sebstar wrote:dk7th wrote:
26-54
31-47
32-47
35-47
42-38
28-26
those teams he played with in the first few years of his career were awful. The point remains that Felton was the PG for the Bobcats first winning record, and playoff appearance in franchise history, and was a favorite of coach larry brown. The knicks record with Felton at the helm has been great.
see what you did there? it's called a red herring. you do this a lot. and then you get on a roll with said red herring:"Kidd is wonderful as a specialist, role player --- but as a featured pg? A liability. He cant put pressure on a defense, nor make things happen as an athlete anymore at his age, which hurts the effectiveness of his teammates. Anyone who watches knows as much."
this part about hurting the effectiveness of teammates because he lacks athleticism is another red herring. what about the positive ways he affects those same teammates with his skills and savvy?
Like many things that you invoke but arent smart enough to fully conceptualize, you dont know what red herring means because you are misapplying. I was providing support for my argument, not trying to radically take the convo into a different direction with misleading info. SMH
but then you just can't help yourself and continue hammering an empty point home:"Efficiency often rewards those who do less, not impact the game more."
says who? this is an unfounded assertion which you try to qualify with "often." not going to fly.
Perhaps if you werent so obsessed with butchering the logic fallacy red herring, you might have been able to recognize that Jason Kidd's efficiency rating was part and parcel to that argument. Kidd is not a top 3 pg, as reasonable person can attest, but he is rewarded for his limited output in that metric.
and then you finish with personal opinions masquerading as fact. basically you are saying that you see the game a certain way and that's that. i'll break it down for you:"Feltons aggressive play," is a euphemism for rash and reckless.
"and decent shooting for a PG the most important position," 39.6% FG is not close to decent
"stresses the defense w/ consistent pressure." nonsense. defenses sag off because they want him to shoot, broken hands or no broken hands. again, the last 5 games he shot 15-20 times a game.
"As a legit offensive threat, the d is on their heels," now you repeat this falsehood to set up another false conclusion:
"which has a positive effect on Melo and the team as a whole." if only he actually distributed the ball properly. so, no... wrong again.
"Even when he misses, its potentially a positive as a cumulative effect (and direct effect w/ an offensive rebound)." LOL
"The formula for success with him as pg works, but it doesnt show up on a sheet sometimes." yeah tell me about it.
My personal opinions are reflected both qualitatively and quantitatively. The shooting percentage % for both Melo and Tyson have dropped in Felton's absence. Again, Felton's struggles with % are directly attributed to devastating hand injuries, yet you keep regurgitating his shooting stat. Any idiot that watches the games can tell that the offense is struggling w/o Felton's penetration and consistent threat on offense. God, I feel like Im talking to children here.
correct me if i am wrong but did bonn or anybody mention that kidd is a point guard? that is YOUR invention, to put it charitably, having ZERO to do with the discussion of felton as point guard. if nobody but you raised this then it. is. a. red. herring.
kidd's efficiency was part and parcel to YOUR premise of speaking about him as a point guard. can't believe you can come up with this tripe with a straight face.
while this is factually the case, you are assuming that felton's absence is the reason for this. maybe you have a point with chandler because felton likes alley-ooping. i'll grant you that one.
with melo, however, in spite of repeating the same unfounded points about felton, it is in fact melo's OWN shot selection that has caused his numbers to go down. why? because when felton puts pressure on defenses felton shoots the ball 75% of the time! you can't lose what you never had.