[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

KT and Penny for Rose and Marshall?!?!? DN Report
Author Thread
JayNYC
Posts: 20732
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/7/2004
Member: #682
USA
1/20/2005  12:05 PM
and then there is that factor. The deal makes like zero sense for Tor. They dont need a PF, they dont need Penny and they dont save money. Tell me again why this trade has a sliver of truth?

Which brings us back to my Pseudotrade.. great segway Fish... lol
This trade would be good for the Knicks. K.T & Penny for Rose and Marshall. TOO GOOD TO BE TRUE! (Provided Toronto would take K.Thomas)!
Bab**** might want back either Nazr & Penny and/or Tim Thomas. I'd do the trade either way honestly. The Knicks would have to get Loren Woods included. At least at 7'2 270 he could pretend to be our Center
NYK
C: Woods/Baker/Sundov
PF: Marshall/K.Thomas/Sweetney/J.Williams
SF: Rose/Ariza
SG: Crawford/Houston/Hardaway
PG: Marbury/Norris/Brewer

Toronto:
C: Mohammed/Araujo/Mourning
PF: Bosh/Bonner/Aaron Williams
SF: T.Thomas/E.Williams
SG: Peterson/L.Murray
PG: Skip/Palacio/Al.Williams

The trade certainly makes Toronto look more complete on paper. NYK gets someone over 7ft that actually can block shots. We'd have a serious logjam at power forward, but what else is new... trade K.Thomas to San Antonio for a 1st rd pick or Nesterovic.

Any deal with Toronto will likely cost us Tim Thomas and Nazr. They fit both Toronto's financial and present team needs. Truthfully, I'd still do the deal!!!!

As an aside, has anyone noticed that Sweetney has been playing backup center lately????
Inhale deep like the words of my breath/ I never sleep, cause sleep is the cousin of death-- Circa 1994 Nasty Nas: NY State of Mind
AUTOADVERT
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/20/2005  12:14 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Hey, I'm new here.. came from the nj.com forums.

I really dont like this trade and its for many of the same reasons that you guys have already said. I really think this year is a lost cause, Isiah should NOT be making trades that he think will benefit the Knicks this year (unless Elton Brand or someone becomes available), any trade he makes should be made with the thought of the future. With that said, I don't want Isiah trading our prime pieces that would get us a young stud BigMan next year when a team (maybe the Clippers) looks for a salary dump. With TT, Penny, Vin coming off the books after next year thats about 30-35 million in salary that can be used to get that big man from a a slary dumping team. I don't like Roses game anyway, he plays no D and he's another egomaniac.

those are some very good points but i'm not sure if The clipppers will really want to trade one of the few great bigmen in the league. The best we could do is problably Kwame/Chandler/Swift & Sam. And we don't need TT/Penny and Baker to get them. With this we'll get two proven players who will really take our offense into higher gear. And free up space for Sweetney to get a few more minutes because i doubt Marshall will bitch like Kurt does. And also very important is the fact that we will still have Nazr/TT & Baker as trading chips. To get a guy on the level of dalembert, etc or we can sign one of theose guys for the MLE.
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/20/2005  12:22 PM
JAY, Guns... if thats the truth then why bother? J, I would take Rose and move Nazr if I got Dalembert back. Thats how high I am on him.

As for the guys in this offseason thats fine. If you add Rose 2 years from now when your STILL around .500 your talking about the next guy.

I'm more willing to do nothing than improve with older guys with no upside. To me thats one step forward and two steps backward. I would rather stink and collect young guys with reasonable contracts and get higher picks. To me thats one step back, and two steps forward. Is it tanking? I dont think so.. heck we are tanking now
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/20/2005  12:37 PM
Posted by fishmike:

JAY, Guns... if thats the truth then why bother? J, I would take Rose and move Nazr if I got Dalembert back. Thats how high I am on him.

As for the guys in this offseason thats fine. If you add Rose 2 years from now when your STILL around .500 your talking about the next guy.

I'm more willing to do nothing than improve with older guys with no upside. To me thats one step forward and two steps backward. I would rather stink and collect young guys with reasonable contracts and get higher picks. To me thats one step back, and two steps forward. Is it tanking? I dont think so.. heck we are tanking now

that would be fine but then Sweetney and Ariza would have to be playing major minutes otherwise people like me who spend the entire day looking forwad to watching the knicks play would be wasting time watching a team of flat-footed injury riddled overpaid players who make this a $103million team. I'm all for rebuilding but if you think this team is rebuilding then you aren't seeing the whole pitcher. If they were Sweetney and Ariza would be playing. They are trying to make the playoffs and only now they are realizing that it is not possible with this team. So they are going to do what it takes to make the playoffs. I would have no problem rebuilding if we actually played our younger players and traded Kurt for a pick. That is fun rebuilding. Playing kurt thomas and allan houston is not rebuilding
OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
1/20/2005  12:46 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by raven:
Posted by joec32033:


The one major risk is that the Knicks would be sacrificing defense. Kurt Thomas, a natural power forward, is the team's best low-post defender.

that is a true joke. we stop nobody, so i really don't know what we could lose here.

I still think that KT's defense is sooo overrated.
I agree. Opposing players are shooting around 55% against Kurt. It's because he has such slow feet; everyone can get by him easily. He's our WORST man-to-man defender among the PFs who get playing time (Kurt, JYD, and Sweetney). The team would be better on defense if JYD or Sweetney or Marshall (if we got him) started at PF.

Ok I have to stand up for Kurt. When this team was still capable of playing Defense Kurt was a big part of it. I really don't think his defense has changed. Kurt is not quick but he's tough and he hustles knows how to play team defense. I agree he does not have the physical ability to shutdown players one on one - his strength is playing defense within a system. But all good defensive teams play good team defense within a system and if we're ever going to be good we going to have to also.

I like JYD but I think the over-rated tag applies much more to him that KT. JYD is 31 and has been in the league a long time. He's a nice hustle player - but his game is more limited then KTS. Even though he's played on some bad teams only once as he gotten more then
28 minutes a game. He has never been a coveted asset and has been availabe to obtain at almost any point in his career. Do you think that's because all the GMS and coaches in the league don't recognize talent or maybe it's because he's only an OK player.

Sweets has potential - but sorry he is NOT a good defense player. He needs to learn how to play in the league and I think has slower feet then KT.

KT only shoots 15 footers because that's what he is capable of. I admit it would be nice if he could do more. But I would rather a player recognize his limitations and play within them. KT is not a great power forward but he's better then most posters give him credit for.

As far as this trade - it's noise. We won't be a good team until we have players who consistently play hard on defense and have discipline on offense. I don't see how this trade addresses either issue and there is no upside both these guys are 31 they're not improving.

If we become a really good team - not one of these guys would be a starter. And if that happens in a few years I'd much rather have Kurt coming off the bench at 7-8 mil a year then a discontented Rose at 16 mil.
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/20/2005  12:50 PM
KT needs to play. You have to assume your going to trade him, so if thats the case then it makes a lot of sense to play him and live with the results. Get him averaging a double double and trade him this offseason. His contract is reasonable. Its NOT reasonable if he's a disgruntled vet sitting on the bench.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/20/2005  12:55 PM
thats a no brainer. of course KT is better than Jerome. I've said countless times how KT would be valuable to a team like San Antonio or Miami because he would spread the floor for Duncan and shaq. Jerome wouldn't have the same impact. It is all about the identity of the team. KT's game is so out of place here on this team. He really holds them back with his lack of athletism defensively and offensively. On a team like this you need an athletic shotblocker. Man I am sick of saying the samethings over and over again! ZEKE PLEASE MAKE THIS TEAM BETTER! I want to let the results do the talking. I'm only basing this team on it's 17-21 record! and guess who have been constant starters on these 30win mediocre high played teams of the past 3 years... Kurt Thomas and Allan Houston!!!! The fans and the front office overrated their abilities and now I have to suffer! they are nice players but they really hold us back because of their contract!
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

1/20/2005  1:16 PM
Who made up this rumor? Toronto is happy with the team they have and are getting themselves in position to take over the ALANTIC DIV.

And at the same time pick up some great picks fron NJ NETS.

They have made 10 3poiters their last 3 games this team has chemistry as is, stop trying to sell papers this trade will never go down.
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
OldFan
Posts: 21456
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2003
Member: #446
1/20/2005  1:30 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

thats a no brainer. of course KT is better than Jerome. I've said countless times how KT would be valuable to a team like San Antonio or Miami because he would spread the floor for Duncan and shaq. Jerome wouldn't have the same impact. It is all about the identity of the team. KT's game is so out of place here on this team. He really holds them back with his lack of athletism defensively and offensively. On a team like this you need an athletic shotblocker. Man I am sick of saying the samethings over and over again! ZEKE PLEASE MAKE THIS TEAM BETTER! I want to let the results do the talking. I'm only basing this team on it's 17-21 record! and guess who have been constant starters on these 30win mediocre high played teams of the past 3 years... Kurt Thomas and Allan Houston!!!! The fans and the front office overrated their abilities and now I have to suffer! they are nice players but they really hold us back because of their contract!

Everyones game is out of place on this team. What I try to envision is how a player would fit in on a good team. I think KT could be a good roll-player and maybe even a starter on a good team.

There is no option to trade KT for the type of player you envision so why blame KT? On the Knicks current roster the two players that I think would most likely contribute to a good team without improving are: KT and Marbs.

I know most people would argue for Crawford, Houston, Naz, jyd or the kids but Crawfords defense is awful and his bad shot selection would kill a good team, Houston would need to be healthy, Naz and JYD only if the team needed some hustle players off the bench. Of the kids maybe Aziz but I could easily see sweeney and aziz mired on the bench of a good team till they learn the game.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/20/2005  1:42 PM
Posted by gunsnewing:

It is all about the identity of the team. KT's game is so out of place here on this team. He really holds them back with his lack of athletism defensively and offensively. On a team like this you need an athletic shotblocker.

KT is not holding this team back- its the team holding the team back.

And instead of an athletic shot blocker, you could argue you need better defensive perimeter players.

And what identity? Its a bunch of players that were thrown together held together with duct tape- I applaud Isiah for the upgrade of the roster, but the team needs to come together and play as a unit with a will to win.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/20/2005  1:50 PM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by gunsnewing:

It is all about the identity of the team. KT's game is so out of place here on this team. He really holds them back with his lack of athletism defensively and offensively. On a team like this you need an athletic shotblocker.

KT is not holding this team back- its the team holding the team back.

And instead of an athletic shot blocker, you could argue you need better defensive perimeter players.

And what identity? Its a bunch of players that were thrown together held together with duct tape- I applaud Isiah for the upgrade of the roster, but the team needs to come together and play as a unit with a will to win.

very good points...i was crucified last year when I suggested trading marbury because of his terrible defense. I'm glad I'm not alone now. The coach is also really holding this team back. I would trade Marbury for either a great big or a proven winner in a second but exactly how possible is that? Will Zeke ever consider it? I doubt it. Not now at least
MaTT4281
Posts: 34915
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
1/20/2005  4:27 PM
As long as its not just Penny for Rose, I'm on board for this trade.
turtle33
Posts: 20127
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #537
Canada
1/20/2005  6:25 PM
frank isola wroe this?????????????

since when is marshall 6'11"??????

The 6-11 Marshall

dos this guy know anything about bball?
turtle33
Posts: 20127
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #537
Canada
1/20/2005  6:26 PM
Posted by turtle33:

frank isola wrote this?????????????

since when is marshall 6'11"??????

The 6-11 Marshall

dos this guy know anything about bball?
turtle33
Posts: 20127
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #537
Canada
1/20/2005  6:27 PM
sorry double post
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/20/2005  6:30 PM
at 6'9'' 230lbs he can get by playing PF but definitely not center
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
1/20/2005  7:15 PM
The way it looks right now, there will not be any trade. Isiah is trying to play it safe, and he will even retain Lenny around until next season....Buckle up fans, we are in for an extrem bumpy ride.
The true Knickabocker..........
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/20/2005  7:52 PM
thank you Peter Vecsey
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
joec32033
Posts: 30615
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/20/2005  8:18 PM
Posted by diderotn:

The way it looks right now, there will not be any trade. Isiah is trying to play it safe, and he will even retain Lenny around until next season....Buckle up fans, we are in for an extrem bumpy ride.

SO exactly where did you hear this? Source please....
~You can't run from who you are.~
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
1/20/2005  8:19 PM
Posted by MaTT4281:

As long as its not just Penny for Rose, I'm on board for this trade.
My feelings exactly.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
KT and Penny for Rose and Marshall?!?!? DN Report

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy