i like the idea of system basketball. Phil likes the triangle but other forms work too. San Antonio is a classic example. Obviously Duncan is a superstar, but a lot of their other guys might not be the same guys on other teams and in some cases might not have even made it into or stayed in the league. (e.g., Danny Green, Manu, Patty Mills). In earlier years Portland and Detroit were very effective without a Big 3.
Miami's big 3 for all their "bigness" lost to Dallas and SA; and OKC had a big 3 (when Harden was there) that was amazing and yet...
So this is a longer way of saying I could care less about a big 3; I'd rather Melo sacrifices some of his game and develops other parts and that this translates to wins. If he does that with other studs, great; if he does that with the Danny Greens of the world, that's great too.
I like the idea of him developing a chip on his shoulder and trying to prove others wrong about defense, passing, leadership. Now it just needs to translate with consistency.