[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Porzingis is ready to be the starting center
Author Thread
fitzfarm
Posts: 25285
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285

12/8/2015  5:08 PM
mreinman wrote:
fitzfarm wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Porzingis is NOT ready to be starting center, give me a break. He's 20 years old, dude!

Let him be the 5 in certain matchups and small ball lineups, but not to start against bigger bruising 5s out there.

You don't want him to get banged up and absorb a beating by wider and heavier guys while he's still developing. Let him transition from stretch 4 to true center in a couple years when he gains more strength and body mass organically.

Again if he can hold his own vs zaza who is one of the dirtiest centers in the league... Let's be real the kid is 7'3 245 and by all means looks to be able to hold his own vs heavier players while completely destroying opposing centers on offense... Teams can guard a stretch 4 but can they guard a stretch 5 and again Melo is the best 4 on the team hands down... Why not play these two where they will dominate... I know protecting KP is important and obviously if he's getting over matched on defense bring Rolo in off the bench and move KP and Melo down to the 4-3 ... But until i see KP getting abused defensively, the kid is hands down our best center who seems to be more involved when he plays the 5 ...

Let's all face it KP is the future stretch 5

we would get crushed on the boards and probably be spending a lot of time on the DL.

lol haven't we been getting crushed on the boards already i mean rolo only averages 5 a game KP is almost doubling rolos rebounds on a nightly basis melo averages 7 boards so with the 2 of kp and melo up front we are putting our best rebounders at the 4 and 5 also again i don't see why kp would go to the dl seems most teams have more active pf's then centers maybe having kp run all over the floor after smaller pf could put him on the dl as well but like most sports you can't be afraid you have to play the best line up possible to win

AUTOADVERT
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

12/8/2015  5:55 PM
fitzfarm wrote:
mreinman wrote:
fitzfarm wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Porzingis is NOT ready to be starting center, give me a break. He's 20 years old, dude!

Let him be the 5 in certain matchups and small ball lineups, but not to start against bigger bruising 5s out there.

You don't want him to get banged up and absorb a beating by wider and heavier guys while he's still developing. Let him transition from stretch 4 to true center in a couple years when he gains more strength and body mass organically.

Again if he can hold his own vs zaza who is one of the dirtiest centers in the league... Let's be real the kid is 7'3 245 and by all means looks to be able to hold his own vs heavier players while completely destroying opposing centers on offense... Teams can guard a stretch 4 but can they guard a stretch 5 and again Melo is the best 4 on the team hands down... Why not play these two where they will dominate... I know protecting KP is important and obviously if he's getting over matched on defense bring Rolo in off the bench and move KP and Melo down to the 4-3 ... But until i see KP getting abused defensively, the kid is hands down our best center who seems to be more involved when he plays the 5 ...

Let's all face it KP is the future stretch 5

we would get crushed on the boards and probably be spending a lot of time on the DL.

lol haven't we been getting crushed on the boards already i mean rolo only averages 5 a game KP is almost doubling rolos rebounds on a nightly basis melo averages 7 boards so with the 2 of kp and melo up front we are putting our best rebounders at the 4 and 5 also again i don't see why kp would go to the dl seems most teams have more active pf's then centers maybe having kp run all over the floor after smaller pf could put him on the dl as well but like most sports you can't be afraid you have to play the best line up possible to win

love the small ball idea but want to overprotect Kp right now.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

12/8/2015  6:13 PM
Hi guys. Was lurking for a while - happy to be posting!

I don't think Porzingis would benefit full time at 5.
IMO, he's sort of like Pau, where you start him at 4 and then slide him to 5 to close games.
Keeps him out of foul trouble.
Also, Lopez/Porzingis are one of the best defensive C/PF tandems in the league. Hands down. I watch a lot of the NBA, and they're really been good. Our weaknesses on D are at 3, and 1 with Melo and Jose. AA is a solid defensive 2 who can slide over to 3 as well.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

12/8/2015  6:15 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:Hi guys. Was lurking for a while - happy to be posting!

I don't think Porzingis would benefit full time at 5.
IMO, he's sort of like Pau, where you start him at 4 and then slide him to 5 to close games.
Keeps him out of foul trouble.
Also, Lopez/Porzingis are one of the best defensive C/PF tandems in the league. Hands down. I watch a lot of the NBA, and they're really been good. Our weaknesses on D are at 3, and 1 with Melo and Jose. AA is a solid defensive 2 who can slide over to 3 as well.

good post. welcome aboard.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
blkexec
Posts: 28451
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
12/8/2015  6:52 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:Hi guys. Was lurking for a while - happy to be posting!

I don't think Porzingis would benefit full time at 5.
IMO, he's sort of like Pau, where you start him at 4 and then slide him to 5 to close games.
Keeps him out of foul trouble.
Also, Lopez/Porzingis are one of the best defensive C/PF tandems in the league. Hands down. I watch a lot of the NBA, and they're really been good. Our weaknesses on D are at 3, and 1 with Melo and Jose. AA is a solid defensive 2 who can slide over to 3 as well.

I agree....Lopez / KP are tough on defense.

What about Lopez / KP on offense? Thats my only debate.

But I agree with you and welcome.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
fitzfarm
Posts: 25285
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285

12/8/2015  6:54 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:Hi guys. Was lurking for a while - happy to be posting!

I don't think Porzingis would benefit full time at 5.
IMO, he's sort of like Pau, where you start him at 4 and then slide him to 5 to close games.
Keeps him out of foul trouble.
Also, Lopez/Porzingis are one of the best defensive C/PF tandems in the league. Hands down. I watch a lot of the NBA, and they're really been good. Our weaknesses on D are at 3, and 1 with Melo and Jose. AA is a solid defensive 2 who can slide over to 3 as well.


Did you see what Monroe did to Rolo ... Again not that I don't like Rolo but dude is a back up he's got to be one of the slowest players in the NBA. He'll get you trash buckets but is it worth it to him him out there to get abused by guys like whiteside,Howard,brother,Monroe... While being a unproductive turnover machine on offense . Now is fish using him wrong yes ! But was there a reason his playing time diminished in Portland yes cause the NBA is evolving into speed ball... I would love to have Rolo when slow ball was real in the 90's ... But this is the age of speed 3's and drives
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

12/8/2015  7:12 PM
fitzfarm wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Hi guys. Was lurking for a while - happy to be posting!

I don't think Porzingis would benefit full time at 5.
IMO, he's sort of like Pau, where you start him at 4 and then slide him to 5 to close games.
Keeps him out of foul trouble.
Also, Lopez/Porzingis are one of the best defensive C/PF tandems in the league. Hands down. I watch a lot of the NBA, and they're really been good. Our weaknesses on D are at 3, and 1 with Melo and Jose. AA is a solid defensive 2 who can slide over to 3 as well.


Did you see what Monroe did to Rolo ... Again not that I don't like Rolo but dude is a back up he's got to be one of the slowest players in the NBA. He'll get you trash buckets but is it worth it to him him out there to get abused by guys like whiteside,Howard,brother,Monroe... While being a unproductive turnover machine on offense . Now is fish using him wrong yes ! But was there a reason his playing time diminished in Portland yes cause the NBA is evolving into speed ball... I would love to have Rolo when slow ball was real in the 90's ... But this is the age of speed 3's and drives

you keep saying turnover machine but he has not ever been a high turnover guy.

Did you watch Rolo in other years or just now?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
nyknickzingis
Posts: 23029
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/8/2015
Member: #6207

12/8/2015  7:21 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/8/2015  7:24 PM
The problem with our O - and this includes when Seraphin is in there - is that in the Triangle post up play is not meant to be there just for the post up player to take the shot or make a post up move. The post ups are one of the least effective plays in the NBA right now. Yet we dump it in a lot, which is a good thing IF our post players are either good in there (Such as Melo, Afflalo maybe Seraphin) OR they should look to move the ball to a cutter or someone open with the motion.

Lopez's role is to get the post position, but not necessarily take the shot in there. He's not been bad. He really hasn't. It's been what his role asks of him. He's not a great scorer, more like adequate.

Mainly I want to see this team get better movement off the ball when the ball is dumped in. It seems too many times we dump the ball inside, only to watch as the post player goes to work. If that's what we want to do, then those plays need to be for Melo/Afflalo and not Lopez. From my understanding of the Triangle though, that's not the only option. To dump in in there, it isn't to watch the post up iso every time as if Shaq or MJ are going to work. There's lots of options, but this team's execution of the Triangle is still very very subpar at best. I think it takes up to a year or two before a team really becomes good at running the Tri. With all the overhaul, there's many new faces, and I think it'll take time before they get on the same page.

I do agree that on most nights Porzingis/Melo should close at 5/4. I just don't agree that Lopez shouldn't start. He's been solid and a key cog in the improved Knicks D.

blkexec
Posts: 28451
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
12/8/2015  8:45 PM
nyknickzingis wrote:The problem with our O - and this includes when Seraphin is in there - is that in the Triangle post up play is not meant to be there just for the post up player to take the shot or make a post up move. The post ups are one of the least effective plays in the NBA right now. Yet we dump it in a lot, which is a good thing IF our post players are either good in there (Such as Melo, Afflalo maybe Seraphin) OR they should look to move the ball to a cutter or someone open with the motion.

Lopez's role is to get the post position, but not necessarily take the shot in there. He's not been bad. He really hasn't. It's been what his role asks of him. He's not a great scorer, more like adequate.

Mainly I want to see this team get better movement off the ball when the ball is dumped in. It seems too many times we dump the ball inside, only to watch as the post player goes to work. If that's what we want to do, then those plays need to be for Melo/Afflalo and not Lopez. From my understanding of the Triangle though, that's not the only option. To dump in in there, it isn't to watch the post up iso every time as if Shaq or MJ are going to work. There's lots of options, but this team's execution of the Triangle is still very very subpar at best. I think it takes up to a year or two before a team really becomes good at running the Tri. With all the overhaul, there's many new faces, and I think it'll take time before they get on the same page.

I do agree that on most nights Porzingis/Melo should close at 5/4. I just don't agree that Lopez shouldn't start. He's been solid and a key cog in the improved Knicks D.

They dump it to Rolo....and Rolo looks to pass. The problem is there's nobody to pass it to, because Rolo's man is playing off of him, forcing Rolo to score. Thats everybodies strategy against our starting 5. Let the offense run through Role by backing off of him and letting him score. We don't have quick players on offense who can simple get free that quick for an easy pass. And Rolo's reaction on his passes are slow. Thats why it doesn't work.

If Seraphin was in the post, you have to guard him. That means there are more passing lanes.....Same with Melo, KP and AA, when they are in the post.

Rolo should be on the second unit with Grant, running the high pick and roll.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/8/2015  9:13 PM
blkexec wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:The problem with our O - and this includes when Seraphin is in there - is that in the Triangle post up play is not meant to be there just for the post up player to take the shot or make a post up move. The post ups are one of the least effective plays in the NBA right now. Yet we dump it in a lot, which is a good thing IF our post players are either good in there (Such as Melo, Afflalo maybe Seraphin) OR they should look to move the ball to a cutter or someone open with the motion.

Lopez's role is to get the post position, but not necessarily take the shot in there. He's not been bad. He really hasn't. It's been what his role asks of him. He's not a great scorer, more like adequate.

Mainly I want to see this team get better movement off the ball when the ball is dumped in. It seems too many times we dump the ball inside, only to watch as the post player goes to work. If that's what we want to do, then those plays need to be for Melo/Afflalo and not Lopez. From my understanding of the Triangle though, that's not the only option. To dump in in there, it isn't to watch the post up iso every time as if Shaq or MJ are going to work. There's lots of options, but this team's execution of the Triangle is still very very subpar at best. I think it takes up to a year or two before a team really becomes good at running the Tri. With all the overhaul, there's many new faces, and I think it'll take time before they get on the same page.

I do agree that on most nights Porzingis/Melo should close at 5/4. I just don't agree that Lopez shouldn't start. He's been solid and a key cog in the improved Knicks D.

They dump it to Rolo....and Rolo looks to pass. The problem is there's nobody to pass it to, because Rolo's man is playing off of him, forcing Rolo to score. Thats everybodies strategy against our starting 5. Let the offense run through Role by backing off of him and letting him score. We don't have quick players on offense who can simple get free that quick for an easy pass. And Rolo's reaction on his passes are slow. Thats why it doesn't work.

If Seraphin was in the post, you have to guard him. That means there are more passing lanes.....Same with Melo, KP and AA, when they are in the post.

Rolo should be on the second unit with Grant, running the high pick and roll.


This is true but remember that the Knicks don't have to keep running RoLo in the Post. There are SO MANY permutations of this offense that people haven't even seen and that's on the players. When they get out there they sometimes have a bit of a brain lock which is to be expected until the guards and wings learn and fully understand how to exploit the defense. If you're a guard and you have the ball on the move your main goal is to either score it or draw the D so you can dish to an open teammate.

This system is so old that there is nearly an answer for anything that a defense can throw at you. It only takes your players to recognize where the defensive weakness is and exploit it. They say it's a read and react system but in truth it's up to the players to trick the defense into defending what they think the Knicks want to do and using that against them. This doesn't happen enough.

The Knicks so far have been FAR too predictable in how they attack teams. This makes them easier to shut down. RoLo is an excellent roll man and really doesn't have to be in the post so much. That's something our guards need to take more advantage of. Call for the screen and RoLo will come out and set it and the other players know what to do when they call for a drag screen. You literally NEVER have to use the Strong Side Triangle if you don't want to. Use it for the spacing but then go away from it and the defense will have to guess what you're trying to do.

One thing I like is when Melo uses a V Cut to get an open shot, rather then cut all the way thru. Others need to learn to use that action in the Triangle. It's in the playbook for a reason. Defenders know that our wings will cut thru after feeding the post, so you aren't supposed to just clear thru every time if you feed RoLo, use the damned V cut if the defender anticipates you cutting thru!!!

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/9/2015  5:57 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/9/2015  6:40 AM
mreinman wrote:
fitzfarm wrote:
nyknickzingis wrote:Hi guys. Was lurking for a while - happy to be posting!

I don't think Porzingis would benefit full time at 5.
IMO, he's sort of like Pau, where you start him at 4 and then slide him to 5 to close games.
Keeps him out of foul trouble.
Also, Lopez/Porzingis are one of the best defensive C/PF tandems in the league. Hands down. I watch a lot of the NBA, and they're really been good. Our weaknesses on D are at 3, and 1 with Melo and Jose. AA is a solid defensive 2 who can slide over to 3 as well.


Did you see what Monroe did to Rolo ... Again not that I don't like Rolo but dude is a back up he's got to be one of the slowest players in the NBA. He'll get you trash buckets but is it worth it to him him out there to get abused by guys like whiteside,Howard,brother,Monroe... While being a unproductive turnover machine on offense . Now is fish using him wrong yes ! But was there a reason his playing time diminished in Portland yes cause the NBA is evolving into speed ball... I would love to have Rolo when slow ball was real in the 90's ... But this is the age of speed 3's and drives

you keep saying turnover machine but he has not ever been a high turnover guy.

Did you watch Rolo in other years or just now?


Actually he has more assists than turnovers, which is rare for a center. That's probably the one and only thing going right with his offense now. If you call him a turnover machine, you'd have to also call him an assist machine since the assists are actually higher.
meloanyk
Posts: 20768
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/5/2013
Member: #5615

12/9/2015  6:15 PM
No. He needs to get even stronger and he needs a true big next to him right now. Certain team matchups might afford him playing five at times but it should not be where he starts. Nurture
Porzingis is ready to be the starting center

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy