[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Jeremy Lin: Was open to return to Knicks, but team not interested..
Author Thread
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/18/2015  12:06 PM
knickscity wrote:
holfresh wrote:
knickscity wrote:
holfresh wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”

Thoroughly inaccurate...


prove it, I've already laid my ground in the thread.

I don't have to prove it, everyone knows it's BS...And the Knicks couldn't offer Lin 24/4 because of the CBA..

Lin signed with Houston on July 11th then added the poison pill to the contract...Knicks announced the sign and trade deal for Felton on July 17th...The time to match the offer expired on July 19th...

You really need to get verse in the events. The Knicks could have offered the deal, did they not come to agreement with Novak on a four year deal on July 9th? The same could have been offered to Lin as they both had the same ruling in their favor. I just posted an article from felton agents discussing s&t chances with the Knicks dated July 5th....and guess what? S& T happens, excatly how they wanted....and nobody denied felton was at Dolans BBQ on July 4th.

But nobody can explain if the Knicks wanted to resign Lin why go after Nash before the moratorium, then Kidd, then Felton? they were not gonna have Lin as a 6 mil + backup.

He was done in NY, the day he said he was 85% yet didnt play, and then explained why.

It was a mess. The Knicks had a set amount that they could offer and they told Lin to get more and they would match. It seemed like they were doing Lin a favor. The first deal with Houston was reported and reports were that the Knicks would match it. It was another one of those moratorium verbal deals that both sides backed out of. Similar to Jordan backing out of his deal with the Mavs, it put the nba in a bad spot. Lin's camp and Houston both look bad here in my opinion. Was Lin trying to squeeze extra dollars out of the Knicks or insure that he would become a rocket? Not sure but I have to think that the nba after ruling on allowing the Knicks to have Lin's early bird rights would have liked him back in NY. I think Morey has had some backlash from the Lin and Asik signings around the league though.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
AUTOADVERT
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/18/2015  12:12 PM
knickscity wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
knickscity wrote:
newyorknewyork wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”


The Knicks signed Felton after they were presented the poison pill deal. It was during the time period where they could match Lin's deal. Once that happened it seemed obvious that they were moving on but they still had not committed either way in regards to lin.

Lin was done way before the pill was presented. recall the Knicks were in the running for Steve Nash as well. Nash to Felton to Kidd...come on now Lin was done. Things were official obviously during that period as there were moratoriums and things in place, but make no mistake Felton was headed to the Knicks way before. From Dolans BBQ appearance to his agent publicly blurting out $&T scenarios July 5th ....the deal was there.

July 5th....“They’ve shown great interest, but there’s stuff they’ve had to get through,’’ Dutt told the Post.

“He loved playing in New York. Our choice was to never have left New York. There were no hard feelings. Management handled it the best they could. I don’t think they ever misled us and I never felt they wanted him in that trade.’’

The Knicks have the $3.09 million taxpayer mid-level exception to offer Felton, though Dutt said he hoped a sign-and-trade can be done with Portland to get an increased salary.

“I consider them definitely on his high list,’’ Dutt said. “He would love to go back. He loved New York and was playing at an all-star level.’’

I realize we as fans want to diss the ex players and laud the team, but the team made this decision happen. Unless they offered the 4/24 deal they could have just like they gave Novak...this was all on them.

ALL indications from the Knicks side was that they were going to match the initial offer. Woodson made the notorious claim we would match up to a billion dollars or something silly like that. If it was so clear that Knicks weren't going to match then Houston wouldn't have upped there offer to poison pill status. They clearly felt the heat that the Knicks were going to match the offer which again ALL indications pointed to.

We had Grunwald hiding in a closet avoiding phone calls to buy time for goodness sake.

Nash and Kidd were being looked at and brought in because they wanted veteran insurance. Lin had the amazing run but still lacked experience and needed more improvement and seasoning. Its logical to have Lin back those guys up and be instant offense off the bench as he grew into a better player with experience. Felton could have always been an option in case we struck out on Nash & Kidd. Or Felton could have been an option along with Nash or Kidd as well as Lin under the first Houston offer. At 3 mil Felton could have competed with Lin for the backup spot. Since we ran a lot of 2 pg sets one of them would have taken Pablo's spot.


We should know by now what happens during the moratorium is never official, but it was a poison pill the entire time. the first "offer" was 4 years 28 mil, 5 for the first two, 9 per for the next two, that fourth year being a team option, but if the Knicks match there would be no options.

http://espn.go.com/newyork/nba/story/_/id/8133715/source-newyork-knicks-jeremy-lin-agrees-sign-offer-sheet-houston-rockets

This deal was equally bad tax wise.

If the Knicks had gotten Nash, there would be no Lin. Even the Kidd deal was before the last deal....

Jason Kidd, who was set to rejoin the Dallas Mavericks, made a late and stunning reversal and agreed to join the Knicks instead. Negotiations were continuing Thursday night, and it was not yet clear whether the Knicks would sign Kidd outright or acquire him in a sign-and-trade deal.

Just as Kidd committed, the Knicks learned that Jeremy Lin, their promising 23-year-old point guard, had agreed to an offer sheet with the Houston Rockets, complicating the picture further.

The Rockets’ offer could be worth as much as $28.8 million over four years, with backloaded payments in the final two seasons, according to a person who was briefed on the details. The fourth year is a team option. Because Lin is a restricted free agent, the Knicks have the right to match the deal.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/sports/basketball/kidd-is-heading-to-the-knicks.html

Lin was done.

Knicks would have matched the initial offer due to it being the market that Lin set for himself. Knicks were able to offer 4 yrs 24mil, but wanted Lin to find the market for himself and then match what that offer was. All was going according the plan until Lin after agreeing in principal to the initial offer from Houston fired his agent. Pulled out of the initial offer once word was set that the Knicks would match(up to 1 billion dollars), and signed for an even more lucrative offer. This is obviously what pissed the Knicks(Dolan) off. As it seemed that Lin was just looking to milk money out of the Knicks once it was clear they were willing to match rather then actually signing a deal that the market set. Not that this is really Lin's fault. Knicks said they would match any offer so he designed a way to get top dollar. But the Knicks were always interested in bringing Lin back until they felt Lin was milking them. He was not done before that.

Regardless if they signed Nash or Kidd they were always able to match Lin's offer. One didn't prevent the other from happening. And since this is a business bring Lin back would have been more profitable for the Knicks in terms of sells then not even if it jacked up the cap. Lin made like mimimum yet during Linsanity Knicks made huge profit, and Lin helped the Knicks make playoffs making the Knicks even more profit while again making minimum. He probably already covered the profit necessary for the first 2 yrs of the new contract during his Linsanity run. The only thing that stopped the Knicks from being interested in bringing Lin back was Dolan feeling betrayed.


This is where rumors vs actual reported facts get lost. You cant match what you didnt recieve. Lin has to sign an agreement first. The first offer was never signed as it was the moratorium and once again it was a poison pill as well. Only difference was the first was 18 mil backloaded over two year and the second was backloaded by 15 in one year.

Also the report that Lin changed agents was dated in June of 2012...before free agency started....

According to a release sent out by Geisler on Thursday, Tanner will represent Lin in all areas of contractual agreements, marketing endorsements, licensing, personal appearances, media relations, community investments and other business opportunities. In addition, Montgomery will collaborate with Tanner on free agency and other basketball-related matters.


http://espn.go.com/blog/newyork/knicks/post/_/id/21003/jeremy-lin-switches-agents

Also I really do think folks are getting the profit angle very much wrong. The Knicks have to share their profits with the other teams, it doesnt just stay with them. Houston found that out once Lin signed with them. Sure they COULD have kept Lin, but they didnt...never offered a deal.

There's two facts we know....Knicks never offered a contract, and they didnt match. Knicks had control over both, not Lin.

There would have been no reason for Rockets to change there offer if they didn't feel the Knicks were going to match there initial offer. They clearly felt that what they offered initially wasn't good enough even with the poison pill initially. Knicks also flat out told the public that they were going to match any offer up to 1 billion dollars which they didn't have to say. Grunwald also attempted to avoid the deadline and buy time which is something he wouldn't have to do if there was no interest in resigning Lin from the get go.

Even if the Knicks had to share profits, they could have used Lin to open up another audience and market outside of US which could have a lasting effect yrs after Lin left.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/18/2015  12:20 PM
Lin also would have been making 5 mil per his yrs as a backup. Then 9 or 15mil the yrs when Kidd or Nash probably retired and if good enough took over the starting role.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

10/18/2015  12:43 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

Speak for yourself..Knicks won 54 games and making it to the second round of the playoffs was much, much, more entertaining for me than the 8-1 media driven Linsanity experience...
no shock there i know you despise lin. I loved the 54 wins but hated the way we got our ass kicked by indy in the playoffs

I didn't despise Lin, I didn't buy into the hype...

nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/18/2015  12:45 PM
My contention at the time was that the Knicks didn't really want Lin. If you REALLY want a player you don't send him out into the market place to get romanced by other teams if you can control it. That's just stupid if you really do control the situation. You negotiate with the player and offer him what you feel he's worth and do your best to lock him down. They basically dared him to go out and find the most money. That's stupid if it's a player you LOVE. Clearly they didn't LOVE Lin. That's OK but don't try to make it sound like you were 110% sold on a guy after you sent him out on the market when you have a chance to lock him up before anyone else. I think Lin was in a grateful mentality originally before they sent him out into the market.
I'm convinced that Lin takes a fair offer from the Knicks if they make it early and don't tell him to go find a contract first.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

10/18/2015  12:48 PM
nixluva wrote:My contention at the time was that the Knicks didn't really want Lin. If you REALLY want a player you don't send him out into the market place to get romanced by other teams if you can control it. That's just stupid if you really do control the situation. You negotiate with the player and offer him what you feel he's worth and do your best to lock him down. They basically dared him to go out and find the most money. That's stupid if it's a player you LOVE. Clearly they didn't LOVE Lin. That's OK but don't try to make it sound like you were 110% sold on a guy after you sent him out on the market when you have a chance to lock him up before anyone else. I think Lin was in a grateful mentality originally before they sent him out into the market.
I'm convinced that Lin takes a fair offer from the Knicks if they make it early and don't tell him to go find a contract first.
agreed. I Think the knicks made the right move and lin didnt throw them under the bus at all
TeamBall
Posts: 24343
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2012
Member: #4386

10/18/2015  12:53 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

Speak for yourself..Knicks won 54 games and making it to the second round of the playoffs was much, much, more entertaining for me than the 8-1 media driven Linsanity experience...
no shock there i know you despise lin. I loved the 54 wins but hated the way we got our ass kicked by indy in the playoffs

And we got our asses kicked by Miami during the season with Lin so what's your point?
Knicksfan: Hypocrite league that fines players after the game for flopping but in the game and with obvious flopping they call the fouls.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

10/18/2015  12:55 PM
TeamBall wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
holfresh wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

Speak for yourself..Knicks won 54 games and making it to the second round of the playoffs was much, much, more entertaining for me than the 8-1 media driven Linsanity experience...
no shock there i know you despise lin. I loved the 54 wins but hated the way we got our ass kicked by indy in the playoffs

And we got our asses kicked by Miami during the season with Lin so what's your point?
great you're back. My point is linsanity was a great time as a knick fan thats all
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
10/18/2015  1:10 PM
nixluva wrote:My contention at the time was that the Knicks didn't really want Lin. If you REALLY want a player you don't send him out into the market place to get romanced by other teams if you can control it. That's just stupid if you really do control the situation. You negotiate with the player and offer him what you feel he's worth and do your best to lock him down. They basically dared him to go out and find the most money. That's stupid if it's a player you LOVE. Clearly they didn't LOVE Lin. That's OK but don't try to make it sound like you were 110% sold on a guy after you sent him out on the market when you have a chance to lock him up before anyone else. I think Lin was in a grateful mentality originally before they sent him out into the market.
I'm convinced that Lin takes a fair offer from the Knicks if they make it early and don't tell him to go find a contract first.

Agreed 100%, and just won a ruling to be able to do just that. They didnt want him, just that simple....
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
10/18/2015  1:13 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
holfresh wrote:
knickscity wrote:
holfresh wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Firstly, the Knicks had already secured a deal with Felton before the Lin decision. they never intended on bringing him back, and even duped Kidd into signing under pretenses he would be a mentor, when he wound up being a key rotational player and broke down.

The underlying fact is Lin did nothing but what the Kniks told him to. The Knicks told Lin to go find a deal and they'll match it. The Knicks could have just offered the 4/24 deal from the start, but THEY did not. Ironically they didnt tell Novak to go find a deal...they gave him his without having to secure one first. Sma situation of both players, and what made the Knicks look so stupid is the NBA players Assoc. fought for them to keep Lin and Novak as they would have lost both for nothing without the EB ruling.

So off Lin goes, and the team that wanted him back offered a deal, a poison pill one. Knicks did not match though, but the players currently on the team sure had words to say about another mans money, which I've always felt was a huge no-no....

Melo: “It’s not up to me,” Anthony said laughing. “It’s up to the organization to say that they want to match that ridiculous contract that’s out there.

Tyson:“Jeremy was a young point guard who was inexperienced, who brought a great light to the organization,” Chandler said. “But as far as being able to run the offense and putting players in the right position he just wasn't there. We got some veteran point guards that are capable of doing that."

JR: "Without a doubt," he said. "I think some guys take it personal, because they've been doing it longer and haven't received any reward for it yet. I think it's a tough subject to touch on for a lot of guys."

Novak: “It can be looked at as a ridiculous contract in the sense that it’s a $5 [million], a $5 [million] and a $15 [million over the first three years],” Novak told SNY.tv Wednesday at the Steve Novak Basketball Camp at Sleepy Hollow High School.

“It is kind of ridiculous in terms of the structure. I don’t think in terms of Jeremy’s value that it’s ridiculous. I think everybody knows that. He’s very valuable….I wasn’t there when Carmelo said it but ‘ridiculous contract,’ I think probably means more the fact that there’s a max offer being offered in the third year when the first two was a five.”

Thoroughly inaccurate...


prove it, I've already laid my ground in the thread.

I don't have to prove it, everyone knows it's BS...And the Knicks couldn't offer Lin 24/4 because of the CBA..

Lin signed with Houston on July 11th then added the poison pill to the contract...Knicks announced the sign and trade deal for Felton on July 17th...The time to match the offer expired on July 19th...

You really need to get verse in the events. The Knicks could have offered the deal, did they not come to agreement with Novak on a four year deal on July 9th? The same could have been offered to Lin as they both had the same ruling in their favor. I just posted an article from felton agents discussing s&t chances with the Knicks dated July 5th....and guess what? S& T happens, excatly how they wanted....and nobody denied felton was at Dolans BBQ on July 4th.

But nobody can explain if the Knicks wanted to resign Lin why go after Nash before the moratorium, then Kidd, then Felton? they were not gonna have Lin as a 6 mil + backup.

He was done in NY, the day he said he was 85% yet didnt play, and then explained why.

It was a mess. The Knicks had a set amount that they could offer and they told Lin to get more and they would match. It seemed like they were doing Lin a favor. The first deal with Houston was reported and reports were that the Knicks would match it. It was another one of those moratorium verbal deals that both sides backed out of. Similar to Jordan backing out of his deal with the Mavs, it put the nba in a bad spot. Lin's camp and Houston both look bad here in my opinion. Was Lin trying to squeeze extra dollars out of the Knicks or insure that he would become a rocket? Not sure but I have to think that the nba after ruling on allowing the Knicks to have Lin's early bird rights would have liked him back in NY. I think Morey has had some backlash from the Lin and Asik signings around the league though.

Side note, but I had actually forgot about Asik, although I think I read somewhere that he wanted to leave the Bulls. cant find that now though. But in Lin's case, what the Knicks did was silly if they wanted to keep him.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/18/2015  1:14 PM
knickscity wrote:
nixluva wrote:My contention at the time was that the Knicks didn't really want Lin. If you REALLY want a player you don't send him out into the market place to get romanced by other teams if you can control it. That's just stupid if you really do control the situation. You negotiate with the player and offer him what you feel he's worth and do your best to lock him down. They basically dared him to go out and find the most money. That's stupid if it's a player you LOVE. Clearly they didn't LOVE Lin. That's OK but don't try to make it sound like you were 110% sold on a guy after you sent him out on the market when you have a chance to lock him up before anyone else. I think Lin was in a grateful mentality originally before they sent him out into the market.
I'm convinced that Lin takes a fair offer from the Knicks if they make it early and don't tell him to go find a contract first.

Agreed 100%, and just won a ruling to be able to do just that. They didnt want him, just that simple....
If you are just going to take a fair offer do you fire your agent to go with a bigger firm to negotiate that deal?
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

10/18/2015  1:27 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
nixluva wrote:My contention at the time was that the Knicks didn't really want Lin. If you REALLY want a player you don't send him out into the market place to get romanced by other teams if you can control it. That's just stupid if you really do control the situation. You negotiate with the player and offer him what you feel he's worth and do your best to lock him down. They basically dared him to go out and find the most money. That's stupid if it's a player you LOVE. Clearly they didn't LOVE Lin. That's OK but don't try to make it sound like you were 110% sold on a guy after you sent him out on the market when you have a chance to lock him up before anyone else. I think Lin was in a grateful mentality originally before they sent him out into the market.
I'm convinced that Lin takes a fair offer from the Knicks if they make it early and don't tell him to go find a contract first.
agreed. I Think the knicks made the right move and lin didnt throw them under the bus at all

Agree that the Knicks probably did not want him...especially if it was going to mess up their cap situation down the road.

Have to look at the Lin contract situation in the context of our coaching change. If MDA is still coach I think he probably remains.

Still, while he gets more $$ with Houston, he is on a team with Harden, a ball dominant player who was not a good compliment for him.

Smart move for Lin if he was only looking for $$, foolish move he he wanted to take the next progression in his career. You can also make a case that it was not the smartest move for the Rockets, either.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/18/2015  1:36 PM
nixluva wrote:My contention at the time was that the Knicks didn't really want Lin. If you REALLY want a player you don't send him out into the market place to get romanced by other teams if you can control it. That's just stupid if you really do control the situation. You negotiate with the player and offer him what you feel he's worth and do your best to lock him down. They basically dared him to go out and find the most money. That's stupid if it's a player you LOVE. Clearly they didn't LOVE Lin. That's OK but don't try to make it sound like you were 110% sold on a guy after you sent him out on the market when you have a chance to lock him up before anyone else. I think Lin was in a grateful mentality originally before they sent him out into the market.
I'm convinced that Lin takes a fair offer from the Knicks if they make it early and don't tell him to go find a contract first.

IMO the Knicks didn't know how to feel about Lin. Wasn't like he was a sure thing. He had Linsanity and he had some bad moments as well. Letting the market decide Lin's value is understandable as it allows you to see what his the league values Lin giving some substance to the contract you will sign him to. Knicks also didn't control the situation since they weren't able to offer the most money. They were only able to match the most money. And there is no indication the Lin would have accepted less money. His agent would have made him test the market regardless to see the max amount of money his client could recieve. Lin controlled the situation since he was able to test the market or not and tell his agent to get a deal done with the Knicks. Did Lin offer any terms to the Knicks that they could accept or turn down.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30169
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/18/2015  1:38 PM
Not saying he had to but there ate two sides. And Lin had more control while Knicks had less the you believe.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
10/18/2015  1:57 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

I agree. It is a business for these guys. But one guy chasing money is no different from another guy doing it. Right after Lin hired his new agent to negotiate that contract the agent came out and said it wasn't a done deal that Lin would return to NY.

sure it is:

http://www.spotrac.com/nba/charlotte-hornets/jeremy-lin/cash-earnings/
http://www.spotrac.com/nba/new-york-knicks/carmelo-anthony/cash-earnings/

lets make an educated guess on what your thinking: you want to somehow exonerate carmelo anthony's greed by showing us what you think is jeremy lin's greed....

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/18/2015  2:04 PM
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
Sangfroid wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:The quote where he said they chose not to resign me oissed me off. The Knicks were going to match the original deal offered to Lin but couldn't match the poison pill deal. I really liked Lin as a knick but he needs to take some ownership for chasing the money. He got paid but he owned ny and his career probably would have had a different path had he not put the Knicks in a position where matching his offer was almost financially not possuble. the aw shucks its all good I just want to get back to linsanity isn't cutting it anymore in my opinion.

Revisionist's history. He must be a Republican.


Really? You don't think Lin went for the money? I have said this since that July by the way.
its not fair to bash lin for chasing the money because EVERY player chases the money. Lets be honest melo is a knick because we could offer him much more than anyone otherwise he would have went to chicago. LINSANITY was probably the best time we have had as knick fans since 2000

I agree. It is a business for these guys. But one guy chasing money is no different from another guy doing it. Right after Lin hired his new agent to negotiate that contract the agent came out and said it wasn't a done deal that Lin would return to NY.

sure it is:

http://www.spotrac.com/nba/charlotte-hornets/jeremy-lin/cash-earnings/
http://www.spotrac.com/nba/new-york-knicks/carmelo-anthony/cash-earnings/

lets make an educated guess on what your thinking: you want to somehow exonerate carmelo anthony's greed by showing us what you think is jeremy lin's greed....


Guys get paid their value. If your deal is so bad that a first round pick has to be included to move it then that player was overpaid. If you have a brief but spectacular run before your first free agency you might be able to turn that into getting overpaid on your contract. If you can't retain your starting position you will get paid back up money on your next deal. If you are one of the top players on the planet for a sustained number of years you get paid accordingly.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
10/18/2015  2:25 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
nixluva wrote:My contention at the time was that the Knicks didn't really want Lin. If you REALLY want a player you don't send him out into the market place to get romanced by other teams if you can control it. That's just stupid if you really do control the situation. You negotiate with the player and offer him what you feel he's worth and do your best to lock him down. They basically dared him to go out and find the most money. That's stupid if it's a player you LOVE. Clearly they didn't LOVE Lin. That's OK but don't try to make it sound like you were 110% sold on a guy after you sent him out on the market when you have a chance to lock him up before anyone else. I think Lin was in a grateful mentality originally before they sent him out into the market.
I'm convinced that Lin takes a fair offer from the Knicks if they make it early and don't tell him to go find a contract first.

Agreed 100%, and just won a ruling to be able to do just that. They didnt want him, just that simple....
If you are just going to take a fair offer do you fire your agent to go with a bigger firm to negotiate that deal?

Idk. Lin hired the bigger agent way before free agency though. Not sure how one relates to the other.
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
10/18/2015  2:26 PM
newyorknewyork wrote:Not saying he had to but there ate two sides. And Lin had more control while Knicks had less the you believe.

yeah, because they offered no contract at all. The control was 100% in the knicks hands.
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
10/18/2015  2:28 PM
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
nixluva wrote:My contention at the time was that the Knicks didn't really want Lin. If you REALLY want a player you don't send him out into the market place to get romanced by other teams if you can control it. That's just stupid if you really do control the situation. You negotiate with the player and offer him what you feel he's worth and do your best to lock him down. They basically dared him to go out and find the most money. That's stupid if it's a player you LOVE. Clearly they didn't LOVE Lin. That's OK but don't try to make it sound like you were 110% sold on a guy after you sent him out on the market when you have a chance to lock him up before anyone else. I think Lin was in a grateful mentality originally before they sent him out into the market.
I'm convinced that Lin takes a fair offer from the Knicks if they make it early and don't tell him to go find a contract first.

Agreed 100%, and just won a ruling to be able to do just that. They didnt want him, just that simple....
If you are just going to take a fair offer do you fire your agent to go with a bigger firm to negotiate that deal?

Idk. Lin hired the bigger agent way before free agency though. Not sure how one relates to the other.
He hired him when the season ended and the agent issued a statement that Lin might not return to the Knicks.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
10/18/2015  2:32 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
knickscity wrote:
nixluva wrote:My contention at the time was that the Knicks didn't really want Lin. If you REALLY want a player you don't send him out into the market place to get romanced by other teams if you can control it. That's just stupid if you really do control the situation. You negotiate with the player and offer him what you feel he's worth and do your best to lock him down. They basically dared him to go out and find the most money. That's stupid if it's a player you LOVE. Clearly they didn't LOVE Lin. That's OK but don't try to make it sound like you were 110% sold on a guy after you sent him out on the market when you have a chance to lock him up before anyone else. I think Lin was in a grateful mentality originally before they sent him out into the market.
I'm convinced that Lin takes a fair offer from the Knicks if they make it early and don't tell him to go find a contract first.

Agreed 100%, and just won a ruling to be able to do just that. They didnt want him, just that simple....
If you are just going to take a fair offer do you fire your agent to go with a bigger firm to negotiate that deal?

Idk. Lin hired the bigger agent way before free agency though. Not sure how one relates to the other.
He hired him when the season ended and the agent issued a statement that Lin might not return to the Knicks.

Of course, because the Knicks never offered a contract, that part makes total sense. This topic is amazing. Team offers nothing, fans blame the player. The Knicks could have easily offered Lin a deal that wouldnt have killed their tax budget. Now if Lin rejected that, then I could the venom. But they did no such thing.
Jeremy Lin: Was open to return to Knicks, but team not interested..

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy