Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
martin
Posts: 76237 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:so Newsweek is stepping up. Haven't read the articles but they should be interesting. Are you familiar with Charles Krauthamme? Read his stuff before and have a good idea how slanted he is? I've said this before: Everyone has some sort of slant and I'm OK with that, understand a person's point of view and you can take their description of what they are writing about with that in mind. I'm not wasting my time reading Charles Krauthamme and neither should you. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
martin
Posts: 76237 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
![]() GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:GoNyGoNyGo wrote:martin wrote:so Newsweek is stepping up. Haven't read the articles but they should be interesting. So, regarding the article. Cheryl Mills is a top aid to Hilary. Cheryl was asked by Hilary to help interview candidates for a position at the foundation. Cheryl was not paid for this work, her work was voluntary (or so she claims). Are you to suggest that any person that is working within the State Department cannot do volunteer work? Or just can't do volunteer work for the Clinton Foundation? And if they do, it's what? Illegal? Conflict of interest? Cheryl Mills, and thus Hilary, has a conflict of interest because Cheryl was asked to help interview candidates for a position at the foundation? Am I missing something untoward? What's the smoke that leads to the fire? What if Hilary asked Cheryl to make a phone call to the foundation? Is that bad? Is that slimy? Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
![]() After debate #1 Im predicting this will all be over.
RIP Crushalot😞
|
MaTT4281
Posts: 34884 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #538 USA |
![]() I'm absolutely dumb founded how the country is still split - I get party lines and all, but really? I sincerely hope it's just the 24 hour news cycle that's just creating this illusion of a race and the veil will be lifted in November.
I don't particularly care for Hillary, nor did I vote for her in the primaries. She has the untrustworthy air to her that's become a stereotype among politicians. But as Nalod has much more adequately fleshed out, she's competent. Our current president has called her the most qualified candidate in history. She's worked with the president and foreign leaders. She's been in the war room. She's married to a 2-term president. That's a whole lot experience to draw from. Enter Donald Trump. He's insulted Mexicans, Muslims, women...blacks - what the hell do you have to lose? He incites violence at his rallies. He's picked a verbal fight with a gold star family, called McCain a loser for getting captured, and this is the guy veterans can get behind? Well, at least he has a purple heart now. What do we actually know about his policies, other than the generic check list for Republicans on taxes, abortion, and the 2nd amendment? Sincere question, I'm ignorant on the subject. Every time I see him asked for specifics on how he will accomplish anything, whether it be the wall Mexico is buying us or strategy to combat ISIS, it comes back to "I'm good at negotiating" and "I'll put brilliant minds around me and they'll advise." I guess I haven't taken the taken the time to see if there is a beautiful mind underneath all those layers of bull****. Of course I'm a democrat, maybe it's just my liberal bias turning me off. What does the rest of the world think? http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/trump-terrifies-world-leaders-222233 I'll wait for the debates, but I'm going to need a few drinks to get me through it. |