| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
Moonangie wrote:you have to remember that longer players move differently, and will also look slower as they have to move less to cover more ground. I see him getting a ton of steals and deflections in his game footage. I also see him creating seperation just fine. However he's long, so he hasnt had to work to get around guys. He can pass over them, or around them. That is the advantage of a long player.BRIGGS wrote:Beyond a high loose dribble--look at how much trouble Frank N has with separation. Hes always contested and think about the level of an NBA athlete vs what hes playing now. Fox separates on demand. All this debate is silly though, because as usual we work with limited info. Lets see him in a workout (we wont). I would love to hear how he played or ran drills against Fox, Monk, Smith, Ball, etc.. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
BigDaddyG
Posts: 40252 Alba Posts: 9 Joined: 1/22/2010 Member: #3049 |
fishmike wrote:Moonangie wrote:you have to remember that longer players move differently, and will also look slower as they have to move less to cover more ground. I see him getting a ton of steals and deflections in his game footage. I also see him creating seperation just fine. However he's long, so he hasnt had to work to get around guys. He can pass over them, or around them. That is the advantage of a long player.BRIGGS wrote:Beyond a high loose dribble--look at how much trouble Frank N has with separation. Hes always contested and think about the level of an NBA athlete vs what hes playing now. Fox separates on demand. And honestly, a high dribble is easier to fix than a jumpshot. If Harrison Barnes can tighten his dribble, than I have no doubt French kid can. I wouldn't call him John Wall, but he looks more athletic than Lonzo Ball. Does he have that extra gear that most star players have? That's a question I can't really answer based on a few video clips. Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right.
- The Tick
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
BigDaddyG wrote:fishmike wrote:Moonangie wrote:you have to remember that longer players move differently, and will also look slower as they have to move less to cover more ground. I see him getting a ton of steals and deflections in his game footage. I also see him creating seperation just fine. However he's long, so he hasnt had to work to get around guys. He can pass over them, or around them. That is the advantage of a long player.BRIGGS wrote:Beyond a high loose dribble--look at how much trouble Frank N has with separation. Hes always contested and think about the level of an NBA athlete vs what hes playing now. Fox separates on demand. Like most Kids Frank will have to adjust to the speed at the NBA level. He's so young that you have to imagine him down the line with a more filled out body. He's still on his Bambi legs right now. Get this kid with NBA level trainers and he should make good progress. There's a ton of potential if he's this good already. |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
BigDaddyG wrote:exactly. NOBODY can answer that question no matter how many threads they start. Guards are real wildcards in the draft. Scout, work em out, interview, do as much DD as you can and go from there.fishmike wrote:Moonangie wrote:you have to remember that longer players move differently, and will also look slower as they have to move less to cover more ground. I see him getting a ton of steals and deflections in his game footage. I also see him creating seperation just fine. However he's long, so he hasnt had to work to get around guys. He can pass over them, or around them. That is the advantage of a long player.BRIGGS wrote:Beyond a high loose dribble--look at how much trouble Frank N has with separation. Hes always contested and think about the level of an NBA athlete vs what hes playing now. Fox separates on demand. Everyone talks about how great Pat Riley is. He drafted Beasley. Jerry West drafted duds. If you draft long enough it will happen. Do the DD and pick the best talent you can. If you have what is perceived as equal talent you go on personality and team need. I suspect a Melo trade results in some more guys being here also so there will be some fresh faces. I think the Knicks really need to focus on the best talent they can get, that is hopefully not a PF/C tweener. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
Nalod
Posts: 72092 Alba Posts: 155 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
I watched a few video's with Frank and changed the soundtracks. Added some gothic intense type and his game changed, it was more "Important".
SOme articles/Writers reference Fred Weis. Does that really matter? |
|
martin
Posts: 79973 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
Nalod wrote:I watched a few video's with Frank and changed the soundtracks. Added some gothic intense type and his game changed, it was more "Important". Because they are both French and author has nothing more to add Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
EnySpree wrote:GustavBahler wrote:nixluva wrote:Fox, Frank, Smith and Monk could all be in play! Grant isn't in the same class as any of them. Grant was fools gold. I thought he'd be better than this as did a lot of scouts. Sometimes that just happens. All of the guards at the top of this draft are worthy of their ranking. The Knicks wouldn't be reaching by choosing one of them IMO. There's no guarantees in the draft but these are some good players. Thought he might emerge in Chicago...surprised that he showed so poorly. I remember that during the draft folks were happy with him...and though I didn't know him well as a player, everything I read about his ability and intelligence made me think that he could become a solid player. I still believe he might have a "now I get it" moment, but I'm much less sure, and being benched in the playoffs when stepping up might have really been a step forward, will be a big blow to an already fragile ego. We all thought the Triangle was the problem...now we know it wasn't. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
Now that we know what Phil is thinking. I'm now certain that the Knicks will not be selecting a PG.
|
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
BRIGGS wrote:Were already been hot on a "tall" lead pg who played good D yet couldn't shoot wellin Jerian Grant and I believe they had him ranked in the lottery. Watch Frenchy shoot, Briggs...He has a good stroke... good enough, in my opinion, that he can fill in very well at SG, another position we have talked about. I expect that his shot will improve even more, just as it has improved over the past few years according to things I've read. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
Vmart wrote:Now that we know what Phil is thinking. I'm now certain that the Knicks will not be selecting a PG. So does he have a secret crush on a certain player or position that he doesn't want others to know about? EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
WaltLongmire wrote:This.. and this is the part that folks forget. High dribbles and too skinny. Cmon... thats not what the draft is about. Its about adding a young prospect every year. FrankN is just a young player with great upside. You develop them. You build them. Hopefully at some point you have something. With a guy like Frank it could be a PG or SG who knows... I have read and seen he's unselfish to a fault, but that mindset of passing and defense first is certainly what this FO is looking for.BRIGGS wrote:Were already been hot on a "tall" lead pg who played good D yet couldn't shoot wellin Jerian Grant and I believe they had him ranked in the lottery. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
WaltLongmire wrote:Vmart wrote:Now that we know what Phil is thinking. I'm now certain that the Knicks will not be selecting a PG. We don't even know where they are drafting. I think Phil will look at everyone and make a decision. Once he knows where he is drafting then he can better gage what player to pick. I still think there are scenarios that still need to be played out like a Melo trade which might play into which player to draft. |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
WaltLongmire wrote:OG Anunoby... I think this is the Phil sleeper pick. He might be able to guard 5 positions in the NBA, he's got an insane wingspan, is a physical specimen and pretty versatile. 7-8 seems a bit high but we will see.Vmart wrote:Now that we know what Phil is thinking. I'm now certain that the Knicks will not be selecting a PG. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
fishmike wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:This.. and this is the part that folks forget. High dribbles and too skinny. Cmon... thats not what the draft is about. Its about adding a young prospect every year. FrankN is just a young player with great upside. You develop them. You build them. Hopefully at some point you have something. With a guy like Frank it could be a PG or SG who knows... I have read and seen he's unselfish to a fault, but that mindset of passing and defense first is certainly what this FO is looking for.BRIGGS wrote:Were already been hot on a "tall" lead pg who played good D yet couldn't shoot wellin Jerian Grant and I believe they had him ranked in the lottery. From a NYT article in January...posted the link before, not the text. Good background article. Who knows if we take him...just have to depend on our braintrust...but you know the guy is in the mix, and if he was to drop down under 7, we would then get one of the top ranked kids falling to us, so I expect we would still be happy.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
WaltLongmire wrote:EnySpree wrote:GustavBahler wrote:nixluva wrote:Fox, Frank, Smith and Monk could all be in play! Grant isn't in the same class as any of them. Grant was fools gold. I thought he'd be better than this as did a lot of scouts. Sometimes that just happens. All of the guards at the top of this draft are worthy of their ranking. The Knicks wouldn't be reaching by choosing one of them IMO. There's no guarantees in the draft but these are some good players. They thought very highly of Grant and also Early. They need to have open minds-- watch the playoffs to see what is working-- how teams and certain players are doing it.
RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
HofstraBBall
Posts: 28099 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
BRIGGS wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Were already been hot on a "tall" lead pg who played good D yet couldn't shoot wellin Jerian Grant and I believe they had him ranked in the lottery. Problem with Fox is that he can be Jennings Part 2 but only if he gets a three point shot. Yikes. Didn't he shoot in low 20's? Agree about Frank. He is a reserve on his current team? Saw that he only played 14 minutes in their last loss. I am with you and think we should pick the most NBA ready regardless of position. 'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
HofstraBBall wrote:BRIGGS wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:BRIGGS wrote:Were already been hot on a "tall" lead pg who played good D yet couldn't shoot wellin Jerian Grant and I believe they had him ranked in the lottery. Fox is an in game above the rim finisher close to 6-4 good defensively. I would categorize him as a jumpshot away from a potential star RIP Crushalot😞
|