| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 4/23/2011 Member: #3538 |
I would love to get Teague because under Budenholzer he has learned to play off the ball more but I would be tempted to make it a 3-team trade for Holiday. I think what Holiday is doing is sustainable and he is doing it taking less than 12 shots a game. He could get those shots here and maybe be taught to attack the rim with a more spaced offense. I wouldn't even mind giving up Grant in the deal because of Holiday's age. It would be a nice gamble.
|
|
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/19/2014 Member: #5816 |
crzymdups wrote:Teague's numbers have fallen off a cliff this year. I haven't seen much of Atlanta - anyone know why? I think the biggest reason is because of Schroeder coming on strong and taking some minutes away from him and i guess he's been playing with a ankle injury as well. |
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
TPercy wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer That's easy to say but what if the knicks don't want to pay D-Will? He's going to opt out and he needs to get paid. Hell even if Teague needs to get some surgery and miss a few months, in the long term is makes sense to get him at the low and sell D-Will on his potential high. Especially when 1) the knicks do not have D-Will's bird rights (no team does) Keep #5 in mind Conley has been injured just like Teague and could want a max. After that you got guys like Jennings, and Ty Lawson as your best PG option. Teague would be on a 2 year contract. That means the knicks could go after a good/great FA this year, have teague for 2 years and if he doesn't work they can still shop for a replacement PG in that great 2017 FA class. If however Teague does work they would have his bird rights and could add a piece to the team and still keep him. Honestly and trade for Teague that doesn't involve a future knicks 1st round pick and moves Calderon to the Hawks is worth considering. Regardless if it involves AA, D-Will, O'quinn, Grant, Lance, or Gallo. I just think D-Will is the best move short term for both teams. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
|
NardDogNation
Posts: 27692 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 5/7/2013 Member: #5555 |
newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer Finally, some sanity! |
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer actually he has shot the 3 better this season and his D hasn't been bad. Also all the other things he did (In the video I posted) D Will does and why trade for AA when you have Bazemore who is having a career season? Also I mentioned how the defense wasn't the same..... but Carroll didn't camp in the corner. He was much more versatile than that. *watch Carroll Highlights and Watch D-Will Highlights and you'll see how the operate in the offense. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|
|
NardDogNation
Posts: 27692 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 5/7/2013 Member: #5555 |
yellowboy90 wrote:I would love to get Teague because under Budenholzer he has learned to play off the ball more but I would be tempted to make it a 3-team trade for Holiday. I think what Holiday is doing is sustainable and he is doing it taking less than 12 shots a game. He could get those shots here and maybe be taught to attack the rim with a more spaced offense. I wouldn't even mind giving up Grant in the deal because of Holiday's age. It would be a nice gamble. I've been a proponent of Holiday for a while but his defense looks awful now in the games I've seen. What's your take about him on that end of the floor? |
|
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/19/2014 Member: #5816 |
TPercy wrote:nixluva wrote:babyKnicks wrote:Id like to keep dwill and grant. To be honest. Unless they are taking back calderone, I would pass. Teague doesn't put us over the top and sending calderone to the bench would kill team chemistry and morale. I don't know much about Teague though. But grant and Galloway are two way players I'd prefer to take a chance on. But lets just look at it this way. If Phil knows he's not gonna be able to re-sign DW after this year and still be able to go forward with his plan then do you think keeping DW just for the rest of this year would be better than trading him for Teague who's already signed for next year at $8 mil?? He could be good for J.Grant for the rest of this year and all of next year. |
|
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/19/2014 Member: #5816 |
wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer I stopped reading after his D hasn't been bad. Sorry but laughing too hard to go on. |
|
wargames
Posts: 22833 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/27/2015 Member: #6053 |
newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:wargames wrote:NardDogNation wrote:EnySpree wrote:Rookie wrote:callmened wrote:we have nothing good to offer Still ignoring my point about the offense huh? Anyhow bad defense didn't stop them from trading for Hardaway now did it. And D-Will's game matches Carroll's game a whole lot more. The algorithm gives and the algorithm takes away
|