[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

All around the League: 2020-21 season!
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
2/2/2021  10:41 PM
Free van fleet incredible tonight w 54 points hardly missed 11 threes
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
Knixkik
Posts: 35445
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
2/3/2021  9:01 AM
BRIGGS wrote:Free van fleet incredible tonight w 54 points hardly missed 11 threes

Imagine how good this team would be with him instead of Payton?

ESOMKnicks
Posts: 21420
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/14/2015
Member: #6064

2/3/2021  9:43 AM
Knixkik wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Free van fleet incredible tonight w 54 points hardly missed 11 threes

Imagine how good this team would be with him instead of Payton?

No one doubted that the Knicks would have had a better record this season if they signed FVV. But they still would not have been championship caliber, and already capped out with his $20m annual salary on the books. With limited room for improvement.

jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/3/2021  9:53 AM
ESOMKnicks wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Free van fleet incredible tonight w 54 points hardly missed 11 threes

Imagine how good this team would be with him instead of Payton?

No one doubted that the Knicks would have had a better record this season if they signed FVV. But they still would not have been championship caliber, and already capped out with his $20m annual salary on the books. With limited room for improvement.

Not to mention the added thrill of watching him go 1-7 and 2-6 game after game while we wait for this one freak game where he shoots 70% from 3. And then IQ would probably not be getting 20-30 min a game now, would he?

Nalod
Posts: 71144
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/3/2021  9:57 AM
jrodmc wrote:
ESOMKnicks wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Free van fleet incredible tonight w 54 points hardly missed 11 threes

Imagine how good this team would be with him instead of Payton?

No one doubted that the Knicks would have had a better record this season if they signed FVV. But they still would not have been championship caliber, and already capped out with his $20m annual salary on the books. With limited room for improvement.

Not to mention the added thrill of watching him go 1-7 and 2-6 game after game while we wait for this one freak game where he shoots 70% from 3. And then IQ would probably not be getting 20-30 min a game now, would he?

But, we could have had Woods for less.......LOL

jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/3/2021  9:59 AM
Nalod wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
ESOMKnicks wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Free van fleet incredible tonight w 54 points hardly missed 11 threes

Imagine how good this team would be with him instead of Payton?

No one doubted that the Knicks would have had a better record this season if they signed FVV. But they still would not have been championship caliber, and already capped out with his $20m annual salary on the books. With limited room for improvement.

Not to mention the added thrill of watching him go 1-7 and 2-6 game after game while we wait for this one freak game where he shoots 70% from 3. And then IQ would probably not be getting 20-30 min a game now, would he?

But, we could have had Woods for less.......LOL

And...and we should have drafted Wiseman!

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39867
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

2/3/2021  11:54 AM
jrodmc wrote:
ESOMKnicks wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Free van fleet incredible tonight w 54 points hardly missed 11 threes

Imagine how good this team would be with him instead of Payton?

No one doubted that the Knicks would have had a better record this season if they signed FVV. But they still would not have been championship caliber, and already capped out with his $20m annual salary on the books. With limited room for improvement.

Not to mention the added thrill of watching him go 1-7 and 2-6 game after game while we wait for this one freak game where he shoots 70% from 3. And then IQ would probably not be getting 20-30 min a game now, would he?

Also, didn't he alert the Knicks through back channels that he did not want to come?

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27980
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 11/21/2015
Member: #6192

2/3/2021  3:46 PM
jrodmc wrote:
ESOMKnicks wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Free van fleet incredible tonight w 54 points hardly missed 11 threes

Imagine how good this team would be with him instead of Payton?

No one doubted that the Knicks would have had a better record this season if they signed FVV. But they still would not have been championship caliber, and already capped out with his $20m annual salary on the books. With limited room for improvement.

Not to mention the added thrill of watching him go 1-7 and 2-6 game after game while we wait for this one freak game where he shoots 70% from 3. And then IQ would probably not be getting 20-30 min a game now, would he?

Brought this up on another thread. Most ignore the minus of adding a player. IQ would have had zero opportunity if we added VanVleet. You look at IQ's per 36 and it is at some measures better than VanVleet. Not to mention VanVleet is getting plus 20M. Raptors with Van Fleet, Lowery and Siakam are just okay. Yet we are to believe he would have put our roster over the top. I liked VanVleet but happy with IQ. Do agree that we need a better shooting PG instead of Payton. Although for the price, Payton was not a bad option.

'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
martin
Posts: 76188
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/3/2021  3:52 PM
HofstraBBall wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
ESOMKnicks wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Free van fleet incredible tonight w 54 points hardly missed 11 threes

Imagine how good this team would be with him instead of Payton?

No one doubted that the Knicks would have had a better record this season if they signed FVV. But they still would not have been championship caliber, and already capped out with his $20m annual salary on the books. With limited room for improvement.

Not to mention the added thrill of watching him go 1-7 and 2-6 game after game while we wait for this one freak game where he shoots 70% from 3. And then IQ would probably not be getting 20-30 min a game now, would he?

Brought this up on another thread. Most ignore the minus of adding a player. IQ would have had zero opportunity if we added VanVleet. You look at IQ's per 36 and it is at some measures better than VanVleet. Not to mention VanVleet is getting plus 20M. Raptors with Van Fleet, Lowery and Siakam are just okay. Yet we are to believe he would have put our roster over the top. I liked VanVleet but happy with IQ. Do agree that we need a better shooting PG instead of Payton. Although for the price, Payton was not a bad option.

Fair to bring up that Knicks and Toronto have similar records so far with the Knicks having far less talent and having had played a difficult schedule. Toronto doing the playing home games in different country thing. Records won't last that way but we are a quarter way thru season

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
smackeddog
Posts: 38389
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
2/3/2021  5:54 PM
Mavs vs hawks today- don't see the mavs losing it, unfortunately
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39867
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

2/3/2021  6:41 PM
smackeddog wrote:Mavs vs hawks today- don't see the mavs losing it, unfortunately

Trae out?

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

2/3/2021  7:08 PM
BigDaddyG wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Mavs vs hawks today- don't see the mavs losing it, unfortunately

Trae out?

I expect a shoot out. If the mavs lose though. Somebody might get fired

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39867
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

2/3/2021  7:18 PM
wargames wrote:
BigDaddyG wrote:
smackeddog wrote:Mavs vs hawks today- don't see the mavs losing it, unfortunately

Trae out?

I expect a shoot out. If the mavs lose though. Somebody might get fired


Rick Carlisle is a championship winning coach. They should stay Pat and reevaluate. Unless they want to make a deal to remove the protections off of next year's pick. Mark need to be patient and thoroughly evaluate the roster.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748

2/3/2021  9:07 PM
71 67 Mavs.
The Future is Bright!
KnickDanger
Posts: 24375
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/30/2017
Member: #7578

2/3/2021  10:20 PM
Can't lose 'em all.
Nalod
Posts: 71144
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
2/4/2021  8:38 AM
KP had that look. Like he was sending US a message
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/4/2021  10:40 AM
KP letting Willie get the blocks. Gallo and Rondo on the second unit for the Hawks.

Can someone tell me how +/- has any value when Solomon Hill shoots 0% from everywhere, grabs 3 whole rebounds in 26 minutes and is +11?

KnickDanger
Posts: 24375
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/30/2017
Member: #7578

2/4/2021  11:31 AM
jrodmc wrote:KP letting Willie get the blocks. Gallo and Rondo on the second unit for the Hawks.

Can someone tell me how +/- has any value when Solomon Hill shoots 0% from everywhere, grabs 3 whole rebounds in 26 minutes and is +11?

Eye test always > +/- which I have no comprehension of other than it seems wack.

jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/4/2021  12:02 PM
KnickDanger wrote:
jrodmc wrote:KP letting Willie get the blocks. Gallo and Rondo on the second unit for the Hawks.

Can someone tell me how +/- has any value when Solomon Hill shoots 0% from everywhere, grabs 3 whole rebounds in 26 minutes and is +11?

Eye test always > +/- which I have no comprehension of other than it seems wack.

I guess it's just being on the floor at the right time, with the right people. Even if you're just taking up space against someone else who's just taking up space.
He did have 1 steal, I think...

Juliano
Posts: 20179
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/7/2017
Member: #7589

2/4/2021  12:31 PM
jrodmc wrote:Can someone tell me how +/- has any value when Solomon Hill shoots 0% from everywhere, grabs 3 whole rebounds in 26 minutes and is +11?

It has little value on a small sample let alone a single game, but over a season, and for otherwise similar stats, I believe it tells the difference between the stat padders and the wins contributors.

All around the League: 2020-21 season!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy