[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

James Jones?
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/16/2005  3:20 PM
Bulls sold out for 6 years doing that.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
8/16/2005  3:24 PM
Ofcoure they did, and so many other bad teams. People come to watch the show, if teams that loose would not sell we would only have 10 teams in the NBA going at it with stacked rosters and having .500 records.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/16/2005  3:27 PM
Posted by simrud:

My plan is so bad that every team that ever succesfully rebuilt has taken that approach.

But who am I to argue with you, you obvously know better then every other GM in the history of the association.

Its called sellin hope, kinda what the Rangera are finally doing now. Guess what, the hockey fans will still come event hough the team is made up of Jagr and a bunch of youngsters.

The Pacers and Spurs didn't do anything remotely like that to rebuild. Neither did the Suns. Or the Lakers (I'm talking about the dynasty that won three times).

The Pistons didn't either.

Of the top teams in the league, only the Heat did something close to that and they were only in the top 5 picks once and only got under the cap because they had a point guard who forgot to pick up his player option.

There are plenty of ways to build a team.

The Pacers have never been under the cap once in building their two strong teams from the 90s and now the 00s. The Lakers had a bunch of overpriced veterans keeping them around the .500 mark, never got a good draft pick, but had the cap room to offer Shaq at the right time. They didn't tank though, because, like New York, they know they have to be competitive to keep fan's attention in an entertainment-filled city. They traded Divac for Kobe and the rest is history.

Tanking and building through picks doesn't always work: ask the Clippers and the Bulls how long it takes. Ask the Hawks. Ask the Warriors.
¿ △ ?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/16/2005  3:29 PM
Posted by misterearl:

TMS - well done summary

>that imo was NOT a fiscally irresponsible move, because it completely rejuvenated public interest in the NY Knicks franchise, increased ticket sales & concessions, & brought in marketing dollars to the garden.

I stand corrected for any misguided critique on my part

You are indde a Knicks gentleman and a scholar

How would you grade Isiah Thomas in total?

overall, i'd say he gets a C from me...not great, not terrible overall...just passing...the Knicks are a more interesting team now than they were when Layden was GM, so i give him that much...we at least have some talented players that i can identify with...but losing JYD really ticked me off because he epitomized the type of hard working players that played on the Knick teams of the early '90's that made me an real avid Knick fan to begin with...before then, i was only a casual fan of basketball, starting w/when Ewing was drafted by the Knicks...it's really sad for me to see a guy who i felt brought some of that old school toughness & passion that this team had been lacking for several years in recent times...this team will obviously survive, but the same type of monetary savings could easily have been achieved through other means that made alot more sense in my view.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/16/2005  3:35 PM
Clippers are a bad example because they dont sign their own players, or any players for that matter. This is the first time in 20 years they actually went out and got guys that might help them win.

It worked just fine for the Bulls, they just made bad decisions. Elton Brand, Brad Miller, Ron Artest...

Both the Lakers and Pacers were willing to take steps backward in order to improve. Both traded quality veterans for unproven HS kids.

As for the Spurs they most certainly did tank. They had a veteran team when Robinson went down. Rather than add a guy that could help them they tanked to be in the Duncan Sweepstakes, like we should have done the year Lebron came out.

You cant sit here and say Isiah is doing a good job running the Knicks. He's done a good job with the draft, but thats about it. The rest is spending $300mm and hoping like hell LArry Brown can bail him out.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Nalod
Posts: 71897
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
8/16/2005  3:36 PM
Having been labeled a Layden supporter, I agree with briggs that we were on the path to rebuild. What I percieve also is Dolan saw the garden as dead (panic and directive to get it together by Stern) and went a different route with a more charasmatic face to facilitate the moves. Im not talking about supporting what happened to add those players, but what was needed to rebuild.

I believe Layden was handed a bad deck of cards and he was the wrong person to deal with it. Bad On Dolan and mills! Its easy to say "layden sucked" its harder to reconstruct a time line and really look at the alternatives at the time.

In fact, non of those team sucked as bad as last years team! Wins and losses do matter! Ok, SO our team has more prospects then before, true, but if left alone those players would have been replaced by youth, and we'd have a ton of cap room and flex to make trades. Isiah/Dolan tried to buy their way instead. Hey, it kept a buzz, kept the garden full.

Im ok either way, but please have a plan and please stick it thru!

Now I thought Isiah got to ambitious by trying to rebuild on the fly. It has been very expensive this process, and one that is finally taking shape. Isiah would have been better off taking that money and accerlerate the process when he first go here.

Be it as it may, Isiah kept the garden full last year and realizing his failure (last year was a complete failure) he has gone to plan "B" which is again expensive, but a plan.


This jones fella is ok, if we dump TT. Larry don't like him, I don't like him, thats enough for me.

We still have a curious roster. Like why is MO T really here? Will Allan really make it back? Who is the point?

Why are we even mentioned in any Finley article?

misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
8/16/2005  3:42 PM
> My plan is so bad that every team that ever succesfully rebuilt has taken that approach.

Simrud - can you name just one sucessful franchise that has follwed your idiotic plan?
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
8/16/2005  3:44 PM
>>if he decided to dump and build through the draft and smart trading-- we would be in much better position than we are today, it's not even close imho.

Briggs - you TOTALLY overlook what Isiah inherited

Nice job
once a knick always a knick
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/16/2005  3:48 PM
Posted by TMS:

well if you want my honest OPINION (not the be all & end all of ideas), if i were in charge, i would have done exactly what IT did & acquired a star player w/some of the expiring contracts & draft picks (a move that i SUPPORTED - what? you mean TMS actually supported an IT move? no way...i mean he only mentioned that about 3000 times before on this forum)...that imo was NOT a fiscally irresponsible move, because it completely rejuvenated public interest in the NY Knicks franchise, increased ticket sales & concessions, & brought in marketing dollars to the garden.

then i would have probably analyzed the remaining parts & formulated a similar plan of attack of acquiring young & athletic players to fill in around Marbury...these 2 aspects i am in complete agreement w/Isiah...so much for all the hater theories, eh?

i SUPPORTED the trade to get Jamal Crawford & JYD using the scrap parts of Deke, Frank, Othella & Trybanski (i think that was the package)...i felt both players could help this franchise nicely & were both the types of athletic players who could run up & down the floor that i liked...plus i've always like JYD's style of unselfish play & hustle, even in his days in Detroit...i also liked the signing of DerMarr Johnson because he was a talented young player who was worth taking a flyer on...had IT been a bit more patient w/him he could have been a nice piece to our offense last season.

where i DISAGREED w/Isiah was when he extended KT to that 5 year extension w/trade kicker...at that point i would have used his expiring contract to trade for a young PF if available (i don't feel going back to list all the available names is necessary to explain this one, is it?)

I also wasn't crazy about the signing of Vin Baker to half the MLE...i felt he didn't fit the team's needs at all & was a nonsensical (there's that word again) roster move on Isiah's part...signing a scrub like Jamison Brewer didn't phase me 1 way or the other because he was a minimal investment, though i do feel Isiah could have gotten a much more serviceable player than Bruno for the LLE...the Jerome James signing to the full MLE contract everyone knows my feelings on...if IT signs Diop to the LLE you'll hear some more whining from me whether you like it or not...i can't pretend to agree w/something that is illogical & nonsensical in my mind (damn, that word has a nice ring to it, doesn't it?)

concerning the KVH/Doleac for TT/Nazr trade, i was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt for a year's time...turns out i hated that trade because i've grown to despise TT as a player, & Nazr was a 1 year stopgap, but at least he did land us some draft picks in the long run, so that's his 1 saving grace.

the Mo T trade i was initially in favor of because i assumed IT had a plan in place to trade off 1 of our PF's last season, but fill the team's need at C...but turns out he ad libbed his way out of this one by dealing KT this past offseason & signing an overpaid scrub to a full MLE contract to be our starting C...not exactly a plan of action that instills confidence in me sorry to say, but at least we did end up w/Q & Nate Robinson out of the KT deal, so it turns out well for us overall.

As for draft picks, i'll say that Isiah's pick of Trevor Ariza was perfectly fine with me after i read up some more on him after that draft...& his trade to acquire the extra 1st rounders in the Malik Rose trade with which he was able to land David Lee was also a move i was in favor of...along w/Nate Rob, those 3 represent some young, athletic players that fit the mantra nicely...but i did NOT like passing over Gerald Green in favor of Channing Frye...i think Green will be a monster in this league someday...

i've discussed all of this plenty of times on other threads & i don't feel it's necessary to go over this or any of my other points on this thread...i'm just doing this so you get a general overview of where i agree & disagree w/the moves Isiah's made as Knicks' GM...now if you want to continue to label me as a hater or whatever, knock yourself out...i'm gonna call it like i see it, regardless if it's a popular opinion around here or not.

[Edited by - TMS on 08-16-2005 3:37 PM]


make this your signature
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/16/2005  3:52 PM
just because you say you want to burn it down and build it up, doesnt mean you are the chicago bulls. the chicago bulls had a core of ron artest+ elton brand in 2001! they ALREADY had it and gave it away and got it back together again--really they reuilt the squad twice and ultimately it wouldve been successful building around artest brand or what they have now.
the NY Knicks, after Mcdyess knee exploded was a roster of non-athletc role players who still held there own, but at the end of the day, with a payroll of 74mm, with an aging boring roster--this team cried to be stripped and rebuilt. we didnt need to take on over 300mm$--at the end of the day, anyone from the business world will ask you the bottom line--the bottom line results if bringing all this cash on has been brutal, a failure. When you rebuild the team, you should rebuild it so that salary comes down, not go up, so that FA space is available OR a deal like Baron Davis for nothing is handed to you. We have been free-whelling other peoples crp and unwanteds and hoping they turn around here at SUBSTANTIAL cost

to say that isiah inherited a bad roster is reasonably true, to say that he compounded things in an inchorent way can be said as well. but at HUGE HUGE HUGE $$$ costs.
RIP Crushalot😞
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
8/16/2005  3:53 PM
>in Isiah's 19 months here he has added 300MILLIOn dollars in long term payroll

Briggs - it ain't your money

Has Isiah improved the team or not?

Did he just sign Larry Freakin' Brown?

Just win baby
once a knick always a knick
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/16/2005  3:55 PM
Briggs, on misterearl's behalf... nice job
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
8/16/2005  3:58 PM
Posted by misterearl:

>in Isiah's 19 months here he has added 300MILLIOn dollars in long term payroll

Briggs - it ain't your money

Has Isiah improved the team or not?

Did he just sign Larry Freakin' Brown?

Just win baby


i remember big earl and little earl.
which one was misterearl?
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/16/2005  4:01 PM
when in doubt you can always pull the "its not your money" card. Its an issue because it affects what you can and cant do in the future. Why did Layden leave a mess? Because of the money. Its not the cash, rather the immovble players attached to it, and the inability to make good trades or have an offseason where you sign a Nash/Q combo.

I dont know... has he improved the team? We are at the point where we are paying $13mm a year to guys not here, so we can make roster spots and talk to scrubs like James Jones and Diop. How many wins have Isiah's moves resulted in? Is the roster more flexible? Or has he added $300mm in players that arent going anywhere and hoping like hell that Larry Brown bails him out?
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/16/2005  4:03 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by misterearl:

>in Isiah's 19 months here he has added 300MILLIOn dollars in long term payroll

Briggs - it ain't your money

Has Isiah improved the team or not?

Did he just sign Larry Freakin' Brown?

Just win baby


i remember big earl and little earl.
which one was misterearl?


After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
8/16/2005  4:03 PM
fishmike - the Bulls sold out on Michael Jordan residuals and a bunch of championships

>Simrud - Of coure they did, and so many other bad teams.

That is simply not true

You haven't named any teams that totally dismantled a roster and rebuilt from scratch

Not one

once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
8/16/2005  4:04 PM
TMS - but do you remember "Speedo"?
once a knick always a knick
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
8/16/2005  4:06 PM
Thank you very much crzymdups

People that think a tear-down is the norm, or remotely acceptible in the marketing-driven corporate universe of Knicks ownership in New York City, are nuts

[Edited by - MisterEarl on 08-16-2005 4:08 PM]
once a knick always a knick
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
8/16/2005  4:16 PM
Earl why don't you read posts that people write as opposed to pickin out one line at a time and responding to it. Somebody else already refuted crazdumps argument and gave examples of teams that did it my way. But you choose to ignore those posts. Kinda pointless to argue with you I guess.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/16/2005  4:20 PM
Posted by misterearl:

TMS - but do you remember "Speedo"?


no, i'm not nearly old enough (born in '71)...i just know the song from movies & some commercials i've seen over the years...catchy tune.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
James Jones?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy