newyorker4ever wrote:GustavBahler wrote:nyk4ever wrote:GustavBahler wrote:nyk4ever wrote:GustavBahler wrote:nyk4ever wrote:GustavBahler wrote:nyk4ever wrote:GustavBahler wrote:nyk4ever wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Fisher said in so many words in the post game press conference that he messed up the rotation and that he will do a better job. Like I said, this team has more work to do. Still about 3 more months to go, plenty of time to figure things out.
i seriously wonder how he thinks he messed up the rotation? there was nowhere to go last night. the end of our bench has absolutely no guard play whatsoever.
Fisher said he didnt play enough guys, volunteered the information.
i understand what he said and how he thinks he messed up. im saying where else did he want to go? oquinn, seraphin and amundson were really the only other guys he could've went to and they all play the same position/do the same thing. where we really needed to go was bringing in a guard or forward who can score and we didn't have any to goto. i am disagreeing with him and saying making the change wouldn't of made a difference since he had no guards or scoring forwards to goto. we lack scoring depth terribly.
KP was gassed, back to back, arms were tired, not very complicated. Im glad Fisher owns up to his mistakes, more faith in him learning from this than I would if he said that he did everything right. I take Fisher admitting that he has room for improvement as a good thing.
what is so hard to understand about what im saying? i have no problem with fisher taking the blame for the loss, it's what leaders/coaches do.. the simple fact though is that he had nowhere to go on his bench even if he wanted to. the team needs to trade for scoring depth so we don't have nights like this again.
I understand completely what your saying. Your're saying you understand why Fisher took the rap, he had nothing to do with this loss, its all on the players. None of the decisions he made had any bearing on this loss. Thats what you're saying, and its 100 percent wrong.
apparently you don't understand. where did i say fisher didn't have anything to do with the loss? the lack of depth on the knicks bench certainly contributed to his use (or non-use) of his bench last night.
Please read my response to that upthread. Thank you.
i saw it. all it leads me to believe is that instead of reading what people are typing you are just assuming that they mean something else.
You said he took the blame not that he deserved it. Fisher said why, you said that his explanation for the loss was wrong. Where in any of what you said points out to him having to do anything with this loss? If you did believe he had something to do with the loss, why leave that part out? We were discussing Fisher's role in this loss.
I guess some people just can't put the simple things together but hopefully that's something you'll be able to figure out in the future cause it's really quite easy. Good luck with that.
Once again when challenged I get insults from you and no coherent argument. It might be a bit wordier, but lacking in any logic just the same. All you said was that Fisher was covering for the players, not that he had any role in this loss. If you do believe Fisher has some role in this loss, lets hear it....