[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks 2016-2017
Author Thread
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/13/2016  5:35 PM
martin wrote:
crzymdups wrote:One thing to think about for Free Agency this summer - thank frickin' god we got KP.

Dude just looks fun to play with and NBA guys know he's a budding superstar. Every single team is gonna have $20M to offer - everyone's gonna get overpaid. So it becomes a question of what else can you offer.

The narrative of the Knicks having the young, limitless potential of KP, brand new passing Dad Melo, solid professionals in Rolo and Afflalo, good team guys in Lance, Langston, DWill, solid young guy Grant, etc, back in the playoffs, Zen Master running the show...

The Knicks are going to be an attractive destination this summer to get that one piece. I'd love to get Batum or Conley - I'd cheer like heck on either move. I think they will meet with the team and listen.

I thought the GameThread dudes landed on ThisMelo

Whatever makes Conley or Batum happier!

¿ △ ?
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/13/2016  5:37 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
fishmike wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
fishmike wrote:Mike Conley now is great. Mike Conley at the money it would take him to leave Memphis... not so much. I would not pay $20mm to bring him here. He's a really good player, but he's not a star, and Im not paying him star money. Rather resign our guys mentioned above, especially if they are reasonable deals.

If $20M is what it will take to get him, he's not going to be a Knick, even if he wants to come here. IMO.

You guys need to stop thinking by the old salary cap standards. Conley has consistently been a top-10 PG in the league the last few years, and is only 27 years old. He is commanding max money.

Yep. Goran Drgic got 5yr $92M. That's the going rate for Conley - that's the low end for Conley - Conley is way better than Dragic and defends.

I think Conley would be a perfect fit with this team, especially next to Afflalo in the backcourt.

I don't know how much I'm willing to pay - but if you want to max out the Melo years a lineup like this would be a great way to do it:


Conley
Afflalo
Melo
KP
Rolo

bench: Grant, Galloway, Lance, DWill, KOQ

Conley to me is the missing piece. That team, with KP and Grant in year 2 - I think that team can win 50-55 games and compete for the ECF. Heck, KP already owns Love every time they play and Bron is aging. With Conley to lock down Kyrie Irving, that team might be able to beat the Cavs.

thats assuming DWill/AA/Lance opt in (or Lance resigns cheap).

Many things can change, but how do we pay Conley that money? Seems like signing him would be at the expense of DWill/AA and that doesnt strike me as huge improvement. I like Money Mike a lot.

We have $19M in cap room, give or take. We have more like $34M if DWill and Afflalo opt out. We could stretch Calderon to get an extra $6M in cap room, I believe (stretching his final season of $8M over five seasons on the cap). So we'd have ~$40M to sign Conley, Afflalo, DWill, Lance and Langston. I think that's possible.

Conley $18M, Afflalo $10M, DWill $5M, Lance $5M, Langston $2M

There's a way to do, I'm sure. Maybe give DWill and Lance $6M each and then when we are at the cap, use the Room exception of $3M to sign Langston.

Not for nothing, but Knicks can pay Afflalo $9.6m and LT close to $6m without cutting into cap space.

AA qualifies for 120% of his salary as a non-Bird exception and LT can get 104.5% of this year's average salary, which may be from $5.5 to $5.8m.

Best part is if they don't do anything until the KNicks use their cap space, Knicks can go over the cap to do it.

Do you mean DWill instead of LT? DWill is making $5M this year, LT is making $1.6M

But I like you point - Knicks can get crafty with the timing of the signings to go over the cap for Afflalo and DWill. That helps immensely.

IMHO - you give Afflalo a 20% raise to ~$10M and that's a fair deal for him.

We shall see.

¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/13/2016  5:43 PM
C Lopez
PF Porzingis
F Melo
G Affalo 4 years 40mm)
G T Johnson(4 years 28mm)

C Powell 4 years 28mm)
F D Williams 4 years 24mm
F L Thomas 3 years 15mm
G Grant/ Miles(acquired pick 42 cash)/Galloway(2 years 5mm)
G Calderon

C Bachyinski(2 years 2mm)
F Oquinn
G Miles/Grant/Galloway
G Felder (acquired pick 27 future and cash)

RIP Crushalot😞
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

1/13/2016  5:52 PM
crzymdups wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
fishmike wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
fishmike wrote:Mike Conley now is great. Mike Conley at the money it would take him to leave Memphis... not so much. I would not pay $20mm to bring him here. He's a really good player, but he's not a star, and Im not paying him star money. Rather resign our guys mentioned above, especially if they are reasonable deals.

If $20M is what it will take to get him, he's not going to be a Knick, even if he wants to come here. IMO.

You guys need to stop thinking by the old salary cap standards. Conley has consistently been a top-10 PG in the league the last few years, and is only 27 years old. He is commanding max money.

Yep. Goran Drgic got 5yr $92M. That's the going rate for Conley - that's the low end for Conley - Conley is way better than Dragic and defends.

I think Conley would be a perfect fit with this team, especially next to Afflalo in the backcourt.

I don't know how much I'm willing to pay - but if you want to max out the Melo years a lineup like this would be a great way to do it:


Conley
Afflalo
Melo
KP
Rolo

bench: Grant, Galloway, Lance, DWill, KOQ

Conley to me is the missing piece. That team, with KP and Grant in year 2 - I think that team can win 50-55 games and compete for the ECF. Heck, KP already owns Love every time they play and Bron is aging. With Conley to lock down Kyrie Irving, that team might be able to beat the Cavs.

thats assuming DWill/AA/Lance opt in (or Lance resigns cheap).

Many things can change, but how do we pay Conley that money? Seems like signing him would be at the expense of DWill/AA and that doesnt strike me as huge improvement. I like Money Mike a lot.

We have $19M in cap room, give or take. We have more like $34M if DWill and Afflalo opt out. We could stretch Calderon to get an extra $6M in cap room, I believe (stretching his final season of $8M over five seasons on the cap). So we'd have ~$40M to sign Conley, Afflalo, DWill, Lance and Langston. I think that's possible.

Conley $18M, Afflalo $10M, DWill $5M, Lance $5M, Langston $2M

There's a way to do, I'm sure. Maybe give DWill and Lance $6M each and then when we are at the cap, use the Room exception of $3M to sign Langston.

Not for nothing, but Knicks can pay Afflalo $9.6m and LT close to $6m without cutting into cap space.

AA qualifies for 120% of his salary as a non-Bird exception and LT can get 104.5% of this year's average salary, which may be from $5.5 to $5.8m.

Best part is if they don't do anything until the KNicks use their cap space, Knicks can go over the cap to do it.

Do you mean DWill instead of LT? DWill is making $5M this year, LT is making $1.6M

But I like you point - Knicks can get crafty with the timing of the signings to go over the cap for Afflalo and DWill. That helps immensely.

IMHO - you give Afflalo a 20% raise to ~$10M and that's a fair deal for him.

We shall see.

No, LT is a UFA but the Knicks hold his early birds rights, which specifically means that can pay him 104.5% of this year's avg salary at any time, including when they're over the cap.

So if LT hangs on on his $2m cap hold until the Knicks spend all their cap room, he can still sign for $5.8-$6m AFTER.

nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

1/13/2016  5:53 PM
Afflalo - same deal per year, I'd give him 2 years with a 3rd year as a team option. No team is paying Afflalo more than that at this stage. He's pretty up there in age and he's going to not have a better situation than this in terms of being able to post up and do what he does. Before this season the last 2 years he struggled to fit in. He's good for the Triangle as it allows him to post up.

DWill - Shouldn't opt out. He should show he can keep improving and get a massive pay day a year from now. Teams aren't going to all of a sudden think DWill is some high IQ player. He fits in in a perfect role designated to him by Phil. Not every team can do that for him. He should stick with them for another year and cash in a year after that. If he opts out, I'd give him 5-6 million a year over 3 years. No more than that.

Thomas - He is the easiest of the 3 to let go. Love him, but he doesn't look up to pass or make the same impact as DWill/Afflalo. He is a quality bench player, but that's where I see it end for him.

I like these guys, but I wouldn't go more than what they're currently making on an annual basis (except for Thomas obviously). If they want more guaranteed years, I'd give it to both, but not more than 2 for Afflalo and no more than 3 for Thomas/Williams.

Galloway - About 3 years 4 million per year.

With Lopez/Porzingis/Anthony/Calderon/Grant/Galloway all likely to return, I'd be very ok with letting guys like Afflalo, Williams, Thomas walk if they ask for more than what they are currently making (other than Lance again obviously). This team is built in a way where they are the anti-Knicks of the past. No more overpaying talent and handing 6-7 massive contracts in one summer. If Phil has shown anything, it's that he knows how to scout free agent talent that can fit in his system right away. With capspace he'll be able to continue to look at role players like Batum, Parsons, Stephenson to replace or add to the team.

As for free agent targets, the 2 that seem to be obvious are Conley and Batum.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/13/2016  6:06 PM    LAST EDITED: 1/13/2016  6:09 PM
Also I think Kay Felder is an NBA superstar--better than anything we can possibly get in free agency. I would expect low year return 1 but I wouldnt be surprised if he was Porzingis like right away from the 1. Just incredible body control power speed and skills. This would be like putting Isiah Thomas(Boston) on our team with more PG skill) Its not q PJ PG at 5-9 but hes a cerebral player who would help the Knicks become unguardable (Hes no ball stopper)

Miles is a Spur like pick 6-7 225 SG with long arms gorgeous stroke with great defensive potential. To me its easy. Identify two later round picks you really believe in(low cost) and attainable and two moderate cost YOUNG NBA players(Powell and Johnson) who have upside but fit in here for the short and long term.


Guys like Noah(always always hurt) and Batum(extreme expensive who also is injury prone)

RIP Crushalot😞
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/13/2016  6:16 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
No, LT is a UFA but the Knicks hold his early birds rights, which specifically means that can pay him 104.5% of this year's avg salary at any time, including when they're over the cap.

So if LT hangs on on his $2m cap hold until the Knicks spend all their cap room, he can still sign for $5.8-$6m AFTER.

Ohhhhh, interesting. Theoretically, the same holds true for DWill as well.

So technically, the Knicks can wait to re-sign all of the group of Afflalo, DWill, Lance as long as they don't renounce their cap holds. That's huge.

Though going over the cap to re-sign them to long-term deals would of course eat into 2017 cap room.

¿ △ ?
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

1/13/2016  6:50 PM
crzymdups wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
No, LT is a UFA but the Knicks hold his early birds rights, which specifically means that can pay him 104.5% of this year's avg salary at any time, including when they're over the cap.

So if LT hangs on on his $2m cap hold until the Knicks spend all their cap room, he can still sign for $5.8-$6m AFTER.

Ohhhhh, interesting. Theoretically, the same holds true for DWill as well.

So technically, the Knicks can wait to re-sign all of the group of Afflalo, DWill, Lance as long as they don't renounce their cap holds. That's huge.

Though going over the cap to re-sign them to long-term deals would of course eat into 2017 cap room.

D-Will would be eligible for 120% of his previous salary as a non-Bird FA.

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

1/13/2016  6:56 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
No, LT is a UFA but the Knicks hold his early birds rights, which specifically means that can pay him 104.5% of this year's avg salary at any time, including when they're over the cap.

So if LT hangs on on his $2m cap hold until the Knicks spend all their cap room, he can still sign for $5.8-$6m AFTER.

Ohhhhh, interesting. Theoretically, the same holds true for DWill as well.

So technically, the Knicks can wait to re-sign all of the group of Afflalo, DWill, Lance as long as they don't renounce their cap holds. That's huge.

Though going over the cap to re-sign them to long-term deals would of course eat into 2017 cap room.

D-Will would be eligible for 120% of his previous salary as a non-Bird FA.


Exactly,just for clarification it goes 1 yr(non-bird), 2 yrs(early-bird), and 3yrs(full-bird)
Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

1/13/2016  7:07 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
No, LT is a UFA but the Knicks hold his early birds rights, which specifically means that can pay him 104.5% of this year's avg salary at any time, including when they're over the cap.

So if LT hangs on on his $2m cap hold until the Knicks spend all their cap room, he can still sign for $5.8-$6m AFTER.

Ohhhhh, interesting. Theoretically, the same holds true for DWill as well.

So technically, the Knicks can wait to re-sign all of the group of Afflalo, DWill, Lance as long as they don't renounce their cap holds. That's huge.

Though going over the cap to re-sign them to long-term deals would of course eat into 2017 cap room.

D-Will would be eligible for 120% of his previous salary as a non-Bird FA.


Exactly,just for clarification it goes 1 yr(non-bird), 2 yrs(early-bird), and 3yrs(full-bird)

Correct, with a "year" being the team you were on the roster on for game 82.

yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

1/13/2016  7:12 PM
Knickoftime wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
No, LT is a UFA but the Knicks hold his early birds rights, which specifically means that can pay him 104.5% of this year's avg salary at any time, including when they're over the cap.

So if LT hangs on on his $2m cap hold until the Knicks spend all their cap room, he can still sign for $5.8-$6m AFTER.

Ohhhhh, interesting. Theoretically, the same holds true for DWill as well.

So technically, the Knicks can wait to re-sign all of the group of Afflalo, DWill, Lance as long as they don't renounce their cap holds. That's huge.

Though going over the cap to re-sign them to long-term deals would of course eat into 2017 cap room.

D-Will would be eligible for 120% of his previous salary as a non-Bird FA.


Exactly,just for clarification it goes 1 yr(non-bird), 2 yrs(early-bird), and 3yrs(full-bird)

Correct, with a "year" being the team you were on the roster on for game 82.

Not exactly, any amount of time qualifies a yr. Even if they were signed before he playoffs that season will count as a full 1yr. Gallo is an example although not as extreme as I mentioned before. He was signed in January but he still got his full yr last season.

Knickoftime
Posts: 24159
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/13/2011
Member: #3370

1/13/2016  7:21 PM
yellowboy90 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
crzymdups wrote:
Knickoftime wrote:
No, LT is a UFA but the Knicks hold his early birds rights, which specifically means that can pay him 104.5% of this year's avg salary at any time, including when they're over the cap.

So if LT hangs on on his $2m cap hold until the Knicks spend all their cap room, he can still sign for $5.8-$6m AFTER.

Ohhhhh, interesting. Theoretically, the same holds true for DWill as well.

So technically, the Knicks can wait to re-sign all of the group of Afflalo, DWill, Lance as long as they don't renounce their cap holds. That's huge.

Though going over the cap to re-sign them to long-term deals would of course eat into 2017 cap room.

D-Will would be eligible for 120% of his previous salary as a non-Bird FA.


Exactly,just for clarification it goes 1 yr(non-bird), 2 yrs(early-bird), and 3yrs(full-bird)

Correct, with a "year" being the team you were on the roster on for game 82.

Not exactly, any amount of time qualifies a yr. Even if they were signed before he playoffs that season will count as a full 1yr. Gallo is an example although not as extreme as I mentioned before. He was signed in January but he still got his full yr last season.

That's what I mean, you just have to finish the year with the team.

BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
1/13/2016  10:47 PM
Im not one who thinks we are "there" but I do think we have some key pieces in place. Adding to our sore points with younger efficient athletic lengthy players that do NOT cost 20mm is the way to go. It shows in a game like tonight that we need more quality on the bench--you cant do 8 guys on a back to back--its 13 active players for a reason. On the back to back you must go 10-11 deep and those guys have to play well. Look at Golden State and San Antonio they use the WHOLE roster. But they have quality DEEP. Thats our next step--taking the quality and moving it deep into the bench. Also the Spurs--looks at the players they get the ROOKIES EACH year

Andersen Simmons McCallum Marjanovich--they literally add two young guys every year. they understand the need for quality all the way down--no wasted spots. It enhances the front key players and keeps them FRESH.

Tonight we were NOT fresh.

RIP Crushalot😞
Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

1/13/2016  10:52 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Im not one who thinks we are "there" but I do think we have some key pieces in place. Adding to our sore points with younger efficient athletic lengthy players that do NOT cost 20mm is the way to go. It shows in a game like tonight that we need more quality on the bench--you cant do 8 guys on a back to back--its 13 active players for a reason. On the back to back you must go 10-11 deep and those guys have to play well. Look at Golden State and San Antonio they use the WHOLE roster. But they have quality DEEP. Thats our next step--taking the quality and moving it deep into the bench. Also the Spurs--looks at the players they get the ROOKIES EACH year

Andersen Simmons McCallum Marjanovich--they literally add two young guys every year. they understand the need for quality all the way down--no wasted spots. It enhances the front key players and keeps them FRESH.

Tonight we were NOT fresh.

what about the player we stashed in europe last year?

Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

1/13/2016  11:25 PM
Cartman718 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Im not one who thinks we are "there" but I do think we have some key pieces in place. Adding to our sore points with younger efficient athletic lengthy players that do NOT cost 20mm is the way to go. It shows in a game like tonight that we need more quality on the bench--you cant do 8 guys on a back to back--its 13 active players for a reason. On the back to back you must go 10-11 deep and those guys have to play well. Look at Golden State and San Antonio they use the WHOLE roster. But they have quality DEEP. Thats our next step--taking the quality and moving it deep into the bench. Also the Spurs--looks at the players they get the ROOKIES EACH year

Andersen Simmons McCallum Marjanovich--they literally add two young guys every year. they understand the need for quality all the way down--no wasted spots. It enhances the front key players and keeps them FRESH.

Tonight we were NOT fresh.

what about the player we stashed in europe last year?


Louis Labeyrie?

Plays PF - is in France.

Cartman718
Posts: 29069
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/12/2007
Member: #1694

1/13/2016  11:41 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:
Cartman718 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:Im not one who thinks we are "there" but I do think we have some key pieces in place. Adding to our sore points with younger efficient athletic lengthy players that do NOT cost 20mm is the way to go. It shows in a game like tonight that we need more quality on the bench--you cant do 8 guys on a back to back--its 13 active players for a reason. On the back to back you must go 10-11 deep and those guys have to play well. Look at Golden State and San Antonio they use the WHOLE roster. But they have quality DEEP. Thats our next step--taking the quality and moving it deep into the bench. Also the Spurs--looks at the players they get the ROOKIES EACH year

Andersen Simmons McCallum Marjanovich--they literally add two young guys every year. they understand the need for quality all the way down--no wasted spots. It enhances the front key players and keeps them FRESH.

Tonight we were NOT fresh.

what about the player we stashed in europe last year?


Louis Labeyrie?

Plays PF - is in France.

this guy http://www.nba.com/knicks/knicks-acquire-guillermo-hernangomez

Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

1/14/2016  1:46 AM
If the Knicks signed a FA(Batum) to a salary starting at $19m how much would you want the knicks to try to keep D.Will? Yes, he has to continue to play like he has been. Would you stretch Calderon to give him $10m and try to get AA to resign for a 120% increase? Another option would be to trade O'Quinn for peanuts and try to being Willy H over for a rookie min. So what would you want the knicks to do? Waive goodbye?
martin
Posts: 80096
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
1/14/2016  11:05 AM
yellowboy90 wrote:If the Knicks signed a FA(Batum) to a salary starting at $19m how much would you want the knicks to try to keep D.Will? Yes, he has to continue to play like he has been. Would you stretch Calderon to give him $10m and try to get AA to resign for a 120% increase? Another option would be to trade O'Quinn for peanuts and try to being Willy H over for a rookie min. So what would you want the knicks to do? Waive goodbye?

Your assumption is that DWill is going to want $10M per? For me, even with cap of $89M, that is overpaying by about $5M.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/14/2016  12:10 PM
BRIGGS wrote:Im not one who thinks we are "there" but I do think we have some key pieces in place. Adding to our sore points with younger efficient athletic lengthy players that do NOT cost 20mm is the way to go. It shows in a game like tonight that we need more quality on the bench--you cant do 8 guys on a back to back--its 13 active players for a reason. On the back to back you must go 10-11 deep and those guys have to play well. Look at Golden State and San Antonio they use the WHOLE roster. But they have quality DEEP. Thats our next step--taking the quality and moving it deep into the bench. Also the Spurs--looks at the players they get the ROOKIES EACH year

Andersen Simmons McCallum Marjanovich--they literally add two young guys every year. they understand the need for quality all the way down--no wasted spots. It enhances the front key players and keeps them FRESH.

Tonight we were NOT fresh.

I think you look to add those types of players cheaply - as Phil has been doing already...

But when you have $20M in cap space and the ability to essentially jump start the process a little and buy a starter, I think that's an advantage you can't just let pass by.

If the Knicks can buy another reliable above average / ideally near all-star level starter, it makes them that much deeper and more balanced and less prone to a Melo injury derailing them completely.

I still think it is highly important to continue adding young guys to make the team deeper. Guys like Seraphin and Amundson just feel like dead weight at this point and it'd be good to have young, long athletic guys in those roles who could fit the style of play we're going for.

You talk about San Antonio and GSW - they do look to add quality youth to their bench. But San Antonio just had $20M in cap room and made sure they added a foundational player in LMA. GSW went out and got Bogut and Igoudala and then Livingston, quality vets, even though they had a deep young roster that is the envy of the league.

¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/14/2016  12:12 PM
martin wrote:
yellowboy90 wrote:If the Knicks signed a FA(Batum) to a salary starting at $19m how much would you want the knicks to try to keep D.Will? Yes, he has to continue to play like he has been. Would you stretch Calderon to give him $10m and try to get AA to resign for a 120% increase? Another option would be to trade O'Quinn for peanuts and try to being Willy H over for a rookie min. So what would you want the knicks to do? Waive goodbye?

Your assumption is that DWill is going to want $10M per? For me, even with cap of $89M, that is overpaying by about $5M.

I offer DWill the %20 raise we can give him - so up to $6M annually. IF we can get Batum, my priority is to keep one of AAA or DWill - not necessarily both.

¿ △ ?
Knicks 2016-2017

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy