NYKMentality wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:I wouldn't go that far. He was still a chucker - just much less bad at it. All of his other stats were average or a little above average though and he was helping the team.
Since you state such as "fact's" as if you "know" everything around here... Answer these questions please. Lets stop with the one line fillers ala "his stats were average". Let's add some insight.
A.) Which game (team) did Felton injured?
B.) At the time of Felton's injury, what were his overall shooting percentage, points per game, assists per game and turnovers per game?
I know the answer too. Had post's about it. Just trying to see if you, yourself personally, know all of the above. Because lets face it, you've stated his stats were average? When in reality 1997, his stats were pretty much top tier in regards to PG's. Borderline All-Star production.
C.) Our record.
Peace out. I'll be waiting for a response, and hopefully not a one line filler either.
A) Don't remember or care.
B) Don't remember off-hand. I posted his career #s earlier compared to the average PG because the large (career) sample is likely to be more predictive of future play than any dozen or so games you want me to look at.
C) If I remember right, we started 18-5, people started getting injured and we lost 3 out of 5, and then Felton went down and we continued losing. No one's saying he's not helping the team though. You can be a little below average and still be important to your team.
I don't know why people are so defensive about this. He's paid what you'd pay a competent but below average PG and that's what he is.
1/15/2013 10:43 AM
