[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Isola: Mills “either be reassigned or simply removed from the building” after the season
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53828
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/9/2019  11:03 AM
knicks1248 wrote:I think the 2 best trades that (everyone hated at first) was starks for spree, and Oak for Camby.

I know one thing is for certain, the next regime will trade most of our young guys.

more or less than certain of the win total you predicted for this season?
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
GustavBahler
Posts: 42801
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

12/9/2019  11:36 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/9/2019  11:37 AM
knicks1248 wrote:I think the 2 best trades that (everyone hated at first) was starks for spree, and Oak for Camby.

I know one thing is for certain, the next regime will trade most of our young guys.

Was ambivalent about Spree, because I knew about his coach's rep at the time. Became one of my favorite all time Knicks. Even by today's standards, a high octane league. Spree was relentlesss. Attacked the rim like it was personal.

After 94', lets just say I was more open to trading Starks, wasnt in a hurry either. My concern with Camby was how easily he got hurt. Also gave us some great moments. Oak was getting on in years.

The only players I consider untradeable is Barrett and Mitch at this point. Dont believe any exec would move them so soon. Not when they're showing so much already. Mitch's foul troubles, and Barrett's improving FT shooting aside. Not worth trading for a lotto pick, not worth trading with all that cap room.

Not in a hurry to see any of the younger players traded. Dont believe a new front office will either. We have some good young players, on cheap contracts, and plenty of cap room. Guessing the next exec will build through the draft, trade any younger player who hasnt panned out. Work around the edges until the next big FA class.

NYKBocker
Posts: 38411
Alba Posts: 474
Joined: 1/14/2003
Member: #377
USA
12/9/2019  12:03 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I think the 2 best trades that (everyone hated at first) was starks for spree, and Oak for Camby.

I know one thing is for certain, the next regime will trade most of our young guys.

Was ambivalent about Spree, because I knew about his coach's rep at the time. Became one of my favorite all time Knicks. Even by today's standards, a high octane league. Spree was relentlesss. Attacked the rim like it was personal.

After 94', lets just say I was more open to trading Starks, wasnt in a hurry either. My concern with Camby was how easily he got hurt. Also gave us some great moments. Oak was getting on in years.

The only players I consider untradeable is Barrett and Mitch at this point. Dont believe any exec would move them so soon. Not when they're showing so much already. Mitch's foul troubles, and Barrett's improving FT shooting aside. Not worth trading for a lotto pick, not worth trading with all that cap room.

Not in a hurry to see any of the younger players traded. Dont believe a new front office will either. We have some good young players, on cheap contracts, and plenty of cap room. Guessing the next exec will build through the draft, trade any younger player who hasnt panned out. Work around the edges until the next big FA class.

My untouchables are RJ, Mitch, Frank.

Trier and Dotson I would like to stay but they can be moved if needed to get the players mentioned below traded.

Knox is too much of a space cadet for me. I hope he gets it.

Randle and DSJr needs to be traded. The others can be collateral damage and packaged with them to get the deal done.

martin
Posts: 76215
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/9/2019  12:13 PM
NYKBocker wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I think the 2 best trades that (everyone hated at first) was starks for spree, and Oak for Camby.

I know one thing is for certain, the next regime will trade most of our young guys.

Was ambivalent about Spree, because I knew about his coach's rep at the time. Became one of my favorite all time Knicks. Even by today's standards, a high octane league. Spree was relentlesss. Attacked the rim like it was personal.

After 94', lets just say I was more open to trading Starks, wasnt in a hurry either. My concern with Camby was how easily he got hurt. Also gave us some great moments. Oak was getting on in years.

The only players I consider untradeable is Barrett and Mitch at this point. Dont believe any exec would move them so soon. Not when they're showing so much already. Mitch's foul troubles, and Barrett's improving FT shooting aside. Not worth trading for a lotto pick, not worth trading with all that cap room.

Not in a hurry to see any of the younger players traded. Dont believe a new front office will either. We have some good young players, on cheap contracts, and plenty of cap room. Guessing the next exec will build through the draft, trade any younger player who hasnt panned out. Work around the edges until the next big FA class.

My untouchables are RJ, Mitch, Frank.

Trier and Dotson I would like to stay but they can be moved if needed to get the players mentioned below traded.

Knox is too much of a space cadet for me. I hope he gets it.

Randle and DSJr needs to be traded. The others can be collateral damage and packaged with them to get the deal done.

I'm pretty much here.

I would say it's hard to get a take on Trier because of his lack of playing time but it seems like we can guess that out. And I'm down on Dot; I get that he may need time to get his shooting rhythm but he is making the same mistakes on D as he has the last 2 years, easily fixable stuff and yet no change.

For me Mitch needs to take a good step next year. Frank has plodded along and needs to continue that and continue to work on shooting.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

12/9/2019  12:44 PM
Serious question: if the powers that be are convinced that Mills needs to go (or Perry for that matter) why would one wait until the end of the season?

I imagine one may want to wait to see if your preferred candidates become available, or can be made available,

But I also worry about a desperate GM or president making boneheaded decisions, swinging for the fences

(5)(7)
Chandler
Posts: 26778
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/26/2015
Member: #6197

12/9/2019  12:51 PM
NYKBocker wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I think the 2 best trades that (everyone hated at first) was starks for spree, and Oak for Camby.

I know one thing is for certain, the next regime will trade most of our young guys.

Was ambivalent about Spree, because I knew about his coach's rep at the time. Became one of my favorite all time Knicks. Even by today's standards, a high octane league. Spree was relentlesss. Attacked the rim like it was personal.

After 94', lets just say I was more open to trading Starks, wasnt in a hurry either. My concern with Camby was how easily he got hurt. Also gave us some great moments. Oak was getting on in years.

The only players I consider untradeable is Barrett and Mitch at this point. Dont believe any exec would move them so soon. Not when they're showing so much already. Mitch's foul troubles, and Barrett's improving FT shooting aside. Not worth trading for a lotto pick, not worth trading with all that cap room.

Not in a hurry to see any of the younger players traded. Dont believe a new front office will either. We have some good young players, on cheap contracts, and plenty of cap room. Guessing the next exec will build through the draft, trade any younger player who hasnt panned out. Work around the edges until the next big FA class.

My untouchables are RJ, Mitch, Frank.

Trier and Dotson I would like to stay but they can be moved if needed to get the players mentioned below traded.

Knox is too much of a space cadet for me. I hope he gets it.

Randle and DSJr needs to be traded. The others can be collateral damage and packaged with them to get the deal done.

I am in general agreement.

I do think KK will come around though. He needs a defined role. I feel that will help a lot.

Randle i think can play better. Wouldn't cry if he was traded. If he stays, his role needs to change -- less dribbling

I was never a fan of DSJ. I want him to do well because he's a Knick, but that sulking crap is a major turn off. My suspicion is his back or something else is hurting and that's why we're seeing less explosiveness. DSJ without explosion is "meh minus". If he's not hurt I'm even more jaundiced

(5)(7)
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/9/2019  12:52 PM
martin wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I think the 2 best trades that (everyone hated at first) was starks for spree, and Oak for Camby.

I know one thing is for certain, the next regime will trade most of our young guys.

Was ambivalent about Spree, because I knew about his coach's rep at the time. Became one of my favorite all time Knicks. Even by today's standards, a high octane league. Spree was relentlesss. Attacked the rim like it was personal.

After 94', lets just say I was more open to trading Starks, wasnt in a hurry either. My concern with Camby was how easily he got hurt. Also gave us some great moments. Oak was getting on in years.

The only players I consider untradeable is Barrett and Mitch at this point. Dont believe any exec would move them so soon. Not when they're showing so much already. Mitch's foul troubles, and Barrett's improving FT shooting aside. Not worth trading for a lotto pick, not worth trading with all that cap room.

Not in a hurry to see any of the younger players traded. Dont believe a new front office will either. We have some good young players, on cheap contracts, and plenty of cap room. Guessing the next exec will build through the draft, trade any younger player who hasnt panned out. Work around the edges until the next big FA class.

My untouchables are RJ, Mitch, Frank.

Trier and Dotson I would like to stay but they can be moved if needed to get the players mentioned below traded.

Knox is too much of a space cadet for me. I hope he gets it.

Randle and DSJr needs to be traded. The others can be collateral damage and packaged with them to get the deal done.

I'm pretty much here.

I would say it's hard to get a take on Trier because of his lack of playing time but it seems like we can guess that out. And I'm down on Dot; I get that he may need time to get his shooting rhythm but he is making the same mistakes on D as he has the last 2 years, easily fixable stuff and yet no change.

For me Mitch needs to take a good step next year. Frank has plodded along and needs to continue that and continue to work on shooting.

I'm so done with Knox It's not even funny..

I see TIM THOMAS all over this kid, the potential to be really good, but his motor issues and LOW ass IQ seems like a long process to fix. He's not even mad at himself when he misses a defensive rotation.

ES
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
12/9/2019  3:58 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
martin wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I think the 2 best trades that (everyone hated at first) was starks for spree, and Oak for Camby.

I know one thing is for certain, the next regime will trade most of our young guys.

Was ambivalent about Spree, because I knew about his coach's rep at the time. Became one of my favorite all time Knicks. Even by today's standards, a high octane league. Spree was relentlesss. Attacked the rim like it was personal.

After 94', lets just say I was more open to trading Starks, wasnt in a hurry either. My concern with Camby was how easily he got hurt. Also gave us some great moments. Oak was getting on in years.

The only players I consider untradeable is Barrett and Mitch at this point. Dont believe any exec would move them so soon. Not when they're showing so much already. Mitch's foul troubles, and Barrett's improving FT shooting aside. Not worth trading for a lotto pick, not worth trading with all that cap room.

Not in a hurry to see any of the younger players traded. Dont believe a new front office will either. We have some good young players, on cheap contracts, and plenty of cap room. Guessing the next exec will build through the draft, trade any younger player who hasnt panned out. Work around the edges until the next big FA class.

My untouchables are RJ, Mitch, Frank.

Trier and Dotson I would like to stay but they can be moved if needed to get the players mentioned below traded.

Knox is too much of a space cadet for me. I hope he gets it.

Randle and DSJr needs to be traded. The others can be collateral damage and packaged with them to get the deal done.

I'm pretty much here.

I would say it's hard to get a take on Trier because of his lack of playing time but it seems like we can guess that out. And I'm down on Dot; I get that he may need time to get his shooting rhythm but he is making the same mistakes on D as he has the last 2 years, easily fixable stuff and yet no change.

For me Mitch needs to take a good step next year. Frank has plodded along and needs to continue that and continue to work on shooting.

I'm so done with Knox It's not even funny..

I see TIM THOMAS all over this kid, the potential to be really good, but his motor issues and LOW ass IQ seems like a long process to fix. He's not even mad at himself when he misses a defensive rotation.

we'll be lucky if Knox turns into Tim Thomas - 12 years of NBA play!

The issue is expectations. Tim Thomas was a fine NBA player. He wasn't a franchise changing talent.

And how do you know whether Knox is angry at himself?

martin
Posts: 76215
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/9/2019  4:26 PM
Chandler wrote:Serious question: if the powers that be are convinced that Mills needs to go (or Perry for that matter) why would one wait until the end of the season?

I imagine one may want to wait to see if your preferred candidates become available, or can be made available,

But I also worry about a desperate GM or president making boneheaded decisions, swinging for the fences

The powers that be is Dolan. All reasonable decision making goes out the door after that.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Nalod
Posts: 71155
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
12/9/2019  6:13 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
martin wrote:
NYKBocker wrote:
GustavBahler wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I think the 2 best trades that (everyone hated at first) was starks for spree, and Oak for Camby.

I know one thing is for certain, the next regime will trade most of our young guys.

Was ambivalent about Spree, because I knew about his coach's rep at the time. Became one of my favorite all time Knicks. Even by today's standards, a high octane league. Spree was relentlesss. Attacked the rim like it was personal.

After 94', lets just say I was more open to trading Starks, wasnt in a hurry either. My concern with Camby was how easily he got hurt. Also gave us some great moments. Oak was getting on in years.

The only players I consider untradeable is Barrett and Mitch at this point. Dont believe any exec would move them so soon. Not when they're showing so much already. Mitch's foul troubles, and Barrett's improving FT shooting aside. Not worth trading for a lotto pick, not worth trading with all that cap room.

Not in a hurry to see any of the younger players traded. Dont believe a new front office will either. We have some good young players, on cheap contracts, and plenty of cap room. Guessing the next exec will build through the draft, trade any younger player who hasnt panned out. Work around the edges until the next big FA class.

My untouchables are RJ, Mitch, Frank.

Trier and Dotson I would like to stay but they can be moved if needed to get the players mentioned below traded.

Knox is too much of a space cadet for me. I hope he gets it.

Randle and DSJr needs to be traded. The others can be collateral damage and packaged with them to get the deal done.

I'm pretty much here.

I would say it's hard to get a take on Trier because of his lack of playing time but it seems like we can guess that out. And I'm down on Dot; I get that he may need time to get his shooting rhythm but he is making the same mistakes on D as he has the last 2 years, easily fixable stuff and yet no change.

For me Mitch needs to take a good step next year. Frank has plodded along and needs to continue that and continue to work on shooting.

I'm so done with Knox It's not even funny..

I see TIM THOMAS all over this kid, the potential to be really good, but his motor issues and LOW ass IQ seems like a long process to fix. He's not even mad at himself when he misses a defensive rotation.

Your the poster child for why NY fans can’t handle a future unless its a starphuch.
Your done? A year and 20 games and your done with a 20 year old?

Balroy
Posts: 20028
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2013
Member: #5609

12/9/2019  10:49 PM
GustavBahler wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:I think the 2 best trades that (everyone hated at first) was starks for spree, and Oak for Camby.

I know one thing is for certain, the next regime will trade most of our young guys.

Was ambivalent about Spree, because I knew about his coach's rep at the time. Became one of my favorite all time Knicks. Even by today's standards, a high octane league. Spree was relentlesss. Attacked the rim like it was personal.

After 94', lets just say I was more open to trading Starks, wasnt in a hurry either. My concern with Camby was how easily he got hurt. Also gave us some great moments. Oak was getting on in years.

The only players I consider untradeable is Barrett and Mitch at this point. Dont believe any exec would move them so soon. Not when they're showing so much already. Mitch's foul troubles, and Barrett's improving FT shooting aside. Not worth trading for a lotto pick, not worth trading with all that cap room.

Not in a hurry to see any of the younger players traded. Dont believe a new front office will either. We have some good young players, on cheap contracts, and plenty of cap room. Guessing the next exec will build through the draft, trade any younger player who hasnt panned out. Work around the edges until the next big FA class.

Balroy
Posts: 20028
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2013
Member: #5609

12/9/2019  10:52 PM
Man, loved Spree! And that fastbreak with Spree and Camby on the wings was incredible. Too bad he he broke it up by insisting on starting.
GustavBahler
Posts: 42801
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 7/12/2010
Member: #3186

12/9/2019  11:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/9/2019  11:42 PM
^ Dont remember it that way. Spree was asked to play out of position, so Houston could play SG. Spree was a two way player, and was a better fit as the starting 2. He willingly defended bigger players for the bulk of his time here, without complaining.
Isola: Mills “either be reassigned or simply removed from the building” after the season

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy