gunsnewing wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:Pence wasn't overshadowed.

Turn on a cable news network. Check the websites.

You're mistaken.

But maybe it doesn't matter, because any day now the subliminal message intended with Mrs. Trump's plagiarism is going to kick in and people will be talking about that..

no thanks lol
no interest in what cnn, msnbc, huffington post, ny times, or daily news has to say

Pick your preferred venue. Show me a link showing Pence is the lead story over Cruz.

Any link.

holfresh wrote:With the shots I have taken at Trump, I have to say I'm no fan of Hilary either..Definately an election of lessor of two evils..

The thought of having someone with Hillary Clinton's record of incompetence and dishonesty leading this country. Commander in Chief Hillary Clinton is a total nightmare. A very frightening scenario that will put all our innocent lives at risk

gunsnewing wrote:

holfresh wrote:With the shots I have taken at Trump, I have to say I'm no fan of Hilary either..Definately an election of lessor of two evils..

The thought of having someone with Hillary Clinton's record of incompetence and dishonesty leading this country. Commander in Chief Hillary Clinton is a total nightmare. A very frightening scenario that will put all our innocent lives at risk

With all genuine sincerity gunsnewing, I hope you choose to educate yourself on the issues before November and make a choice from an informed standpoint whatever that choice may be.

Or maybe you already are and you choose just to ape talking points and campaign commercial platitudes. But at the moment, I think if I asked you to cite an actual, specific reason why you'd be less safe under Hilary Clinton, I don't suspect I'd get an answer.

I'll even help.

How is Donald Trump going to stop or intimidate people already willing to die to kill you. Which candidate uniquely has a solution to that dilemma?

gunsnewing wrote:There is nothing standard about Trump. And that's a beautiful thing. One of the speakers made a great point. Forgot who.

What would you rather have? A leader who is brutally honest to a fault or a leader who is brutally DISHONEST?

Do you live in a bubble? You honestly believe the lies Trump tells casually and daily?

For two days he sent his campaign manager out to claim his wife's speech wasn't plagiarized and that Hilary Clinton was responsible for drawing attention to it. Hours later he admitted it was plagiarized.

That was just TODAY's lies.

gunsnewing wrote:

holfresh wrote:With the shots I have taken at Trump, I have to say I'm no fan of Hilary either..Definately an election of lessor of two evils..

The thought of having someone with Hillary Clinton's record of incompetence and dishonesty leading this country. Commander in Chief Hillary Clinton is a total nightmare. A very frightening scenario that will put all our innocent lives at risk

Yesterday Trump said he would abandon NATO allies, specifically those that border Russia and wouldn't defend them. That type of policy, similar to when George Bush I signaled to Saddam that the US wouldn't do anything if Kuwait was invaded is FAR MORE dangerous than anything Hillary has ever even imagined. Putin surely heard that loud and clear and as when he invaded a sovereign European nation recently and annexed land by force you should be positively frightened by the prospect of Trump abandoning the NATO alliance.

Trump is a pathological liar and yet you blame Hillary for dishonesty. I feel like I'm living in la la land. And I'm no Hillary fan and she surely is cagey probably because she's been slandered incessantly for 30 years (By the way a Trump advisor called on her to be shot in front of a firing squad and or locked up for Benghazi when TWO republican lead congressional committees absolved her of any wrongdoing --that kind of talk is beyond the pale and disgusting).

So sure, Hillary is cagey and dishonest about stuff but Trump is literally a pathological liar and probably a sociopath who cares only about himself and who is also wholey ignorant about world and domestic issues. Dangerously ignorant.

H1AND1 wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:

holfresh wrote:With the shots I have taken at Trump, I have to say I'm no fan of Hilary either..Definately an election of lessor of two evils..

The thought of having someone with Hillary Clinton's record of incompetence and dishonesty leading this country. Commander in Chief Hillary Clinton is a total nightmare. A very frightening scenario that will put all our innocent lives at risk

Yesterday Trump said he would abandon NATO allies, specifically those that border Russia and wouldn't defend them. That type of policy, similar to when George Bush I signaled to Saddam that the US wouldn't do anything if Kuwait was invaded is FAR MORE dangerous than anything Hillary has ever even imagined. Putin surely heard that loud and clear and as when he invaded a sovereign European nation recently and annexed land by force you should be positively frightened by the prospect of Trump abandoning the NATO alliance.

Trump is a pathological liar and yet you blame Hillary for dishonesty. I feel like I'm living in la la land. And I'm no Hillary fan and she surely is cagey probably because she's been slandered incessantly for 30 years (By the way a Trump advisor called on her to be shot in front of a firing squad and or locked up for Benghazi when TWO republican lead congressional committees absolved her of any wrongdoing --that kind of talk is beyond the pale and disgusting).

So sure, Hillary is cagey and dishonest about stuff but Trump is literally a pathological liar and probably a sociopath who cares only about himself and who is also wholey ignorant about world and domestic issues. Dangerously ignorant.

Sure, Trump can be a bit crude to many but I prefer someone who speaks whet they think and draws a clear and distinctive line in the sand.

Hillary is a career politician who, in my opinion, seems to change her stance not because of belief or conviction but because of what she believes is what the voting public desires.

Knickoftime wrote:

CashMoney wrote:I've been a registered Democrat and have voted as a Democrat since. However, this will be the 1st time in my life that I will vote Republican.

Sure, Trump can be a bit crude to many but I prefer someone who speaks whet they think and draws a clear and distinctive line in the sand.

Hillary is a career politician who, in my opinion, seems to change her stance not because of belief or conviction but because of what she believes is what the voting public desires.

You can play the YouTube flip-flop game all day...

It is very easy to choose between clown and bitch.
Vote for the party you support disregarding the personality of candidate.
Or if you do not support both parties (which are essentially the same) do not wote at all or vote for independent (which is same as do not vote at all)

arkrud wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:

CashMoney wrote:I've been a registered Democrat and have voted as a Democrat since. However, this will be the 1st time in my life that I will vote Republican.

Sure, Trump can be a bit crude to many but I prefer someone who speaks whet they think and draws a clear and distinctive line in the sand.

Hillary is a career politician who, in my opinion, seems to change her stance not because of belief or conviction but because of what she believes is what the voting public desires.

You can play the YouTube flip-flop game all day...

It is very easy to choose between clown and bitch.
Vote for the party you support disregarding the personality of candidate.
Or if you do not support both parties (which are essentially the same) do not wote at all or vote for independent (which is same as do not vote at all)

My vote will be for a third party candidate as a protest . Both candidates are flawed, people will vote for what best fits their ideologies and self interests. Many will vote simply on the basis of race. Old hag Hillary is a shrieking political machine who doesn't inspire any confidence that she can jump start the nation while zany Trump is not versed at all in affairs to warrant holding the highest office

Something tells me that Trump will win against all odds and reason as the passion for change is real and increasing. Too many don't like the stagnation in wages, the focus and direction towards the left, the perceived weakness of leadership and the events . The last few weeks have just heightened the sense that law and order is failing on many fronts

If Trump wins, one can only hope that his narcissistic bravado is a front not a disorder and that he is intelligent enough to refine some positions and listen and lean on the knowledge and experience of advisers

fishmike wrote:

Knickoftime wrote:

gunsnewing wrote:

holfresh wrote:With the shots I have taken at Trump, I have to say I'm no fan of Hilary either..Definately an election of lessor of two evils..

The thought of having someone with Hillary Clinton's record of incompetence and dishonesty leading this country. Commander in Chief Hillary Clinton is a total nightmare. A very frightening scenario that will put all our innocent lives at risk

With all genuine sincerity gunsnewing, I hope you choose to educate yourself on the issues before November and make a choice from an informed standpoint whatever that choice may be.

Or maybe you already are and you choose just to ape talking points and campaign commercial platitudes. But at the moment, I think if I asked you to cite an actual, specific reason why you'd be less safe under Hilary Clinton, I don't suspect I'd get an answer.

I'll even help.

How is Donald Trump going to stop or intimidate people already willing to die to kill you. Which candidate uniquely has a solution to that dilemma?

why do research when you can "feel good" about the guy/gal you are voting for? That is what these elections are about, and its why we have the candidates we have. Guns has decided Trump is the guy because he "feels good" about his immigration rhetoric, and that's enough. The rest of the issues... Trump will figure those out because he's a good guy. That's pretty much status quo. The stuff Guns is saying is 100% the normal status quo.

Politics have been made into Yankees/Redsox or maybe more like sunnis vs Shiites. The problem is if you even consider something the "other" candidate says you might as well be rooting for the other team. Guns is far from unique in this trait. I think its more the norm than anything.