[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Draft Board as of now
Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/15/2005  11:47 AM
Posted by crzymdups:

No offense, guys, but I have extreme faith in Isiah's talent evaluation. If Isiah looks at Bynum, Granger, Wright, Webster, Warrick, Blatche, Taft, Green, Ellis, Simien, etc and decides Frye is his guy, I trust that. (Knicks are working out Blatche today).

Frye didn't bang in the post in college because that's not the system Olsen favors. He favors quick decisions with the ball. One dribble, then shoot or pass unless the ball was in Salim Stoudimire's hands. Look at Jefferson's numbers at Arizona - 11ppg and 4rpg, nothing to write home about - but looking back, Jefferson could arguably be the best player from that draft.

Zeke has never made a catastrophic mistake in the draft like you guys are predicting Frye to be, so IF he takes him, can we all agree to have a little patience to see how he fits with the actual team and how his game actually translates?

For all the Bynum hype, how do we know he has the mental makeup to be anything more than Yinka Dare or Dasagana Diop. Judging players on their physical attributes is nice, but it only tells you so much. Look at all the power forwards every year that are built like Elton Brand and get compared to him. None of them ever have the success Elton did. There is more to evaluating a player than size, strength and length. Strength, in particular, can be worked on and Frye has the frame to add more and he's working with the best trainer in basketball. And IF he comes to the Knicks, he'll be working with one of the best big man coaches in the league in Agguire. Sorry, but I trust Zeke to evaluate talent in the draft.

I am one of Isiah's biggest supporters and I am so in every facet of him being the GM. This is why I am completely and have the utmost confidence that he will NOT select Channing.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
6/15/2005  11:48 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:

I am one of Isiah's biggest supporters and I am so in every facet of him being the GM. This is why I am completely and have the utmost confidence that he will NOT select Channing.
I'm late in asking but who do u want to pick at #8? I think guns wants Bynum after Zeke's workout.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/15/2005  11:52 AM
Posted by Silverfuel:
Posted by nyk4ever:

I am one of Isiah's biggest supporters and I am so in every facet of him being the GM. This is why I am completely and have the utmost confidence that he will NOT select Channing.
I'm late in asking but who do u want to pick at #8? I think guns wants Bynum after Zeke's workout.

It's cool Nik. I wouldn't mind Bynum at 8 but I really would like to get Danny Granger at 8. He has the ability of Paul Pierce on offense and plays a higher intenser level of defense then Paul does. He would be an all-star candidate every year and be putting up 20ppg/6rbg/1bpg/1spg by year 2 or 3 I think.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 06/15/2005 11:52:52]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/15/2005  11:52 AM
Originally posted by nyk4ever:

I am one of Isiah's biggest supporters and I am so in every facet of him being the GM. This is why I am completely and have the utmost confidence that he will NOT select Channing.

But, all I'm saying is IF IF IF he does, can we agree to wait and see what Frye looks like in the NBA before declaring him a bust? For one thing, people here have been dogging Frye's makeup, saying he took it easy in college games, but that had a lot to do with the way the offense was run. Camby only averaged 7 rebounds a game in college, I'm not saying Frye will be Camby, but I am saying a guy's college rebounding totals can be misleading. It all depends on a team's defensive and offensive schemes.

Edit: Also, I can pretty much guarantee you Granger will be gone by pick 8. I would take Granger over Frye too. But Granger might go 5th at this rate and he'll certainly go 7th.

[Edited by - crzymdups on 06/15/2005 11:54:32]
¿ △ ?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/15/2005  11:57 AM
Posted by crzymdups:

But, all I'm saying is IF IF IF he does, can we agree to wait and see what Frye looks like in the NBA before declaring him a bust? For one thing, people here have been dogging Frye's makeup, saying he took it easy in college games, but that had a lot to do with the way the offense was run. Camby only averaged 7 rebounds a game in college, I'm not saying Frye will be Camby, but I am saying a guy's college rebounding totals can be misleading. It all depends on a team's defensive and offensive schemes.

Thats fine Crzy and I would agree with you 99.9% of the time, but you have to take a look at other big men that have come out of Arizona and away from Lute's system. The big men that have come out of that system and into the NBA, not them has done a thing in the NBA and there have been a few who were just as succesful as Channing was in college, guys like Loren Woods, Tom Tolbert just to name a few.

Lute's system doesn't produce good NBA big men as well as it produces good NBA guards. I just don't see Channing having the ability to change his game for the better in the NBA becuase 1. he doesnt have the body and 2. it hasn't been done before by any other former Arizona big man yet.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 06/15/2005 11:58:32]
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/15/2005  11:57 AM
Posted by crzymdups:
Originally posted by nyk4ever:

I am one of Isiah's biggest supporters and I am so in every facet of him being the GM. This is why I am completely and have the utmost confidence that he will NOT select Channing.

But, all I'm saying is IF IF IF he does, can we agree to wait and see what Frye looks like in the NBA before declaring him a bust? For one thing, people here have been dogging Frye's makeup, saying he took it easy in college games, but that had a lot to do with the way the offense was run. Camby only averaged 7 rebounds a game in college, I'm not saying Frye will be Camby, but I am saying a guy's college rebounding totals can be misleading. It all depends on a team's defensive and offensive schemes.

Edit: Also, I can pretty much guarantee you Granger will be gone by pick 8. I would take Granger over Frye too. But Granger might go 5th at this rate and he'll certainly go 7th.

[Edited by - crzymdups on 06/15/2005 11:54:32]
From what I've heard, I don't like the idea of drafting Frye at #8, but I agree with you that if he is drafted at #8, he deserves a chance before we kill him.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/15/2005  12:10 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by crzymdups:

But, all I'm saying is IF IF IF he does, can we agree to wait and see what Frye looks like in the NBA before declaring him a bust? For one thing, people here have been dogging Frye's makeup, saying he took it easy in college games, but that had a lot to do with the way the offense was run. Camby only averaged 7 rebounds a game in college, I'm not saying Frye will be Camby, but I am saying a guy's college rebounding totals can be misleading. It all depends on a team's defensive and offensive schemes.

Thats fine Crzy and I would agree with you 99.9% of the time, but you have to take a look at other big men that have come out of Arizona and away from Lute's system. The big men that have come out of that system and into the NBA, not them has done a thing in the NBA and there have been a few who were just as succesful as Channing was in college, guys like Loren Woods, Tom Tolbert just to name a few.

Lute's system doesn't produce good NBA big men as well as it produces good NBA guards. I just don't see Channing having the ability to change his game for the better in the NBA becuase 1. he doesnt have the body and 2. it hasn't been done before by any other former Arizona big man yet.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 06/15/2005 11:58:32]

That's a decent point, but I think WHERE a guy comes from shouldn't really preclude him from being elavuated on his own merits. Loren Woods also had three back surgeries which sapped him of any leaping ability and from what I've heard does not have the mental makeup of Frye. Also Woods' stats were probably inflated by playing with Arenas and Jefferson on one of the best college teams of the last ten years or so.

I mean, yeah, I have my reservations about Frye too, but honestly, it's the 8th pick, I have reservations about every single guy who will be there. Even Granger, who would be my no.1 option if I thought he would fall that far, has had a torn meniscus in his knee and has had a few surgeries. It's a draft with a lot of potential players, but to me, every single player has at least one red flag. But, yeah, I trust Zeke to grab two players (at least) in this draft, and if he takes Frye, I'll be happy to wait and see.
¿ △ ?
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/15/2005  12:12 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by nyk4ever:
Posted by crzymdups:

But, all I'm saying is IF IF IF he does, can we agree to wait and see what Frye looks like in the NBA before declaring him a bust? For one thing, people here have been dogging Frye's makeup, saying he took it easy in college games, but that had a lot to do with the way the offense was run. Camby only averaged 7 rebounds a game in college, I'm not saying Frye will be Camby, but I am saying a guy's college rebounding totals can be misleading. It all depends on a team's defensive and offensive schemes.

Thats fine Crzy and I would agree with you 99.9% of the time, but you have to take a look at other big men that have come out of Arizona and away from Lute's system. The big men that have come out of that system and into the NBA, not them has done a thing in the NBA and there have been a few who were just as succesful as Channing was in college, guys like Loren Woods, Tom Tolbert just to name a few.

Lute's system doesn't produce good NBA big men as well as it produces good NBA guards. I just don't see Channing having the ability to change his game for the better in the NBA becuase 1. he doesnt have the body and 2. it hasn't been done before by any other former Arizona big man yet.

[Edited by - nyk4ever on 06/15/2005 11:58:32]

That's a decent point, but I think WHERE a guy comes from shouldn't really preclude him from being elavuated on his own merits. Loren Woods also had three back surgeries which sapped him of any leaping ability and from what I've heard does not have the mental makeup of Frye. Also Woods' stats were probably inflated by playing with Arenas and Jefferson on one of the best college teams of the last ten years or so.

I mean, yeah, I have my reservations about Frye too, but honestly, it's the 8th pick, I have reservations about every single guy who will be there. Even Granger, who would be my no.1 option if I thought he would fall that far, has had a torn meniscus in his knee and has had a few surgeries. It's a draft with a lot of potential players, but to me, every single player has at least one red flag. But, yeah, I trust Zeke to grab two players (at least) in this draft, and if he takes Frye, I'll be happy to wait and see.

Theres nothing with that I don't agree with there, we're just going to have to wait and see. Just curious though, who do you like at 8 besides Frye and say Granger is off the board already.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
6/15/2005  12:22 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by crzymdups:
Originally posted by nyk4ever:

I am one of Isiah's biggest supporters and I am so in every facet of him being the GM. This is why I am completely and have the utmost confidence that he will NOT select Channing.

But, all I'm saying is IF IF IF he does, can we agree to wait and see what Frye looks like in the NBA before declaring him a bust? For one thing, people here have been dogging Frye's makeup, saying he took it easy in college games, but that had a lot to do with the way the offense was run. Camby only averaged 7 rebounds a game in college, I'm not saying Frye will be Camby, but I am saying a guy's college rebounding totals can be misleading. It all depends on a team's defensive and offensive schemes.

Edit: Also, I can pretty much guarantee you Granger will be gone by pick 8. I would take Granger over Frye too. But Granger might go 5th at this rate and he'll certainly go 7th.

[Edited by - crzymdups on 06/15/2005 11:54:32]
From what I've heard, I don't like the idea of drafting Frye at #8, but I agree with you that if he is drafted at #8, he deserves a chance before we kill him.

Absolutely. It's not his fault where he gets drafted. If he has a low ceiling, but he reaches that ceiling and stays there, then good for him. He's a solid player with a good head. If we drafted him at 8, I would root for him and give him a chance just like everyone else. As a matter of fact, I would probably root for him extra hard, b/c I would feel bad if he got booed and everyone just hated him off the bat.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
6/15/2005  12:22 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:


Theres nothing with that I don't agree with there, we're just going to have to wait and see. Just curious though, who do you like at 8 besides Frye and say Granger is off the board already.

After those two? I would avoid Felton because I think that would make the backcourt FAR too small. I'd avoid Wright, for some reason I don't trust him, he only shot 38% for his first two years of school. Mostly, I'd avoid him because I feel the Knicks need a SF far more than another SG. The guys I like:

1) Graham
2) Warrick
3) Green (not sure if he'll be there at 8)
4) Bynum
5) Webster
6) Diogu (we'd have to move some guys out)
7) Blatche
¿ △ ?
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
6/15/2005  12:54 PM
I forgot to mention Warrick too. He sucked in our workout but seemed to play pretty well in the others, and shot pretty decently from mid-range. And you know who else in spite of poor workouts I would give a shot to:

Chris Taft. He really could be a monster in the league, its a risk, but he has what it takes. He sucked in the workouts, he hasn't always played hard, but it just seems that he would benefit so much from playing with Steph and for us to have a strong, athletic, and long 6-10 guy with an NBA body, it is still appealing to me.
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
6/15/2005  1:40 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by nyk4ever:


Theres nothing with that I don't agree with there, we're just going to have to wait and see. Just curious though, who do you like at 8 besides Frye and say Granger is off the board already.

After those two? I would avoid Felton because I think that would make the backcourt FAR too small. I'd avoid Wright, for some reason I don't trust him, he only shot 38% for his first two years of school. Mostly, I'd avoid him because I feel the Knicks need a SF far more than another SG. The guys I like:

1) Graham
2) Warrick
3) Green (not sure if he'll be there at 8)
4) Bynum
5) Webster
6) Diogu (we'd have to move some guys out)
7) Blatche
1) Green
2) Wright
3) Webster
4) M. Andriuskevioc
5) Warrick
6) Splitter
7) Granger
8)Bynum
9)Petro
10)Charlie V.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Draft Board as of now

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy