martin wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:

jrodmc wrote:

TPercy wrote:

knicks1248 wrote:6-2 so far without mitch..

We have a winning record without Noel to, but it goes back to me saying we don't need both..

Mitch, Obi, Frank, Rivers two future 1st picks..For KAT and Culver and they get to swap best pick

Kat make us a contender right out the gate

No he dosent. He’s been a loser for the majority of his NBA career.

And yeah, this is great. Bump your own thread about trading a second round steal because our young, hurt starting center on a cheap contract doesn't hit threes. Notice 1248 never responded to the point that hitting two's at 75% is like hitting threes at 46%. Does Mitch have a deranged brother we don't know about or something?

And KAT probably can't wait to be reunited with Thibs, right? Maybe we can trade RJ and IQ and all our first rounders until 2047 for Jimmy Butler and we can contend while watching KAT and Jimmy fight each other in practice and in games.

Stay tuned, Mitch for KP is coming to a thread near you...

Teams are shoot 40 3 point attempts per game, and best believe it's going to get higher than that.

making 2's over 3's and being the lowest scoring team in the league sounds about right

And while Randle is a better defender than KAT, there's no question that having them both, with the ability to shoot anywhere on the floor, is a bonus.

Your acting like if we trade a role player for a franchise type player it wood be a foolish move.

Yes you keep Mitch if the trade doesn't make us better, but if it does, it should be a no brainer.

https://go.nba.com/779z

Teams are also shooting ~30 3 point attempts per 100 possessions - WHICH NEGATES PACE - and leading the league in wins. Lakers and Philly are in the same margin as the Knicks.

Each team has different players, strengths, pace, style of play. Focusing in on one element dont mean much

what's a negates?