TPercy wrote:I can't believe this is actually being argued.He is very inefficient compared to Caledron. Caledron over his career has acheived a damn high 575% TS average. Bradley Beal is subordinate to Caledron in everything that involves shooting and it is not even close.
Bradley much like Caledron is also very injury prone;thus, we can't depend on this guy to be our second star on our team.
In terms of impact, once again, Bradley Beal doesn't even come close to being the impact player that Caledron is over his career. His WS48 is a average to mediocre .81 compared to Jose's 127.
I'm not saying that Bradley won't become a much better player in the future. His impact in the playoffs no doubt was very good, but it is way too big of a risk to sign an injury prone, inefficient and non-impactful(regular season) player in hopes that he can change our team.
To be honest comparing him to Calderon might be the silliest thing I've seen in a while. I'd love to see when calderon has ever averaged 23 points in a playoff series. I also find it odd while Calderon is praised for his efficiency, why wasnt his PER in his last playoff series with Dallas only a 13? Beal on the other hand has been above average both times he's played, and he just turned 22. he already has one skill locked down...his three point shot is legit and that is efficient. What kills him is the long two's which can easily be altered, and he has noted that himself.
“I have to do as much as I can as best as I can to eliminate those long twos and get to the basket, get to the free throw line,” Beal told Martin in Los Angeles. “Those are just easy points.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wizards-insider/wp/2015/09/25/wizards-have-offered-bradley-beal-a-contract-extension/
He is also an excellent rebounder and can distribute the rock.
Calderon is efficient only because he picks when to shoot, like a pg should, but make no mistake Calderon is a massive liability on both ends. task Calderon with being a scoring option and he will fail you. beal isnt a pg, thus making the comparison and the criteria a brain dead comparison.
The two players arent comparable at all. One is young has legit all around skill and the other is just plain old in every facet of the game.
Players getting their first big deal usually arent putting up stats to warrant it immediately, they grow into them though, and for a player who seems to rise during the playoffs, this is a no brainer.
By your analysis you'd take Calderon over Kobe.