| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
newyorker4ever wrote:BRIGGS wrote:If we took our time. Portis Seem to recall that Briggs was looking at Portis pre-draft and rating him very high up- pretty sure he had him in his top ten at one point. Remember this pretty distinctly because I looked at him after Briggs mentioned him. I thought he was a top 15 type talent, and was surprised to see him drop. I don't think Portis was as consistently good as he could have been at Arkansas, but he was on a free-wheeling team that did not seem to have much discipline or any system on offense (fun to watch, though). Not sure he got all the touches that he would have gotten on another team. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
crzymdups wrote:Sangfroid wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:Some on here need to get some patience with not only Grant but this team. Grant is a kid coming from playing 4 years of college basketball and playing all 4 years in a certain system to having to learn a whole new offense and doing it with the pressure of playing for his first time in the NBA and in New York City for the New York Knicks so it's a ton of pressure for a rookie point guard especially having to learn an offense where so much is dependent on the point guard. It's gotta be a lot to take on for a kid but he seems like a very mature kid so i think he has a really good chance of getting his game right but we have to have patience with him. So much of being a successful shooter has to do with confidence. The confidence allows you to be a little more relaxed when you shoot, and allows the muscle memory from the 500/600 shots/day to kick in and take over. The hesitation and doubt you see with Grant is almost painful to watch at times. We've see a few glimpses where he's looked confident, but these moments have been rare. Hopefully this changes sooner rather than later...just have to have some patience with him. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
|
nixluva
Posts: 56258 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/5/2004 Member: #758 USA |
WaltLongmire wrote:crzymdups wrote:Sangfroid wrote:newyorker4ever wrote:Some on here need to get some patience with not only Grant but this team. Grant is a kid coming from playing 4 years of college basketball and playing all 4 years in a certain system to having to learn a whole new offense and doing it with the pressure of playing for his first time in the NBA and in New York City for the New York Knicks so it's a ton of pressure for a rookie point guard especially having to learn an offense where so much is dependent on the point guard. It's gotta be a lot to take on for a kid but he seems like a very mature kid so i think he has a really good chance of getting his game right but we have to have patience with him. Jerian doesn't want to be he reason the team loses and that fear is paralyzing. People really don't understand how it's a HUGE mental thing. Jerian worked hard in the summer and is a hard worker but it's more than that. We see KP working on his hook all the time and yet he still isn't comfortable enough to use it in games. It's sometimes tough to get your confidence back once you lose it. Especially for a rookie. Hopefully Jerian will eventually snap out of it and start to play like he can. |
|
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/8/2015 Member: #6207 |
Give him a year to understand his role in the offense and what skills he needs to improve. He's clearly lost. Defensively I love his potential.
|
|
RonRon
Posts: 25531 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/22/2002 Member: #246 |
instantly DURING the draft (i made multiple posts, some of which were in one of the draft posts we had going LIVE) Before, during, and after Summer League (before he put up huge numbers)
Honestly, I would much rather have looked to sign a combination of PG's for value like Ish Smith and Jeremy Lin, great value for the buck (both of which could be FA's again this summer) Both of which (could basically be had for NOTHING, we could have signed LT and LA to vet mins and signed both players) As a shooter like a young Mo Williams, I also like, Troy Daniels as a shooter with the ability good quickness or Isiah Cannnon
Isiah Thomas II was the FINAL pick of the the draft and perhaps the BEST FINAL draft pick EVER in the NBA Would also look to add playmakers/ball handlers from other positions such as
Lance Stephenson/Evan Turner *UFA*
============ Battum is going to be cost a bit, possibly a near "max" However, as the cap continues to go up in the next 2 years, I would prefer to look to acquire a PG 2 years from now with many possible FA's
Tyler Johnson
|
|
RonRon
Posts: 25531 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/22/2002 Member: #246 |
he is still our BEST DEFENDER at PG right now
That is how the league is trending now.... look at Draymond Green... During midway season last year,
|
|
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
RonRon wrote: You know posts like these are full of bunk. You wouldnt even know who Bobby Portis is if it wasnt for me. I had him ranked as high as 3 at one point during the regular season(when no one else even knew who the F he was). He wasnt going to be drafted 4 and my other picks were based on 2nd round assumptions in fact Bobby Portis wasn't on my radar as he shouldve been a later lottery pick Johnny come lately:) and we had no other picks going into draft. RIP Crushalot😞
|
|
HofstraBBall
Posts: 28100 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
Hindsight makes it easy to say we should have Traded Hardaway for Portis. Of course it would now prove to have been a great trade. However, my point was that trading what you know for a might be rookie is risky. Specially at the point guard position. Traditionally a very risky pick due to the many factors that go into becoming a succesful NBA point guard. Hardaway was a scorer and pretty good three point shooter, something we dearly need in our second unit. Yes he had deficiencies but you knew what they were. Not claiming Hardaway was a great plaer but at least he was not an unproven rookie. Would have preferred to trade him as part of a package for an experienced guard. Say, Lowry?
'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|
|
Cartman718
Posts: 29069 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/12/2007 Member: #1694 |
CrushAlot wrote:CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:He had an incredible pre-draft workout video where he was hitting his shots if I recall correctly. It was posted here a couple of times.newyorker4ever wrote:Some on here need to get some patience with not only Grant but this team. Grant is a kid coming from playing 4 years of college basketball and playing all 4 years in a certain system to having to learn a whole new offense and doing it with the pressure of playing for his first time in the NBA and in New York City for the New York Knicks so it's a ton of pressure for a rookie point guard especially having to learn an offense where so much is dependent on the point guard. It's gotta be a lot to take on for a kid but he seems like a very mature kid so i think he has a really good chance of getting his game right but we have to have patience with him. oh you mean the workout where no one is defending him? great we'll just ask the opposing team to sit down and watch grant dribble. sorry if i sound mad but these workouts dont mean jack. right now hardaway looks like a winner and phil looking like a loser for trading him, maybe next year things will be different Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL
So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
|
|
knickscity
Posts: 24533 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/2/2012 Member: #4241 USA |
HofstraBBall wrote:Hindsight makes it easy to say we should have Traded Hardaway for Portis. Of course it would now prove to have been a great trade. However, my point was that trading what you know for a might be rookie is risky. Specially at the point guard position. Traditionally a very risky pick due to the many factors that go into becoming a succesful NBA point guard. Hardaway was a scorer and pretty good three point shooter, something we dearly need in our second unit. Yes he had deficiencies but you knew what they were. Not claiming Hardaway was a great plaer but at least he was not an unproven rookie. Would have preferred to trade him as part of a package for an experienced guard. Say, Lowry? Not hindsight when quite a few viewed Portis as lottery talent. As far as Timmy for Grant, Hardaway was awful even in the one area he was supposedly good at. |
|
anrst
Posts: 22707 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/7/2005 Member: #1054 USA |
grant had to go to college classes past 4 years. only time for 100 shots per day, just like i only had time for 10 bong hits in school.
|
|
HofstraBBall
Posts: 28100 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
knickscity wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Hindsight makes it easy to say we should have Traded Hardaway for Portis. Of course it would now prove to have been a great trade. However, my point was that trading what you know for a might be rookie is risky. Specially at the point guard position. Traditionally a very risky pick due to the many factors that go into becoming a succesful NBA point guard. Hardaway was a scorer and pretty good three point shooter, something we dearly need in our second unit. Yes he had deficiencies but you knew what they were. Not claiming Hardaway was a great plaer but at least he was not an unproven rookie. Would have preferred to trade him as part of a package for an experienced guard. Say, Lowry? Awful? In what sense? I am not saying he was a starter. We are comparing two bench players right? So to say 11 points off bench is awful is juat a blanket unsupported opinion. Something rampant on the boards. He was nothing more than a good bench scorer. He did that. Grant is giving us what again? 'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
HofstraBBall wrote:knickscity wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Hindsight makes it easy to say we should have Traded Hardaway for Portis. Of course it would now prove to have been a great trade. However, my point was that trading what you know for a might be rookie is risky. Specially at the point guard position. Traditionally a very risky pick due to the many factors that go into becoming a succesful NBA point guard. Hardaway was a scorer and pretty good three point shooter, something we dearly need in our second unit. Yes he had deficiencies but you knew what they were. Not claiming Hardaway was a great plaer but at least he was not an unproven rookie. Would have preferred to trade him as part of a package for an experienced guard. Say, Lowry? wait ... are you saying that THJ was not awful? He was a good bench player? Points? so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
HofstraBBall
Posts: 28100 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
mreinman wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:knickscity wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Hindsight makes it easy to say we should have Traded Hardaway for Portis. Of course it would now prove to have been a great trade. However, my point was that trading what you know for a might be rookie is risky. Specially at the point guard position. Traditionally a very risky pick due to the many factors that go into becoming a succesful NBA point guard. Hardaway was a scorer and pretty good three point shooter, something we dearly need in our second unit. Yes he had deficiencies but you knew what they were. Not claiming Hardaway was a great plaer but at least he was not an unproven rookie. Would have preferred to trade him as part of a package for an experienced guard. Say, Lowry? As a player coming off the bench as offensive spark, yes. Compared to first year rookie, Grant, hell yes. Point of thread was to voice preference to keep a third year player that showed signs of offensive ability as oppose to a first year rookie point guard. One of the toughest positions to draft. As Grant is showing. Not necessary to get into a conversation to argue how good TH was or was not. But a third year player that showed signs of a offensive spark. Something currently lacking. 'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
HofstraBBall wrote:mreinman wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:knickscity wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Hindsight makes it easy to say we should have Traded Hardaway for Portis. Of course it would now prove to have been a great trade. However, my point was that trading what you know for a might be rookie is risky. Specially at the point guard position. Traditionally a very risky pick due to the many factors that go into becoming a succesful NBA point guard. Hardaway was a scorer and pretty good three point shooter, something we dearly need in our second unit. Yes he had deficiencies but you knew what they were. Not claiming Hardaway was a great plaer but at least he was not an unproven rookie. Would have preferred to trade him as part of a package for an experienced guard. Say, Lowry? THJ was a terrible offensive player and possibly the worst defender in the league. Grant plays defense and has much more potential already and he is nothing at this point. so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
|
HofstraBBall
Posts: 28100 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
mreinman wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:mreinman wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:knickscity wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:Hindsight makes it easy to say we should have Traded Hardaway for Portis. Of course it would now prove to have been a great trade. However, my point was that trading what you know for a might be rookie is risky. Specially at the point guard position. Traditionally a very risky pick due to the many factors that go into becoming a succesful NBA point guard. Hardaway was a scorer and pretty good three point shooter, something we dearly need in our second unit. Yes he had deficiencies but you knew what they were. Not claiming Hardaway was a great plaer but at least he was not an unproven rookie. Would have preferred to trade him as part of a package for an experienced guard. Say, Lowry? So your going to prolong your point or lack there of by using the pretense that he has "Potential". A word used by those that can't concede a point until three years from now. As a Knick fan I hope you are right and I am wrong, in three years. Still can't change the point. At this time without assumptions and personal opinion TH better for us than Grant. If you need me to pull up stats, I wont. 'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|