fishmike wrote:blkexec wrote:Jimbo5 wrote:The knicks are so much interesting to watch when the kids are given playing time.if the front office wants to stir the team back to last year's success. They need to undo last offseason's signing and double down on the youth!
If Thibs played the yoots earlier, say when he removed Kemba the 1st time, we would at least be in the playin tournament or playoffs. Instead he started Burks and gave most his mins to the vets.
Our young core already plays with loads of energy. Now their confidence is starting to increase. And the wins over teams we suppose to beat are adding up.
During the season, every guard had a career game. I’m sure thibs is kicking himself that he never played our best guard defender during those games. Deuce is a solid on ball defender to have off the bench. IQ looks like he found that balance between playmaking and shooting.
This is a deep team full of good but not great players. Before we talk about adding players we need to decide on which players will we drop. We already 12 or more deep when rose and grimes return.
Im sorry... who was he supposed to play over the veteran he trusts? Didnt you play some ball? You really think a coach is going to play 2nd round rookie over a guy he trusts and has played well for him?Burks wasnt good but when you lose your starter and backup PGs things get hard. Suggesting the answer was there all along is silly.
The answer? To what question?
It’s very simple guys. Burks is not a PG or combo guard. And to think the answer is deuce, u are not understanding my point at all.
Yes I played ball, but that was in the 80s. It’s a different game now. We had PGs that set up plays for the team.
But let me be a little clear for you. When thibs removed Kemba, that was his opportunity to switch things up. Just looking at deuce is very narrow minded. Thibs had his chance to make changes. Let’s say it this way. Let’s say I was thibs and I removed Kemba (which I wouldn’t do because it was too early)
I’m starting IQ not Burks. And I’m moving Deuce to the second unit. I’m moving Fournier to the bench and starting grimes. Also I’m not dropping Kemba, I’m moving him to the bench. Thibs saying he respects Kemba too much to bench him is bullshet. It’s more disrespectful to remove him from the team and he did it twice 🤣. So I call bullshet on that.
That’s just off the top of the head without thinking too much. So please stop this “how can you start deuce over Burks stuff. Please. Deuce was the next PG on the depth chart. But I’m bringing him off the bench to get used to nba speed first. IQ wouldve been the next man up. IQ understands if rose came back, he would start. Now to me it’s still close between picking IQ or deuce at that time why? So I’ll admit I was going back and forth between IQ and deuce to start, why u ask? Because RJ and Randle are the ball handlers. Thibs system runs with or without a PG. could be why he put Burks in there. What thibs failed to forget is we already had a problem with slow tempo, And guard defense at the point of attack. Burks is 6’6. He’s not agile enough to guard point guards with a quick first step and a jumper, which is most guards in the nba.
Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland.
The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!