[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Herring: Knicks Shock the NBA With Their Sudden Win Now Approach
Author Thread
NardDogNation
Posts: 27678
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

7/2/2016  9:26 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
franco12 wrote:
EnySpree wrote:The funniest thing about this argument is if the Knicks do end up losing.... everyone will be calling for Phil to get fired and calling him an idiot and inexperienced.... yet you guys want the Knicks to build "organically"... how does one do that without losing at a ridiculous rate?

We have all our picks going forward and alot of young players in the organization.... what more do you want? We are building from within and signing guys to play now.... what is there to complain about? This is the best situation we've been in for 15 years

who are the alot of young players in the organization? KP and ?.

Cleanthony Early - released, but invited to summer league. There is clearly not a commitment on our part to keep him, and I applaud the move. I don't see him playing for an NBA team.

Galloway?

Justin Holiday?

KOQ
Seraphin? Is he even back?

Who is this youth I'm missing?


Rose is younger than Lopez. Calderon is 35? Holiday is 27 and Jerian Grant will be 24 at the start of the season. The Knicks gave up the youngest and the oldest player in the trade. Also, looking at youth the Knicks have O'Quinn, Willy, Baker, Labeyrie and Plumlee that you left off of your list. They added a second round pick in the deal. I liked Grant but I am not sure that he is anything special.

How can you qualify "young guys" on the Knicks that don't even have contracts? Willy, Baker, Labeyrie and Plumlee are guys that we don't even know could hack it in the league!

AUTOADVERT
NardDogNation
Posts: 27678
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

7/2/2016  9:27 PM
franco12 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
franco12 wrote:
EnySpree wrote:The funniest thing about this argument is if the Knicks do end up losing.... everyone will be calling for Phil to get fired and calling him an idiot and inexperienced.... yet you guys want the Knicks to build "organically"... how does one do that without losing at a ridiculous rate?

We have all our picks going forward and alot of young players in the organization.... what more do you want? We are building from within and signing guys to play now.... what is there to complain about? This is the best situation we've been in for 15 years

who are the alot of young players in the organization? KP and ?.

Cleanthony Early - released, but invited to summer league. There is clearly not a commitment on our part to keep him, and I applaud the move. I don't see him playing for an NBA team.

Galloway?

Justin Holiday?

KOQ
Seraphin? Is he even back?

Who is this youth I'm missing?


Rose is younger than Lopez. Calderon is 35? Holiday is 27 and Jerian Grant will be 24 at the start of the season. The Knicks gave up the youngest and the oldest player in the trade. Also, looking at youth the Knicks have O'Quinn, Willy, Baker, Labeyrie and Plumlee that you left off of your list. They added a second round pick in the deal. I liked Grant but I am not sure that he is anything special.

My I forgot about all those young players because, I guess they were what, all second rounders or undrafted?

I like KOQ and hope Willy will contribute and turn into something.

But the others?

Plumlee so good he went undrafted.

Same with Baker.

Rose is younger than Lopez and Calderon, and he played exactly 73 minutes more than Calderon in 6 less games. And Lopez played 122 more minutes and played every game.

+1

NardDogNation
Posts: 27678
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

7/2/2016  9:29 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:There was nothing wrong with trading Lopez but there is something wrong with getting back subpar value for him

What would have been on par value?

Platitudes just gum up the discourse.

Be specific.

a healthy Above average player/starter who is not over 30 yrs old or a 1st rd pick.

I have difficulty with "1st rd pick."

There are 30 first round picks, wildly varying in potential value. To lump them all together seems to lack specifics.

Now honest question. The NBA has given most teams significant cap room each of the next two seasons.

Add to that there is a fair number of center options on the free agent market, but high rent to low rent to everything in between.

Can you illustrate a scenario in which a team is giving up a healthy, above average player/starter under 30 for Lopez?

Lopez's impact can be approximated on the free agent market AND he requires $14m in cap space.

To me, giving up what you described as a rare, valuable player when you can simply buy most (if not all) of what Lopez brings doesn't make sense.

That's why I'm asking for a for instance - a team and a name player where i can weigh it on context and either say "oh yeah, I can see that, that makes sense for that team" or not.

Can you help out?

Atlanta, Miami, Detroit, Brooklyn, Pacers, Lakers have all signed centers so far, suggesting a need. Did any of these teams have a good player to give up that would have made a Lopez trade a better deal for them?

What if the knicks would have made a 3-way deal for Teague instead of Rose.

What about the pkg Orl gave up for Ibaka

Then again they could have held onto Lopez and ransom him off now. How much would Lopez be worth to teams looking for a Center. Dallas is still out there and they are known to overpay for talent. Boston, Portland, Charlotte, Houston, and others still need centers.

I would have liked to see them try to trade for Noel in a 3-team deal. I'd take a up and coming talent over a declining talent on a major deal. You save $10m and gain a young player under restriction.

+1

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/2/2016  9:36 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/2/2016  9:36 PM
nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/2/2016  10:04 PM
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

7/2/2016  10:07 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

No you can't.

The Knicks will certainly be expected to improve upon 2015-16 by a decent margin. No less than postseason will be the minimum expectation.

wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

7/2/2016  10:10 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/2/2016  10:12 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

No you can't.

The Knicks will certainly be expected to improve upon 2015-16 by a decent margin. No less than postseason will be the minimum expectation.

Saying Phil is on par with his predecessors is giving his predecessors wayyyyyyyy to much credit. Even if this explodes in his face the Knicks have their pick this year, and Rose (who is the most injury prone) becomes an expiring in a very PG heavy FA and Draft.

This is a big risk, but there is a level of foresight to this current lineup we haven't seen from the Knicks...... Ever.

Also he got guys who if healthy makes this team a lot better. The Lakers had more money and came away with nothing..... The 76'ers can't give their money away. The East got a lot tougher overall and I think the Knicks got tougher to match it.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
Welpee
Posts: 23162
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/22/2016
Member: #6239

7/2/2016  10:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 7/2/2016  10:14 PM
wargames wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

No you can't.

The Knicks will certainly be expected to improve upon 2015-16 by a decent margin. No less than postseason will be the minimum expectation.

Saying Phil is on par with his predecessors is giving his predecessors wayyyyyyyy to much credit. Even if this explodes in his face the Knicks have their pick this year, and Rose (who is the most injury prone) becomes an expiring in a very PG heavy FA and Draft. This is a big risk, but there is a level of foresight to this current lineup we haven't seen from the Knicks...... Ever.


Yeah, and I don't think Phil has traded any first round picks since he arrived. In fact, he acquired one which is rare around here.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/2/2016  10:21 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

This was Phil's team before these moves. Why are you talking as if you're a fan of some other team looking to assign blame??? You don't sound like someone who is interested in looking for how the team CAN be successful as much as how they can fail.

Yes there is a risk of injury. That isn't the same as a guarantee that things will go wrong. I'm not reading anything from you about how this could workout with the players in great shape going into next season. How do you think the players will function together and why?

djsunyc, the Knicks are NOT going to have to play their starters 35+ minutes a game! I mean come on man. At least try to be less biased. Phil has done this MANY times before and knows how to handle a team with older vets. Phil and JH will be very much aware of taking care of the players who need to watch their minutes.

nychamp
Posts: 20565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/8/2009
Member: #2556

7/3/2016  12:12 AM
wargames wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

No you can't.

The Knicks will certainly be expected to improve upon 2015-16 by a decent margin. No less than postseason will be the minimum expectation.

Saying Phil is on par with his predecessors is giving his predecessors wayyyyyyyy to much credit. Even if this explodes in his face the Knicks have their pick this year, and Rose (who is the most injury prone) becomes an expiring in a very PG heavy FA and Draft.

This is a big risk, but there is a level of foresight to this current lineup we haven't seen from the Knicks...... Ever.

Also he got guys who if healthy makes this team a lot better. The Lakers had more money and came away with nothing..... The 76'ers can't give their money away. The East got a lot tougher overall and I think the Knicks got tougher to match it.

+1 wargames this is totally on point. Not every Phil move has turned out as hoped but his thinking, vision and plan B contingencies have been intelligently conceived, broad minded and planned out. At this point he has put the Knicks in a position to become dramatically more competitive or, if struck by injury or failure of whatever sort, to sharply improve/alter the team next year through free agency, the draft and reasonably priced, movable assets.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
7/3/2016  12:38 AM
franco12 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
franco12 wrote:
EnySpree wrote:The funniest thing about this argument is if the Knicks do end up losing.... everyone will be calling for Phil to get fired and calling him an idiot and inexperienced.... yet you guys want the Knicks to build "organically"... how does one do that without losing at a ridiculous rate?

We have all our picks going forward and alot of young players in the organization.... what more do you want? We are building from within and signing guys to play now.... what is there to complain about? This is the best situation we've been in for 15 years

who are the alot of young players in the organization? KP and ?.

Cleanthony Early - released, but invited to summer league. There is clearly not a commitment on our part to keep him, and I applaud the move. I don't see him playing for an NBA team.

Galloway?

Justin Holiday?

KOQ
Seraphin? Is he even back?

Who is this youth I'm missing?


Rose is younger than Lopez. Calderon is 35? Holiday is 27 and Jerian Grant will be 24 at the start of the season. The Knicks gave up the youngest and the oldest player in the trade. Also, looking at youth the Knicks have O'Quinn, Willy, Baker, Labeyrie and Plumlee that you left off of your list. They added a second round pick in the deal. I liked Grant but I am not sure that he is anything special.

My I forgot about all those young players because, I guess they were what, all second rounders or undrafted?

I like KOQ and hope Willy will contribute and turn into something.

But the others?

Plumlee so good he went undrafted.

Same with Baker.

Rose is younger than Lopez and Calderon, and he played exactly 73 minutes more than Calderon in 6 less games. And Lopez played 122 more minutes and played every game.

In your initial list of four you have two undrafted guys and a second rounder. What is your selection process for who you remember?
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
7/3/2016  1:22 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.
Really? You guys think the Knicks are going with a seven man roster? Just for clarification the only knick to average 35 mins a game last year was Melo. Guys on their bench that should be back, Gallo averaged 25 a game and Lance averaged 22 a game.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/3/2016  1:42 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.
Really? You guys think the Knicks are going with a seven man roster? Just for clarification the only knick to average 35 mins a game last year was Melo. Guys on their bench that should be back, Gallo averaged 25 a game and Lance averaged 22 a game.

Phil knows he has to address the bench. There should be no reason why this team will have to overuse anyone. They should be able to get plenty of rest for the older players on this team. The interesting thing going to be just who is going to actually make up the bench, beyond the guys we know he wants to bring back from last year.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/3/2016  7:08 AM    LAST EDITED: 7/3/2016  7:30 AM
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

This was Phil's team before these moves. Why are you talking as if you're a fan of some other team looking to assign blame??? You don't sound like someone who is interested in looking for how the team CAN be successful as much as how they can fail.

Yes there is a risk of injury. That isn't the same as a guarantee that things will go wrong. I'm not reading anything from you about how this could workout with the players in great shape going into next season. How do you think the players will function together and why?

djsunyc, the Knicks are NOT going to have to play their starters 35+ minutes a game! I mean come on man. At least try to be less biased. Phil has done this MANY times before and knows how to handle a team with older vets. Phil and JH will be very much aware of taking care of the players who need to watch their minutes.

I want the Knicks fans to demand a better product. That's the only way we'll get one.
You're right it was his team before this off-season. But each time you turn over the roster, it becomes more your team and less traceable to past GMs.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/3/2016  7:09 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.
Really? You guys think the Knicks are going with a seven man roster? Just for clarification the only knick to average 35 mins a game last year was Melo. Guys on their bench that should be back, Gallo averaged 25 a game and Lance averaged 22 a game.

I said this is fully his team (as opposed to what he inherited), not that it's his full team. Clearly he'll have to fill out the bench.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/3/2016  7:13 AM
Welpee wrote:
wargames wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

No you can't.

The Knicks will certainly be expected to improve upon 2015-16 by a decent margin. No less than postseason will be the minimum expectation.

Saying Phil is on par with his predecessors is giving his predecessors wayyyyyyyy to much credit. Even if this explodes in his face the Knicks have their pick this year, and Rose (who is the most injury prone) becomes an expiring in a very PG heavy FA and Draft. This is a big risk, but there is a level of foresight to this current lineup we haven't seen from the Knicks...... Ever.


Yeah, and I don't think Phil has traded any first round picks since he arrived. In fact, he acquired one which is rare around here.

I think DJ meant the results not the methods were on par with the predecessors. How many picks did Layden trade anyway? I think only one.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/3/2016  8:56 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.


Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

This was Phil's team before these moves. Why are you talking as if you're a fan of some other team looking to assign blame??? You don't sound like someone who is interested in looking for how the team CAN be successful as much as how they can fail.

Yes there is a risk of injury. That isn't the same as a guarantee that things will go wrong. I'm not reading anything from you about how this could workout with the players in great shape going into next season. How do you think the players will function together and why?

djsunyc, the Knicks are NOT going to have to play their starters 35+ minutes a game! I mean come on man. At least try to be less biased. Phil has done this MANY times before and knows how to handle a team with older vets. Phil and JH will be very much aware of taking care of the players who need to watch their minutes.

I want the Knicks fans to demand a better product. That's the only way we'll get one.
You're right it was his team before this off-season. But each time you turn over the roster, it becomes more your team and less traceable to past GMs.

You sound like SAS. Phil is making the team better each summer and that will make the Knicks a more attractive destination for 2017 Free Agents!!! It seems like no one in the media is even thinking about how things could improve if the Knicks have a good season. That's the gambit. If it fails he still has his picks and can make improvement thru the draft. In the end he's set himself up for a Win, Win scenario. This is unlike ANY of his recent predecessors. None of them ended up in this situation where they basically covered their ass this way.

djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/3/2016  9:45 AM
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.

Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

This was Phil's team before these moves. Why are you talking as if you're a fan of some other team looking to assign blame??? You don't sound like someone who is interested in looking for how the team CAN be successful as much as how they can fail.

Yes there is a risk of injury. That isn't the same as a guarantee that things will go wrong. I'm not reading anything from you about how this could workout with the players in great shape going into next season. How do you think the players will function together and why?

djsunyc, the Knicks are NOT going to have to play their starters 35+ minutes a game! I mean come on man. At least try to be less biased. Phil has done this MANY times before and knows how to handle a team with older vets. Phil and JH will be very much aware of taking care of the players who need to watch their minutes.

while i am biased (and pretend not to be) the bottom line is results. fans constantly rationalize moves their teams make. but ultimately, if the team isnt winning or making the playoffs in a league where more teams make it than dont, then its a failure. so my point is that if the knicks dont make the playoffs, then its a failure like past regimes. doesnt matter how many picks you didnt trade or cap space or whatever. 3 years in and phil has made his huge free agent splash and acquisitions. missing the playoffs again would be indicative of his team building ability. nothing ive said here is biased or "haterade". i think thats a fair argument that many would agree with.

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/3/2016  9:47 AM
djsunyc wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.

Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

This was Phil's team before these moves. Why are you talking as if you're a fan of some other team looking to assign blame??? You don't sound like someone who is interested in looking for how the team CAN be successful as much as how they can fail.

Yes there is a risk of injury. That isn't the same as a guarantee that things will go wrong. I'm not reading anything from you about how this could workout with the players in great shape going into next season. How do you think the players will function together and why?

djsunyc, the Knicks are NOT going to have to play their starters 35+ minutes a game! I mean come on man. At least try to be less biased. Phil has done this MANY times before and knows how to handle a team with older vets. Phil and JH will be very much aware of taking care of the players who need to watch their minutes.

while i am biased (and pretend not to be) the bottom line is results. fans constantly rationalize moves their teams make. but ultimately, if the team isnt winning or making the playoffs in a league where more teams make it than dont, then its a failure. so my point is that if the knicks dont make the playoffs, then its a failure like past regimes. doesnt matter how many picks you didnt trade or cap space or whatever. 3 years in and phil has made his huge free agent splash and acquisitions. missing the playoffs again would be indicative of his team building ability. nothing ive said here is biased or "haterade". i think thats a fair argument that many would agree with.


They may not now but they will in 6 months if the team is bad.
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
7/3/2016  10:18 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:
nixluva wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
djsunyc wrote:nobody knows what the results will be but the knicks still have alot of work to do to "win now".

b/c of rose + noah's injury history (as well as noah's all out play which will get him hurt again), the knicks have to get 2 quality backup pg's and 2 quality backup bigs that can play center.

then they need another scorer off the bench and depth in general. as it stands right now, the knicks have about $4 mil and no MLE b/c of the cap space. they need to fill all those spots with that and minimum deals.

the starting 5 right now will be expected to play 35+ mins each. it's a really long season...and it will be a tough fight this year in the east for slots 2-8. i think the knicks just need to make the playoffs - regardless of how it is. even if they squeak in with 41 wins and the 8th seed. and just hope everyone is healthy once it starts. if they don't make the playoffs then you would have to say the phil jackson era has been on par with his predecessors.

Exactly. And this is completely his team. At this point, you can't keep blaming the situation he inherited. He'll be 40 months into a 5 year contract after this season.

This was Phil's team before these moves. Why are you talking as if you're a fan of some other team looking to assign blame??? You don't sound like someone who is interested in looking for how the team CAN be successful as much as how they can fail.

Yes there is a risk of injury. That isn't the same as a guarantee that things will go wrong. I'm not reading anything from you about how this could workout with the players in great shape going into next season. How do you think the players will function together and why?

djsunyc, the Knicks are NOT going to have to play their starters 35+ minutes a game! I mean come on man. At least try to be less biased. Phil has done this MANY times before and knows how to handle a team with older vets. Phil and JH will be very much aware of taking care of the players who need to watch their minutes.

while i am biased (and pretend not to be) the bottom line is results. fans constantly rationalize moves their teams make. but ultimately, if the team isnt winning or making the playoffs in a league where more teams make it than dont, then its a failure. so my point is that if the knicks dont make the playoffs, then its a failure like past regimes. doesnt matter how many picks you didnt trade or cap space or whatever. 3 years in and phil has made his huge free agent splash and acquisitions. missing the playoffs again would be indicative of his team building ability. nothing ive said here is biased or "haterade". i think thats a fair argument that many would agree with.


They may not now but they will in 6 months if the team is bad.

The odds of the team being "bad" are not that high IMO. They may not go gangbusters but they shouldn't be "bad". This is a quality starting unit. What about it should lead to a "bad" performance? Part of the key to success is what Phil is able to do with the bench. That is still up in the air. We have to hope he can manage to squeeze a decent PG into the little cap he has left.
Herring: Knicks Shock the NBA With Their Sudden Win Now Approach

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy