PatCummings wrote:

nycericanguy wrote:I wish he had gone to the Lakers or something though I will say. Mitch was a huge impact guy but he might be one of those guys thats better to let go of a year early than a year too late. He was getting noticeably bigger and was winded and gasping for air even just playing 20 minutes sometimes. And the FT's getting worse and worse.

I have faith we'll get a good replacement.

I agree. I think the Celtics may regret this signing

Brian Windhorst said in an interview recently the entire nba’s teams’ offseason are about restructuring rosters to try to beat the Knicks. Celtics can’t beat us so they sign Mitch.

Philc1 wrote:

jaydh wrote:

fitzfarm wrote:Why wouldn’t we match that ?

Dolan's 2nd apron mandate.....

I think they were going back and forth on it. Initially dolan said no. Then Rose said he thought he could pull it off without going over second apron. Now we lose both Mitch and Huk.

You gotta be decisive.

I doubt knicks are incompetent and reactive here.
WE did not lose Huk. We either have another plan or deliberately made a decision.
Huk was in our control. Knicks made the decision.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://www.twitter.com/KnicksMemes/status/2072351543706206569

Philc1 wrote:

Nalod wrote:

Philc1 wrote:

jaydh wrote:

fitzfarm wrote:Why wouldn’t we match that ?

Dolan's 2nd apron mandate.....

I think they were going back and forth on it. Initially dolan said no. Then Rose said he thought he could pull it off without going over second apron. Now we lose both Mitch and Huk.

You gotta be decisive.

I doubt knicks are incompetent and reactive here.
WE did not lose Huk. We either have another plan or deliberately made a decision.
Huk was in our control. Knicks made the decision.

Choose not to resign a cheap and effective 7 ft center who was RFA. What’s the plan?

Your panicking already?
Whats the plan? I don't know.
But I gather there was a good reason why they did not reign him.
Im not second gueesing this FO.