[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Idiots who liked the Mo Taylor trade manup!
Author Thread
joec32033
Posts: 30613
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
3/20/2005  12:35 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by fishmike:

an ex alkie center that Isiah signed for $8mm. Its not like he replaced some Layden mistake. He replaced his own mistake with a bigger mistake. Maybe he will trade Mo Taylor and another draft pick for Adonal Foyal.

Was there ANY truth to the rumour tha signing Baker was a package deal to get Crawford to sign a favorable contract to get here since they share the same agent? I remember that going around for a little bit over the summer.

Fish...It is a second round pick! You can pick up a second round pick in this league for a future pick 100 years (exaggeration) down the road...We didn't give up an unprotected first round pick coming off a 20 win season......That has to be taken into perspective.

joe, if frank williams, deke, othella, and cezary can return a 24 year old jamal crawford, don't you think vin, moochie, #2 can yield something better than a non defensive playing 29 year old PF that likes to shoot?

Correction....those players netted us Crawford and an overpaid energy player...Frank WAS a promising PG at one time, Deke, Czary were expiring contracts,and the Bulls actually wanted Othella for his work ethic and attitude....

At Best, Vin, Mooch and a #2 can yeild us a player like Donyell Marshall at best...and I would rather have a 28 (29) yr old mo than a 33 year old Donyell (if all other things are equal)...Obviously this comaprison doesn't take into account the fact that Marshall does carry a premium this year because of his contract.
~You can't run from who you are.~
AUTOADVERT
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/20/2005  12:35 AM
Posted by simrud:

What does Houston have to do with this?

Why are you bringing up Houston and Layden, we are talkin about IT's track record here.

Layden stunk, but IT has not been much better.

Maybe you should get over Houston and Layden man.

The reason some of us are so upset is because we had to actually watch Mo fuc@cking taylor play tonight! He is pathetic, his futility is in the league of Fatspoon and Shanderson!

And we got him 2 WEEKS AGO! We might has well have gotten Webber if we were gonna take on salary, at least Webber can play.

until Isiah gets a legitimate chance i will continue to support him! every GM makes mistakes every now and then! it is not Isiah's fault that the Knicks severely overpaid for Allan Houston and shandon & co!
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
3/20/2005  12:35 AM
can't handle the truth can ya
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
3/20/2005  12:37 AM
Forget Houston man, its in the past.

Look at Penny, TT, KT, Marbury, Rose, JYD, Taylor, those are all IT's guys!
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/20/2005  12:37 AM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by fishmike:

an ex alkie center that Isiah signed for $8mm. Its not like he replaced some Layden mistake. He replaced his own mistake with a bigger mistake. Maybe he will trade Mo Taylor and another draft pick for Adonal Foyal.

Was there ANY truth to the rumour tha signing Baker was a package deal to get Crawford to sign a favorable contract to get here since they share the same agent? I remember that going around for a little bit over the summer.

Fish...It is a second round pick! You can pick up a second round pick in this league for a future pick 100 years (exaggeration) down the road...We didn't give up an unprotected first round pick coming off a 20 win season......That has to be taken into perspective.

joe, if frank williams, deke, othella, and cezary can return a 24 year old jamal crawford, don't you think vin, moochie, #2 can yield something better than a non defensive playing 29 year old PF that likes to shoot?

Correction....those players netted us Crawford and an overpaid energy player...Frank WAS a promising PG at one time, Deke, Czary were expiring contracts,and the Bulls actually wanted Othella for his work ethic and attitude....

At Best, Vin, Mooch and a #2 can yeild us a player like Donyell Marshall at best...and I would rather have a 28 (29) yr old mo than a 33 year old Donyell (if all other things are equal)...Obviously this comaprison doesn't take into account the fact that Marshall does carry a premium this year because of his contract.

another brilliant post! really shows who the true idiot here it is!
Nalod
Posts: 71313
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
3/20/2005  12:39 AM
Its funny when "layden" is bought up. Layden make Saddam look good!

Its like you can't get on Isiahs ass, without the "oh yeah, what about Shanden, Eyes, Knight, blah blah. Then Layden gets blamed for shoyt he didn't even do.

Looks to me like same old Knick bullshoyt no matter who is in the GM seat. The hopeful hype is greater than reality.

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/20/2005  12:39 AM
Posted by simrud:

Forget Houston man, its in the past.

Look at Penny, TT, KT, Marbury, Rose, JYD, Taylor, those are all IT's guys!

and the only onnes with long contracts are Steph & Crawford...so your point is..........??
fishmike
Posts: 53863
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/20/2005  12:39 AM
Joe, in that case why not include Ariza instead? We can always just get another guy like him in the 2nd round. Its just another 2nd rounder.

Its not the pick or the players, its the philosophy. I had hoped after Layden we would stop doing 2 things: Stop including picks in trades and stop taking on players with BAD contracts; ie not giving production for what they are paid. Is Mo Taylor going to ruin the team? Probably not. Is the philosophy that brought Mo Taylor here going to ruin the team? It certainly can (its already ruined, at this point we are talking just delaying the recovery)
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
3/20/2005  12:42 AM
Ahm, Taylor goes till Houston.

Rose a yar PAST Houston.

JYD also a year PAST Houston.

Marbury and Craw are signed forever.

TT and Penny were here for 3 years counting next year.

Thats pretty damn long man.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
3/20/2005  12:42 AM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by fishmike:

an ex alkie center that Isiah signed for $8mm. Its not like he replaced some Layden mistake. He replaced his own mistake with a bigger mistake. Maybe he will trade Mo Taylor and another draft pick for Adonal Foyal.

Was there ANY truth to the rumour tha signing Baker was a package deal to get Crawford to sign a favorable contract to get here since they share the same agent? I remember that going around for a little bit over the summer.

Fish...It is a second round pick! You can pick up a second round pick in this league for a future pick 100 years (exaggeration) down the road...We didn't give up an unprotected first round pick coming off a 20 win season......That has to be taken into perspective.

joe, if frank williams, deke, othella, and cezary can return a 24 year old jamal crawford, don't you think vin, moochie, #2 can yield something better than a non defensive playing 29 year old PF that likes to shoot?

Correction....those players netted us Crawford and an overpaid energy player...Frank WAS a promising PG at one time, Deke, Czary were expiring contracts,and the Bulls actually wanted Othella for his work ethic and attitude....

At Best, Vin, Mooch and a #2 can yeild us a player like Donyell Marshall at best...and I would rather have a 28 (29) yr old mo than a 33 year old Donyell (if all other things are equal)...Obviously this comaprison doesn't take into account the fact that Marshall does carry a premium this year because of his contract.

then why not wait till this offseason to make the deal?
why make it now with 4 PF's already on the roster?

this deal would still be available this summer.

we don't even know what would've been available. and now we'll never know b/c we have mo taylor.

if you truly believe that if we held on to these expiring deals, and waited this summer to see what was out there, and the best thing was mo taylor...and you still want him...then there's no point discussing this anymore.

btw, as for marshall...i would take him any day of the week over mo b/c marshall can play the 3. mo plays the 4 and ONLY the 4. marshall can play both AND hit the 3. with tim stinking it up all season, we coudlve used yell, especially in place of penny.
fishmike
Posts: 53863
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/20/2005  12:44 AM
Posted by joec32033:

Actually my perspective is if I have to eat crap, I want to get it over with as quickly as possible and if there is anything I can do to make the experience more pleasurable to me, I would do it.

JYD and Malik are the two players that are redundant. KT, Sweets, and Mo bring something different to the table, IMO.

I assume you aren't talking to me about Houston so I'll refrain from responding to that part.
if thats the case its still bad. Moochie and Vin would have just been gone at the end of next year. Now you have Mo Taylor for 2 more years. Thats more time to eat crap. No biggie, most Knick fans are used to it I know.

Its a bad way to build a team. Show me one other team anywhere in NBA history that has had success by bringing in overpaid underachieving players with long term deals. Its assanine to quote Clyde.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
3/20/2005  12:46 AM
Posted by Nalod:

Its funny when "layden" is bought up. Layden make Saddam look good!

Its like you can't get on Isiahs ass, without the "oh yeah, what about Shanden, Eyes, Knight, blah blah. Then Layden gets blamed for shoyt he didn't even do.

Looks to me like same old Knick bullshoyt no matter who is in the GM seat. The hopeful hype is greater than reality.

I'm not happy with Isiah because it's unlikely that he will be able to get a dominant big man in his prime, who has never been injured, any time soon, acquring Marbury is at odds with all his other moves.
joec32033
Posts: 30613
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
3/20/2005  12:47 AM
Posted by fishmike:

Joe, in that case why not include Ariza instead? We can always just get another guy like him in the 2nd round. Its just another 2nd rounder.

Its not the pick or the players, its the philosophy. I had hoped after Layden we would stop doing 2 things: Stop including picks in trades and stop taking on players with BAD contracts; ie not giving production for what they are paid. Is Mo Taylor going to ruin the team? Probably not. Is the philosophy that brought Mo Taylor here going to ruin the team? It certainly can (its already ruined, at this point we are talking just delaying the recovery)

Fish for every Ariza there are 25 Steve Logans and Vonteego Cummings.

I agree I want Zeke to stick to one philosophy, but technically he really didn't veer to far from what he has been saying. He took on a younger big man and didn't touch any of our top 10 guys. Obviously Zeke has an eye for talent....is there a difference if he picks a guy in the second round, or if the guy slips through the draft and he signs him as a rookie FA?
~You can't run from who you are.~
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/20/2005  12:49 AM
Posted by simrud:

Ahm, Taylor goes till Houston.

Rose a yar PAST Houston.

JYD also a year PAST Houston.

Marbury and Craw are signed forever.

TT and Penny were here for 3 years counting next year.

Thats pretty damn long man.

please we don't have nearly as much salary in 2007-2008 as we do in 2006-2007 solely because of H20. guys like jyd, rose, kt most likely be traded by 2008! looks like some people are still overreacting! what a surprise!
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/20/2005  12:51 AM
so we're going to ignore the good things Isiah has done for this team and focus on the trivial and moveable $7mil contracts!
joec32033
Posts: 30613
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
3/20/2005  12:51 AM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by fishmike:

an ex alkie center that Isiah signed for $8mm. Its not like he replaced some Layden mistake. He replaced his own mistake with a bigger mistake. Maybe he will trade Mo Taylor and another draft pick for Adonal Foyal.

Was there ANY truth to the rumour tha signing Baker was a package deal to get Crawford to sign a favorable contract to get here since they share the same agent? I remember that going around for a little bit over the summer.

Fish...It is a second round pick! You can pick up a second round pick in this league for a future pick 100 years (exaggeration) down the road...We didn't give up an unprotected first round pick coming off a 20 win season......That has to be taken into perspective.

joe, if frank williams, deke, othella, and cezary can return a 24 year old jamal crawford, don't you think vin, moochie, #2 can yield something better than a non defensive playing 29 year old PF that likes to shoot?

Correction....those players netted us Crawford and an overpaid energy player...Frank WAS a promising PG at one time, Deke, Czary were expiring contracts,and the Bulls actually wanted Othella for his work ethic and attitude....

At Best, Vin, Mooch and a #2 can yeild us a player like Donyell Marshall at best...and I would rather have a 28 (29) yr old mo than a 33 year old Donyell (if all other things are equal)...Obviously this comaprison doesn't take into account the fact that Marshall does carry a premium this year because of his contract.

then why not wait till this offseason to make the deal?
why make it now with 4 PF's already on the roster?

this deal would still be available this summer.

we don't even know what would've been available. and now we'll never know b/c we have mo taylor.

if you truly believe that if we held on to these expiring deals, and waited this summer to see what was out there, and the best thing was mo taylor...and you still want him...then there's no point discussing this anymore.

btw, as for marshall...i would take him any day of the week over mo b/c marshall can play the 3. mo plays the 4 and ONLY the 4. marshall can play both AND hit the 3. with tim stinking it up all season, we coudlve used yell, especially in place of penny.

DJ..as I repeatedly said, I wouldn't have minded, maybe even preferred to wait...I am not trying to say this was a great deal, I am saying this deal was relatively minor and IMO should never be examined on a scope as we are doing now, IMO. No I don't truly want Taylor, but I didn't rtruly want Vin or Moochie either....

Please don't misunderstand me....as I have said before I personally wouldn't have made a trade like this, but it is not that big a deal that a deal like this was made.
~You can't run from who you are.~
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
3/20/2005  12:53 AM
But we are still not under the cap that year becaue of Rose, JYD, Marbury and Craw, plus Sweetney's deal, and more 1st round picks.

That is a 10+ mil a year FA you are not gettin because of JYD and Rose the year when Houston expires.

That is a big freakin deal, it delays the process by another year.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/20/2005  12:53 AM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by fishmike:

Joe, in that case why not include Ariza instead? We can always just get another guy like him in the 2nd round. Its just another 2nd rounder.

Its not the pick or the players, its the philosophy. I had hoped after Layden we would stop doing 2 things: Stop including picks in trades and stop taking on players with BAD contracts; ie not giving production for what they are paid. Is Mo Taylor going to ruin the team? Probably not. Is the philosophy that brought Mo Taylor here going to ruin the team? It certainly can (its already ruined, at this point we are talking just delaying the recovery)

Fish for every Ariza there are 25 Steve Logans and Vonteego Cummings.

I agree I want Zeke to stick to one philosophy, but technically he really didn't veer to far from what he has been saying. He took on a younger big man and didn't touch any of our top 10 guys. Obviously Zeke has an eye for talent....is there a difference if he picks a guy in the second round, or if the guy slips through the draft and he signs him as a rookie FA?

great post yet again!

again this is a perfect example of fans just being fans and overreacting over everything. Thats why we're not the ones making the big bucks!
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
3/20/2005  12:56 AM
Posted by gunsnewing:
Posted by simrud:

Ahm, Taylor goes till Houston.

Rose a yar PAST Houston.

JYD also a year PAST Houston.

Marbury and Craw are signed forever.

TT and Penny were here for 3 years counting next year.

Thats pretty damn long man.

please we don't have nearly as much salary in 2007-2008 as we do in 2006-2007 solely because of H20. guys like jyd, rose, kt most likely be traded by 2008! looks like some people are still overreacting! what a surprise!

guns, with the way this franchise is run, what do you think we'll get in return for jyd, rose, and kt? i think we're getting longer contracts back b/c they won't get traded until they expire...which means we won't have less salary in 07-08. we ALREADY bit into it by $9 mil by bringing in malik rose. when was the last time this team let a contract expire? i don't buy the 07/08 argument b/c you know, a long term deal is being made with the 3 player you mentioned above.
joec32033
Posts: 30613
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
3/20/2005  12:56 AM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by joec32033:

Actually my perspective is if I have to eat crap, I want to get it over with as quickly as possible and if there is anything I can do to make the experience more pleasurable to me, I would do it.

JYD and Malik are the two players that are redundant. KT, Sweets, and Mo bring something different to the table, IMO.

I assume you aren't talking to me about Houston so I'll refrain from responding to that part.
if thats the case its still bad. Moochie and Vin would have just been gone at the end of next year. Now you have Mo Taylor for 2 more years. Thats more time to eat crap. No biggie, most Knick fans are used to it I know.

Its a bad way to build a team. Show me one other team anywhere in NBA history that has had success by bringing in overpaid underachieving players with long term deals. Its assanine to quote Clyde.

Exactly....Mooch and Vin would have been gone at the end of the year. Meaning we would have to sign two players to the minimum and get absolutley (maybe) no production and they would have MINIMUM trade value. Taylor is a step or two above minimum trade value, IMO, as he may be able to help a team in more ways than one (on the court and when he is a FA).

Yes it is a bad way to build a team....Portland tried to do it the same way and it didn't work. The last successful team to do it was probably Miami, getting Timmy Hardaway, Zo, PJ Brown, overpaying Voshon Lenard and Anthony Carter (and he would've been overpaid still if his agent wasn't an idiot).
~You can't run from who you are.~
Idiots who liked the Mo Taylor trade manup!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy