GustavBahler wrote:

Nalod wrote:

HofstraBBall wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

HofstraBBall wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

KnickDanger wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

fishmike wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:Hopefully Randle wont play heroball tonite. The last few minutes of the game, Brunson was only passing to Randle, who had trailed off at that point. Brunson's scoring was enough to win the game.

But if the game is close, I hope JB looks to the other players on the court, as well. Randle hasnt shown a consistent ability to close out games. "Ra,Ra,Ra" wont change that. Only Randle can.

Looks like we dodged a bullet with Lonzo. I wanted the Knicks to sign him.

agree... another 30/15/7 type effort from Jules would be a disaster. Man no matter what folks "find a way"

Cant get stoked about our best scoring option also being a liability in crunch time. If we can get a good return, this would be the time to trade Randle.

Trade Randle! Now there's an idea!

Hope the FO is open to the idea.

Who would YOU trade him for?

Frank, of course.

Kaminsky?

Funny how guys that want him traded don't have an answer for the other part of the equation.
You can't get rid of your BEST player without having someone that can replace his production.

or "Fire Thibs". no mention of another coach execpt one that has one elsewhere.
Open concept whining. WHere fans want to fix something but can't say what it is.

Listen to Frik and Frak here lol

Two names, Draymond Green and Quinn Snyder. Been mentioning their names all season. Green, pre and post "the punch". But that ship has likely sailed. For this season anyway. With Green's game getting back to where it was, and Curry out. Snyder is available, as far as I know.

You wanted names, you got names.

To keep you both honest, this is what I wrote...

Cant get stoked about our best scoring option also being a liability in crunch time. If we can get a good return, this would be the time to trade Randle.

Wasnt suggesting that Randle be moved without a good deal in place.

That sounds nothing like what you were implying that I was saying. You make Randle sound like the best thing since sliced bread, and question his trade value at the same time.

More than a few posters questioned Randle's trade value this season. Said it couldnt be raised. I wasnt one of them. I argued that if Randle can get his game back, by the first trade deadline. That there should be interest. I still believe that.

Who wants out, who is considered expendable by other teams..dont know. Thats why Id like to see the FO test the market and find out.

Draymond Green? Your funny bro.
32 year old who is heading down and up for an overpriced renewal? Nah I'm good.
Typical Knicks fan starphuck mentality where their vision of what some guy was is enough to make them think they will be that here. Which btw, a vision reinforced by riding the jocks of several future HOFs

This is exactly the type of deal that reenforces the logic of us "Randle" lovers (Knicks lovers) for keeping Randle.

Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:

https://twitter.com/FredKatz/status/1603894608278200321

KnickDanger wrote:

Clean wrote:Yall can call it Gold Stars if you want to try and be dismissive because it seems like yall believe whatever Thibs does is right. If Thibs did not do it its wrong until he does then it's right. Since people here say I just make things up or are dismissive of me every time an opposing coach points out exactly what I been saying for months I make sure I post it. I have noticed those posts don't get much replies though.

I will continue to say my opinions and if Thibs is doing good I will praise him for it and if he is doing bad I will say so. It's better than changing my opinions depending on what Thibs does or does not do.

"Gold Stars" was coined by your fellow Thibs bashing buddy for how "right" all along you all have been. We just enjoy repeating it. Funny, you seem hurt by "dismissive" posts yet you claim "we" "believe whatever Thibs does is right." That is pretty simplistic and, uh, dismissive. And wrong of course. I'll speak only for myself here -- my point is that perhaps Thibs knew what he was doing in developing these kids. Your (and others') point is he didn't and you knew better all along (hence the gold stars). I choose to side with the knowledge of a professional NBA coach who was COY year before last over bipolar Knicks fans. And whatever the process it's paying off now.

By all means continue to state your opinions. But I suggest you thicken your skin when the opinion that you are full of s#!t comes back at you.

Thibs haven't been consistent since Kurt Thomas was on the Bulls roster.
Leon Rose did well when he hired TWO unemployed head-coaches Mike Woodson & Tom Thibs to coach the Knicks.
If fans didn't notice the BIG change in coaching when Woodson took the college job, end we were headed to the playoffs to play a team we beat all season .... Clean, let them keep defending the negatives bout the Knicks.

This gonna be a good rematch on our Friday night Knicks in Chi Town ..
Go Knicks for 6 game win streak .. Brunson Grimes and MitchRob !!!

BigDaddyG wrote:Let's win this one for Jordana!

Lol.

Told them not to post a pic of her!
Now you her biggest fan.

Ha.

HofstraBBall wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

Nalod wrote:

HofstraBBall wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

HofstraBBall wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

KnickDanger wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:

fishmike wrote:

GustavBahler wrote:Hopefully Randle wont play heroball tonite. The last few minutes of the game, Brunson was only passing to Randle, who had trailed off at that point. Brunson's scoring was enough to win the game.

But if the game is close, I hope JB looks to the other players on the court, as well. Randle hasnt shown a consistent ability to close out games. "Ra,Ra,Ra" wont change that. Only Randle can.

Looks like we dodged a bullet with Lonzo. I wanted the Knicks to sign him.

agree... another 30/15/7 type effort from Jules would be a disaster. Man no matter what folks "find a way"

Cant get stoked about our best scoring option also being a liability in crunch time. If we can get a good return, this would be the time to trade Randle.

Trade Randle! Now there's an idea!

Hope the FO is open to the idea.

Who would YOU trade him for?

Frank, of course.

Kaminsky?

Funny how guys that want him traded don't have an answer for the other part of the equation.
You can't get rid of your BEST player without having someone that can replace his production.

or "Fire Thibs". no mention of another coach execpt one that has one elsewhere.
Open concept whining. WHere fans want to fix something but can't say what it is.

Listen to Frik and Frak here lol

Two names, Draymond Green and Quinn Snyder. Been mentioning their names all season. Green, pre and post "the punch". But that ship has likely sailed. For this season anyway. With Green's game getting back to where it was, and Curry out. Snyder is available, as far as I know.

You wanted names, you got names.

To keep you both honest, this is what I wrote...

Cant get stoked about our best scoring option also being a liability in crunch time. If we can get a good return, this would be the time to trade Randle.

Wasnt suggesting that Randle be moved without a good deal in place.

That sounds nothing like what you were implying that I was saying. You make Randle sound like the best thing since sliced bread, and question his trade value at the same time.

More than a few posters questioned Randle's trade value this season. Said it couldnt be raised. I wasnt one of them. I argued that if Randle can get his game back, by the first trade deadline. That there should be interest. I still believe that.

Who wants out, who is considered expendable by other teams..dont know. Thats why Id like to see the FO test the market and find out.

Draymond Green? Your funny bro.
32 year old who is heading down and up for an overpriced renewal? Nah I'm good.
Typical Knicks fan starphuck mentality where their vision of what some guy was is enough to make them think they will be that here. Which btw, a vision reinforced by riding the jocks of several future HOFs

This is exactly the type of deal that reenforces the logic of us "Randle" lovers (Knicks lovers) for keeping Randle.

Right because Green fills up stat sheet. Sure genius, thats a starphuch. Aint about stats. You love moving the goalposts.

BigDaddyG wrote:

ToddTT wrote:ScoreBot too!

Scorebot said you can't trade him because he already quit!

ScoreBot is the Joakim Noah of bots.