[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

out with Jose.. in with Jimmer
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/4/2015  10:39 AM
TPercy wrote:
fishmike wrote:
TPercy wrote:Why Make Gallo, who is having his best days as a SG move him to a position where he is less effective??
meaning the position he was playing against the Wizards when keyed the Knicks win? That position? To make the team better.

I'm pretty sure Galloway was mostly a SG throughout the entire game...No?
mostly yes... but he finished the entire 4th qtr for Jose so he was the PG at that point.

I prefer Gallo at SG also, but we have a big problem with Jose right now. I was hoping he would bounce back but he has been terrible. Gallo is very good triangle PG. Hits shots, can attack the basket and is a great defender. Most of all he doesnt turn the ball over.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/4/2015  10:44 AM
SwishAndDish13 wrote:Amazing how people are always preaching on here about leadership, playing the right way the handful of players who we would support as ideal in the whole league, yet Jimmer who plays no defense whatsoever, and has no concept of how to play within an NBA offense is going to be the savior for a backcourt that has been sub-par for years now. WOW!
who are you talking to? Who has said Jimmer is going to be a savior? Did you read a single post in this thread? The discussion is what are the current options to upgrade our starting PG who is getting lit up on defense evertime down the floor and is shooting 29%

The Jimmer part of the discussion is to see if this guy can get his act together enough to be a back of the rotation guard. Those 12-15 minutes a night would push Galloway and Grant ahead of Jose and Sasha in the rotation.

Its just a discussion... maybe the part where we vote to get a Jimmer statute erected outside the garden was deleted because I seem to have missed it

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
SwishAndDish13
Posts: 20878
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/2/2013
Member: #5700

11/4/2015  11:08 AM
fishmike wrote:
SwishAndDish13 wrote:Amazing how people are always preaching on here about leadership, playing the right way the handful of players who we would support as ideal in the whole league, yet Jimmer who plays no defense whatsoever, and has no concept of how to play within an NBA offense is going to be the savior for a backcourt that has been sub-par for years now. WOW!
who are you talking to? Who has said Jimmer is going to be a savior? Did you read a single post in this thread? The discussion is what are the current options to upgrade our starting PG who is getting lit up on defense evertime down the floor and is shooting 29%

The Jimmer part of the discussion is to see if this guy can get his act together enough to be a back of the rotation guard. Those 12-15 minutes a night would push Galloway and Grant ahead of Jose and Sasha in the rotation.

Its just a discussion... maybe the part where we vote to get a Jimmer statute erected outside the garden was deleted because I seem to have missed it

That's fair. I just find it surprising people are high on him. Seems to be only positives. I agree it made sense as a rebuild project with little to no risk for the Knicks. However, Jose is the better option right now despite his shooting issues through 4 games. He is a better defender than Jimmer, which is sad, and historically has been a better shooter. Jimmer currently adds no value but I hope they can turn him around in the future.

In general people need to mention how he got to this point when mentioning him as an option right now. That is extremely unlikely. Percentages of him having an impact this year are 1% or less, but I would love to see improvement in the backcourt so I will hope for the best.

fishmike
Posts: 53867
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/4/2015  11:29 AM
SwishAndDish13 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
SwishAndDish13 wrote:Amazing how people are always preaching on here about leadership, playing the right way the handful of players who we would support as ideal in the whole league, yet Jimmer who plays no defense whatsoever, and has no concept of how to play within an NBA offense is going to be the savior for a backcourt that has been sub-par for years now. WOW!
who are you talking to? Who has said Jimmer is going to be a savior? Did you read a single post in this thread? The discussion is what are the current options to upgrade our starting PG who is getting lit up on defense evertime down the floor and is shooting 29%

The Jimmer part of the discussion is to see if this guy can get his act together enough to be a back of the rotation guard. Those 12-15 minutes a night would push Galloway and Grant ahead of Jose and Sasha in the rotation.

Its just a discussion... maybe the part where we vote to get a Jimmer statute erected outside the garden was deleted because I seem to have missed it

That's fair. I just find it surprising people are high on him. Seems to be only positives. I agree it made sense as a rebuild project with little to no risk for the Knicks. However, Jose is the better option right now despite his shooting issues through 4 games. He is a better defender than Jimmer, which is sad, and historically has been a better shooter. Jimmer currently adds no value but I hope they can turn him around in the future.

In general people need to mention how he got to this point when mentioning him as an option right now. That is extremely unlikely. Percentages of him having an impact this year are 1% or less, but I would love to see improvement in the backcourt so I will hope for the best.

He's just another prospect at this point. There are guys that hang around awhile before they get it. For Jimmer that means changing his mindset to a guy who takes care of the ball, stays in front of his man and hits jumpers when the ball comes to him. If he could do that and get back his shooting stroke he could be usefull. It took J.J. Redick a few years. Jimmer isnt a sloth.. dude is pretty quick, but he's a substandard NBA athlete.

lots of guys come from the dleague or undrafted and become useful NBA role players. Jimmer's ability to shoot is like a 90mph fastball, but he's got no control right now. If he can hone that some there is a role for him for sure. Its up to Jimmer, I agree he hasnt shown much cause for hope, but there talent/skillset is there

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

11/4/2015  11:52 AM    LAST EDITED: 11/4/2015  12:02 PM
fishmike wrote:
SwishAndDish13 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
SwishAndDish13 wrote:Amazing how people are always preaching on here about leadership, playing the right way the handful of players who we would support as ideal in the whole league, yet Jimmer who plays no defense whatsoever, and has no concept of how to play within an NBA offense is going to be the savior for a backcourt that has been sub-par for years now. WOW!
who are you talking to? Who has said Jimmer is going to be a savior? Did you read a single post in this thread? The discussion is what are the current options to upgrade our starting PG who is getting lit up on defense evertime down the floor and is shooting 29%

The Jimmer part of the discussion is to see if this guy can get his act together enough to be a back of the rotation guard. Those 12-15 minutes a night would push Galloway and Grant ahead of Jose and Sasha in the rotation.

Its just a discussion... maybe the part where we vote to get a Jimmer statute erected outside the garden was deleted because I seem to have missed it

That's fair. I just find it surprising people are high on him. Seems to be only positives. I agree it made sense as a rebuild project with little to no risk for the Knicks. However, Jose is the better option right now despite his shooting issues through 4 games. He is a better defender than Jimmer, which is sad, and historically has been a better shooter. Jimmer currently adds no value but I hope they can turn him around in the future.

In general people need to mention how he got to this point when mentioning him as an option right now. That is extremely unlikely. Percentages of him having an impact this year are 1% or less, but I would love to see improvement in the backcourt so I will hope for the best.

He's just another prospect at this point. There are guys that hang around awhile before they get it. For Jimmer that means changing his mindset to a guy who takes care of the ball, stays in front of his man and hits jumpers when the ball comes to him. If he could do that and get back his shooting stroke he could be usefull. It took J.J. Redick a few years. Jimmer isnt a sloth.. dude is pretty quick, but he's a substandard NBA athlete.

lots of guys come from the dleague or undrafted and become useful NBA role players. Jimmer's ability to shoot is like a 90mph fastball, but he's got no control right now. If he can hone that some there is a role for him for sure. Its up to Jimmer, I agree he hasnt shown much cause for hope, but there talent/skillset is there

Great post, Fish. I think you're right on the money here, bro. I'll actually take the optimism and positivity to another level.

I guess Swish was talking about me -- sure, I've probably been overly positive on Jimmer but WTF man -- look at what we're dealing with here. Jose and Sasha have been DREADFUL! How much longer do we continue going with these two? STARTING them no less?? I understand AA will be back soon and that the G2 backcourt has been impressive but we're still gonna need at least one more productive guard added to the mix. No way around it...I'm not averse to adding Jimmer right now. Let's see what he can do. If he didn't work out--cut him and move on. Simple as that...What if he did pan out though? What if we catch some lightning in a bottle? What if we uncover a good role player here a-la Steve Kerr/John Paxson? Or what if we're looking at more than that? What if he thrives coming back home, starts to really feed off the crowd, regains his swagger, etc. Would anyone be against that happening? I wouldn't...I know this: just like Jeremy Lin, if Jimmer played well, NY would eat him up. He'd become a sensation here. I honestly think there's potential for that to occur. And even if we didn't have another 'Linsanity' situation on our hands, I think he could still be a good role player for this team...With our current backcourt trouble, this is worth the tiny bit of risk (which equates to nothing more than a small amount of Dolan's money--what other risk is there??). We even have an open roster spot--no one would have to be cut!!! We're approaching this way too cautiously imo -- dive right in an let's see what he's got. No need for a DL tryout imo. Enough with the respect for Calderon and Vujacic -- I don't care how long a player's been around or how much they make--if you're not producing, you shouldn't be playing. Am I right or what? How long does Fish wait to make adjustments? I mean, come on fellas--this isn't last year--there are wins and losses at stake here now.. I'm willing to bet Fredette would be a better option over Jose and Sasha. Is that so hard to believe?? If no one else feels that way, OK--you're all entitled to your opinions. But this is how I feel and I stand by it. This is a complete no-brainer upside move. Nothing to lose here at all from where I'm standing, only something to gain.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
11/4/2015  12:13 PM
fishmike wrote:
SwishAndDish13 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
SwishAndDish13 wrote:Amazing how people are always preaching on here about leadership, playing the right way the handful of players who we would support as ideal in the whole league, yet Jimmer who plays no defense whatsoever, and has no concept of how to play within an NBA offense is going to be the savior for a backcourt that has been sub-par for years now. WOW!
who are you talking to? Who has said Jimmer is going to be a savior? Did you read a single post in this thread? The discussion is what are the current options to upgrade our starting PG who is getting lit up on defense evertime down the floor and is shooting 29%

The Jimmer part of the discussion is to see if this guy can get his act together enough to be a back of the rotation guard. Those 12-15 minutes a night would push Galloway and Grant ahead of Jose and Sasha in the rotation.

Its just a discussion... maybe the part where we vote to get a Jimmer statute erected outside the garden was deleted because I seem to have missed it

That's fair. I just find it surprising people are high on him. Seems to be only positives. I agree it made sense as a rebuild project with little to no risk for the Knicks. However, Jose is the better option right now despite his shooting issues through 4 games. He is a better defender than Jimmer, which is sad, and historically has been a better shooter. Jimmer currently adds no value but I hope they can turn him around in the future.

In general people need to mention how he got to this point when mentioning him as an option right now. That is extremely unlikely. Percentages of him having an impact this year are 1% or less, but I would love to see improvement in the backcourt so I will hope for the best.

He's just another prospect at this point. There are guys that hang around awhile before they get it. For Jimmer that means changing his mindset to a guy who takes care of the ball, stays in front of his man and hits jumpers when the ball comes to him. If he could do that and get back his shooting stroke he could be usefull. It took J.J. Redick a few years. Jimmer isnt a sloth.. dude is pretty quick, but he's a substandard NBA athlete.

lots of guys come from the dleague or undrafted and become useful NBA role players. Jimmer's ability to shoot is like a 90mph fastball, but he's got no control right now. If he can hone that some there is a role for him for sure. Its up to Jimmer, I agree he hasnt shown much cause for hope, but there talent/skillset is there

I agree, but to add on

90% of the players in the league have major talent, but the mind set, the work ethic, the character, and the respect of the game is where a lot of players fall short.

Guy's come from being star players in college, and think that's just going to roll over when they get into the NBA. The adjustment for a lot of players is daunting, and soon find themselves overseas, or in the d leauge

ES
Nalod
Posts: 71379
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/4/2015  12:14 PM
In this league vets with bigger contracts get the opportunity to play back into shape.
I don't care who starts. Jose is not playing bigger minutes than Gallo or Grant.
I hope Jose kicks ass and then can get traded as our upside is with the Yoots. In this case, Jimmer can perhaps maybe might could be called up based on merit. Maybe this happens next year.
As for Sasha, lets see how the kid does the other 78 games. I thought his contract and knick appeal was he'd be given a chance to play. If promised, team will uphold it to it. 4 games might be too long for some of you.
one hopes Affalo can fill that spot nice or Sasha comes off the bench.
SwishAndDish13
Posts: 20878
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/2/2013
Member: #5700

11/4/2015  1:08 PM
Finestrg wrote:
fishmike wrote:
SwishAndDish13 wrote:
fishmike wrote:
SwishAndDish13 wrote:Amazing how people are always preaching on here about leadership, playing the right way the handful of players who we would support as ideal in the whole league, yet Jimmer who plays no defense whatsoever, and has no concept of how to play within an NBA offense is going to be the savior for a backcourt that has been sub-par for years now. WOW!
who are you talking to? Who has said Jimmer is going to be a savior? Did you read a single post in this thread? The discussion is what are the current options to upgrade our starting PG who is getting lit up on defense evertime down the floor and is shooting 29%

The Jimmer part of the discussion is to see if this guy can get his act together enough to be a back of the rotation guard. Those 12-15 minutes a night would push Galloway and Grant ahead of Jose and Sasha in the rotation.

Its just a discussion... maybe the part where we vote to get a Jimmer statute erected outside the garden was deleted because I seem to have missed it

That's fair. I just find it surprising people are high on him. Seems to be only positives. I agree it made sense as a rebuild project with little to no risk for the Knicks. However, Jose is the better option right now despite his shooting issues through 4 games. He is a better defender than Jimmer, which is sad, and historically has been a better shooter. Jimmer currently adds no value but I hope they can turn him around in the future.

In general people need to mention how he got to this point when mentioning him as an option right now. That is extremely unlikely. Percentages of him having an impact this year are 1% or less, but I would love to see improvement in the backcourt so I will hope for the best.

He's just another prospect at this point. There are guys that hang around awhile before they get it. For Jimmer that means changing his mindset to a guy who takes care of the ball, stays in front of his man and hits jumpers when the ball comes to him. If he could do that and get back his shooting stroke he could be usefull. It took J.J. Redick a few years. Jimmer isnt a sloth.. dude is pretty quick, but he's a substandard NBA athlete.

lots of guys come from the dleague or undrafted and become useful NBA role players. Jimmer's ability to shoot is like a 90mph fastball, but he's got no control right now. If he can hone that some there is a role for him for sure. Its up to Jimmer, I agree he hasnt shown much cause for hope, but there talent/skillset is there

Great post, Fish. I think you're right on the money here, bro. I'll actually take the optimism and positivity to another level.

I guess Swish was talking about me -- sure, I've probably been overly positive on Jimmer but WTF man -- look at what we're dealing with here. Jose and Sasha have been DREADFUL! How much longer do we continue going with these two? STARTING them no less?? I understand AA will be back soon and that the G2 backcourt has been impressive but we're still gonna need at least one more productive guard added to the mix. No way around it...I'm not averse to adding Jimmer right now. Let's see what he can do. If he didn't work out--cut him and move on. Simple as that...What if he did pan out though? What if we catch some lightning in a bottle? What if we uncover a good role player here a-la Steve Kerr/John Paxson? Or what if we're looking at more than that? What if he thrives coming back home, starts to really feed off the crowd, regains his swagger, etc. Would anyone be against that happening? I wouldn't...I know this: just like Jeremy Lin, if Jimmer played well, NY would eat him up. He'd become a sensation here. I honestly think there's potential for that to occur. And even if we didn't have another 'Linsanity' situation on our hands, I think he could still be a good role player for this team...With our current backcourt trouble, this is worth the tiny bit of risk (which equates to nothing more than a small amount of Dolan's money--what other risk is there??). We even have an open roster spot--no one would have to be cut!!! We're approaching this way too cautiously imo -- dive right in an let's see what he's got. No need for a DL tryout imo. Enough with the respect for Calderon and Vujacic -- I don't care how long a player's been around or how much they make--if you're not producing, you shouldn't be playing. Am I right or what? How long does Fish wait to make adjustments? I mean, come on fellas--this isn't last year--there are wins and losses at stake here now.. I'm willing to bet Fredette would be a better option over Jose and Sasha. Is that so hard to believe?? If no one else feels that way, OK--you're all entitled to your opinions. But this is how I feel and I stand by it. This is a complete no-brainer upside move. Nothing to lose here at all from where I'm standing, only something to gain.

I agree with pretty much everything Fish said. The tone from the title and posts I read was that people were expecting an unrealistic timeframe. I hope he can turn it around and compete for time next year. This year would be highly unlikely.

I agree 100% on Sasha. My hope is that Affalo fully recovers and Sasha is cemented on the bench. He can come in for the last 2 min of the game on offense/defense substitutions like in his Lakers days and hit FTs. That's it. That's literally all I want to see of him.

martin
Posts: 76527
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/4/2015  1:35 PM
Finestrg wrote:
I guess Swish was talking about me -- sure, I've probably been overly positive on Jimmer but WTF man -- look at what we're dealing with here. Jose and Sasha have been DREADFUL! How much longer do we continue going with these two? STARTING them no less?? I understand AA will be back soon and that the G2 backcourt has been impressive but we're still gonna need at least one more productive guard added to the mix. No way around it...I'm not averse to adding Jimmer right now. Let's see what he can do. If he didn't work out--cut him and move on. Simple as that...What if he did pan out though? What if we catch some lightning in a bottle? What if we uncover a good role player here a-la Steve Kerr/John Paxson? Or what if we're looking at more than that? What if he thrives coming back home, starts to really feed off the crowd, regains his swagger, etc. Would anyone be against that happening? I wouldn't...I know this: just like Jeremy Lin, if Jimmer played well, NY would eat him up. He'd become a sensation here. I honestly think there's potential for that to occur. And even if we didn't have another 'Linsanity' situation on our hands, I think he could still be a good role player for this team...With our current backcourt trouble, this is worth the tiny bit of risk (which equates to nothing more than a small amount of Dolan's money--what other risk is there??). We even have an open roster spot--no one would have to be cut!!! We're approaching this way too cautiously imo -- dive right in an let's see what he's got. No need for a DL tryout imo. Enough with the respect for Calderon and Vujacic -- I don't care how long a player's been around or how much they make--if you're not producing, you shouldn't be playing. Am I right or what? How long does Fish wait to make adjustments? I mean, come on fellas--this isn't last year--there are wins and losses at stake here now.. I'm willing to bet Fredette would be a better option over Jose and Sasha. Is that so hard to believe?? If no one else feels that way, OK--you're all entitled to your opinions. But this is how I feel and I stand by it. This is a complete no-brainer upside move. Nothing to lose here at all from where I'm standing, only something to gain.

It's not as simple as that. You just can't plug and play guys, it's a process and certain types of players need to earn spots and convince coaches that they deserve playing time. This is not JR dominating in China waiting for his contract to finish up so he can pick up where he left off in the NBA. This is a failed player who has had multiple opportunities to show his stuff and has repeatedly failed. Jimmer is going to need to show it at the DLeague level, both shooting and understanding the offense and not be defensive siv.

You bring in Jimmer and give him minutes and the guys who have been working hard, from Jose to AA to Sasha to Grant to Gallo to everyone else will all start to not trust the coaching staff, point blank. There are humans and competitors and this is not some video game.

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
MaTT4281
Posts: 34916
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
11/4/2015  1:38 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/4/2015  1:39 PM
I'm not convinced the parent club has Jimmer in their plans. The Westchester team is still running a business, and Jimmer is a name that even casual basketball fans know, especially in NY. Get fans to the games and take it from there.

I'm sure we'll be keeping our eyes on how he's doing, as we will also be doing with our lot of traning camp guys we stashed away. It's great that Jimmer wants the Knicks, but do the Knicks actually want Jimmer? Spurs gave up on him pretty quick...

I like Trice, personally.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
11/4/2015  2:19 PM
martin wrote:
Finestrg wrote:
I guess Swish was talking about me -- sure, I've probably been overly positive on Jimmer but WTF man -- look at what we're dealing with here. Jose and Sasha have been DREADFUL! How much longer do we continue going with these two? STARTING them no less?? I understand AA will be back soon and that the G2 backcourt has been impressive but we're still gonna need at least one more productive guard added to the mix. No way around it...I'm not averse to adding Jimmer right now. Let's see what he can do. If he didn't work out--cut him and move on. Simple as that...What if he did pan out though? What if we catch some lightning in a bottle? What if we uncover a good role player here a-la Steve Kerr/John Paxson? Or what if we're looking at more than that? What if he thrives coming back home, starts to really feed off the crowd, regains his swagger, etc. Would anyone be against that happening? I wouldn't...I know this: just like Jeremy Lin, if Jimmer played well, NY would eat him up. He'd become a sensation here. I honestly think there's potential for that to occur. And even if we didn't have another 'Linsanity' situation on our hands, I think he could still be a good role player for this team...With our current backcourt trouble, this is worth the tiny bit of risk (which equates to nothing more than a small amount of Dolan's money--what other risk is there??). We even have an open roster spot--no one would have to be cut!!! We're approaching this way too cautiously imo -- dive right in an let's see what he's got. No need for a DL tryout imo. Enough with the respect for Calderon and Vujacic -- I don't care how long a player's been around or how much they make--if you're not producing, you shouldn't be playing. Am I right or what? How long does Fish wait to make adjustments? I mean, come on fellas--this isn't last year--there are wins and losses at stake here now.. I'm willing to bet Fredette would be a better option over Jose and Sasha. Is that so hard to believe?? If no one else feels that way, OK--you're all entitled to your opinions. But this is how I feel and I stand by it. This is a complete no-brainer upside move. Nothing to lose here at all from where I'm standing, only something to gain.

It's not as simple as that. You just can't plug and play guys, it's a process and certain types of players need to earn spots and convince coaches that they deserve playing time. This is not JR dominating in China waiting for his contract to finish up so he can pick up where he left off in the NBA. This is a failed player who has had multiple opportunities to show his stuff and has repeatedly failed. Jimmer is going to need to show it at the DLeague level, both shooting and understanding the offense and not be defensive siv.

You bring in Jimmer and give him minutes and the guys who have been working hard, from Jose to AA to Sasha to Grant to Gallo to everyone else will all start to not trust the coaching staff, point blank. There are humans and competitors and this is not some video game.

exactly, some of you just think a player is suppose to be perfect every game, and if he's not, he needs to be kicked to the curb.

ES
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

11/4/2015  4:04 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/4/2015  11:36 PM
martin wrote:
Finestrg wrote:
I guess Swish was talking about me -- sure, I've probably been overly positive on Jimmer but WTF man -- look at what we're dealing with here. Jose and Sasha have been DREADFUL! How much longer do we continue going with these two? STARTING them no less?? I understand AA will be back soon and that the G2 backcourt has been impressive but we're still gonna need at least one more productive guard added to the mix. No way around it...I'm not averse to adding Jimmer right now. Let's see what he can do. If he didn't work out--cut him and move on. Simple as that...What if he did pan out though? What if we catch some lightning in a bottle? What if we uncover a good role player here a-la Steve Kerr/John Paxson? Or what if we're looking at more than that? What if he thrives coming back home, starts to really feed off the crowd, regains his swagger, etc. Would anyone be against that happening? I wouldn't...I know this: just like Jeremy Lin, if Jimmer played well, NY would eat him up. He'd become a sensation here. I honestly think there's potential for that to occur. And even if we didn't have another 'Linsanity' situation on our hands, I think he could still be a good role player for this team...With our current backcourt trouble, this is worth the tiny bit of risk (which equates to nothing more than a small amount of Dolan's money--what other risk is there??). We even have an open roster spot--no one would have to be cut!!! We're approaching this way too cautiously imo -- dive right in an let's see what he's got. No need for a DL tryout imo. Enough with the respect for Calderon and Vujacic -- I don't care how long a player's been around or how much they make--if you're not producing, you shouldn't be playing. Am I right or what? How long does Fish wait to make adjustments? I mean, come on fellas--this isn't last year--there are wins and losses at stake here now.. I'm willing to bet Fredette would be a better option over Jose and Sasha. Is that so hard to believe?? If no one else feels that way, OK--you're all entitled to your opinions. But this is how I feel and I stand by it. This is a complete no-brainer upside move. Nothing to lose here at all from where I'm standing, only something to gain.

It's not as simple as that. You just can't plug and play guys, it's a process and certain types of players need to earn spots and convince coaches that they deserve playing time. This is not JR dominating in China waiting for his contract to finish up so he can pick up where he left off in the NBA. This is a failed player who has had multiple opportunities to show his stuff and has repeatedly failed. Jimmer is going to need to show it at the DLeague level, both shooting and understanding the offense and not be defensive siv.

You bring in Jimmer and give him minutes and the guys who have been working hard, from Jose to AA to Sasha to Grant to Gallo to everyone else will all start to not trust the coaching staff, point blank. There are humans and competitors and this is not some video game.

I know it's not a video game. By your logic, we can't possibly import any help because we'll run the risk of offending certain players (who exactly? The ones not playing well??) and losing an entire locker room?? Is that right?? Wow... Sorry, but I just don't see it like that at all. We owe Jose and Sasha nothing. Absolutely nothing. Those are the 2 players we're talking about replacing with better options and it's something we could do right now very easily -- no waiting for next year. I honestly think it is as simple as that. Phil/Fisher LOVE these guys--that's the problem. Phil traded for Calderon knowing full well his age and salary were detriments and then they decided to throw one of their former teammates, Sasha, a huge bone. Personally, I didn't like either acquisition. Not sure too many GMs out there would've made either of those moves. I'd even be willing to bet deep down Phil now regrets the Calderon move and I bet he may feel the same about Vujacic very soon. So now what, we have them so we're forced to live with them and their shortcomings? You might be good with that, man, but I'm not.

Two schools of thought here I suppose: (1) remain super patient and hope that Jose miraculously turns it around and that Sasha starts playing a much higher %, better brand of basketball (how likely is this, honestly? You feel good about those prospects? I don't at all. I see the writing on the wall with both guys already. I mean how can you not?? Jose's not even trying to shoot his way out of it, something I called for in a thread a few days back--I thought that could maybe be a remedy for him. Part of me still feels that way. We just haven't seen it. The only thing this dude can really do now is shoot the ball. So let's see it--shoot the damn ball more!! He's less than useless if he's not looking for his shot. You know the adage 'make yourself useful'? Well that's what I'd like to see Jose do, make himself useful. Ahh, who am I kidding with that though--even if he did hit some jumpers, he'd just give it right back at the other end) and Sasha just doesn't look good at all. He looks outclassed and overmatched. Both starting guards do. Sasha isn't hitting any shots -- we need this dude to be a perimeter threat and he just isn't right now. And not only that, the evidence has shown he's been a low % offensive player for awhile now...The other school of thought (2) identify the weaknesses on the roster and work feverishly to address them with whatever class of player and amount of cap room available to us. Even if I had to cycle through several low-salary options before I came up with a solution that could help, that's what I'd be prepared to do. Other teams utilize this method to great effect. The Knicks never seem to see it that way.. And who cares that it's only 4 games in? I don't. I'd prefer mgmt. not sit on their hands and play the 'let's wait and see' game with things. Not my style.. When I see something that's not working and has little chance to work, I'll call for change. Believe me, I'm not the only one. Half the beat writers and blog writers out there have the same concerns. Doesn't mean I'm some impatient lunatic. I'm willing to be patient with a lot of things -- both our rookies, Derrick Williams, Fisher as a coach, even Phil as president...

The backcourt needs at least one more guard, even with AA. No way around it...I mean we never even finalized this roster -- we still have one spot open. Are we good enough--specifically, is our backcourt good enough to not go to war with a full 15 players?? No way, man. We're not. We could use the help. All hands on deck...I think it would've been nice to have a Travis Trice or a Thanasis Antetokounmpo to turn to right now with Jose and Sasha not playing well (thank God both are still with us at the DL level--I personally see bright futures for both). Or a Jimmer Fredette (a FA who can sign with anyone whenever he wants to btw--wouldn't it suck if he played great in the DL for a week or two and some GM came along and offered him a guaranteed contract? Money talks, man. Bye-bye Fredette if that happens. It'd be another Mo N'Dour all over again, except this time we could really use the player in question). All I'm saying, man. I don't think you lose an entire locker room with a move to fill the 15th roster spot with a player than could be better than someone you already have. No one would even be getting cut. Let's bring in a Jimmer Fredette, a Bryce Cotton or a Jabari Brown and see if they outplay Jose and Sasha in practice. Let's start there. I bet any of those guys could. Look back to the preseason -- it seemed like every time you turned around, the reserves were kicking the starters' asses, and look what's happened--that trend's carried over into the regular season. Getting AA back will fix some things but not all of them -- Jose will still probably be the starting PG (or the backup if Fish ever gets around to promoting Grant) and Sasha may still be getting mins. as a backup (at whose expense btw? Galloway's? Man, I hope not. That dude looks much improved and is a much better option). How long are you prepared to wait for adjustments? Again, like I said before, wins and loses are at stake now, so is relinquishing our first round pick to a division rival that's already off to a 4-0 start (Toronto), so forgive me for feeling uneasy about Jose and Sasha's poor play game after game thusfar.

SwishAndDish13
Posts: 20878
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/2/2013
Member: #5700

11/4/2015  4:29 PM
Finestrg wrote:
martin wrote:
Finestrg wrote:
I guess Swish was talking about me -- sure, I've probably been overly positive on Jimmer but WTF man -- look at what we're dealing with here. Jose and Sasha have been DREADFUL! How much longer do we continue going with these two? STARTING them no less?? I understand AA will be back soon and that the G2 backcourt has been impressive but we're still gonna need at least one more productive guard added to the mix. No way around it...I'm not averse to adding Jimmer right now. Let's see what he can do. If he didn't work out--cut him and move on. Simple as that...What if he did pan out though? What if we catch some lightning in a bottle? What if we uncover a good role player here a-la Steve Kerr/John Paxson? Or what if we're looking at more than that? What if he thrives coming back home, starts to really feed off the crowd, regains his swagger, etc. Would anyone be against that happening? I wouldn't...I know this: just like Jeremy Lin, if Jimmer played well, NY would eat him up. He'd become a sensation here. I honestly think there's potential for that to occur. And even if we didn't have another 'Linsanity' situation on our hands, I think he could still be a good role player for this team...With our current backcourt trouble, this is worth the tiny bit of risk (which equates to nothing more than a small amount of Dolan's money--what other risk is there??). We even have an open roster spot--no one would have to be cut!!! We're approaching this way too cautiously imo -- dive right in an let's see what he's got. No need for a DL tryout imo. Enough with the respect for Calderon and Vujacic -- I don't care how long a player's been around or how much they make--if you're not producing, you shouldn't be playing. Am I right or what? How long does Fish wait to make adjustments? I mean, come on fellas--this isn't last year--there are wins and losses at stake here now.. I'm willing to bet Fredette would be a better option over Jose and Sasha. Is that so hard to believe?? If no one else feels that way, OK--you're all entitled to your opinions. But this is how I feel and I stand by it. This is a complete no-brainer upside move. Nothing to lose here at all from where I'm standing, only something to gain.

It's not as simple as that. You just can't plug and play guys, it's a process and certain types of players need to earn spots and convince coaches that they deserve playing time. This is not JR dominating in China waiting for his contract to finish up so he can pick up where he left off in the NBA. This is a failed player who has had multiple opportunities to show his stuff and has repeatedly failed. Jimmer is going to need to show it at the DLeague level, both shooting and understanding the offense and not be defensive siv.

You bring in Jimmer and give him minutes and the guys who have been working hard, from Jose to AA to Sasha to Grant to Gallo to everyone else will all start to not trust the coaching staff, point blank. There are humans and competitors and this is not some video game.

I know it's not a video game. By your logic, we can't possibly import any help because we'll run the risk of offending certain players (who exactly? The ones not playing well??) and losing an entire locker room?? Is that right?? Wow... Sorry, but I just don't see it like that at all. We owe Jose and Sasha nothing. Absolutely nothing. Those are the 2 players that need to be replaced with better options and it's something we could do right now very easily -- no waiting for next year. I honestly think it is as simple as that. Phil/Fisher LOVE these guys--that's the problem. Phil traded for Calderon knowing full well his age and salary were detriments and then they decided to throw one of their former teammates, Sasha, a huge bone. Personally, I didn't like either acquisition. Not sure too many GMs out there would've made either of those moves. I'd even be willing to bet deep down Phil now regrets the Calderon move and I bet he may soon feel the same about Vujacic soon if not already. So now what, we have them so we're forced to live with them and their shortcomings? You might be good with that, man, but I'm not.

Two schools of thought here I suppose: (1) remain patient that Jose miraculously turns it around and that Sasha starts playing a much higher %, better brand of basketball (how likely is this, honestly? You feel good about those prospects? I don't at all. I see the writing on the wall with both guys already. I mean how can you not?? Jose's not even trying to shoot his way out of it, something I called for in a thread a few days back--I thought that could maybe be a remedy for him. I still think so in fact. We just haven't seen it. The only thing this dude can really do now is shoot the ball. So let's see it--shoot the damn ball more!! He's less than useless if he's not looking for his shot. You know the adage 'make yourself useful'? Well that's what I'd like to see Jose do, make himself useful. Ahh, who am I kidding with that though--even if he did hit some jumpers, he'd just give it right back at the other end) and Sasha just doesn't look good at all. He looks outclassed and overmatched. Both starting guards do. Sasha isn't hitting any shots..The other school of thought (2) identify the weaknesses on the roster and work feverishly to address them with whatever class of player and amount of cap room available to us. Even if I had to cycle through several low-salary options before I came up with a solution that could help, that's what I'd do. Other teams utilize this method to great effect. The Knicks never seem to see it that way.. And who cares that it's only 4 games in? I don't. I'd prefer mgmt. not sit on their hands and play the 'let's wait and see' game with things. Not my style.. When I see something that's not working and has little chance to work, I'll call for change. Believe me, I'm not the only one. Half the beat writers and blog writers have the same concerns. Doesn't mean I'm some impatient lunatic. I'm willing to be patient with a lot of things -- both our rookies, Derrick Williams, Fisher as a coach, even Phil as president...

The backcourt needs at least one more guard, even with AA. No way around it...I mean we never even finalized this roster -- we still have one spot open. Are we good enough--specifically, is our backcourt good enough to not go to war with a full 15 players?? No way, man. We're not. We could use the help. All hands on deck...I think it would've been nice to have a Travis Trice or a Thanasis Antetokounmpo to turn to right now with Jose and Sasha not playing well (thank God both are still with us at the DL level--I personally see bright futures for both). Or a Jimmer Fredette (a FA who can sign with anyone whenever he wants to btw--wouldn't it suck if he played great in the DL for a week and some GM went out and offered him a guaranteed contract? Money talks, man. Bye-bye Fredette if that happens. It'd be another Mo N'Dour all over again, except this time we could really use the player in question). All I'm saying, man. I don't think you lose an entire locker room with a move like that. No one would even be getting cut. Let's bring in a Jimmer Fredette, a Bryce Cotton or a Jabari Brown and see if they outplay Jose and Sasha in practice. Let's start there. I bet any of those guys could. Look back to the preseason -- it seemed like every time you turned around, the reserves were kicking the starters' asses, and look what's happened--that trend's carried over into the regular season. Getting AA back will fix some things but not all of them -- Jose will still probably be the starting PG (or the backup if Fish ever gets around to promoting Grant) and Sasha may still be getting mins. as a backup (at whose expense btw? Galloway's? Man, I hope not. That dude looks much improved and is a much better option). How long are you prepared to wait for adjustments? Again, like I said before, wins and loses are at stake now, so is relinquishing our first round pick to a division rival that's already off to a 4-0 start (Toronto), so forgive me for losing my mind with Jose and Sasha's poor play game after game thusfar.

Sasha won't be playing (or at least should be receiving minimal minutes) when Affalo returns. They need to assume he can come back and be healthy. Affalo is going to get around 30 min when healthy. So you won't need to worry about Sasha.

smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
11/9/2015  12:05 PM    LAST EDITED: 11/9/2015  12:06 PM
Jimmer has just left westchester and signed with the pelicans

Good!

martin
Posts: 76527
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
11/9/2015  12:07 PM
smackeddog wrote:Jimmer has just left westchester and signed with the pelicans

Good!

hahaha, for real?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/9/2015  12:07 PM
smackeddog wrote:Jimmer has just left westchester and signed with the pelicans

Good!

Yeah saw that. Wonder if we would have interest in Green?

RIP Crushalot😞
clyderules
Posts: 20693
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/11/2015
Member: #6156

11/9/2015  7:37 PM
Jimmer we hardly knew ya!
out with Jose.. in with Jimmer

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy