[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Allen Crabbe
Author Thread
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/10/2016  12:15 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
wargames wrote:I actually like Allen Crabbe a lot too and think he would be a realistic RFA to steal. Portland has its starters at SG in McCollum and a reserve wings in Harkless and Henderson and needs as much cap room as possible to try and get a big. If he accepts an offer early they will likely let him go because they wouldn't want that cap space tied up as they try to attract FA's like Whiteside or Horford with Max contracts. (on the low I think the Blazers are going to go hard to get Whiteside he fits their youth movement and is the rim protector they desperately need)

Crabbe is likely going to be a lot cheaper to attempt to acquire than say Bazemore, or Fournier. Bazemore is likely gone from Atlanta but is going to get paid. I also doubt Orlando doesn't match Fournier's contract since he has developed into a high level scorer for them and is their best SG.

Crabbe will probably never be a star in the league, but he could become a reliable starter.

Crabbe's efficient, plays off the ball, scores off of catch and shoot situation from running over screens, scores well in transition, can shoot the 3 very well, and is a ok defender.

Crabbe probably could avg around 10-15 ppg as a starter in the triangle due to opponents focusing on KP and Melo and his outside shot would make it easier for guys like Wroten and Grant to score off of drives by forcing defenses to guard him on the perimeter creating space.

Yeah he seems to fit in more efficiently than Bazemore--these other guys are just out of our league financially. Its going to cost some cash--8-9mm for Crabbe 7mm for Curry--but I think --well I know I like both a lot. I also like that back up center from San Antonio.


Im pretty much set on my wish list barring a really great player wanting to play in NY or a Carmelo trade.

My personal priority free agent list

#1 Seth Curry--Im willing to pay between 7-8mma year(the new MLE)
#2 Allen Crabbe--Im willing to pay slightly above the MLE 9mm
#3 Boban M willing to pay up to 5mm for 3 years.


Draft
Round 1 past 15
The two players I like
A Denzell Valentine
B Malik Beasley

Round 2
In order of appeal

#1 Bryn Forbes
#2 Derrick Jones
#3 Patric McCaw
#4 Ben Bentil


Undrafted Daniel Ocheku

Also its impossible to take into account a falling rock but I like this list.

Well at least you've moved away from giving Seth Curry $10 mil per and changed it to $7 mil per which sounds more reasonable.

AUTOADVERT
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/19/2014
Member: #5816

5/10/2016  12:19 PM
How many offers can a team have out to RFA's at one time?? Can they only have one offer on the table at a time or can they have multiple offers out at one time??
martin
Posts: 80093
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/10/2016  12:27 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34075
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

5/10/2016  12:37 PM
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/10/2016  12:54 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams


I post the Win Share 48 List here to show where the guys like Crabbe sit currently. Also Tyler Johnson, Ian Clark and Troy Daniels are also guys to keep in mind.

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
01 Mike Conley PG 28 MEM 56 1760 19.4 .538 .309 .329 5.3 32.9 2.0 0.8 9.5 22.6 5.4 .147 3.7 -1.9 1.7 1.7
02 D.J. Augustin PG 28 TOT 56 1061 14.3 .582 .479 .371 4.6 25.1 1.6 0.2 16.5 17.8 2.6 .120 1.3 -2.6 -1.3 0.2
03 Ramon Sessions PG 29 WAS 75 1469 15.0 .556 .186 .498 7.0 19.3 1.4 0.3 13.6 21.7 2.9 .095 -0.9 -1.4 -2.3 -0.1
04 Brandon Jennings PG 26 TOT 44 799 14.1 .495 .514 .269 6.3 28.8 1.6 0.6 13.8 20.4 1.5 .090 0.7 -1.7 -1.0 0.2
05 Rajon Rondo PG 29 SAC 70 2466 16.8 .504 .218 .189 9.2 47.9 2.7 0.3 25.0 18.8 4.4 .085 0.7 0.2 0.9 1.8
06 Donald Sloan PG 28 BRK 54 1164 13.8 .540 .285 .325 7.9 29.0 1.3 0.2 18.2 15.9 1.7 .072 -0.4 -1.7 -2.1 0.0

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
07 Isaiah Canaan PG 24 PHI 74 1880 10.9 .527 .671 .248 4.8 11.3 1.4 0.4 10.6 19.8 1.3 .034 0.1 -2.9 -2.8 -0.4
08 Ish Smith PG 27 TOT 70 1993 15.3 .460 .161 .181 7.5 39.4 2.0 0.7 13.8 24.4 1.2 .028 -0.4 -1.0 -1.4 0.3
09 Ty Lawson PG 28 TOT 59 1257 9.5 .485 .319 .256 4.3 23.2 1.9 0.4 19.8 14.9 0.6 .024 -2.7 -2.1 -4.8 -0.9
10 Norris Cole PG 27 NOP 45 1198 10.9 .465 .211 .134 7.0 22.1 1.5 0.3 12.8 21.7 0.0 -0.002 -2.3 -1.2 -3.5 -0.5
11 Greivis Vasquez PG 29 MIL 17 374 8.8 .456 .482 .219 6.1 28.9 1.1 0.0 19.9 18.8 -0.1 -0.009 -2.3 -3.7 -6.0 -0.4

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
01 Kevin Durant SF 27 OKC 67 2403 28.1 .634 .339 .359 12.6 24.0 1.3 2.6 13.5 30.4 13.5 .269 6.8 1.0 7.8 6.0
02 Luol Deng SF 30 MIA 66 2117 14.9 .545 .345 .267 10.3 8.4 1.6 1.0 8.3 17.4 5.6 .128 1.1 0.5 1.6 1.9
03 Michael Beasley SF 27 HOU 13 257 22.6 .572 .054 .209 14.6 6.8 1.5 2.6 9.5 30.0 0.6 .114 -1.4 -2.9 -4.3 -0.1
04 Harrison Barnes SF 23 GSW 59 1812 12.0 .544 .316 .225 8.5 8.1 1.1 0.4 7.4 15.8 4.3 .113 0.1 -0.5 -0.4 0.7
05 Evan Fournier SF 23 ORL 71 2277 14.4 .579 .425 .249 4.9 12.7 1.9 0.1 10.8 19.7 5.0 .106 1.9 -1.4 0.6 1.5
06 Solomon Hill SF 24 IND 51 660 10.7 .499 .326 .243 10.0 9.6 1.9 1.2 11.1 12.0 1.4 .105 -2.0 1.3 -0.7 0.2
07 Kent Bazemore SF 26 ATL 70 1935 12.9 .547 .416 .206 9.6 12.1 2.2 1.3 14.4 19.8 3.5 .088 -1.4 1.3 -0.1 0.9
08 Maurice Harkless SF 22 POR 71 1263 12.6 .544 .353 .274 9.9 7.0 1.5 1.7 12.9 15.3 2.3 .086 -0.8 0.0 -0.9 0.4
09 Chase Budinger SF 27 TOT 60 865 10.6 .506 .366 .223 8.9 9.6 1.7 0.8 13.1 14.3 1.4 .075 -2.1 0.3 -1.7 0.1

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
10 Jeff Green SF 29 TOT 72 2052 12.9 .512 .259 .265 8.5 10.0 1.3 1.5 9.3 19.8 2.9 .069 -1.0 -0.7 -1.6 0.2
11 Garrett Temple SF 29 WAS 73 1812 9.1 .518 .511 .246 6.0 9.7 1.7 0.7 9.4 13.9 2.5 .065 -1.0 0.0 -1.0 0.4
12 Lance Thomas SF 27 NYK 59 1313 10.5 .557 .285 .312 5.5 6.4 0.9 0.4 11.6 16.9 1.7 .061 -1.1 -2.1 -3.2 -0.4
13 Jarell Eddie SF 24 WAS 22 99 10.8 .492 .791 .093 8.0 3.0 1.0 0.8 2.2 20.3 0.1 .047 -1.3 -4.3 -5.6 -0.1
14 Cleanthony Early SF 24 NYK 11 34 7.0 .583 .667 .000 3.2 4.4 1.5 2.2 14.3 9.3 0.0 .042 -2.8 -0.6 -3.3 0.0
15 Sergey Karasev SF 22 BRK 38 366 8.9 .584 .515 .379 7.7 10.6 0.8 0.4 19.8 11.8 0.3 .040 -2.2 -1.8 -4.0 -0.2
16 P.J. Hairston SF 23 TOT 62 1251 7.0 .473 .590 .158 7.2 4.5 1.2 0.7 8.7 16.2 0.7 .025 -2.6 -1.4 -3.9 -0.6


Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
01 DeMar DeRozan SG 26 TOR 73 2640 21.5 .551 .102 .483 7.0 20.4 1.5 0.7 9.5 29.7 9.3 .169 2.6 -1.2 1.4 2.3
02 Tyler Johnson SG 23 MIA 36 863 13.8 .581 .289 .264 7.2 14.1 1.4 1.3 14.8 16.8 2.1 .114 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.5
03 Troy Daniels SG 24 CHO 39 386 14.7 .613 .626 .058 6.8 7.2 1.0 0.6 10.2 20.7 0.8 .105 1.1 -2.8 -1.7 0.0
04 Nicolas Batum SG 27 CHO 65 2317 15.8 .549 .460 .226 9.7 26.5 1.3 1.5 17.7 21.3 4.9 .101 1.2 1.1 2.3 2.5
05 Leandro Barbosa SG 33 GSW 62 980 12.1 .545 .297 .182 5.6 11.4 2.1 0.7 11.3 18.2 0.9 .099 -1.0 -0.9 -1.9 0.0
06 Allen Crabbe SG 23 POR 74 1925 12.2 .568 .416 .158 5.6 7.2 1.5 0.6 8.1 16.6 3.9 .098 0.3 -1.1 -0.8 0.6
07 Brandon Rush SG 30 GSW 65 990 10.3 .556 .593 .114 9.1 7.3 1.0 1.5 10.1 12.5 1.9 .093 -1.1 -0.1 -1.2 0.2
08 Evan Turner SG 27 BOS 74 2051 13.6 .507 .114 .237 9.4 24.0 1.7 0.9 16.7 18.5 3.7 .086 -2.0 1.3 -0.7 0.7
09 Courtney Lee SG 30 TOT 71 2088 12.0 .566 .341 .195 4.9 8.9 1.8 1.0 9.8 14.9 2.2 .086 -0.2 -0.3 -0.5 0.8

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
10 Ian Clark SG 24 GSW 61 556 12.0 .549 .415 .170 6.5 15.6 1.4 1.6 16.3 19.9 0.9 .080 -1.5 -1.3 -2.9 -0.1
11 Bradley Beal SG 22 WAS 50 1554 15.6 .547 .336 .219 6.2 15.5 1.5 0.5 11.1 25.4 2.5 .076 1.0 -1.7 -0.8 0.5
12 Jerryd Bayless SG 27 MIL 52 1505 12.5 .568 .529 .206 5.3 16.2 1.6 0.6 13.3 16.5 2.4 .076 1.1 -2.1 -1.0 0.4
13 E'Twaun Moore SG 26 CHI 56 1182 11.5 .553 .263 .096 5.5 11.9 1.4 1.0 11.8 15.9 1.8 .074 -1.1 -0.6 -1.7 0.1
14 Eric Gordon SG 27 NOP 45 1481 13.6 .565 .533 .226 3.7 12.8 1.4 0.8 10.7 20.3 2.2 .072 1.7 -2.0 -0.3 0.6
15 Gerald Henderson SG 28 POR 66 1290 13.0 .527 .268 .272 8.3 7.8 1.3 1.2 10.0 20.0 1.9 .071 -2.0 -1.3 -3.3 -0.4

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
16 Arron Afflalo SG 30 NYK 65 2200 11.1 .534 .294 .168 6.1 9.8 0.5 0.3 8.8 18.1 2.5 .055 -0.5 -1.8 -2.3 -0.2
17 Kevin Martin SG 32 TOT 50 995 11.4 .516 .313 .412 5.5 8.5 1.1 0.2 9.3 22.7 1.0 .050 -1.4 -3.4 -4.8 -0.7
18 Dion Waiters SG 24 OKC 71 1967 9.0 .490 .338 .204 5.1 9.4 1.8 0.5 13.4 17.4 1.8 .044 -1.7 -0.6 -2.4 -0.2
19 Jordan Clarkson SG 23 LAL 72 2315 14.5 .515 .277 .190 6.6 14.2 1.7 0.2 10.1 22.9 2.0 .041 0.6 -2.1 -1.5 0.3
20 Markel Brown SG 24 BRK 54 772 10.9 .510 .398 .343 6.3 13.6 1.8 0.7 12.8 18.1 0.6 .040 -1.1 -1.9 -3.0 -0.2
21 Gerald Green SG 30 MIA 62 1438 9.2 .480 .443 .158 6.0 5.7 1.1 1.0 7.5 19.6 1.1 .037 -1.8 -1.7 -3.5 -0.5
22 Sasha Vujacic SG 31 NYK 55 745 9.4 .463 .509 .147 8.8 13.9 2.1 0.3 13.4 16.7 0.5 .030 -1.8 -0.7 -2.5 -0.1
23 Randy Foye SG 32 TOT 74 1500 7.6 .458 .532 .151 5.5 14.3 1.2 1.3 14.0 15.7 0.4 .013 -2.2 -1.3 -3.4 -0.5
24 O.J. Mayo SG 28 MIL 41 1090 7.7 .474 .505 .125 5.5 15.9 2.2 0.6 17.5 17.0 -0.1 -0.004 -1.9 -1.5 -3.4 -0.4

martin
Posts: 80093
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/10/2016  1:00 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams

Im definitely not the guy to do it cause I haven't seen him play enough but I always start here and loot at progression: http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/crabbal01.html

Shooting across the table and from year to year is very good. 23 years old. Defensive stats are hard to come by and he is still non-starter, but his play has progressed.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

5/10/2016  1:48 PM
nixluva wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams


I post the Win Share 48 List here to show where the guys like Crabbe sit currently. Also Tyler Johnson, Ian Clark and Troy Daniels are also guys to keep in mind.

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
01 Mike Conley PG 28 MEM 56 1760 19.4 .538 .309 .329 5.3 32.9 2.0 0.8 9.5 22.6 5.4 .147 3.7 -1.9 1.7 1.7
02 D.J. Augustin PG 28 TOT 56 1061 14.3 .582 .479 .371 4.6 25.1 1.6 0.2 16.5 17.8 2.6 .120 1.3 -2.6 -1.3 0.2
03 Ramon Sessions PG 29 WAS 75 1469 15.0 .556 .186 .498 7.0 19.3 1.4 0.3 13.6 21.7 2.9 .095 -0.9 -1.4 -2.3 -0.1
04 Brandon Jennings PG 26 TOT 44 799 14.1 .495 .514 .269 6.3 28.8 1.6 0.6 13.8 20.4 1.5 .090 0.7 -1.7 -1.0 0.2
05 Rajon Rondo PG 29 SAC 70 2466 16.8 .504 .218 .189 9.2 47.9 2.7 0.3 25.0 18.8 4.4 .085 0.7 0.2 0.9 1.8
06 Donald Sloan PG 28 BRK 54 1164 13.8 .540 .285 .325 7.9 29.0 1.3 0.2 18.2 15.9 1.7 .072 -0.4 -1.7 -2.1 0.0

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
07 Isaiah Canaan PG 24 PHI 74 1880 10.9 .527 .671 .248 4.8 11.3 1.4 0.4 10.6 19.8 1.3 .034 0.1 -2.9 -2.8 -0.4
08 Ish Smith PG 27 TOT 70 1993 15.3 .460 .161 .181 7.5 39.4 2.0 0.7 13.8 24.4 1.2 .028 -0.4 -1.0 -1.4 0.3
09 Ty Lawson PG 28 TOT 59 1257 9.5 .485 .319 .256 4.3 23.2 1.9 0.4 19.8 14.9 0.6 .024 -2.7 -2.1 -4.8 -0.9
10 Norris Cole PG 27 NOP 45 1198 10.9 .465 .211 .134 7.0 22.1 1.5 0.3 12.8 21.7 0.0 -0.002 -2.3 -1.2 -3.5 -0.5
11 Greivis Vasquez PG 29 MIL 17 374 8.8 .456 .482 .219 6.1 28.9 1.1 0.0 19.9 18.8 -0.1 -0.009 -2.3 -3.7 -6.0 -0.4

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
01 Kevin Durant SF 27 OKC 67 2403 28.1 .634 .339 .359 12.6 24.0 1.3 2.6 13.5 30.4 13.5 .269 6.8 1.0 7.8 6.0
02 Luol Deng SF 30 MIA 66 2117 14.9 .545 .345 .267 10.3 8.4 1.6 1.0 8.3 17.4 5.6 .128 1.1 0.5 1.6 1.9
03 Michael Beasley SF 27 HOU 13 257 22.6 .572 .054 .209 14.6 6.8 1.5 2.6 9.5 30.0 0.6 .114 -1.4 -2.9 -4.3 -0.1
04 Harrison Barnes SF 23 GSW 59 1812 12.0 .544 .316 .225 8.5 8.1 1.1 0.4 7.4 15.8 4.3 .113 0.1 -0.5 -0.4 0.7
05 Evan Fournier SF 23 ORL 71 2277 14.4 .579 .425 .249 4.9 12.7 1.9 0.1 10.8 19.7 5.0 .106 1.9 -1.4 0.6 1.5
06 Solomon Hill SF 24 IND 51 660 10.7 .499 .326 .243 10.0 9.6 1.9 1.2 11.1 12.0 1.4 .105 -2.0 1.3 -0.7 0.2
07 Kent Bazemore SF 26 ATL 70 1935 12.9 .547 .416 .206 9.6 12.1 2.2 1.3 14.4 19.8 3.5 .088 -1.4 1.3 -0.1 0.9
08 Maurice Harkless SF 22 POR 71 1263 12.6 .544 .353 .274 9.9 7.0 1.5 1.7 12.9 15.3 2.3 .086 -0.8 0.0 -0.9 0.4
09 Chase Budinger SF 27 TOT 60 865 10.6 .506 .366 .223 8.9 9.6 1.7 0.8 13.1 14.3 1.4 .075 -2.1 0.3 -1.7 0.1

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
10 Jeff Green SF 29 TOT 72 2052 12.9 .512 .259 .265 8.5 10.0 1.3 1.5 9.3 19.8 2.9 .069 -1.0 -0.7 -1.6 0.2
11 Garrett Temple SF 29 WAS 73 1812 9.1 .518 .511 .246 6.0 9.7 1.7 0.7 9.4 13.9 2.5 .065 -1.0 0.0 -1.0 0.4
12 Lance Thomas SF 27 NYK 59 1313 10.5 .557 .285 .312 5.5 6.4 0.9 0.4 11.6 16.9 1.7 .061 -1.1 -2.1 -3.2 -0.4
13 Jarell Eddie SF 24 WAS 22 99 10.8 .492 .791 .093 8.0 3.0 1.0 0.8 2.2 20.3 0.1 .047 -1.3 -4.3 -5.6 -0.1
14 Cleanthony Early SF 24 NYK 11 34 7.0 .583 .667 .000 3.2 4.4 1.5 2.2 14.3 9.3 0.0 .042 -2.8 -0.6 -3.3 0.0
15 Sergey Karasev SF 22 BRK 38 366 8.9 .584 .515 .379 7.7 10.6 0.8 0.4 19.8 11.8 0.3 .040 -2.2 -1.8 -4.0 -0.2
16 P.J. Hairston SF 23 TOT 62 1251 7.0 .473 .590 .158 7.2 4.5 1.2 0.7 8.7 16.2 0.7 .025 -2.6 -1.4 -3.9 -0.6


Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
01 DeMar DeRozan SG 26 TOR 73 2640 21.5 .551 .102 .483 7.0 20.4 1.5 0.7 9.5 29.7 9.3 .169 2.6 -1.2 1.4 2.3
02 Tyler Johnson SG 23 MIA 36 863 13.8 .581 .289 .264 7.2 14.1 1.4 1.3 14.8 16.8 2.1 .114 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.5
03 Troy Daniels SG 24 CHO 39 386 14.7 .613 .626 .058 6.8 7.2 1.0 0.6 10.2 20.7 0.8 .105 1.1 -2.8 -1.7 0.0
04 Nicolas Batum SG 27 CHO 65 2317 15.8 .549 .460 .226 9.7 26.5 1.3 1.5 17.7 21.3 4.9 .101 1.2 1.1 2.3 2.5
05 Leandro Barbosa SG 33 GSW 62 980 12.1 .545 .297 .182 5.6 11.4 2.1 0.7 11.3 18.2 0.9 .099 -1.0 -0.9 -1.9 0.0
06 Allen Crabbe SG 23 POR 74 1925 12.2 .568 .416 .158 5.6 7.2 1.5 0.6 8.1 16.6 3.9 .098 0.3 -1.1 -0.8 0.6
07 Brandon Rush SG 30 GSW 65 990 10.3 .556 .593 .114 9.1 7.3 1.0 1.5 10.1 12.5 1.9 .093 -1.1 -0.1 -1.2 0.2
08 Evan Turner SG 27 BOS 74 2051 13.6 .507 .114 .237 9.4 24.0 1.7 0.9 16.7 18.5 3.7 .086 -2.0 1.3 -0.7 0.7
09 Courtney Lee SG 30 TOT 71 2088 12.0 .566 .341 .195 4.9 8.9 1.8 1.0 9.8 14.9 2.2 .086 -0.2 -0.3 -0.5 0.8

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
10 Ian Clark SG 24 GSW 61 556 12.0 .549 .415 .170 6.5 15.6 1.4 1.6 16.3 19.9 0.9 .080 -1.5 -1.3 -2.9 -0.1
11 Bradley Beal SG 22 WAS 50 1554 15.6 .547 .336 .219 6.2 15.5 1.5 0.5 11.1 25.4 2.5 .076 1.0 -1.7 -0.8 0.5
12 Jerryd Bayless SG 27 MIL 52 1505 12.5 .568 .529 .206 5.3 16.2 1.6 0.6 13.3 16.5 2.4 .076 1.1 -2.1 -1.0 0.4
13 E'Twaun Moore SG 26 CHI 56 1182 11.5 .553 .263 .096 5.5 11.9 1.4 1.0 11.8 15.9 1.8 .074 -1.1 -0.6 -1.7 0.1
14 Eric Gordon SG 27 NOP 45 1481 13.6 .565 .533 .226 3.7 12.8 1.4 0.8 10.7 20.3 2.2 .072 1.7 -2.0 -0.3 0.6
15 Gerald Henderson SG 28 POR 66 1290 13.0 .527 .268 .272 8.3 7.8 1.3 1.2 10.0 20.0 1.9 .071 -2.0 -1.3 -3.3 -0.4

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
16 Arron Afflalo SG 30 NYK 65 2200 11.1 .534 .294 .168 6.1 9.8 0.5 0.3 8.8 18.1 2.5 .055 -0.5 -1.8 -2.3 -0.2
17 Kevin Martin SG 32 TOT 50 995 11.4 .516 .313 .412 5.5 8.5 1.1 0.2 9.3 22.7 1.0 .050 -1.4 -3.4 -4.8 -0.7
18 Dion Waiters SG 24 OKC 71 1967 9.0 .490 .338 .204 5.1 9.4 1.8 0.5 13.4 17.4 1.8 .044 -1.7 -0.6 -2.4 -0.2
19 Jordan Clarkson SG 23 LAL 72 2315 14.5 .515 .277 .190 6.6 14.2 1.7 0.2 10.1 22.9 2.0 .041 0.6 -2.1 -1.5 0.3
20 Markel Brown SG 24 BRK 54 772 10.9 .510 .398 .343 6.3 13.6 1.8 0.7 12.8 18.1 0.6 .040 -1.1 -1.9 -3.0 -0.2
21 Gerald Green SG 30 MIA 62 1438 9.2 .480 .443 .158 6.0 5.7 1.1 1.0 7.5 19.6 1.1 .037 -1.8 -1.7 -3.5 -0.5
22 Sasha Vujacic SG 31 NYK 55 745 9.4 .463 .509 .147 8.8 13.9 2.1 0.3 13.4 16.7 0.5 .030 -1.8 -0.7 -2.5 -0.1
23 Randy Foye SG 32 TOT 74 1500 7.6 .458 .532 .151 5.5 14.3 1.2 1.3 14.0 15.7 0.4 .013 -2.2 -1.3 -3.4 -0.5
24 O.J. Mayo SG 28 MIL 41 1090 7.7 .474 .505 .125 5.5 15.9 2.2 0.6 17.5 17.0 -0.1 -0.004 -1.9 -1.5 -3.4 -0.4

This is a really great list. It definitely puts Crabbe in perspective and he is't a bad player player and holds his own stat wise with other Starter Quality/roleplayer SG. Another name I highlighted is Solomon Hill. He also looks like he could be a a steal based on his production/skill and the fact that beyond 2.5 million the Pacers won't be able to match any offer he takes.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
martin
Posts: 80093
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/10/2016  1:55 PM
wargames wrote:This is a really great list. It definitely puts Crabbe in perspective and he is't a bad player player and holds his own stat wise with other Starter Quality/roleplayer SG. Another name I highlighted is Solomon Hill. He also looks like he could be a a steal based on his production/skill and the fact that beyond 2.5 million the Pacers won't be able to match any offer he takes.

If the Knicks came away with Hill and Crabee, I'd be 100% satisfied. 3 year deals. Cap numbers are so whackey I wouldn't know where to start but something in the $5-7M and $8-10M range respectively.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34075
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

5/10/2016  1:58 PM
wargames wrote:
nixluva wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams


I post the Win Share 48 List here to show where the guys like Crabbe sit currently. Also Tyler Johnson, Ian Clark and Troy Daniels are also guys to keep in mind.

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
01 Mike Conley PG 28 MEM 56 1760 19.4 .538 .309 .329 5.3 32.9 2.0 0.8 9.5 22.6 5.4 .147 3.7 -1.9 1.7 1.7
02 D.J. Augustin PG 28 TOT 56 1061 14.3 .582 .479 .371 4.6 25.1 1.6 0.2 16.5 17.8 2.6 .120 1.3 -2.6 -1.3 0.2
03 Ramon Sessions PG 29 WAS 75 1469 15.0 .556 .186 .498 7.0 19.3 1.4 0.3 13.6 21.7 2.9 .095 -0.9 -1.4 -2.3 -0.1
04 Brandon Jennings PG 26 TOT 44 799 14.1 .495 .514 .269 6.3 28.8 1.6 0.6 13.8 20.4 1.5 .090 0.7 -1.7 -1.0 0.2
05 Rajon Rondo PG 29 SAC 70 2466 16.8 .504 .218 .189 9.2 47.9 2.7 0.3 25.0 18.8 4.4 .085 0.7 0.2 0.9 1.8
06 Donald Sloan PG 28 BRK 54 1164 13.8 .540 .285 .325 7.9 29.0 1.3 0.2 18.2 15.9 1.7 .072 -0.4 -1.7 -2.1 0.0

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
07 Isaiah Canaan PG 24 PHI 74 1880 10.9 .527 .671 .248 4.8 11.3 1.4 0.4 10.6 19.8 1.3 .034 0.1 -2.9 -2.8 -0.4
08 Ish Smith PG 27 TOT 70 1993 15.3 .460 .161 .181 7.5 39.4 2.0 0.7 13.8 24.4 1.2 .028 -0.4 -1.0 -1.4 0.3
09 Ty Lawson PG 28 TOT 59 1257 9.5 .485 .319 .256 4.3 23.2 1.9 0.4 19.8 14.9 0.6 .024 -2.7 -2.1 -4.8 -0.9
10 Norris Cole PG 27 NOP 45 1198 10.9 .465 .211 .134 7.0 22.1 1.5 0.3 12.8 21.7 0.0 -0.002 -2.3 -1.2 -3.5 -0.5
11 Greivis Vasquez PG 29 MIL 17 374 8.8 .456 .482 .219 6.1 28.9 1.1 0.0 19.9 18.8 -0.1 -0.009 -2.3 -3.7 -6.0 -0.4

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
01 Kevin Durant SF 27 OKC 67 2403 28.1 .634 .339 .359 12.6 24.0 1.3 2.6 13.5 30.4 13.5 .269 6.8 1.0 7.8 6.0
02 Luol Deng SF 30 MIA 66 2117 14.9 .545 .345 .267 10.3 8.4 1.6 1.0 8.3 17.4 5.6 .128 1.1 0.5 1.6 1.9
03 Michael Beasley SF 27 HOU 13 257 22.6 .572 .054 .209 14.6 6.8 1.5 2.6 9.5 30.0 0.6 .114 -1.4 -2.9 -4.3 -0.1
04 Harrison Barnes SF 23 GSW 59 1812 12.0 .544 .316 .225 8.5 8.1 1.1 0.4 7.4 15.8 4.3 .113 0.1 -0.5 -0.4 0.7
05 Evan Fournier SF 23 ORL 71 2277 14.4 .579 .425 .249 4.9 12.7 1.9 0.1 10.8 19.7 5.0 .106 1.9 -1.4 0.6 1.5
06 Solomon Hill SF 24 IND 51 660 10.7 .499 .326 .243 10.0 9.6 1.9 1.2 11.1 12.0 1.4 .105 -2.0 1.3 -0.7 0.2
07 Kent Bazemore SF 26 ATL 70 1935 12.9 .547 .416 .206 9.6 12.1 2.2 1.3 14.4 19.8 3.5 .088 -1.4 1.3 -0.1 0.9
08 Maurice Harkless SF 22 POR 71 1263 12.6 .544 .353 .274 9.9 7.0 1.5 1.7 12.9 15.3 2.3 .086 -0.8 0.0 -0.9 0.4
09 Chase Budinger SF 27 TOT 60 865 10.6 .506 .366 .223 8.9 9.6 1.7 0.8 13.1 14.3 1.4 .075 -2.1 0.3 -1.7 0.1

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
10 Jeff Green SF 29 TOT 72 2052 12.9 .512 .259 .265 8.5 10.0 1.3 1.5 9.3 19.8 2.9 .069 -1.0 -0.7 -1.6 0.2
11 Garrett Temple SF 29 WAS 73 1812 9.1 .518 .511 .246 6.0 9.7 1.7 0.7 9.4 13.9 2.5 .065 -1.0 0.0 -1.0 0.4
12 Lance Thomas SF 27 NYK 59 1313 10.5 .557 .285 .312 5.5 6.4 0.9 0.4 11.6 16.9 1.7 .061 -1.1 -2.1 -3.2 -0.4
13 Jarell Eddie SF 24 WAS 22 99 10.8 .492 .791 .093 8.0 3.0 1.0 0.8 2.2 20.3 0.1 .047 -1.3 -4.3 -5.6 -0.1
14 Cleanthony Early SF 24 NYK 11 34 7.0 .583 .667 .000 3.2 4.4 1.5 2.2 14.3 9.3 0.0 .042 -2.8 -0.6 -3.3 0.0
15 Sergey Karasev SF 22 BRK 38 366 8.9 .584 .515 .379 7.7 10.6 0.8 0.4 19.8 11.8 0.3 .040 -2.2 -1.8 -4.0 -0.2
16 P.J. Hairston SF 23 TOT 62 1251 7.0 .473 .590 .158 7.2 4.5 1.2 0.7 8.7 16.2 0.7 .025 -2.6 -1.4 -3.9 -0.6


Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
01 DeMar DeRozan SG 26 TOR 73 2640 21.5 .551 .102 .483 7.0 20.4 1.5 0.7 9.5 29.7 9.3 .169 2.6 -1.2 1.4 2.3
02 Tyler Johnson SG 23 MIA 36 863 13.8 .581 .289 .264 7.2 14.1 1.4 1.3 14.8 16.8 2.1 .114 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.5
03 Troy Daniels SG 24 CHO 39 386 14.7 .613 .626 .058 6.8 7.2 1.0 0.6 10.2 20.7 0.8 .105 1.1 -2.8 -1.7 0.0
04 Nicolas Batum SG 27 CHO 65 2317 15.8 .549 .460 .226 9.7 26.5 1.3 1.5 17.7 21.3 4.9 .101 1.2 1.1 2.3 2.5
05 Leandro Barbosa SG 33 GSW 62 980 12.1 .545 .297 .182 5.6 11.4 2.1 0.7 11.3 18.2 0.9 .099 -1.0 -0.9 -1.9 0.0
06 Allen Crabbe SG 23 POR 74 1925 12.2 .568 .416 .158 5.6 7.2 1.5 0.6 8.1 16.6 3.9 .098 0.3 -1.1 -0.8 0.6
07 Brandon Rush SG 30 GSW 65 990 10.3 .556 .593 .114 9.1 7.3 1.0 1.5 10.1 12.5 1.9 .093 -1.1 -0.1 -1.2 0.2
08 Evan Turner SG 27 BOS 74 2051 13.6 .507 .114 .237 9.4 24.0 1.7 0.9 16.7 18.5 3.7 .086 -2.0 1.3 -0.7 0.7
09 Courtney Lee SG 30 TOT 71 2088 12.0 .566 .341 .195 4.9 8.9 1.8 1.0 9.8 14.9 2.2 .086 -0.2 -0.3 -0.5 0.8

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
10 Ian Clark SG 24 GSW 61 556 12.0 .549 .415 .170 6.5 15.6 1.4 1.6 16.3 19.9 0.9 .080 -1.5 -1.3 -2.9 -0.1
11 Bradley Beal SG 22 WAS 50 1554 15.6 .547 .336 .219 6.2 15.5 1.5 0.5 11.1 25.4 2.5 .076 1.0 -1.7 -0.8 0.5
12 Jerryd Bayless SG 27 MIL 52 1505 12.5 .568 .529 .206 5.3 16.2 1.6 0.6 13.3 16.5 2.4 .076 1.1 -2.1 -1.0 0.4
13 E'Twaun Moore SG 26 CHI 56 1182 11.5 .553 .263 .096 5.5 11.9 1.4 1.0 11.8 15.9 1.8 .074 -1.1 -0.6 -1.7 0.1
14 Eric Gordon SG 27 NOP 45 1481 13.6 .565 .533 .226 3.7 12.8 1.4 0.8 10.7 20.3 2.2 .072 1.7 -2.0 -0.3 0.6
15 Gerald Henderson SG 28 POR 66 1290 13.0 .527 .268 .272 8.3 7.8 1.3 1.2 10.0 20.0 1.9 .071 -2.0 -1.3 -3.3 -0.4

Rk Player Pos Age Tm G MP PER TS% 3PAr FTr TRB% AST% STL% BLK% TOV% USG% WS WS/48 ▾ OBPM DBPM BPM VORP
16 Arron Afflalo SG 30 NYK 65 2200 11.1 .534 .294 .168 6.1 9.8 0.5 0.3 8.8 18.1 2.5 .055 -0.5 -1.8 -2.3 -0.2
17 Kevin Martin SG 32 TOT 50 995 11.4 .516 .313 .412 5.5 8.5 1.1 0.2 9.3 22.7 1.0 .050 -1.4 -3.4 -4.8 -0.7
18 Dion Waiters SG 24 OKC 71 1967 9.0 .490 .338 .204 5.1 9.4 1.8 0.5 13.4 17.4 1.8 .044 -1.7 -0.6 -2.4 -0.2
19 Jordan Clarkson SG 23 LAL 72 2315 14.5 .515 .277 .190 6.6 14.2 1.7 0.2 10.1 22.9 2.0 .041 0.6 -2.1 -1.5 0.3
20 Markel Brown SG 24 BRK 54 772 10.9 .510 .398 .343 6.3 13.6 1.8 0.7 12.8 18.1 0.6 .040 -1.1 -1.9 -3.0 -0.2
21 Gerald Green SG 30 MIA 62 1438 9.2 .480 .443 .158 6.0 5.7 1.1 1.0 7.5 19.6 1.1 .037 -1.8 -1.7 -3.5 -0.5
22 Sasha Vujacic SG 31 NYK 55 745 9.4 .463 .509 .147 8.8 13.9 2.1 0.3 13.4 16.7 0.5 .030 -1.8 -0.7 -2.5 -0.1
23 Randy Foye SG 32 TOT 74 1500 7.6 .458 .532 .151 5.5 14.3 1.2 1.3 14.0 15.7 0.4 .013 -2.2 -1.3 -3.4 -0.5
24 O.J. Mayo SG 28 MIL 41 1090 7.7 .474 .505 .125 5.5 15.9 2.2 0.6 17.5 17.0 -0.1 -0.004 -1.9 -1.5 -3.4 -0.4

This is a really great list. It definitely puts Crabbe in perspective and he is't a bad player player and holds his own stat wise with other Starter Quality/roleplayer SG. Another name I highlighted is Solomon Hill. He also looks like he could be a a steal based on his production/skill and the fact that beyond 2.5 million the Pacers won't be able to match any offer he takes.

I agree. Thank you nixluva

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

5/10/2016  1:59 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/10/2016  2:00 PM
martin wrote:
wargames wrote:This is a really great list. It definitely puts Crabbe in perspective and he is't a bad player player and holds his own stat wise with other Starter Quality/roleplayer SG. Another name I highlighted is Solomon Hill. He also looks like he could be a a steal based on his production/skill and the fact that beyond 2.5 million the Pacers won't be able to match any offer he takes.

If the Knicks came away with Hill and Crabee, I'd be 100% satisfied. 3 year deals. Cap numbers are so whackey I wouldn't know where to start but something in the $5-7M and $8-10M range respectively.

I could see them paying a little more but yeah if D-Will and AA don't use their player options that would be a good strategy. If either or both opts out the knicks would then have an addition 13 million to resign guys like D-Will, Lance, Gallo, and Early while not going over the cap if that is the plan. Its not a beat the world team, but it potentially might be enough to go big game hunting in 2017. Even beyond PG's which is a need there are legit some guys who could come in and make the knicks contenders for the foreseeable future.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/10/2016  2:06 PM
wargames wrote:
martin wrote:
wargames wrote:This is a really great list. It definitely puts Crabbe in perspective and he is't a bad player player and holds his own stat wise with other Starter Quality/roleplayer SG. Another name I highlighted is Solomon Hill. He also looks like he could be a a steal based on his production/skill and the fact that beyond 2.5 million the Pacers won't be able to match any offer he takes.

If the Knicks came away with Hill and Crabee, I'd be 100% satisfied. 3 year deals. Cap numbers are so whackey I wouldn't know where to start but something in the $5-7M and $8-10M range respectively.

I could see them paying a little more but yeah if D-Will and AA don't use their player options that would be a good strategy. If either or both opts out the knicks would then have an addition 13 million to resign guys like D-Will, Lance, Gallo, and Early while not going over the cap if that is the plan. Its not a beat the world team, but it potentially might be enough to go big game hunting in 2017. Even beyond PG's which is a need there are legit some guys who could come in and make the knicks contenders for the foreseeable future.


I get the impression Phil will be very interested in these young players that haven't peaked yet. Lower cost but good upside young players. Watching DeRozan in the playoffs, i'm no longer high on him for what he would cost. This FA class is a tease cuz you could easily overspend and not get the value your paying for.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34075
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

5/10/2016  2:06 PM
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams

Im definitely not the guy to do it cause I haven't seen him play enough but I always start here and loot at progression: http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/crabbal01.html

Shooting across the table and from year to year is very good. 23 years old. Defensive stats are hard to come by and he is still non-starter, but his play has progressed.

more of a question for the board... as I've said previously, I would be pumped with an offseason equivalent to Childs and H20. That requires taking a chance on younger guys--just want it to be the right younger guys. Childs was a heralded defender and H20 had a sweet stroke when we signed them but it was still taking a chance...

My struggle with Crabbe is that I haven't seen him play that much and his PER is 12.26. He'll probably get better and the WS nix posted is impressive. What number is right? I don't know. That's why I want someone to say "this skillset is above average and here's why I think he'll live up to or even exceed his contract"

DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

5/10/2016  2:26 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/10/2016  2:26 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams

Im definitely not the guy to do it cause I haven't seen him play enough but I always start here and loot at progression: http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/crabbal01.html

Shooting across the table and from year to year is very good. 23 years old. Defensive stats are hard to come by and he is still non-starter, but his play has progressed.

more of a question for the board... as I've said previously, I would be pumped with an offseason equivalent to Childs and H20. That requires taking a chance on younger guys--just want it to be the right younger guys. Childs was a heralded defender and H20 had a sweet stroke when we signed them but it was still taking a chance...

My struggle with Crabbe is that I haven't seen him play that much and his PER is 12.26. He'll probably get better and the WS nix posted is impressive. What number is right? I don't know. That's why I want someone to say "this skillset is above average and here's why I think he'll live up to or even exceed his contract"

Its not that good of a FA. A lot of guys are going to be overpaid because their is money available and teams will try to improve upon themselves even if that means using their money foolishly. The best thing I think the knicks could do is be frugal in shoring up their obvious holes in the back court (Wroten, some under the radar cheap RFA's) and wait until the much superior 2017 FA class. If the goal is to tank its doable, if the goal is make a playoff push its the same deal. The knicks should look to rebuild using a money ball type strategy

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/10/2016  2:26 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams

Im definitely not the guy to do it cause I haven't seen him play enough but I always start here and loot at progression: http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/crabbal01.html

Shooting across the table and from year to year is very good. 23 years old. Defensive stats are hard to come by and he is still non-starter, but his play has progressed.

more of a question for the board... as I've said previously, I would be pumped with an offseason equivalent to Childs and H20. That requires taking a chance on younger guys--just want it to be the right younger guys. Childs was a heralded defender and H20 had a sweet stroke when we signed them but it was still taking a chance...

My struggle with Crabbe is that I haven't seen him play that much and his PER is 12.26. He'll probably get better and the WS nix posted is impressive. What number is right? I don't know. That's why I want someone to say "this skillset is above average and here's why I think he'll live up to or even exceed his contract"


IMO the problem with Crabbe is that he's not the Breakdown or Ball Handling type of SG that you typically want in the Triangle. You want SG's that are more combo in nature. Guys that aren't just spot up or catch and shoot types. A guy that has some PG like skills and can get to the rim off the dribble and pass effectively. In the Triangle the SG doesn't have as many catch and shoot looks like in a spread offense. It's more cuts, Dribble hand offs and driving to the hoop etc.
Knixkik
Posts: 35759
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
5/10/2016  2:32 PM
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams

Im definitely not the guy to do it cause I haven't seen him play enough but I always start here and loot at progression: http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/crabbal01.html

Shooting across the table and from year to year is very good. 23 years old. Defensive stats are hard to come by and he is still non-starter, but his play has progressed.

more of a question for the board... as I've said previously, I would be pumped with an offseason equivalent to Childs and H20. That requires taking a chance on younger guys--just want it to be the right younger guys. Childs was a heralded defender and H20 had a sweet stroke when we signed them but it was still taking a chance...

My struggle with Crabbe is that I haven't seen him play that much and his PER is 12.26. He'll probably get better and the WS nix posted is impressive. What number is right? I don't know. That's why I want someone to say "this skillset is above average and here's why I think he'll live up to or even exceed his contract"

If you are looking for an Allan Houston type, the closest thing out there is Evan Fournier, who is young and a pure shooter, but can also break down off the dribble. It will take a big contract to steal him from Orlando, but i think he is get-able.

wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

5/10/2016  2:33 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/10/2016  2:38 PM
nixluva wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams

Im definitely not the guy to do it cause I haven't seen him play enough but I always start here and loot at progression: http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/crabbal01.html

Shooting across the table and from year to year is very good. 23 years old. Defensive stats are hard to come by and he is still non-starter, but his play has progressed.

more of a question for the board... as I've said previously, I would be pumped with an offseason equivalent to Childs and H20. That requires taking a chance on younger guys--just want it to be the right younger guys. Childs was a heralded defender and H20 had a sweet stroke when we signed them but it was still taking a chance...

My struggle with Crabbe is that I haven't seen him play that much and his PER is 12.26. He'll probably get better and the WS nix posted is impressive. What number is right? I don't know. That's why I want someone to say "this skillset is above average and here's why I think he'll live up to or even exceed his contract"


IMO the problem with Crabbe is that he's not the Breakdown or Ball Handling type of SG that you typically want in the Triangle. You want SG's that are more combo in nature. Guys that aren't just spot up or catch and shoot types. A guy that has some PG like skills and can get to the rim off the dribble and pass effectively. In the Triangle the SG doesn't have as many catch and shoot looks like in a spread offense. It's more cuts, Dribble hand offs and driving to the hoop etc.

I think if the plan is too keep Wroten and Grant long term then the plan should be to switch the roles of the SG (or the main ball handler guard traditionally) with the PG (off guard) in the triangle. Both Wroten and Grant are big enough to guard PG/SG's but their game is also based more around making cuts, dribble hand offs and driving to the hoop. If they are functioning in the role of the main guard, then they need to be next to a shooting guard who basically is a catch and shoot guard who runs the triangle to get open to shoot a 3 pointer and defends decently. If the knicks get a superior SG 3 pt shooter they can then have grant and wroten attack more.

Wroten/Crabbe
Grant/Gallo

potentially is a very good Triangle starting and bench back court. You just have to switch the skill sets seen by most triangle back courts. Keep in mind that switching of roles is supposedly one of the triangle offenses strengths. However, their is enough size their to do it, and to be honest the potential of not having to overpay a PG in 2017 to take on the PG role is good enough to at least give it a try next season too.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

5/10/2016  2:39 PM    LAST EDITED: 5/10/2016  2:41 PM
I like Crabbe. I think he's a fine player--a good young contributor on a playoff team. He'd be a good addition -- I just don't know if we should pay $10mm a pop for him on a long-term deal. Don't know if that's in our best interest--not when we have other positions to reinforce. Solomon Hill's out there and he's unrestricted. I think I like Hill's game better in the long run--I see a higher ceiling and he might cost half what Crabbe gets. Thing with Hill -- I read that he likes it in Indy. He knows they drafted him and gave him his chance in the NBA, he likes his teammates and he likes Vogel. After reading all that, I didn't think we could get him anymore but if we got Vogel, that could change. We need a head coach anyway and this guy's a good one--someone who would outlast Phil in NY imo--a guy I'd want here after Phil packs it in. I think getting Vogel improves out chances of getting Hill--that's potential a big plus I'd be looking to exploit right now. Kill two birds with one stone here I'm thinking.. And if they really want Crabbe, I would hope they're looking at other players who would cost less that have very similar games. PJ Hairston's one option. I think he might have even better 3&D potential than Crabbe and he'd cost less. Heck, I think Terrico White might be better than Crabbe and we can get that dude for the minimum.

Question for Wargames -- you mentioned Indy may not be able to match any offer for Hill over $2.5mm per. Is that true? I'd love to believe that. Tell me what your thinking is on that.

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
5/10/2016  2:39 PM
wargames wrote:
nixluva wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
martin wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:If you're going to overpay no matter who you sign, I think it might make sense to go after a young player. Crabbe isn't going to outrank Lillard or McCollum so I do think Portland would be less likely to match. What scares me is that he looks like an average player. I hope we can employ the cash more effectively

Well I guess it would be a theory that the guy just turned 24 is on an upswing in his game--his efficient in what he does and can grow with the team. To say were getting a star player--thats a tough sell. I think that we can win by getting a lot of good players who are efficient who can spread the floor who have different skill sets which will work in a cumulative team fashion. I think we made some progress using this in last free agency--we got 3 players who helped. Our stars have to be KP and Carmelo if he stays and the more efficient we can become--the better everything will work.

I don't disagree with you. He could get better. But I don't see anything that makes me think that he's anything more than an average player. What does Crabbe do at an above average level?

And that's the rub. Pretty much every FA the Knicks go after this summer will be for a projection of what that player COULD be down the line.

I'm more in favor of something like this if you can say something like, "Crabbe is a young guy that hasn't put it all together yet BUT he is a an above average (1) shooter, (2) passer, or (3) defender etc." At least you could argue that Landry Fields was an elite rebounder at his position or that Marco Belinelli could stroke it...

I'm not going to claim to be a Crabbe expert so that's why I'm asking. I would not be opposed to a signing like this but I want to see the growth potential a la Derrick Williams

Im definitely not the guy to do it cause I haven't seen him play enough but I always start here and loot at progression: http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/c/crabbal01.html

Shooting across the table and from year to year is very good. 23 years old. Defensive stats are hard to come by and he is still non-starter, but his play has progressed.

more of a question for the board... as I've said previously, I would be pumped with an offseason equivalent to Childs and H20. That requires taking a chance on younger guys--just want it to be the right younger guys. Childs was a heralded defender and H20 had a sweet stroke when we signed them but it was still taking a chance...

My struggle with Crabbe is that I haven't seen him play that much and his PER is 12.26. He'll probably get better and the WS nix posted is impressive. What number is right? I don't know. That's why I want someone to say "this skillset is above average and here's why I think he'll live up to or even exceed his contract"


IMO the problem with Crabbe is that he's not the Breakdown or Ball Handling type of SG that you typically want in the Triangle. You want SG's that are more combo in nature. Guys that aren't just spot up or catch and shoot types. A guy that has some PG like skills and can get to the rim off the dribble and pass effectively. In the Triangle the SG doesn't have as many catch and shoot looks like in a spread offense. It's more cuts, Dribble hand offs and driving to the hoop etc.

I think if the plan is too keep Wroten and Grant the plan is to switch the roles of the SG (or the main ball handler guard traditionally) with the PG (off guard) in the triangle. Both Wroten and Grant are big enough to guard PG/SG's but their game is also based more around making cuts, dribble hand offs and driving to the hoop. If they are functioning in the role of the main guard, then they need to be next to a shooting guard who basically is a catch and shoot guard who runs the triangle to get open to shoot a 3 pointer and defends decently. If the knicks get a superior SG 3 pt shooter they can then have grant and wroten attack more.

Wroten/Crabbe
Grant/Gallo

potentially is a very good Triangle starting and bench back court. You just have to switch the skill sets seen by most triangle back courts. However, their is enough size their to do it.

YUP!!! That's pretty much what Phil is likely thinking. It's a very logical approach to balancing out the backcourt.

wargames
Posts: 22833
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/27/2015
Member: #6053

5/10/2016  2:50 PM
Finestrg wrote:I like Crabbe. I think he's a fine player--a good young contributor on a playoff team. He'd be a good addition -- I just don't know if we should pay $10mm a pop for him on a long-term deal. Don't know if that's in our best interest--not when we have other positions to reinforce. Solomon Hill's out there and he's unrestricted. I think I like Hill's game better in the long run--I see a higher ceiling and he might cost half what Crabbe gets. Thing with Hill -- I read that he likes it in Indy. He knows they drafted him and gave him his chance in the NBA, he likes his teammates and he likes Vogel. After reading all that, I didn't think we could get him anymore but if we got Vogel, that could change. We need a head coach anyway and this guy's a good one--someone who would outlast Phil in NY imo--a guy I'd want here after Phil packs it in. I think getting Vogel improves out chances of getting Hill--that's potential a big plus I'd be looking to exploit right now. Kill two birds with one stone here I'm thinking.. And if they really want Crabbe, I would hope they're looking at other players who would cost less that have very similar games. PJ Hairston's one option. I think he might have even better 3&D potential than Crabbe and he'd cost less. Heck, I think Terrico White might be better than Crabbe and we can get that dude for the minimum.

Question for Wargames -- you mentioned Indy may not be able to match any offer for Hill over $2.5mm per. Is that true? I'd love to believe that. Tell me what your thinking is on that.

They can't. When I was reading up on Vogel I found out that apparently Bird didn't take Hill's 4th year option and they are currently capped out. All they can bid on him is 2.5 mil. Its a bit of a fiasco for Indy fans because he is a Draymond Green'esque player they need to have a small ball system and they know they are going to lose him.

Also I like the idea of taking a flyer on Hairston as well, though I am pretty sure Phil can get him too for dirt cheap. He is the definition of a flyer contract that can either accept the minimum from a team or just as easily end up out of the league.

The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
martin
Posts: 80093
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
5/10/2016  3:12 PM
wargames wrote:
Finestrg wrote:I like Crabbe. I think he's a fine player--a good young contributor on a playoff team. He'd be a good addition -- I just don't know if we should pay $10mm a pop for him on a long-term deal. Don't know if that's in our best interest--not when we have other positions to reinforce. Solomon Hill's out there and he's unrestricted. I think I like Hill's game better in the long run--I see a higher ceiling and he might cost half what Crabbe gets. Thing with Hill -- I read that he likes it in Indy. He knows they drafted him and gave him his chance in the NBA, he likes his teammates and he likes Vogel. After reading all that, I didn't think we could get him anymore but if we got Vogel, that could change. We need a head coach anyway and this guy's a good one--someone who would outlast Phil in NY imo--a guy I'd want here after Phil packs it in. I think getting Vogel improves out chances of getting Hill--that's potential a big plus I'd be looking to exploit right now. Kill two birds with one stone here I'm thinking.. And if they really want Crabbe, I would hope they're looking at other players who would cost less that have very similar games. PJ Hairston's one option. I think he might have even better 3&D potential than Crabbe and he'd cost less. Heck, I think Terrico White might be better than Crabbe and we can get that dude for the minimum.

Question for Wargames -- you mentioned Indy may not be able to match any offer for Hill over $2.5mm per. Is that true? I'd love to believe that. Tell me what your thinking is on that.

They can't. When I was reading up on Vogel I found out that apparently Bird didn't take Hill's 4th year option and they are currently capped out. All they can bid on him is 2.5 mil. Its a bit of a fiasco for Indy fans because he is a Draymond Green'esque player they need to have a small ball system and they know they are going to lose him.

Also I like the idea of taking a flyer on Hairston as well, though I am pretty sure Phil can get him too for dirt cheap. He is the definition of a flyer contract that can either accept the minimum from a team or just as easily end up out of the league.

Indiana is not capped out next year. Maybe they can't go OVER the cap with him, but they got cap room to sign him to a big deal if they want.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Allen Crabbe

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy