Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: Not sure what this proves? Where does it reference how the NRA buying out politicians caused the stalling of a flawed bill? The Future is Bright!
|
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() Cartman718 wrote:TPercy wrote:Because the second amendment was written at a time when no one fathomed 3 things:meloshouldgo wrote:GustavBahler wrote:exactly what it isTPercy wrote:Is this some lame variation on "Guns dont kill people, people kill people"?GustavBahler wrote:Ignorance at its finest. Is the NRA killing all those people?BRIGGS wrote:Thank the NRAGudris wrote:Yes part of United States is horrible. True. Guns sck I hate guns So because a law was made under different circumstances than it was today, its relevance is invalid? You can make that claim for basically every single development in history since the founding fathers. The Future is Bright!
|
GustavBahler
Posts: 42187 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
![]() TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote:
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/totals.php?id=D000000082 Edit: More accurate link.. https://www.opensecrets.org/outsidespending/detail.php?cycle=2016&cmte=National+Rifle+Assn |
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/3/2014 Member: #5801 |
![]() martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: He is a perfect example of a Trump voter - as much as it's hard to comprehend half the country is actually this stupid. I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
|
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() meloshouldgo wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: I voted for Evan Mcmullin you ****ing *******. The Future is Bright!
|
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: Martin. It is a known fact that the NRA is not financially strong nor is it that huge membership wise, so logically speaking, the NRA can't exactly be buying out politicians. Would you make the argument that Democrats are in the pockets of Unions who spend far far far more than they do? The Future is Bright!
|
GustavBahler
Posts: 42187 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
![]() TPercy wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: 4 million members not big enough? They spent almost 60 million dollars during the last election cycle. Do facts matter? They are heavily funded by gunmakers and the Koch Brothers. |
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: Bruh...those numbers are like pennies compared to what other groups are spending. Priorities USA and the Democratic senatorial committeee out spent almost 5 times as much they did. The Future is Bright!
|
GustavBahler
Posts: 42187 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
![]() TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: A group that can spend 60 million dollars in one election cycle has a great deal of influence. Look at the second link I posted, and their success rate in electing and defeating politicians. |
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: As I said, when you compare how much the NRA spent on the election to other groups, its not that much. Furthermore, the fact that they don't even make up the top 50(maybe 100) on lobbying hinders your point that the NRA is buying out politicians. NRA is strong, but money isn't the reason The Future is Bright!
|
GustavBahler
Posts: 42187 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
![]() TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: There are exponentially more guns in the US than anywhere else in the world. This happened for one reason, the NRA spending hundreds of millions of dollars over the years to keep any serious gun control legislation from emerging. You really think they didnt play a big part? I could have Wayne LePierre tell you how successful they are and you would find a way to rationalize it. Just because they arent the biggest, doesnt mean they arent wildly successful, look at the results. Think about how much more they are spending than gun control advocates. |
Cartman718
Posts: 29068 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/12/2007 Member: #1694 |
![]() TPercy wrote:Nice try but you are not dodging this one unless you simply choose to not reply. I never said that a law is invalid or irrelevant because it was made under different circumstances or time.Cartman718 wrote:TPercy wrote:Because the second amendment was written at a time when no one fathomed 3 things:meloshouldgo wrote:You are against the 2nd Amendment? Why?GustavBahler wrote:exactly what it isTPercy wrote:Is this some lame variation on "Guns dont kill people, people kill people"?GustavBahler wrote:Ignorance at its finest. Is the NRA killing all those people?BRIGGS wrote:Thank the NRAGudris wrote:Yes part of United States is horrible. True. Guns sck I hate guns My statement was... In other words, it may be invalid today it may not be but you have to have open dialogue about it and revisit controversial laws periodically. And I don’t mean just talk about it. Put it up to the people to vote on in a primary or presidential election or online vote by social security number. In the case of the 2nd amendment yes I believe it is now invalid. We are talking about controversial laws not every law and bill that founding fathers passed. Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL
So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
|
Cartman718
Posts: 29068 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/12/2007 Member: #1694 |
![]() And by the way TPercy please note that in just that one statement it shows that these laws were written by a bunch of white men. Pretty sure minority or women opinions were not taken into account when writing them
Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL
So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
|
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() @Cartman718 and Gustav I don't want to get into a long winded debate on this topic at the moment(because I know that it is heading in that direction and I only have the stomach for 1 of these off-topic debates on this forum)
Just know that all I am saying is that in order to be intellectually consistent, when you use the date and the circumstances surrounding a law to apply it to current times you have to apply it to all developments that exist today that were permitted under the laws of the same era you are referencing. The Future is Bright!
|
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
![]() GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: Or maybe Americans just love their guns? Although gun ownership is at a low almost 40% of adults own a gun. Thats a lot. The Future is Bright!
|
Cartman718
Posts: 29068 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/12/2007 Member: #1694 |
![]() TPercy wrote:@Cartman718 and Gustav I don't want to get into a long winded debate on this topic at the moment(because I know that it is heading in that direction and I only have the stomach for 1 of these off-topic debates on this forum) you are somehow suggesting (correct me if i am wrong), that if the circumstances of the time allowed great developments that exist today, that Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL
So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
|
GustavBahler
Posts: 42187 Alba Posts: 15 Joined: 7/12/2010 Member: #3186 |
![]() TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:martin wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:TPercy wrote:GustavBahler wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Gudris wrote: Americans would love their RPGs, if they were legal too. |