[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Blow it up or fire Thibs?


Author Poll
franco12
Posts: 14069
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
I think we have witnessed enough poor play, inexcusable play. Collapses extraordinaire.

So, from our arm chair GMs, what is the solution to save the season?

Stay the course, things will work out
Last year was an outlier, we're just not that good still
Fire Thibs- he is good for one year and then players are burnt out
Time to blow it up, from Randle to Grimes- time to shake up the roster
Maybe not blow it up, 1 or 2 moves (Simmons) can save our season
View Results


Author Thread
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
12/5/2021  4:51 PM
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

I don't quite follow. I'm saying rather than banish Kemba, switch Burks if that is the direction you want to go, and let Kemba sub in.

I might have switched Rose and Kemba, and kept everything else the same.

Kemba's per 36 & per 100 numbers all look comparable to last year.

Stalwart defender? Absolutely not, but maybe he needs more time to pick up our schemes? Maybe he should be going up against second tier talent.

Wish I got paid $5M a year to make these decisions!

How? How do you sub in Kemba and play him next to Rose and IQ?

It literally just doesn't work

The move I would have made was to swap Kemba & Rose. Rose starts, Kemba off the bench.

Also, we could have tried swapping Burks and Fournier.

Regardless, we’re not playing well. RJ and Randle have regressed. There is no effort from a lot of these guys. Mitch, Noel, Taj hurt and out, playing hurt.

We’ve got a whole lot of mediocre parts, and no clear top 8 or even a top 5.

AUTOADVERT
jskinny35
Posts: 21580
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
12/5/2021  6:38 PM
Rose can't start - if he does he won't be there to finish (when we need him most). Marathon not a sprint for D Rose
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27949
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 11/21/2015
Member: #6192

12/5/2021  9:25 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/5/2021  9:27 PM
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

I don't quite follow. I'm saying rather than banish Kemba, switch Burks if that is the direction you want to go, and let Kemba sub in.

I might have switched Rose and Kemba, and kept everything else the same.

Kemba's per 36 & per 100 numbers all look comparable to last year.

Stalwart defender? Absolutely not, but maybe he needs more time to pick up our schemes? Maybe he should be going up against second tier talent.

Wish I got paid $5M a year to make these decisions!

How? How do you sub in Kemba and play him next to Rose and IQ?

It literally just doesn't work

The move I would have made was to swap Kemba & Rose. Rose starts, Kemba off the bench.

Also, we could have tried swapping Burks and Fournier.

Regardless, we’re not playing well. RJ and Randle have regressed. There is no effort from a lot of these guys. Mitch, Noel, Taj hurt and out, playing hurt.

We’ve got a whole lot of mediocre parts, and no clear top 8 or even a top 5.

Rose starting is the next move Thibs makes. He is so loyal to him and I feel that was the plan from the start. Thibs seemed like he never liked Kemba. Due to alleged bad defense. Agree that Rose in for Kemba made the most sense. I mean, you thought he could start 20 games ago but now he can't even be a PG in second unit?
Thibs did mention that he thought of keeping Kemba in the second unit but that defensive size would have been an issue. (IQ, Rose, Kemba) But again, Rose-Kemba switch would not create that issue.

But hell no!! Thibs should not be fired. That is ridiculous.

'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
12/5/2021  11:07 PM
HofstraBBall wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

I don't quite follow. I'm saying rather than banish Kemba, switch Burks if that is the direction you want to go, and let Kemba sub in.

I might have switched Rose and Kemba, and kept everything else the same.

Kemba's per 36 & per 100 numbers all look comparable to last year.

Stalwart defender? Absolutely not, but maybe he needs more time to pick up our schemes? Maybe he should be going up against second tier talent.

Wish I got paid $5M a year to make these decisions!

How? How do you sub in Kemba and play him next to Rose and IQ?

It literally just doesn't work

The move I would have made was to swap Kemba & Rose. Rose starts, Kemba off the bench.

Also, we could have tried swapping Burks and Fournier.

Regardless, we’re not playing well. RJ and Randle have regressed. There is no effort from a lot of these guys. Mitch, Noel, Taj hurt and out, playing hurt.

We’ve got a whole lot of mediocre parts, and no clear top 8 or even a top 5.

Rose starting is the next move Thibs makes. He is so loyal to him and I feel that was the plan from the start. Thibs seemed like he never liked Kemba. Due to alleged bad defense. Agree that Rose in for Kemba made the most sense. I mean, you thought he could start 20 games ago but now he can't even be a PG in second unit?
Thibs did mention that he thought of keeping Kemba in the second unit but that defensive size would have been an issue. (IQ, Rose, Kemba) But again, Rose-Kemba switch would not create that issue.

But hell no!! Thibs should not be fired. That is ridiculous.

I agree it might be too early to fire Thibs- though just about every coach eventually gets fire.

The problem I have with him this year is our offense is lackluster and the effort is not there. Those are squarely on him.

Rose came in, said Kemba is the starter. But was that Thibs making the call or deferring to Rose?

Realistically, think about this. Rose is the one held over, familiar with the system and the players- he should have gone into the starting line up- Kemba should have started off the bench.

Even if we can right the ship, we're just a first round exit waiting for the play offs, at best.

Nalod
Posts: 71092
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/6/2021  8:07 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/6/2021  8:13 AM
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

If your a fan and don’t think,, its easy to just say ****. Reacting to a loss as a fan is easy. No accountability.

Berman cites Thibs yesterday. This makes sense. (Not endorsing Elf):

Now Walker isn’t getting any. It’s rare for a player — let alone a four-time All-Star — to go from starter to zero minutes.

Thibodeau actually did the same thing in the playoffs last spring against Atlanta when he yanked season-long starter Elfrid Payton for Game 3. Payton did not play for three straight games and the Knicks were blown out in each contest.

“If you’re going to change a rotation, you want to make sure you’re looking at it, not one game,’’ Thibodeau said. “You’re looking at it in totality.’’

Take it in the proper context This was the playoffs but he had a COY season turning the team around. It did not work. Again, nobody saying Elf would have made a difference. Im saying Kemba out might not be the true cause and he might return but it has to be effective to stick.
Fire the guy after 20 games is comical. Here is why: what does his replacement do that is different and is it a systemic issue Thibs is embroiled in or is it chemistry of team, lineups, and needing a tweek? Really, the whole culture thing, the money for coaches, etc, and you then keep this madness of hiring and firing coaches and think you ever gonna get a culture of stabilty? Player development?

I’d say after the Denver loss Randle and Thibs are having some uncomfortable convo’s

franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
12/6/2021  8:21 AM
Nalod wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

If your a fan and don’t think,, its easy to just say ****. Reacting to a loss as a fan is easy. No accountability.

Berman cites Thibs yesterday. This makes sense. (Not endorsing Elf):

Now Walker isn’t getting any. It’s rare for a player — let alone a four-time All-Star — to go from starter to zero minutes.

Thibodeau actually did the same thing in the playoffs last spring against Atlanta when he yanked season-long starter Elfrid Payton for Game 3. Payton did not play for three straight games and the Knicks were blown out in each contest.

“If you’re going to change a rotation, you want to make sure you’re looking at it, not one game,’’ Thibodeau said. “You’re looking at it in totality.’’

Take it in the proper context This was the playoffs but he had a COY season turning the team around. It did not work. Again, nobody saying Elf would have made a difference. Im saying Kemba out might not be the true cause and he might return but it has to be effective to stick.
Fire the guy after 20 games is comical. Here is why: what does his replacement do that is different and is it a systemic issue Thibs is embroiled in or is it chemistry of team, lineups, and needing a tweek? Really, the whole culture thing, the money for coaches, etc, and you then keep this madness of hiring and firing coaches and think you ever gonna get a culture of stabilty? Player development?

I’d say after the Denver loss Randle and Thibs are having some uncomfortable convo’s

I think it would absurd to sack Thibs at this point, just for the record. I wasn't a fan of the hiring- I thought we needed more time to develop talent as well as aggregate it, but his effort last year was worthy of a NY Knick season, coach and team. I was behind them all the way. There was effort, grit and determination.

Where did that go?

Is Julius Randle the new JR (Smith)?

Is RJ Barret the next Landry Fields, Channing Frye or David Lee - good looking player, just never teases out the potential we see in them?

I think there is the ability of this team to play with heart - and that is all I want to see - anything is gravy.

But long term, we are a long way away from being a threat in the playoffs, let alone a championship contender.

Philc1
Posts: 28296
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

12/6/2021  9:24 AM
martin wrote:
Philc1 wrote:We’re 1-3 about to go 1-4 with Kemba out of the rotation. If that’s logical then we live in a mad world

Only because you live in a world where thinking beyond what is literally right in front of your face is impossible

@ Nets, 2 point game where the refs were lopsided.
Chicago, close game
Nuggets, blow out.

3 very good teams.

Those are some great moral victories

Philc1
Posts: 28296
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

12/6/2021  9:25 AM
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

I don't quite follow. I'm saying rather than banish Kemba, switch Burks if that is the direction you want to go, and let Kemba sub in.

I might have switched Rose and Kemba, and kept everything else the same.

Kemba's per 36 & per 100 numbers all look comparable to last year.

Stalwart defender? Absolutely not, but maybe he needs more time to pick up our schemes? Maybe he should be going up against second tier talent.

Wish I got paid $5M a year to make these decisions!

How? How do you sub in Kemba and play him next to Rose and IQ?

It literally just doesn't work

Literally no one said that

Philc1
Posts: 28296
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

12/6/2021  9:26 AM
HofstraBBall wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

I don't quite follow. I'm saying rather than banish Kemba, switch Burks if that is the direction you want to go, and let Kemba sub in.

I might have switched Rose and Kemba, and kept everything else the same.

Kemba's per 36 & per 100 numbers all look comparable to last year.

Stalwart defender? Absolutely not, but maybe he needs more time to pick up our schemes? Maybe he should be going up against second tier talent.

Wish I got paid $5M a year to make these decisions!

How? How do you sub in Kemba and play him next to Rose and IQ?

It literally just doesn't work

The move I would have made was to swap Kemba & Rose. Rose starts, Kemba off the bench.

Also, we could have tried swapping Burks and Fournier.

Regardless, we’re not playing well. RJ and Randle have regressed. There is no effort from a lot of these guys. Mitch, Noel, Taj hurt and out, playing hurt.

We’ve got a whole lot of mediocre parts, and no clear top 8 or even a top 5.

Rose starting is the next move Thibs makes. He is so loyal to him and I feel that was the plan from the start. Thibs seemed like he never liked Kemba. Due to alleged bad defense. Agree that Rose in for Kemba made the most sense. I mean, you thought he could start 20 games ago but now he can't even be a PG in second unit?
Thibs did mention that he thought of keeping Kemba in the second unit but that defensive size would have been an issue. (IQ, Rose, Kemba) But again, Rose-Kemba switch would not create that issue.

But hell no!! Thibs should not be fired. That is ridiculous.

We are in a lot of trouble if Thibs starts Rose

martin
Posts: 76060
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/6/2021  9:46 AM
Philc1 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

I don't quite follow. I'm saying rather than banish Kemba, switch Burks if that is the direction you want to go, and let Kemba sub in.

I might have switched Rose and Kemba, and kept everything else the same.

Kemba's per 36 & per 100 numbers all look comparable to last year.

Stalwart defender? Absolutely not, but maybe he needs more time to pick up our schemes? Maybe he should be going up against second tier talent.

Wish I got paid $5M a year to make these decisions!

How? How do you sub in Kemba and play him next to Rose and IQ?

It literally just doesn't work

Literally no one said that

The person I responded to just did very indirectly, or was that leap too far for you?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Philc1
Posts: 28296
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 9/2/2020
Member: #8897

12/6/2021  9:56 AM
martin wrote:
Philc1 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

I don't quite follow. I'm saying rather than banish Kemba, switch Burks if that is the direction you want to go, and let Kemba sub in.

I might have switched Rose and Kemba, and kept everything else the same.

Kemba's per 36 & per 100 numbers all look comparable to last year.

Stalwart defender? Absolutely not, but maybe he needs more time to pick up our schemes? Maybe he should be going up against second tier talent.

Wish I got paid $5M a year to make these decisions!

How? How do you sub in Kemba and play him next to Rose and IQ?

It literally just doesn't work

Literally no one said that

The person I responded to just did very indirectly, or was that leap too far for you?

Are you a codebreaker as well?

martin
Posts: 76060
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/6/2021  10:28 AM
Philc1 wrote:
martin wrote:
Philc1 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:I didn't think we needed to bench Kemba, just switch up the starting line up.

That's what happened?

The C spot was locked up and wouldn't have changed, no way you start Obi.

You don't switch up your best player, PF is locked up.

One can argue about moving RJ or Fournier to bench BUT

Kemba had the worst ON/OFF, so why wouldn't you start there?

I don't quite follow. I'm saying rather than banish Kemba, switch Burks if that is the direction you want to go, and let Kemba sub in.

I might have switched Rose and Kemba, and kept everything else the same.

Kemba's per 36 & per 100 numbers all look comparable to last year.

Stalwart defender? Absolutely not, but maybe he needs more time to pick up our schemes? Maybe he should be going up against second tier talent.

Wish I got paid $5M a year to make these decisions!

How? How do you sub in Kemba and play him next to Rose and IQ?

It literally just doesn't work

Literally no one said that

The person I responded to just did very indirectly, or was that leap too far for you?

Are you a codebreaker as well?

are you this daft?

If you move Burks into the SL and still want to play Kemba off the bench, you run into the problem of overlapping him with Rose and IQ, you just can't stagger 3 small guards off the bench.

Bro, this isn't even checkers, you are trying tick tack toe or connect 4 and swinging and missing.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
12/6/2021  11:23 AM
Yes, blow it up AND fire Thibs. Can the FO. All of them. Bring back Phil. No, wait, kidnap Ujiri. Oh wait, Toronto sucks worse than we do.
Trade Randle, trade Fournier, donate Kemba to China. Cut anyone over 25. Start all the kids. Bring everyone up from the GLeague. Make DRose player/coach.

4th seed in a crazy season that was crazy for everyone else, too.
COY.
MVP candidate.
RJ shooting 40% from 3.

Be cool indeed.

TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748

12/6/2021  4:32 PM
I haven't been as attentive to the Knicks so far as I should have but SURELY its not that bad yet? we still .500 after all..
The Future is Bright!
TPercy
Posts: 28010
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/5/2014
Member: #5748

12/6/2021  4:36 PM
franco12 wrote:
Chandler wrote:This is not a blow up situation. There are a lot of good teams right now around 500. Some will get their act together others won’t.

Right now we’re super frustrated because we (Rightfully IMO) expected more especially at home and especially from some player who seemed on an upward trajectory

I do expect a trade

The Cavs are 13 & 10.

The Wizards are 14 & 9.

The Bulls are 16 & 8.

The Heat are 14 & 10.

We were ahead of all of them last year.

All of them made moves and leaped over us.

We made moves and got worse.

Notice how ass each of those teams were last year tho. Cavs added a future HOF, Wizards got a new coach and robbed Lakers in Westbrook trade, Bulls added two all stars and a very good PG in addition to new coaching, the Heat didn't spend 1/3 of season with Covid protocols and added a new PG. The only way was up for a lot of these teams imo.

The Future is Bright!
BillTheButcher
Posts: 20633
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/5/2016
Member: #6326

12/6/2021  4:55 PM
Voted last year was an outlier, we're just not that good still.........IMHO I would look to trade Randle ,Mitch and Knox ..........Randle never should have got that contract we should have made him prove it this year + RJ and him just do not fit , Mitch looks slow AF, has not jump , has to be helped off the floor like every other play I'm over it, Knox will never get playing time here ...Don't mind losing if we did it with the young guns unleash them all RJ, IQ, Obi , Grimes, Simms call up Luka and Duece .
[IMG]http://i1167.photobucket.com/albums/q636/shemmue0311/member15202.png[/IMG]
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
12/6/2021  6:46 PM
BillTheButcher wrote:Voted last year was an outlier, we're just not that good still.........IMHO I would look to trade Randle ,Mitch and Knox ..........Randle never should have got that contract we should have made him prove it this year + RJ and him just do not fit , Mitch looks slow AF, has not jump , has to be helped off the floor like every other play I'm over it, Knox will never get playing time here ...Don't mind losing if we did it with the young guns unleash them all RJ, IQ, Obi , Grimes, Simms call up Luka and Duece .

And this was why I wanted to keep Mike Miller - I felt like we need to build up the asset base a bit more.

It's really hard to trade Randle- we just signed him.

But I think right now, no one should be off limits as far as a trade.

martin
Posts: 76060
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/6/2021  7:26 PM
franco12 wrote:
BillTheButcher wrote:Voted last year was an outlier, we're just not that good still.........IMHO I would look to trade Randle ,Mitch and Knox ..........Randle never should have got that contract we should have made him prove it this year + RJ and him just do not fit , Mitch looks slow AF, has not jump , has to be helped off the floor like every other play I'm over it, Knox will never get playing time here ...Don't mind losing if we did it with the young guns unleash them all RJ, IQ, Obi , Grimes, Simms call up Luka and Duece .

And this was why I wanted to keep Mike Miller - I felt like we need to build up the asset base a bit more.

It's really hard to trade Randle- we just signed him.

But I think right now, no one should be off limits as far as a trade.

What does this mean? What is Miller doing?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27463
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
12/6/2021  9:32 PM
I have minor changes. I think the Walker/Fournier attempt is nearing its end. I don’t really think Fournier’s offense makes up for his defense.

I liked Randle/Barrett last year and think that Fournier is just taking shots from Barrett. It makes the SL that much more jealous. They aren’t passing to each other well.

I think this team could use a defensive PG, and 3&D SF and Myles Turner.

At the high end, I would be going crazy if we made moves for D’Angelo Russell, Jerami Grant and Myles Turner.

Russell/Barrett/Grant/Randle/Turner are all about 26 years old or younger. You’d have to empty the coffers to end up here, but I think they have the trade chips to pull it off. Wouldn’t be a lot left after, but they would be able to fill in the roster in the offseason with their exceptions.

Russell and Point-Edwards probably don’t mesh perfectly together. I could see a move of Russell to fill in some vet depth.

Grant doesn’t really fit the Pistons timeline. Probably starts with Toppin to get Grant, but that rookie scale contract would fit better with what the Pistons are doing.

Turner is what I always hope Robinson will become.

This might sound closer to blowing it up, but I think this is more accepting that this last off-season failed to result in upgraded players and that these 5 are more likely to create a solid core 5 in line with a tough defensive minded squad that can shoot threes.

You know I gonna spin wit it
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
12/6/2021  9:44 PM
martin wrote:
franco12 wrote:
BillTheButcher wrote:Voted last year was an outlier, we're just not that good still.........IMHO I would look to trade Randle ,Mitch and Knox ..........Randle never should have got that contract we should have made him prove it this year + RJ and him just do not fit , Mitch looks slow AF, has not jump , has to be helped off the floor like every other play I'm over it, Knox will never get playing time here ...Don't mind losing if we did it with the young guns unleash them all RJ, IQ, Obi , Grimes, Simms call up Luka and Duece .

And this was why I wanted to keep Mike Miller - I felt like we need to build up the asset base a bit more.

It's really hard to trade Randle- we just signed him.

But I think right now, no one should be off limits as far as a trade.

What does this mean? What is Miller doing?

I thought we weren't in a position to compete, and that is what Thibs is about. I felt we needed to play the young guys, develop them rather than bring in the Roses, the Fourniers of the world. Another lottery or two and maybe we could land the kind of talent we need to compete.

Look, Dolan's mantra has been play offs or bust. He's never been about rebuilding, even though had we actually rebuilt, we'd probably have a championship by now.

Isiah Thomas said it best- he was trying to change the engine in mid flight. With NY, there was no pulling in to the pits.

Leon Rose came in, said - I want the best coach. And we will try to win now. Except there is no franchise talent on this team, no player that steps on the court and is simply the best player out there.

Blow it up or fire Thibs?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy