Guns is crazy. He gets drunk too often so no one ever knows what his real point is. Also, guns does not like Frye because he got caught up in the whole Bynum thing. He might be more negative on his potential than me.

And I obviously recognize your right to have an opinion and say whatever you want. I'm not telling you what to do, I am just saying that his potential is overrated before we know much about how he can develop. For example: people didnt want to trade him + expiring contracts for Kevin Garnett. Thats overrating Frye's potential. If you werent one of them, you are not overrating him. My argument with you was over using rumored trades to gauge his value.

About the K-mart thing. McDyess was traded to the Knicks in 2003 when he was 29 years old. Kenyon Martin is right now 29 years old. Check out their player profiles on NBA.com if you dont believe me. There is no difference in age and Kenyon is just as injury prone or coming off a bad. Isnt he injured right now? He walked out of the last game two mins into the 1st quarter I think. Come on joe, dont be fooled by his play in the past. He is injury prone ever since he shattered his leg in college.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
2/21/2006  10:03 AM
I didn't ralize that..damn that's freaky......but I still think it is a little different because MCDyess wasn't playing when we traded for him, and KMart is putting up some pretty good numbers. Plus KMart is not coming here as the savior of the franchise so hopefully he won't be rushed and pushed like McDyess was.

I don't understand why we know can't talk about a player's potential. Everyone has a different opinion and that's that, with a young team that is a big part of any converstion. I personally think what I think of Frye's game. Someone may think he is the next Garnett, someone may think he is the next Lohaus. Either way it is always intriqguing to have these conversations and there is absolutely nothing wrong with saying what you think a player will end up like.

My using rumoured trades to gauge potential was a direct respinse to underrating a players potential based on media. The media was said to be overrating Frye. We are said to be overrating Frye. As fans we don't have alot to go on but what's in the media and every single person right different things off as bull**** and takes what they want to believe. I believe that Channing has been a breaking point in MANY deals, if for no other reason, it is being reported by more than once source of the media.

My problem is taking what inferences you want out of the media, and using them as a factual argument or using an opinion of it being bull**** and saying it is fact that it is bull****.

I personally would not include Frye in a trade for Garnett. i say this not because I don't like Garnett or because i think channing will be a better player, but because if you trade our best prospect for a 30 yr old who has ALOT of miles on him doesn't do this team any good. For what we have to give to get Garnett it puts us no closer to a championship. Now if you are talking about Bosh, Howard, Amare I'd say good bye to Channing.

~You can't run from who you are.~
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
2/21/2006  10:33 AM
Posted by joec32033:

I didn't ralize that..damn that's freaky......but I still think it is a little different because MCDyess wasn't playing when we traded for him, and KMart is putting up some pretty good numbers. Plus KMart is not coming here as the savior of the franchise so hopefully he won't be rushed and pushed like McDyess was.
He is just too injury prone. He got injured again last game and left early in the 1st.
I don't understand why we know can't talk about a player's potential. Everyone has a different opinion and that's that, with a young team that is a big part of any converstion. I personally think what I think of Frye's game. Someone may think he is the next Garnett, someone may think he is the next Lohaus. Either way it is always intriqguing to have these conversations and there is absolutely nothing wrong with saying what you think a player will end up like.
Agreed. Nothing wrong with that at all and I did mention that. Frye IMO will turn out to be good even if he just keep shooting lights out. I think comparing him to an accomplished PF right now in his career is over rating him.

You have the right to say whatever you want and you are already doing that with the Kmart situation.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy