[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

You trade melo, you risk losing KP
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/27/2016  6:47 PM
crzymdups wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
martin wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:If we're a .400 team, don't you think we risk losing KP? The biggest concern should be creating a winning environment.

You're a stats guy, what's the likelihood that he or anyone like him leaves? It's near zero. Or zero based on rookie contract extensions.


OK, statistically, the most likely scenario for us is that we trade him in a year or two

The last time the Knicks drafted a top five pick who won multiple rookie of the month awards they decided to keep him for 15yrs and retire his jersey. Even though they traded Bernard King.


Sorry, I should have put the smiley face. We have a history of trading lottery picks but I highly doubt Phil would trade KP.
AUTOADVERT
jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/29/2016  9:16 AM
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis is being a good teammate just like Melo has been towards him.
Melo has been pushing and helping KP to be more aggressive and get the ball to him.
KP knows how great that has been and he doesn't want Melo to leave.

They get along well.

The only reason I personally am ok with a Melo trade is his salary vs declining production/physical state. If he were making 15 million a year, I'd call him virtually untouchable. If he were in his prime, and physically capable to carry the team like a player of his caliber should, I'd again trade him virtually for players that would never be traded anyway.

Unfortunately the thing is Melo is on a physical decline, and you just can't ignore his salary. The Hawks/Nets with Joe Johnson are a decent comparison. If NY doesn't trade Melo this summer, they may never get a good deal again. And they'll never be able to get anything once he starts missing all-star teams, which aren't all that far away if he doesn't commit himself in the offseason to get lighter, to take care of his body as if he's on his last legs (which he is).

Two ways out of trading him and succeeding in the longrun are striking gold in free agency and/or Kristaps elevating his level to that of a superstar himself. If either or both happen, then Melo can play 30 minutes a night, be used primarily as a scoring threat and is the team's 2nd/3rd most valuable player. In which he can stay a Knick and the team can keep moving forward.

1)well Melo miss 7 or 8 games this yr, guess what.. , wade mess way more than that and still came back to win 2 rings

2)every single player in this league is subject to injuries, there's no exception, no matter who the hell you get

3)When you have a super star(no matter what you think of melo) and a budding superstar, your half way home, your attractive destination

4)Anthony Davis make 30 mill, super talented guy on a losing team...AKA KP without another star.

5)One star major pressure, over usage until knees go bad and injuries mount, have you seen the allan houston, tracy mcgrady, d howard movie, its playing at a theater near you

6)DRAFT picks, 1 out of every 10 are good, the rest are a toss up

7)we tried to build through the draft prior to AMARE, failed, traded all of our picks and assets for the one guy, is that what your looking fwd to

8)veterans win, young teams lose, and lose for a long time

9)no real coach, and a solid staff..TOAST no matter the talent

10)were worry about a pg in a system the pg is almost completely obsolete on the offense end..on the defensive end, two 7 footers in the paint that were going to the bench at he same time to bring in sasha and seraphin


REALITY

#7 is patently false and #10 is, well... i don't know what it means.

that said, the only way forward is to put melo on a minutes restriction. that won't justify his ridiculous contract since it was based on his being a starter at 36 minutes a game but at least the knicks stand a better chance of getting every ounce of value out of him at 24 minutes a game. and by the way, what team is going to want to pay melo all that money when he is going to have to play bench-like minutes?

So then what does the minutes restriction achieve, exactly? You bench the statistical leader of your team. Less Melo = Even More Losing. Another tank job? We have no draft pick, even if Phil works some draft night magic and trades to get one, you think he's going to get quality at the bottom end of the first round?

You think every other GM in the league is going to be impressed with a healthy, conserved Melo at the end of the season? What value does that provide to some other team, since it's obviously not about to provide any value to us?

What about running him the whole 36 minutes a game until the engine gives and then buying him out, ala Joe Johnson? Would that make you happy as a knicks fan?

dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
2/29/2016  10:26 AM
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis is being a good teammate just like Melo has been towards him.
Melo has been pushing and helping KP to be more aggressive and get the ball to him.
KP knows how great that has been and he doesn't want Melo to leave.

They get along well.

The only reason I personally am ok with a Melo trade is his salary vs declining production/physical state. If he were making 15 million a year, I'd call him virtually untouchable. If he were in his prime, and physically capable to carry the team like a player of his caliber should, I'd again trade him virtually for players that would never be traded anyway.

Unfortunately the thing is Melo is on a physical decline, and you just can't ignore his salary. The Hawks/Nets with Joe Johnson are a decent comparison. If NY doesn't trade Melo this summer, they may never get a good deal again. And they'll never be able to get anything once he starts missing all-star teams, which aren't all that far away if he doesn't commit himself in the offseason to get lighter, to take care of his body as if he's on his last legs (which he is).

Two ways out of trading him and succeeding in the longrun are striking gold in free agency and/or Kristaps elevating his level to that of a superstar himself. If either or both happen, then Melo can play 30 minutes a night, be used primarily as a scoring threat and is the team's 2nd/3rd most valuable player. In which he can stay a Knick and the team can keep moving forward.

1)well Melo miss 7 or 8 games this yr, guess what.. , wade mess way more than that and still came back to win 2 rings

2)every single player in this league is subject to injuries, there's no exception, no matter who the hell you get

3)When you have a super star(no matter what you think of melo) and a budding superstar, your half way home, your attractive destination

4)Anthony Davis make 30 mill, super talented guy on a losing team...AKA KP without another star.

5)One star major pressure, over usage until knees go bad and injuries mount, have you seen the allan houston, tracy mcgrady, d howard movie, its playing at a theater near you

6)DRAFT picks, 1 out of every 10 are good, the rest are a toss up

7)we tried to build through the draft prior to AMARE, failed, traded all of our picks and assets for the one guy, is that what your looking fwd to

8)veterans win, young teams lose, and lose for a long time

9)no real coach, and a solid staff..TOAST no matter the talent

10)were worry about a pg in a system the pg is almost completely obsolete on the offense end..on the defensive end, two 7 footers in the paint that were going to the bench at he same time to bring in sasha and seraphin


REALITY

#7 is patently false and #10 is, well... i don't know what it means.

that said, the only way forward is to put melo on a minutes restriction. that won't justify his ridiculous contract since it was based on his being a starter at 36 minutes a game but at least the knicks stand a better chance of getting every ounce of value out of him at 24 minutes a game. and by the way, what team is going to want to pay melo all that money when he is going to have to play bench-like minutes?

So then what does the minutes restriction achieve, exactly? You bench the statistical leader of your team. Less Melo = Even More Losing. Another tank job? We have no draft pick, even if Phil works some draft night magic and trades to get one, you think he's going to get quality at the bottom end of the first round?

You think every other GM in the league is going to be impressed with a healthy, conserved Melo at the end of the season? What value does that provide to some other team, since it's obviously not about to provide any value to us?

What about running him the whole 36 minutes a game until the engine gives and then buying him out, ala Joe Johnson? Would that make you happy as a knicks fan?

melo's breaking down physically. this is undeniable.

hence, if you want to keep him as a knick then it makes no sense to run him into the ground, unless this is a strategy for forcing him to ask for a trade. i wonder if this is what jackson and rambis are doing here. it's a suspicion i have... as this season is now dust in the wind. melo is breaking down, just as i had feared when the knicks signed him to this ridiculous contract. note that carmelo anthony will have missed the playoffs 3 times in the last 4 seasons, which does not include the strike-shortened linsanity season or the season he forced his way to a knicks team that was already headed to the playoffs. his legacy as a knick is looking very bad, and his career is now decidedly and definitively mediocre at best.

there's only one common denominator in melo's career and his won-loss record: melo.

alternatively, if melo doesn't leave this summer and, although it is a long shot that the knicks become legitimate contenders while melo is here in any capacity, it makes much more sense to keep his minutes down while the coaching staff develops other players who they plan to keep. williams and thomas come to mind. also, whoever the knicks acquire in the offseason. i personally think the guy from boston, evan turner, would be a great pickup: he's a heady, defending swingman who can play both shooting guard and small forward in the triangle.

bottom line is that what i have been predicting for months is apparently going to come to fruition-- melo's only chance to win here will be as a 6th man or a starter in name only, ie a starter who ends up playing closer to 24 minutes per game.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
martin
Posts: 80110
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/29/2016  10:35 AM
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis is being a good teammate just like Melo has been towards him.
Melo has been pushing and helping KP to be more aggressive and get the ball to him.
KP knows how great that has been and he doesn't want Melo to leave.

They get along well.

The only reason I personally am ok with a Melo trade is his salary vs declining production/physical state. If he were making 15 million a year, I'd call him virtually untouchable. If he were in his prime, and physically capable to carry the team like a player of his caliber should, I'd again trade him virtually for players that would never be traded anyway.

Unfortunately the thing is Melo is on a physical decline, and you just can't ignore his salary. The Hawks/Nets with Joe Johnson are a decent comparison. If NY doesn't trade Melo this summer, they may never get a good deal again. And they'll never be able to get anything once he starts missing all-star teams, which aren't all that far away if he doesn't commit himself in the offseason to get lighter, to take care of his body as if he's on his last legs (which he is).

Two ways out of trading him and succeeding in the longrun are striking gold in free agency and/or Kristaps elevating his level to that of a superstar himself. If either or both happen, then Melo can play 30 minutes a night, be used primarily as a scoring threat and is the team's 2nd/3rd most valuable player. In which he can stay a Knick and the team can keep moving forward.

1)well Melo miss 7 or 8 games this yr, guess what.. , wade mess way more than that and still came back to win 2 rings

2)every single player in this league is subject to injuries, there's no exception, no matter who the hell you get

3)When you have a super star(no matter what you think of melo) and a budding superstar, your half way home, your attractive destination

4)Anthony Davis make 30 mill, super talented guy on a losing team...AKA KP without another star.

5)One star major pressure, over usage until knees go bad and injuries mount, have you seen the allan houston, tracy mcgrady, d howard movie, its playing at a theater near you

6)DRAFT picks, 1 out of every 10 are good, the rest are a toss up

7)we tried to build through the draft prior to AMARE, failed, traded all of our picks and assets for the one guy, is that what your looking fwd to

8)veterans win, young teams lose, and lose for a long time

9)no real coach, and a solid staff..TOAST no matter the talent

10)were worry about a pg in a system the pg is almost completely obsolete on the offense end..on the defensive end, two 7 footers in the paint that were going to the bench at he same time to bring in sasha and seraphin


REALITY

#7 is patently false and #10 is, well... i don't know what it means.

that said, the only way forward is to put melo on a minutes restriction. that won't justify his ridiculous contract since it was based on his being a starter at 36 minutes a game but at least the knicks stand a better chance of getting every ounce of value out of him at 24 minutes a game. and by the way, what team is going to want to pay melo all that money when he is going to have to play bench-like minutes?

So then what does the minutes restriction achieve, exactly? You bench the statistical leader of your team. Less Melo = Even More Losing. Another tank job? We have no draft pick, even if Phil works some draft night magic and trades to get one, you think he's going to get quality at the bottom end of the first round?

You think every other GM in the league is going to be impressed with a healthy, conserved Melo at the end of the season? What value does that provide to some other team, since it's obviously not about to provide any value to us?

What about running him the whole 36 minutes a game until the engine gives and then buying him out, ala Joe Johnson? Would that make you happy as a knicks fan?

melo's breaking down physically. this is undeniable.

hence, if you want to keep him as a knick then it makes no sense to run him into the ground, unless this is a strategy for forcing him to ask for a trade. i wonder if this is what jackson and rambis are doing here. it's a suspicion i have... as this season is now dust in the wind. melo is breaking down, just as i had feared when the knicks signed him to this ridiculous contract. note that carmelo anthony will have missed the playoffs 3 times in the last 4 seasons, which does not include the strike-shortened linsanity season or the season he forced his way to a knicks team that was already headed to the playoffs. his legacy as a knick is looking very bad, and his career is now decidedly and definitively mediocre at best.

there's only one common denominator in melo's career and his won-loss record: melo.

alternatively, if melo doesn't leave this summer and, although it is a long shot that the knicks become legitimate contenders while melo is here in any capacity, it makes much more sense to keep his minutes down while the coaching staff develops other players who they plan to keep. williams and thomas come to mind. also, whoever the knicks acquire in the offseason. i personally think the guy from boston, evan turner, would be a great pickup: he's a heady, defending swingman who can play both shooting guard and small forward in the triangle.

bottom line is that what i have been predicting for months is apparently going to come to fruition-- melo's only chance to win here will be as a 6th man or a starter in name only, ie a starter who ends up playing closer to 24 minutes per game.

There is no doubt in my mind that Melo is struggling this year. Been through a lot over the past year and half. Still wondering if that's career defining or a struggle that has just taken longer to come back from.

Was Durant done? Wade? Others?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Knixkik
Posts: 35761
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
2/29/2016  10:46 AM
martin wrote:
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis is being a good teammate just like Melo has been towards him.
Melo has been pushing and helping KP to be more aggressive and get the ball to him.
KP knows how great that has been and he doesn't want Melo to leave.

They get along well.

The only reason I personally am ok with a Melo trade is his salary vs declining production/physical state. If he were making 15 million a year, I'd call him virtually untouchable. If he were in his prime, and physically capable to carry the team like a player of his caliber should, I'd again trade him virtually for players that would never be traded anyway.

Unfortunately the thing is Melo is on a physical decline, and you just can't ignore his salary. The Hawks/Nets with Joe Johnson are a decent comparison. If NY doesn't trade Melo this summer, they may never get a good deal again. And they'll never be able to get anything once he starts missing all-star teams, which aren't all that far away if he doesn't commit himself in the offseason to get lighter, to take care of his body as if he's on his last legs (which he is).

Two ways out of trading him and succeeding in the longrun are striking gold in free agency and/or Kristaps elevating his level to that of a superstar himself. If either or both happen, then Melo can play 30 minutes a night, be used primarily as a scoring threat and is the team's 2nd/3rd most valuable player. In which he can stay a Knick and the team can keep moving forward.

1)well Melo miss 7 or 8 games this yr, guess what.. , wade mess way more than that and still came back to win 2 rings

2)every single player in this league is subject to injuries, there's no exception, no matter who the hell you get

3)When you have a super star(no matter what you think of melo) and a budding superstar, your half way home, your attractive destination

4)Anthony Davis make 30 mill, super talented guy on a losing team...AKA KP without another star.

5)One star major pressure, over usage until knees go bad and injuries mount, have you seen the allan houston, tracy mcgrady, d howard movie, its playing at a theater near you

6)DRAFT picks, 1 out of every 10 are good, the rest are a toss up

7)we tried to build through the draft prior to AMARE, failed, traded all of our picks and assets for the one guy, is that what your looking fwd to

8)veterans win, young teams lose, and lose for a long time

9)no real coach, and a solid staff..TOAST no matter the talent

10)were worry about a pg in a system the pg is almost completely obsolete on the offense end..on the defensive end, two 7 footers in the paint that were going to the bench at he same time to bring in sasha and seraphin


REALITY

#7 is patently false and #10 is, well... i don't know what it means.

that said, the only way forward is to put melo on a minutes restriction. that won't justify his ridiculous contract since it was based on his being a starter at 36 minutes a game but at least the knicks stand a better chance of getting every ounce of value out of him at 24 minutes a game. and by the way, what team is going to want to pay melo all that money when he is going to have to play bench-like minutes?

So then what does the minutes restriction achieve, exactly? You bench the statistical leader of your team. Less Melo = Even More Losing. Another tank job? We have no draft pick, even if Phil works some draft night magic and trades to get one, you think he's going to get quality at the bottom end of the first round?

You think every other GM in the league is going to be impressed with a healthy, conserved Melo at the end of the season? What value does that provide to some other team, since it's obviously not about to provide any value to us?

What about running him the whole 36 minutes a game until the engine gives and then buying him out, ala Joe Johnson? Would that make you happy as a knicks fan?

melo's breaking down physically. this is undeniable.

hence, if you want to keep him as a knick then it makes no sense to run him into the ground, unless this is a strategy for forcing him to ask for a trade. i wonder if this is what jackson and rambis are doing here. it's a suspicion i have... as this season is now dust in the wind. melo is breaking down, just as i had feared when the knicks signed him to this ridiculous contract. note that carmelo anthony will have missed the playoffs 3 times in the last 4 seasons, which does not include the strike-shortened linsanity season or the season he forced his way to a knicks team that was already headed to the playoffs. his legacy as a knick is looking very bad, and his career is now decidedly and definitively mediocre at best.

there's only one common denominator in melo's career and his won-loss record: melo.

alternatively, if melo doesn't leave this summer and, although it is a long shot that the knicks become legitimate contenders while melo is here in any capacity, it makes much more sense to keep his minutes down while the coaching staff develops other players who they plan to keep. williams and thomas come to mind. also, whoever the knicks acquire in the offseason. i personally think the guy from boston, evan turner, would be a great pickup: he's a heady, defending swingman who can play both shooting guard and small forward in the triangle.

bottom line is that what i have been predicting for months is apparently going to come to fruition-- melo's only chance to win here will be as a 6th man or a starter in name only, ie a starter who ends up playing closer to 24 minutes per game.

There is no doubt in my mind that Melo is struggling this year. Been through a lot over the past year and half. Still wondering if that's career defining or a struggle that has just taken longer to come back from.

Was Durant done? Wade? Others?

I agree that it is way too soon to tell. He is experiencing injuries and playing through this like 95% of other high usage players. The same can be said about many other stars like the ones you mentioned above.

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

2/29/2016  10:49 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:I very much doubt trading melo would mean losing kp.....thats just silly. KP WANTED to be in new york. I understand melo has helped him and i appreciate that but that doesnt mean he would leave if/when melo is traded

Agreed. KP just came out and grabbed Melo's back which was cool of him and commendable but deep down I bet he knows we'll all be better off, him included, once we turn the page. Turning the page would help Melo too. Hopefully Phil goes to Melo in the offseason and tries to work something out with him. A split would be amicable in every sense of the word.

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
2/29/2016  10:53 AM
Finestrg wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:I very much doubt trading melo would mean losing kp.....thats just silly. KP WANTED to be in new york. I understand melo has helped him and i appreciate that but that doesnt mean he would leave if/when melo is traded

Agreed. KP just came out and grabbed Melo's back which was cool of him and commendable but deep down I bet he knows we'll all be better off, him included, once we turn the page. Turning the page would help Melo too. Hopefully Phil goes to Melo in the offseason and tries to work something out with him. A split would be amicable in every sense of the word.

Win-Win situation for both parties, no matter how you slice it. KP takes the reins next season and pressure's off the franchise for competing in Melo's timetable, and Melo gets a chance to truly compete for that elusive ring.

dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
2/29/2016  12:00 PM
martin wrote:
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis is being a good teammate just like Melo has been towards him.
Melo has been pushing and helping KP to be more aggressive and get the ball to him.
KP knows how great that has been and he doesn't want Melo to leave.

They get along well.

The only reason I personally am ok with a Melo trade is his salary vs declining production/physical state. If he were making 15 million a year, I'd call him virtually untouchable. If he were in his prime, and physically capable to carry the team like a player of his caliber should, I'd again trade him virtually for players that would never be traded anyway.

Unfortunately the thing is Melo is on a physical decline, and you just can't ignore his salary. The Hawks/Nets with Joe Johnson are a decent comparison. If NY doesn't trade Melo this summer, they may never get a good deal again. And they'll never be able to get anything once he starts missing all-star teams, which aren't all that far away if he doesn't commit himself in the offseason to get lighter, to take care of his body as if he's on his last legs (which he is).

Two ways out of trading him and succeeding in the longrun are striking gold in free agency and/or Kristaps elevating his level to that of a superstar himself. If either or both happen, then Melo can play 30 minutes a night, be used primarily as a scoring threat and is the team's 2nd/3rd most valuable player. In which he can stay a Knick and the team can keep moving forward.

1)well Melo miss 7 or 8 games this yr, guess what.. , wade mess way more than that and still came back to win 2 rings

2)every single player in this league is subject to injuries, there's no exception, no matter who the hell you get

3)When you have a super star(no matter what you think of melo) and a budding superstar, your half way home, your attractive destination

4)Anthony Davis make 30 mill, super talented guy on a losing team...AKA KP without another star.

5)One star major pressure, over usage until knees go bad and injuries mount, have you seen the allan houston, tracy mcgrady, d howard movie, its playing at a theater near you

6)DRAFT picks, 1 out of every 10 are good, the rest are a toss up

7)we tried to build through the draft prior to AMARE, failed, traded all of our picks and assets for the one guy, is that what your looking fwd to

8)veterans win, young teams lose, and lose for a long time

9)no real coach, and a solid staff..TOAST no matter the talent

10)were worry about a pg in a system the pg is almost completely obsolete on the offense end..on the defensive end, two 7 footers in the paint that were going to the bench at he same time to bring in sasha and seraphin


REALITY

#7 is patently false and #10 is, well... i don't know what it means.

that said, the only way forward is to put melo on a minutes restriction. that won't justify his ridiculous contract since it was based on his being a starter at 36 minutes a game but at least the knicks stand a better chance of getting every ounce of value out of him at 24 minutes a game. and by the way, what team is going to want to pay melo all that money when he is going to have to play bench-like minutes?

So then what does the minutes restriction achieve, exactly? You bench the statistical leader of your team. Less Melo = Even More Losing. Another tank job? We have no draft pick, even if Phil works some draft night magic and trades to get one, you think he's going to get quality at the bottom end of the first round?

You think every other GM in the league is going to be impressed with a healthy, conserved Melo at the end of the season? What value does that provide to some other team, since it's obviously not about to provide any value to us?

What about running him the whole 36 minutes a game until the engine gives and then buying him out, ala Joe Johnson? Would that make you happy as a knicks fan?

melo's breaking down physically. this is undeniable.

hence, if you want to keep him as a knick then it makes no sense to run him into the ground, unless this is a strategy for forcing him to ask for a trade. i wonder if this is what jackson and rambis are doing here. it's a suspicion i have... as this season is now dust in the wind. melo is breaking down, just as i had feared when the knicks signed him to this ridiculous contract. note that carmelo anthony will have missed the playoffs 3 times in the last 4 seasons, which does not include the strike-shortened linsanity season or the season he forced his way to a knicks team that was already headed to the playoffs. his legacy as a knick is looking very bad, and his career is now decidedly and definitively mediocre at best.

there's only one common denominator in melo's career and his won-loss record: melo.

alternatively, if melo doesn't leave this summer and, although it is a long shot that the knicks become legitimate contenders while melo is here in any capacity, it makes much more sense to keep his minutes down while the coaching staff develops other players who they plan to keep. williams and thomas come to mind. also, whoever the knicks acquire in the offseason. i personally think the guy from boston, evan turner, would be a great pickup: he's a heady, defending swingman who can play both shooting guard and small forward in the triangle.

bottom line is that what i have been predicting for months is apparently going to come to fruition-- melo's only chance to win here will be as a 6th man or a starter in name only, ie a starter who ends up playing closer to 24 minutes per game.

There is no doubt in my mind that Melo is struggling this year. Been through a lot over the past year and half. Still wondering if that's career defining or a struggle that has just taken longer to come back from.

Was Durant done? Wade? Others?

wade is a good comparison and durant less so. wade (never has been durable), when he hasn't been out with injuries and while spoelstra has been coach, has been given nights off similar to the strategy used by popovich, i believe. it makes eminent sense. so either melo gets nights off as a proactive measure or he gets nights off due to injury breaking down. that's all i am saying. playing him all these minutes this season is just so wrong at this point. it would have been wrong in any scenario given the 32,000 minutes he has logged.

but with the all-around team game he has demonstrated finally this season, including playing some decent defense, it behooves the knicks to limit his minutes or give him nights off as they continue to build a winner with him as a piece rather than a foundation stone. if he ends up leaving then i predict this is what will occur anyway, no matter where he ends up.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

2/29/2016  12:19 PM    LAST EDITED: 2/29/2016  12:27 PM
ChuckBuck wrote:
Finestrg wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:I very much doubt trading melo would mean losing kp.....thats just silly. KP WANTED to be in new york. I understand melo has helped him and i appreciate that but that doesnt mean he would leave if/when melo is traded

Agreed. KP just came out and grabbed Melo's back which was cool of him and commendable but deep down I bet he knows we'll all be better off, him included, once we turn the page. Turning the page would help Melo too. Hopefully Phil goes to Melo in the offseason and tries to work something out with him. A split would be amicable in every sense of the word.

Win-Win situation for both parties, no matter how you slice it. KP takes the reins next season and pressure's off the franchise for competing in Melo's timetable, and Melo gets a chance to truly compete for that elusive ring.

I hear ya Chuck, I don't know if Melo see it like that, though.. All of a sudden, I get the feeling Melo couldn't really care less about competing for a title. If he does, it's secondary to other personal issues. I feel complacency and convenience may be setting in..I like how on the outside now all of a sudden it's "I'm determined to stick it out here and make this work, gosh darnit! NY do or die!," meanwhile that's nothing more than propaganda. If I had to bet money on it, what he really cares about is (1) image/perception (if he asks to leave he'll look like he's running out on us, esp. knowing full well how he left Denver. Meanwhile, gimmie a break--some of the more knowledgeable fans know better and would welcome a Melo trade) and (2) not uprooting his family at this stage--this is home, his kid's go to school here, they all have friends here, his wife has opportunities here, etc. I honestly believe that's all much more important to him than chasing the elusive chip. And you know what--I can't really get on him about that, man. Those are some important issues. If that's really how he feels, that's how he feels. Where's that leave us, though, as a team that may need to turn the page very soon and focus on rebuilding?? He can very well get in the way of that and set us back years with this "I'm not going anywhere" mentality...Just don't spin it like you're doing us a favor Melo, OK? Irritates me to a degree..

jrodmc
Posts: 32927
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 11/24/2004
Member: #805
USA
2/29/2016  12:24 PM
dk7th wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis is being a good teammate just like Melo has been towards him.
Melo has been pushing and helping KP to be more aggressive and get the ball to him.
KP knows how great that has been and he doesn't want Melo to leave.

They get along well.

The only reason I personally am ok with a Melo trade is his salary vs declining production/physical state. If he were making 15 million a year, I'd call him virtually untouchable. If he were in his prime, and physically capable to carry the team like a player of his caliber should, I'd again trade him virtually for players that would never be traded anyway.

Unfortunately the thing is Melo is on a physical decline, and you just can't ignore his salary. The Hawks/Nets with Joe Johnson are a decent comparison. If NY doesn't trade Melo this summer, they may never get a good deal again. And they'll never be able to get anything once he starts missing all-star teams, which aren't all that far away if he doesn't commit himself in the offseason to get lighter, to take care of his body as if he's on his last legs (which he is).

Two ways out of trading him and succeeding in the longrun are striking gold in free agency and/or Kristaps elevating his level to that of a superstar himself. If either or both happen, then Melo can play 30 minutes a night, be used primarily as a scoring threat and is the team's 2nd/3rd most valuable player. In which he can stay a Knick and the team can keep moving forward.

1)well Melo miss 7 or 8 games this yr, guess what.. , wade mess way more than that and still came back to win 2 rings

2)every single player in this league is subject to injuries, there's no exception, no matter who the hell you get

3)When you have a super star(no matter what you think of melo) and a budding superstar, your half way home, your attractive destination

4)Anthony Davis make 30 mill, super talented guy on a losing team...AKA KP without another star.

5)One star major pressure, over usage until knees go bad and injuries mount, have you seen the allan houston, tracy mcgrady, d howard movie, its playing at a theater near you

6)DRAFT picks, 1 out of every 10 are good, the rest are a toss up

7)we tried to build through the draft prior to AMARE, failed, traded all of our picks and assets for the one guy, is that what your looking fwd to

8)veterans win, young teams lose, and lose for a long time

9)no real coach, and a solid staff..TOAST no matter the talent

10)were worry about a pg in a system the pg is almost completely obsolete on the offense end..on the defensive end, two 7 footers in the paint that were going to the bench at he same time to bring in sasha and seraphin


REALITY

#7 is patently false and #10 is, well... i don't know what it means.

that said, the only way forward is to put melo on a minutes restriction. that won't justify his ridiculous contract since it was based on his being a starter at 36 minutes a game but at least the knicks stand a better chance of getting every ounce of value out of him at 24 minutes a game. and by the way, what team is going to want to pay melo all that money when he is going to have to play bench-like minutes?

So then what does the minutes restriction achieve, exactly? You bench the statistical leader of your team. Less Melo = Even More Losing. Another tank job? We have no draft pick, even if Phil works some draft night magic and trades to get one, you think he's going to get quality at the bottom end of the first round?

You think every other GM in the league is going to be impressed with a healthy, conserved Melo at the end of the season? What value does that provide to some other team, since it's obviously not about to provide any value to us?

What about running him the whole 36 minutes a game until the engine gives and then buying him out, ala Joe Johnson? Would that make you happy as a knicks fan?

melo's breaking down physically. this is undeniable.

hence, if you want to keep him as a knick then it makes no sense to run him into the ground, unless this is a strategy for forcing him to ask for a trade. i wonder if this is what jackson and rambis are doing here. it's a suspicion i have... as this season is now dust in the wind. melo is breaking down, just as i had feared when the knicks signed him to this ridiculous contract. note that carmelo anthony will have missed the playoffs 3 times in the last 4 seasons, which does not include the strike-shortened linsanity season or the season he forced his way to a knicks team that was already headed to the playoffs. his legacy as a knick is looking very bad, and his career is now decidedly and definitively mediocre at best.

there's only one common denominator in melo's career and his won-loss record: melo.


You're serious about this? You're going to your grave with the supporting-cast-doesn't-matter argument, no matter what the W/L column actually tells you?

dk7th wrote:
martin wrote:
dk7th wrote:alternatively, if melo doesn't leave this summer and, although it is a long shot that the knicks become legitimate contenders while melo is here in any capacity, it makes much more sense to keep his minutes down while the coaching staff develops other players who they plan to keep. williams and thomas come to mind. also, whoever the knicks acquire in the offseason. i personally think the guy from boston, evan turner, would be a great pickup: he's a heady, defending swingman who can play both shooting guard and small forward in the triangle.

bottom line is that what i have been predicting for months is apparently going to come to fruition-- melo's only chance to win here will be as a 6th man or a starter in name only, ie a starter who ends up playing closer to 24 minutes per game.

There is no doubt in my mind that Melo is struggling this year. Been through a lot over the past year and half. Still wondering if that's career defining or a struggle that has just taken longer to come back from.

Was Durant done? Wade? Others?

wade is a good comparison and durant less so. wade (never has been durable), when he hasn't been out with injuries and while spoelstra has been coach, has been given nights off similar to the strategy used by popovich, i believe. it makes eminent sense. so either melo gets nights off as a proactive measure or he gets nights off due to injury breaking down. that's all i am saying. playing him all these minutes this season is just so wrong at this point. it would have been wrong in any scenario given the 32,000 minutes he has logged.

but with the all-around team game he has demonstrated finally this season, including playing some decent defense, it behooves the knicks to limit his minutes or give him nights off as they continue to build a winner with him as a piece rather than a foundation stone. if he ends up leaving then i predict this is what will occur anyway, no matter where he ends up.


I could see nights off, but minutes restriction is not going to benefit melo or the knicks. this isnt MLB pitching. Good, bad or indifferent, Melo needs high usage to be effective. That's just his game. And this season, as even you mention, he's demonstrated that the dog actually can learn new tricks.

I don't understand how you reward him with the bench. The man wants to play and win. It's painful even to listen to the way he gets pummeled going to the basket night in and night out. Is that his fault? Right, he's a dinosaur, his game's archaic, he's only interested in money, blah blah blah. Truth is, he doesn't get the calls he should, no matter where you place him the NBA pantheon.

So bench your best player to possibly "develop" two journeyman forwards. Got it.

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
2/29/2016  12:46 PM
Finestrg wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Finestrg wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:I very much doubt trading melo would mean losing kp.....thats just silly. KP WANTED to be in new york. I understand melo has helped him and i appreciate that but that doesnt mean he would leave if/when melo is traded

Agreed. KP just came out and grabbed Melo's back which was cool of him and commendable but deep down I bet he knows we'll all be better off, him included, once we turn the page. Turning the page would help Melo too. Hopefully Phil goes to Melo in the offseason and tries to work something out with him. A split would be amicable in every sense of the word.

Win-Win situation for both parties, no matter how you slice it. KP takes the reins next season and pressure's off the franchise for competing in Melo's timetable, and Melo gets a chance to truly compete for that elusive ring.

I hear ya Chuck, I don't know if Melo see it like that, though.. All of a sudden, I get the feeling Melo couldn't really care less about competing for a title. If he does, it's secondary to other personal issues. I feel complacency and convenience may be setting in..I like how on the outside now all of a sudden it's "I'm determined to stick it out here and make this work, gosh darnit! NY do or die!," meanwhile that's nothing more than propaganda. If I had to bet money on it, what he really cares about is (1) image/perception (if he asks to leave he'll look like he's running out on us, esp. knowing full well how he left Denver. Meanwhile, gimmie a break--some of the more knowledgeable fans know better and would welcome a Melo trade) and (2) not uprooting his family at this stage--this is home, his kid's go to school here, they all have friends here, his wife has opportunities here, etc. I honestly believe that's all much more important to him than chasing the elusive chip. And you know what--I can't really get on him about that, man. Those are some important issues. If that's really how he feels, that's how he feels. Where's that leave us, though, as a team that may need to turn the page very soon and focus on rebuilding?? He can very well get in the way of that and set us back years with this "I'm not going anywhere" mentality...Just don't spin it like you're doing us a favor Melo, OK? Irritates me to a degree..

Well said.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
2/29/2016  12:47 PM
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis is being a good teammate just like Melo has been towards him.
Melo has been pushing and helping KP to be more aggressive and get the ball to him.
KP knows how great that has been and he doesn't want Melo to leave.

They get along well.

The only reason I personally am ok with a Melo trade is his salary vs declining production/physical state. If he were making 15 million a year, I'd call him virtually untouchable. If he were in his prime, and physically capable to carry the team like a player of his caliber should, I'd again trade him virtually for players that would never be traded anyway.

Unfortunately the thing is Melo is on a physical decline, and you just can't ignore his salary. The Hawks/Nets with Joe Johnson are a decent comparison. If NY doesn't trade Melo this summer, they may never get a good deal again. And they'll never be able to get anything once he starts missing all-star teams, which aren't all that far away if he doesn't commit himself in the offseason to get lighter, to take care of his body as if he's on his last legs (which he is).

Two ways out of trading him and succeeding in the longrun are striking gold in free agency and/or Kristaps elevating his level to that of a superstar himself. If either or both happen, then Melo can play 30 minutes a night, be used primarily as a scoring threat and is the team's 2nd/3rd most valuable player. In which he can stay a Knick and the team can keep moving forward.

1)well Melo miss 7 or 8 games this yr, guess what.. , wade mess way more than that and still came back to win 2 rings

2)every single player in this league is subject to injuries, there's no exception, no matter who the hell you get

3)When you have a super star(no matter what you think of melo) and a budding superstar, your half way home, your attractive destination

4)Anthony Davis make 30 mill, super talented guy on a losing team...AKA KP without another star.

5)One star major pressure, over usage until knees go bad and injuries mount, have you seen the allan houston, tracy mcgrady, d howard movie, its playing at a theater near you

6)DRAFT picks, 1 out of every 10 are good, the rest are a toss up

7)we tried to build through the draft prior to AMARE, failed, traded all of our picks and assets for the one guy, is that what your looking fwd to

8)veterans win, young teams lose, and lose for a long time

9)no real coach, and a solid staff..TOAST no matter the talent

10)were worry about a pg in a system the pg is almost completely obsolete on the offense end..on the defensive end, two 7 footers in the paint that were going to the bench at he same time to bring in sasha and seraphin


REALITY

#7 is patently false and #10 is, well... i don't know what it means.

that said, the only way forward is to put melo on a minutes restriction. that won't justify his ridiculous contract since it was based on his being a starter at 36 minutes a game but at least the knicks stand a better chance of getting every ounce of value out of him at 24 minutes a game. and by the way, what team is going to want to pay melo all that money when he is going to have to play bench-like minutes?

So then what does the minutes restriction achieve, exactly? You bench the statistical leader of your team. Less Melo = Even More Losing. Another tank job? We have no draft pick, even if Phil works some draft night magic and trades to get one, you think he's going to get quality at the bottom end of the first round?

You think every other GM in the league is going to be impressed with a healthy, conserved Melo at the end of the season? What value does that provide to some other team, since it's obviously not about to provide any value to us?

What about running him the whole 36 minutes a game until the engine gives and then buying him out, ala Joe Johnson? Would that make you happy as a knicks fan?


#7= danilo, toney douglas, david lee, channing fry, chandler, nate robinson, and a few other that never even crack the rotation.

Melo is a grown man, if he feels he needs rest, and his smart, he will ask for it.

ES
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
2/29/2016  1:53 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
jrodmc wrote:
dk7th wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Porzingis is being a good teammate just like Melo has been towards him.
Melo has been pushing and helping KP to be more aggressive and get the ball to him.
KP knows how great that has been and he doesn't want Melo to leave.

They get along well.

The only reason I personally am ok with a Melo trade is his salary vs declining production/physical state. If he were making 15 million a year, I'd call him virtually untouchable. If he were in his prime, and physically capable to carry the team like a player of his caliber should, I'd again trade him virtually for players that would never be traded anyway.

Unfortunately the thing is Melo is on a physical decline, and you just can't ignore his salary. The Hawks/Nets with Joe Johnson are a decent comparison. If NY doesn't trade Melo this summer, they may never get a good deal again. And they'll never be able to get anything once he starts missing all-star teams, which aren't all that far away if he doesn't commit himself in the offseason to get lighter, to take care of his body as if he's on his last legs (which he is).

Two ways out of trading him and succeeding in the longrun are striking gold in free agency and/or Kristaps elevating his level to that of a superstar himself. If either or both happen, then Melo can play 30 minutes a night, be used primarily as a scoring threat and is the team's 2nd/3rd most valuable player. In which he can stay a Knick and the team can keep moving forward.

1)well Melo miss 7 or 8 games this yr, guess what.. , wade mess way more than that and still came back to win 2 rings

2)every single player in this league is subject to injuries, there's no exception, no matter who the hell you get

3)When you have a super star(no matter what you think of melo) and a budding superstar, your half way home, your attractive destination

4)Anthony Davis make 30 mill, super talented guy on a losing team...AKA KP without another star.

5)One star major pressure, over usage until knees go bad and injuries mount, have you seen the allan houston, tracy mcgrady, d howard movie, its playing at a theater near you

6)DRAFT picks, 1 out of every 10 are good, the rest are a toss up

7)we tried to build through the draft prior to AMARE, failed, traded all of our picks and assets for the one guy, is that what your looking fwd to

8)veterans win, young teams lose, and lose for a long time

9)no real coach, and a solid staff..TOAST no matter the talent

10)were worry about a pg in a system the pg is almost completely obsolete on the offense end..on the defensive end, two 7 footers in the paint that were going to the bench at he same time to bring in sasha and seraphin


REALITY

#7 is patently false and #10 is, well... i don't know what it means.

that said, the only way forward is to put melo on a minutes restriction. that won't justify his ridiculous contract since it was based on his being a starter at 36 minutes a game but at least the knicks stand a better chance of getting every ounce of value out of him at 24 minutes a game. and by the way, what team is going to want to pay melo all that money when he is going to have to play bench-like minutes?

So then what does the minutes restriction achieve, exactly? You bench the statistical leader of your team. Less Melo = Even More Losing. Another tank job? We have no draft pick, even if Phil works some draft night magic and trades to get one, you think he's going to get quality at the bottom end of the first round?

You think every other GM in the league is going to be impressed with a healthy, conserved Melo at the end of the season? What value does that provide to some other team, since it's obviously not about to provide any value to us?

What about running him the whole 36 minutes a game until the engine gives and then buying him out, ala Joe Johnson? Would that make you happy as a knicks fan?


#7= danilo, toney douglas, david lee, channing fry, chandler, nate robinson, and a few other that never even crack the rotation.

Melo is a grown man, if he feels he needs rest, and his smart, he will ask for it.

nope.

we had two years of roster flush once walsh arrived. he was brought in after the league insisted because the dolan/isiah era was embarrassing to the league, a laughingstock. walsh drafted

gallinari 6th in june 2008
toney douglas 29th in 2009
raymond felton acquired 2009 on a two-year audition deal
landry fields 39th in 2010
stoudemire acquired 2010
mozgov acquired from overseas in 2010

that is not "building through the draft prior to amare" when all you have in 3 years is one top 10 pick. the knicks were at 28-26 and headed to the playoffs in 2010-2011. they were just getting started on building the team. what should have happened was the knicks should have passed on amare but for dolan's value system combined with lebron's collusion. i liked the trading away of z-bo and crawful. z-bo was not a fit with d'antoni's system, and neither was crawful, who still sucks.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
You trade melo, you risk losing KP

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy