nixluva wrote:We really never got to see how Jose could play if healthy. It could've helped if Jose was healthy to start the season rather than starting with Larkin, but wouldn't have changed Melo's injury problems. In the end the struggles exposed the character of some of the guys and we traded them. Jose is still here and perhaps we'll get to see what he can do this time.
Injuries happen. calderon is old. but we know he doesnt play defense, rarely shoots, and wont attack the rim. he's a liability on both ends of the court, and that has nothing to do with his injury.
nixluva wrote:As for Phil, Rambis and Cleamons, I was talking about them last year too. This isn't some shift as you're trying to make it sound. Go back and look at what I wrote about them as coaches. See you want to drag out this old trope that i'm just changing as things develop when in fact i'm extremely consistent in the points I made.
I can go back and you praised Phil Fisher and Calderon vs the previous group the year before that. That was your mantra before Calderon got injured.
nixluva wrote:As for this notion that Phil hasn't gotten talent for this team you make it sound like all these great players changed teams and we missed out. Most players stayed home. We got players that Phil targeted with the exception of DeAndre. He didn't really want Monroe after drafting KP and didn't want LMA either. The guys we got were the guys Phil wanted so you can shove that "Phil could NOT secure" talent crap. It's not just about collecting talent.
I said Phil couldn't secure talent that can win...all nba players have talent, and sure, there were upgrades. id ont expect this team to win 17 games again, but I dont think the talent was upgraded to the point of winning over 30-35.
nixluva wrote:Good for you that you loved the draft. I read more negative things from you than positive so forgive me for assuming you had a negative view of most things Knicks did. Still a pretty negative take IMO. It's not just about having winners in the front office and on the bench. PAY SOME DAMN ATTENTION! This is different! When have we had this level of cohesion and direction from the top without interference from Dolan or different agendas between the GM and Coach?
classic case of seeing what you want to see. it seems you might wanna pay some attention, but it's clear the only focus you have is anything that isnt related to having squirting orgasms about everything relating to the Knicks.
nixluva wrote:We have the most capable and unified group from top to bottom in a very long time. This is something to be happy about rather than bytching about one Free Agent we didn't get. You can't win if you have different agendas and this franchise is finally in sync. This is what i've been trying to explain to you naysayers. You guys get distracted by the shinny objects and aren't paying F'n attention to what's really going on.
This has yet to be proven. Phil has won no titles as an executive, Fisher has won none as a coach. "Most capable" certainly hasnt been put to the test. if Phil actually was the coach, then yes this statement could be accurate, but he isnt. Your issue is you want an all around suck fest of praise. Sorry, but thats only done in orgies. Someone will be winning a title this year, and it wont be the New York Knicks. If that isnt the goal at some point, then there has been no culture change. if you want to praise guys who have won everywhere but here then expect them to do the same here. Every year the Knicks dont win under Phil should be a failure to you, because thats what you're basing you love for him on....his winning.