Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851 Alba Posts: 11 Joined: 1/3/2012 Member: #3806 USA |
![]() If this somehow goes through, get ready see lots of these:
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
![]() crzymdups wrote:Crawford for Calderon doesn't work under the cap, at least 1-for-1Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Marks is always good with this stuff, and will do additional research and come back with an update, and apology, he realizes he did not have all the info when he said something or made a mistake. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
crzymdups
Posts: 52018 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/1/2004 Member: #671 USA |
![]() WaltLongmire wrote:crzymdups wrote:Crawford for Calderon doesn't work under the cap, at least 1-for-1Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: yeah, he's pretty good. i have to disagree with the notion that where there is smoke there is fire... often it means the teams discussed it, couldn't find a match and moved on. i sort of doubt this trade would happen. i don't think it'd help the knicks much on the floor, but it'd be fun to have Jamal back and would give them another bonafide scoring option and guy who can make a big shot late in games, which is something a young team always needs. Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: ¿ △ ?
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
![]() WaltLongmire wrote:crzymdups wrote:Crawford for Calderon doesn't work under the cap, at least 1-for-1Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL:
ES
|
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076 Alba Posts: 5 Joined: 2/24/2002 Member: #215 USA |
![]() Finestrg wrote:holfresh wrote:Finestrg wrote:holfresh wrote:Finestrg wrote:crzymdups wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: That was a long time ago |