so making a move that makes your defender fall down so you can then hit a wide open 15 footer is a bad shot?
When the shot you created leaves you as off balance as your opponent and it is an unexpected (unexplainable) shot, giving your team 0 chance at a rebound, yes it is a bad shot. Then when you move that shot back 10 feet like most of JC's career it becomes a terrible shot.
Is it still a good shot when AI grabs the long rebound, pushes the ball down court and drills a transition 3 or gets an and 1? I dont think so.
And that is nothing like the shot JC passed up.
Smart players manage situations.
My point exactly. He did it out of fear. When has JC ever been accused of being smart player?
Your better off taking NO shot and letting the clock expire than taking ANY kind of 3 with 20+ seconds left on the 24.
I could not disagree more. Taking a good shot is always better than letting the clock expire, unless you are within a 30 seconds of the end of a game. Otherwise it is just a turnover.
Thats pro hoops 101. I'm suprised your pushing this point.
I don't know what you are talking about. BASKETBALL 101 is not screwing up your offense with a forced delay game, by "letting in" the team that is down and more aggressive score while you play to "not lose". When you are up by a decent margin the thing to do is KEEP PLAYING. What is surprising about me knowing that?
well... he may never excell at that. Its the Marbury dilema all over again. When your a gifted scorer like he (like you described) you have spent your youth getting your own shot and being the man.
Marbury is a basketball Einstein compared to JC.
Who is Crawford supposed to be setting up? Frye? Rose for that baseline jumper we all love so much? Ariza with no jumper?
Anyone. Let's start with Frye. Setting up Ariza properly would mean Ariza is ging to the basket. If he set Ariza up for a jumper that would be okay, but not the best.
Crawford is the only guy on the team that throws a good ally oop, or finds guys on the back door.
Since when?
Yes... your 100% right most of his skills go to finding his shot, but when he's on the floor isnt he usually a first or 2nd scoring option? You just want those shots to be good.
You can still shoot too much as the first or second option. And yes, I would prefer that he shoots good shots.
Last year those shake and bake moves were for 3's. That sucked. Thats chucking. When you have his stroke though using those moves to create open 12-15 footers is just good basketball.
True, and that is what he needs to do. Now if he just realized why...
The only other thing I can say is the ball moves better when Jamal is in there. He does a lot of driving and dishing. Maybe not to create a play but just to start the ball swinging.
That is an extremely new development.
oohah