| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
TPercy
Posts: 28010 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/5/2014 Member: #5748 |
[quote="fi****hoff
mreinman wrote:No.. he wasn't. He just wasn't. You can cling your advanced stats all you want but they are failing you painfully now. Yea.. Jose is better than Rose. Sorry dude, that statement is just such a fail.fishmike wrote:mreinman wrote:did you actually watch Noah vs. Lopez last year? The bold is simply not true. Any more than when you say Jose is a better player than Rose.nixluva wrote:EwingsGlass wrote:nixluva wrote:Durant may be a long shot but I think adding Noah is a very high degree of probability. His game would fit well in the Knicks new style and roster. His ability to run the floor and pass would be great and his passion on D would be very important.Joakim Noah’s Knicks momentum keeps buildinghttp://nypost.com/2016/06/27/joakim-noahs-knicks-momentum-keeps-building/ Lopez had a decent season. Very inconsistent but overall good. Noah was already breaking down and put like 20/10 on Lopez in about 15 minutes of play. The point was Lopez had no answer because he is an inferior player. So you are basing this off of 1 game? The Future is Bright!
|
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
fishmike wrote:nixluva wrote:Welpee wrote:fishmike wrote: I remember he had a lot of issues with his foot at one point... plantar fasciitis? That's the more worrying one for big men. But I would sign Noah in a heartbeat. Dude is a New Yorker and wants to be here. He won Defensive Player of the Year in 2014. He's one of the best passing big men in the league. One of the best defenders. One of the best team leaders. A lot of intangible stuff. Not to mention he's DRose's best friend and probably makes DRose a better player here. I sign him in a heartbeat. If we can get him for $15M a year, honestly, that's a steal for us. That's $2M more per season than Rolo for a guy who impacts the game 10x more than Rolo. ¿ △ ?
|
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:Just for a frame of reference of why the Knicks are after Noah. So you think a separated shoulder has robbed him of his ability to play the game? ¿ △ ?
|
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
Related, LOL, Fred Hoiberg says he can't wait to coach BROOK LOPEZ. oops.
Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: ¿ △ ?
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:Just for a frame of reference of why the Knicks are after Noah. he just looks like his has lost a lot and is a shell of what he was. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:Just for a frame of reference of why the Knicks are after Noah. Like I've said - there was some sort of cultural behind the scenes war with the Bulls that led to Thibs firing, the Bulls front office making that weird announcement, Hoiberg seemed in over his head, DRose and Butler clashed, Gasol and Noah clashed... I don't think you can look at last season as definitive for either Noah or Rose. Something weird went down in Chicago. Noah was at ws/48 .130 in 2014-5... I think that's more the player you'd get than what you saw last season. And that was better than Rolo's season with the Knicks last year. And it was on par with what Dwight did last year. It's a risk, but there are worse risks IMHO. Anyway, we'll see what happens. ¿ △ ?
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:Just for a frame of reference of why the Knicks are after Noah. something was definitely wrong in chicago and I think that we now have that main problem. we can take risks but how many? We can try to do what the Nets did and also fall on our face. Rose is short term right now so this disaster scenario has not played out here yet. I hope it stays that way. I can understand paying for risk but way over paying and praying is just silly. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
mreinman wrote:what does this have to do with the Nets? Im sorry... what draft picks did we include for Rose? Which picks will we be including for Noah?crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:Just for a frame of reference of why the Knicks are after Noah. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
fishmike wrote:mreinman wrote:what does this have to do with the Nets? Im sorry... what draft picks did we include for Rose? Which picks will we be including for Noah?crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:Just for a frame of reference of why the Knicks are after Noah. that I don't want to throw big money at big risks. We have not done it yet (aside for melo which I got). so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
mreinman wrote:Me either. But once the first tier of options goes the next wave of possibilities all carry risk. It would be nice to just sign Durant or Horford and call it a day, but I don't believe we have that luxury so we have to look at risks. Overpaying an RFA or another guy whom you lure with money has risk. Paying a guy who may not be available (injuries) has risk also. Doing nothing carries its own risk.fishmike wrote:mreinman wrote:what does this have to do with the Nets? Im sorry... what draft picks did we include for Rose? Which picks will we be including for Noah?crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:Just for a frame of reference of why the Knicks are after Noah. Despite not liking the Rose trade I do like the philosophy. Knicks we aggressive in upgrading the talent and unlike in the past that risk didn't include future picks or a boatload of young talent. If this fails or REALLY fails our hedge is we still have a draft pick. We are still adding young guys. We are still looking at the team and not a starphuck. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
fishmike wrote:mreinman wrote:Me either. But once the first tier of options goes the next wave of possibilities all carry risk. It would be nice to just sign Durant or Horford and call it a day, but I don't believe we have that luxury so we have to look at risks. Overpaying an RFA or another guy whom you lure with money has risk. Paying a guy who may not be available (injuries) has risk also. Doing nothing carries its own risk.fishmike wrote:mreinman wrote:what does this have to do with the Nets? Im sorry... what draft picks did we include for Rose? Which picks will we be including for Noah?crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:Just for a frame of reference of why the Knicks are after Noah. Phil can't keep losing trades ... I know what he did / trying to do and in my opinion, they gave up way too much value for the (low) potential of upside. I don't care who you trade away as long as you get appropriate value in return. I guess I can just not be a pig and be happy that we did not give up a first. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
mreinman wrote:fishmike wrote:mreinman wrote:Me either. But once the first tier of options goes the next wave of possibilities all carry risk. It would be nice to just sign Durant or Horford and call it a day, but I don't believe we have that luxury so we have to look at risks. Overpaying an RFA or another guy whom you lure with money has risk. Paying a guy who may not be available (injuries) has risk also. Doing nothing carries its own risk.fishmike wrote:mreinman wrote:what does this have to do with the Nets? Im sorry... what draft picks did we include for Rose? Which picks will we be including for Noah?crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:mreinman wrote:crzymdups wrote:nixluva wrote:Just for a frame of reference of why the Knicks are after Noah. RoLo was a good player but in order to get Rose that was the price. The only real issue is if Rose fails to play well. If he plays well then there's literally nothing to bytch about. If he gets hurt he comes off the cap so in the end it's a worthy gamble. With regard to Noah he had shoulder surgery, which of course isn't good but it wasn't his knees!!! People can be concerned about him missing games but in terms of helping this team Noah could end up being a good fit if we can get him to play about 75 games and be healthy for the playoffs i'd take that. Having quality depth behind Noah should also help to keep minutes down. I really hope that the Knicks will have quite a few big leads which would allow for more rest. Think of how Curry barely played in 4th qtrs. Having more games where the Knicks are up big and into the bench has to be a hoped for goal. |
|
JrZyHuStLa
Posts: 25677 Alba Posts: 3 Joined: 1/5/2007 Member: #1241 |
fishmike wrote:crzymdups wrote:I think he'd be a great fit here and fans would love his hustle.100% correct... but he is ALWAYS hurt. He has never been able to stay healthy in his career. Now with smaller lineup and KP playing some 5 potentially he should be able to keep his minutes reasonable, but whats the contract? I mean he's a great player.. even all banged up he embarrassed Lopez last year. How is he "ALWAYS" hurt? For his career, he's played in 572 games out of 738. That's 78% of games played. That number increases to 83% if you remove last season (543 games played out of 656), his worst season in terms of health. Is he going to be the league's iron man? No. Are his injury issues from last season an indicator of future health issues, perhaps. But I wouldn't say he's always hurt. |
|
Welpee
Posts: 23162 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/22/2016 Member: #6239 |
Don't forget, 2011-12 was a lockout season. Only 66 total games.
|
|
anrst
Posts: 22707 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/7/2005 Member: #1054 USA |
i don't have confidence he has any game left or can stay healthy for two straight weeks, let alone two straight months. we better not overpay.
i do like him as a leader though. we havent' had someone like that since Kidd. |
|
fishmike
Posts: 53902 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
JrZyHuStLa wrote:He's averaged 64 games a season. That is missing more than a month and half a year on average, almost 20 games a year. That's a lot. 78% doesn't seem so bad, but its pretty bad. IT would be like signing him but he can play until Christmas... dude is hurt a lot and misses a lot of games. Im a fan but its part of the picture with Noah.fishmike wrote:crzymdups wrote:I think he'd be a great fit here and fans would love his hustle.100% correct... but he is ALWAYS hurt. He has never been able to stay healthy in his career. Now with smaller lineup and KP playing some 5 potentially he should be able to keep his minutes reasonable, but whats the contract? I mean he's a great player.. even all banged up he embarrassed Lopez last year. Better start warming up to him now... Sure sounds like he's gonna be the guy. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/13/2011 Member: #3370 |
fishmike wrote:JrZyHuStLa wrote:He's averaged 64 games a season. That is missing more than a month and half a year on average, almost 20 games a year. That's a lot. 78% doesn't seem so bad, but its pretty bad. IT would be like signing him but he can play until Christmas... dude is hurt a lot and misses a lot of games. Im a fan but its part of the picture with Noah.fishmike wrote:crzymdups wrote:I think he'd be a great fit here and fans would love his hustle.100% correct... but he is ALWAYS hurt. He has never been able to stay healthy in his career. Now with smaller lineup and KP playing some 5 potentially he should be able to keep his minutes reasonable, but whats the contract? I mean he's a great player.. even all banged up he embarrassed Lopez last year. Not for nothing, but Robin Lopez averages 68. |
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
Knickoftime wrote:fishmike wrote:JrZyHuStLa wrote:He's averaged 64 games a season. That is missing more than a month and half a year on average, almost 20 games a year. That's a lot. 78% doesn't seem so bad, but its pretty bad. IT would be like signing him but he can play until Christmas... dude is hurt a lot and misses a lot of games. Im a fan but its part of the picture with Noah.fishmike wrote:crzymdups wrote:I think he'd be a great fit here and fans would love his hustle.100% correct... but he is ALWAYS hurt. He has never been able to stay healthy in his career. Now with smaller lineup and KP playing some 5 potentially he should be able to keep his minutes reasonable, but whats the contract? I mean he's a great player.. even all banged up he embarrassed Lopez last year. he played all 82 3 out of the last 4 years. recent history is more indicative than what he did at the start of his career. He's been quite durable. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|