[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

The Phil Files Part 7
Author Thread
ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/11/2015  10:03 AM
mreinman wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Anybody that says Me7o's NBA career is in anyway more accomplished than Paul Pierce is just being a biased homer.

The Truth career actually had 2 stanzas, began his career similar to Me7o as a numbers gunner. Out for self, and buckets, in the 'Toine Walker days.

Once Doc, KG, Jesus, and Rondo came aboard, he sacrificed his offensive game, switched to small forward from 2 guard, became a better facilitator, played much better defense and just became a great teammate overall. He saved his bucket making for clutch time in the 4th quarters of close games. True Knicks fans know this.

There is really no comparison between the 2...maybe young Pierce, but not Paul Pierce from 2008 on.

2008...when Pierce was 31 and playing alongside KG and Ray? He was also the second best player on his team those years.

30 years old. He actually changed who he was as a player. Bought in completely to teamball.

Season       Age  Tm  Lg Pos    G   GS   MP  FG  FGA  FG%  3P 3PA  3P%  2P  2PA  2P% eFG%  FT  FTA  FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV  PF  PTS
2006-07 29 BOS NBA SG 47 46 37.0 7.9 18.1 .439 2.3 5.9 .389 5.7 12.2 .463 .502 6.8 8.6 .796 0.8 5.1 5.9 4.1 1.0 0.3 3.2 2.6 25.0
2007-08 30 BOS NBA SF 80 80 35.9 6.4 13.7 .464 1.8 4.6 .392 4.6 9.2 .499 .529 5.1 6.1 .843 0.7 4.5 5.1 4.5 1.3 0.5 2.8 2.5 19.6

Just became a more efficient player, took less shots, higher percentage shots, less turnovers, and the numbers reflect this buying into Doc's system.

he had a TS of 60!! that year and a WS48 of .207. Melo will never sniff those numbers.

And, pierce was extremely efficient the 2 years before that as well so lets not start with the bull sh1t teammates excuses to save melo from looking crappy.



Exactly right.

Look at the numbers people, and stop putting your homerism before actual hard cold facts.

Pierce > Me7o

He's better than Me7o in career accomplishments, in advanced statistics and metrics for their peak seasons, efficiency, clutch shot making, in teammate camraderie, and most importantly winning when it mattered most.

This is no slight on Me7o, he's had a good career, just not as good as Pierce's. Numbers never lie.

AUTOADVERT
Knixkik
Posts: 35478
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
8/11/2015  10:09 AM
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:Shows how much phil really does love Melo.

golly does it really though?


Actually yes it does, although i'm sure you have a ton of theories for why he is saying exactly the opposite of what he means. I expected this response from you. You are wrong, and always have been. Just leave it be.
Knixkik
Posts: 35478
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
8/11/2015  10:10 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:Shows how much phil really does love Melo.

golly does it really though?

Yes!
"Like Q, Melo is a leader by example, not by exhorting his teammates. He's also very into the triangle, and with a better supporting cast he has every chance to be the MJ and Kobe of our offense."

Yup, it's pretty straight forward. No sugar coat there.

MaTT4281
Posts: 34916
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
8/11/2015  10:12 AM
ChuckBuck wrote:
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Anybody that says Me7o's NBA career is in anyway more accomplished than Paul Pierce is just being a biased homer.

The Truth career actually had 2 stanzas, began his career similar to Me7o as a numbers gunner. Out for self, and buckets, in the 'Toine Walker days.

Once Doc, KG, Jesus, and Rondo came aboard, he sacrificed his offensive game, switched to small forward from 2 guard, became a better facilitator, played much better defense and just became a great teammate overall. He saved his bucket making for clutch time in the 4th quarters of close games. True Knicks fans know this.

There is really no comparison between the 2...maybe young Pierce, but not Paul Pierce from 2008 on.

2008...when Pierce was 31 and playing alongside KG and Ray? He was also the second best player on his team those years.

30 years old. He actually changed who he was as a player. Bought in completely to teamball.

Season       Age  Tm  Lg Pos    G   GS   MP  FG  FGA  FG%  3P 3PA  3P%  2P  2PA  2P% eFG%  FT  FTA  FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV  PF  PTS
2006-07 29 BOS NBA SG 47 46 37.0 7.9 18.1 .439 2.3 5.9 .389 5.7 12.2 .463 .502 6.8 8.6 .796 0.8 5.1 5.9 4.1 1.0 0.3 3.2 2.6 25.0
2007-08 30 BOS NBA SF 80 80 35.9 6.4 13.7 .464 1.8 4.6 .392 4.6 9.2 .499 .529 5.1 6.1 .843 0.7 4.5 5.1 4.5 1.3 0.5 2.8 2.5 19.6

Just became a more efficient player, took less shots, higher percentage shots, less turnovers, and the numbers reflect this buying into Doc's system.

My mistake, be didn't turn 31 until that October. I have to imagine playing with 2 HOF can go a long way towards improving your efficiency. Going forward he also had Rondo playing into an all star.

This isn't to build up Melo, I don't actually care about the comparison. This about that half court bowing, fake Willis Reed mother****er that has both Celtic and Net checked off on my hate list (going to flop city doesn't help either). Him and KG easily my most hated players.

Knixkik
Posts: 35478
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
8/11/2015  10:14 AM
ChuckBuck wrote:Gross....comparing Me7o to The Truth who won a NBA Finals MVP and made it to 2 NBA Finals.

Disgusting comparison.

Look at them as individual talents. Remember, his championship and finals mvp aren't possible without Garnett and Allen. 2 stars. Prior to the celtics adding those 2 players, their careers were very comparable, even with Melo possibly having a slight advantage (to age 31). Remember, there were years Pierce missed the playoffs in the east. But Pierce has had a better career, for the reasons you stated.

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/11/2015  10:18 AM
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Anybody that says Me7o's NBA career is in anyway more accomplished than Paul Pierce is just being a biased homer.

The Truth career actually had 2 stanzas, began his career similar to Me7o as a numbers gunner. Out for self, and buckets, in the 'Toine Walker days.

Once Doc, KG, Jesus, and Rondo came aboard, he sacrificed his offensive game, switched to small forward from 2 guard, became a better facilitator, played much better defense and just became a great teammate overall. He saved his bucket making for clutch time in the 4th quarters of close games. True Knicks fans know this.

There is really no comparison between the 2...maybe young Pierce, but not Paul Pierce from 2008 on.

2008...when Pierce was 31 and playing alongside KG and Ray? He was also the second best player on his team those years.

30 years old. He actually changed who he was as a player. Bought in completely to teamball.

Season       Age  Tm  Lg Pos    G   GS   MP  FG  FGA  FG%  3P 3PA  3P%  2P  2PA  2P% eFG%  FT  FTA  FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV  PF  PTS
2006-07 29 BOS NBA SG 47 46 37.0 7.9 18.1 .439 2.3 5.9 .389 5.7 12.2 .463 .502 6.8 8.6 .796 0.8 5.1 5.9 4.1 1.0 0.3 3.2 2.6 25.0
2007-08 30 BOS NBA SF 80 80 35.9 6.4 13.7 .464 1.8 4.6 .392 4.6 9.2 .499 .529 5.1 6.1 .843 0.7 4.5 5.1 4.5 1.3 0.5 2.8 2.5 19.6

Just became a more efficient player, took less shots, higher percentage shots, less turnovers, and the numbers reflect this buying into Doc's system.

My mistake, be didn't turn 31 until that October. I have to imagine playing with 2 HOF can go a long way towards improving your efficiency. Going forward he also had Rondo playing into an all star.

This isn't to build up Melo, I don't actually care about the comparison. This about that half court bowing, fake Willis Reed mother****er that has both Celtic and Net checked off on my hate list (going to flop city doesn't help either). Him and KG easily my most hated players.

Fair enough. Stats aside, something we agree upon.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

8/11/2015  10:24 AM
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Anybody that says Me7o's NBA career is in anyway more accomplished than Paul Pierce is just being a biased homer.

The Truth career actually had 2 stanzas, began his career similar to Me7o as a numbers gunner. Out for self, and buckets, in the 'Toine Walker days.

Once Doc, KG, Jesus, and Rondo came aboard, he sacrificed his offensive game, switched to small forward from 2 guard, became a better facilitator, played much better defense and just became a great teammate overall. He saved his bucket making for clutch time in the 4th quarters of close games. True Knicks fans know this.

There is really no comparison between the 2...maybe young Pierce, but not Paul Pierce from 2008 on.

2008...when Pierce was 31 and playing alongside KG and Ray? He was also the second best player on his team those years.

30 years old. He actually changed who he was as a player. Bought in completely to teamball.

Season       Age  Tm  Lg Pos    G   GS   MP  FG  FGA  FG%  3P 3PA  3P%  2P  2PA  2P% eFG%  FT  FTA  FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV  PF  PTS
2006-07 29 BOS NBA SG 47 46 37.0 7.9 18.1 .439 2.3 5.9 .389 5.7 12.2 .463 .502 6.8 8.6 .796 0.8 5.1 5.9 4.1 1.0 0.3 3.2 2.6 25.0
2007-08 30 BOS NBA SF 80 80 35.9 6.4 13.7 .464 1.8 4.6 .392 4.6 9.2 .499 .529 5.1 6.1 .843 0.7 4.5 5.1 4.5 1.3 0.5 2.8 2.5 19.6

Just became a more efficient player, took less shots, higher percentage shots, less turnovers, and the numbers reflect this buying into Doc's system.

My mistake, be didn't turn 31 until that October. I have to imagine playing with 2 HOF can go a long way towards improving your efficiency. Going forward he also had Rondo playing into an all star.

This isn't to build up Melo, I don't actually care about the comparison. This about that half court bowing, fake Willis Reed mother****er that has both Celtic and Net checked off on my hate list (going to flop city doesn't help either). Him and KG easily my most hated players.

again ... he was efficient before they got there. I mentioned this because I knew that this would be an attempted excuse.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/11/2015  10:24 AM
Knixkik wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Gross....comparing Me7o to The Truth who won a NBA Finals MVP and made it to 2 NBA Finals.

Disgusting comparison.

Look at them as individual talents. Remember, his championship and finals mvp aren't possible without Garnett and Allen. 2 stars. Prior to the celtics adding those 2 players, their careers were very comparable, even with Melo possibly having a slight advantage (to age 31). Remember, there were years Pierce missed the playoffs in the east. But Pierce has had a better career, for the reasons you stated.

Agreed, they were comparable, pre big 3(4).

Pierce 2007-2008 season on, a better all around player than Me7o, for reasons stated in the previous posts.

No matter who they brought in, you still have to play the games.

Kobe had Dwight and Nash before that experiment failed. Barkley went to Houston with Pippen even. No matter what players come in, you have to make it work and Pierce made it harmoniously so, after averaging 25-26 pts/game for his Boston career. He could've easily said, this is my team, you guys make sure I average my 25, but he sacrificed.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

8/11/2015  10:28 AM
ChuckBuck wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Gross....comparing Me7o to The Truth who won a NBA Finals MVP and made it to 2 NBA Finals.

Disgusting comparison.

Look at them as individual talents. Remember, his championship and finals mvp aren't possible without Garnett and Allen. 2 stars. Prior to the celtics adding those 2 players, their careers were very comparable, even with Melo possibly having a slight advantage (to age 31). Remember, there were years Pierce missed the playoffs in the east. But Pierce has had a better career, for the reasons you stated.

Agreed, they were comparable, pre big 3(4).

Pierce 2007-2008 season on, a better all around player than Me7o, for reasons stated in the previous posts.

No matter who they brought in, you still have to play the games.

Kobe had Dwight and Nash before that experiment failed. Barkley went to Houston with Pippen even. No matter what players come in, you have to make it work and Pierce made it harmoniously so, after averaging 25-26 pts/game for his Boston career. He could've easily said, this is my team, you guys make sure I average my 25, but he sacrificed.

again ...

melo never had years like PP did in 2005 and 2006

so here is what phil is thinking ....
ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/11/2015  10:31 AM
mreinman wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Gross....comparing Me7o to The Truth who won a NBA Finals MVP and made it to 2 NBA Finals.

Disgusting comparison.

Look at them as individual talents. Remember, his championship and finals mvp aren't possible without Garnett and Allen. 2 stars. Prior to the celtics adding those 2 players, their careers were very comparable, even with Melo possibly having a slight advantage (to age 31). Remember, there were years Pierce missed the playoffs in the east. But Pierce has had a better career, for the reasons you stated.

Agreed, they were comparable, pre big 3(4).

Pierce 2007-2008 season on, a better all around player than Me7o, for reasons stated in the previous posts.

No matter who they brought in, you still have to play the games.

Kobe had Dwight and Nash before that experiment failed. Barkley went to Houston with Pippen even. No matter what players come in, you have to make it work and Pierce made it harmoniously so, after averaging 25-26 pts/game for his Boston career. He could've easily said, this is my team, you guys make sure I average my 25, but he sacrificed.

again ...

melo never had years like PP did in 2005 and 2006

I'm in agreement, don't pitch slap the dudes sticking up for you!

Comparable doesn't mean equal, just means easily compared or likened.

Most real bball fans know PP has had a better career than Me7o, it's just for arguments sake that they can be compared on certain bodies of work.

Post Big 3(4), there's no comparison.

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

8/11/2015  10:36 AM
ChuckBuck wrote:
mreinman wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Gross....comparing Me7o to The Truth who won a NBA Finals MVP and made it to 2 NBA Finals.

Disgusting comparison.

Look at them as individual talents. Remember, his championship and finals mvp aren't possible without Garnett and Allen. 2 stars. Prior to the celtics adding those 2 players, their careers were very comparable, even with Melo possibly having a slight advantage (to age 31). Remember, there were years Pierce missed the playoffs in the east. But Pierce has had a better career, for the reasons you stated.

Agreed, they were comparable, pre big 3(4).

Pierce 2007-2008 season on, a better all around player than Me7o, for reasons stated in the previous posts.

No matter who they brought in, you still have to play the games.

Kobe had Dwight and Nash before that experiment failed. Barkley went to Houston with Pippen even. No matter what players come in, you have to make it work and Pierce made it harmoniously so, after averaging 25-26 pts/game for his Boston career. He could've easily said, this is my team, you guys make sure I average my 25, but he sacrificed.

again ...

melo never had years like PP did in 2005 and 2006

I'm in agreement, don't pitch slap the dudes sticking up for you!

Comparable doesn't mean equal, just means easily compared or likened.

Most real bball fans know PP has had a better career than Me7o, it's just for arguments sake that they can be compared on certain bodies of work.

Post Big 3(4), there's no comparison.

no pitch slap intended :-)

PP had a TS over 58 the 2 years before the other guys got there and he also averaged over 4 assists per.

just give me one JUST ONE season of melo having a TS of 58 and 4 assists per JJJJJJJJJJJUUUUUUUUUUST ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!

ugh ... so sad and disgusting that this guy just does not get it. He has the talent to be great but the brain to just be a putz

so here is what phil is thinking ....
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/11/2015  10:42 AM
mreinman wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Gross....comparing Me7o to The Truth who won a NBA Finals MVP and made it to 2 NBA Finals.

Disgusting comparison.

Look at them as individual talents. Remember, his championship and finals mvp aren't possible without Garnett and Allen. 2 stars. Prior to the celtics adding those 2 players, their careers were very comparable, even with Melo possibly having a slight advantage (to age 31). Remember, there were years Pierce missed the playoffs in the east. But Pierce has had a better career, for the reasons you stated.

Agreed, they were comparable, pre big 3(4).

Pierce 2007-2008 season on, a better all around player than Me7o, for reasons stated in the previous posts.

No matter who they brought in, you still have to play the games.

Kobe had Dwight and Nash before that experiment failed. Barkley went to Houston with Pippen even. No matter what players come in, you have to make it work and Pierce made it harmoniously so, after averaging 25-26 pts/game for his Boston career. He could've easily said, this is my team, you guys make sure I average my 25, but he sacrificed.

again ...

melo never had years like PP did in 2005 and 2006

Celtics won 33 games in 06.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

8/11/2015  10:44 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Gross....comparing Me7o to The Truth who won a NBA Finals MVP and made it to 2 NBA Finals.

Disgusting comparison.

Look at them as individual talents. Remember, his championship and finals mvp aren't possible without Garnett and Allen. 2 stars. Prior to the celtics adding those 2 players, their careers were very comparable, even with Melo possibly having a slight advantage (to age 31). Remember, there were years Pierce missed the playoffs in the east. But Pierce has had a better career, for the reasons you stated.

Agreed, they were comparable, pre big 3(4).

Pierce 2007-2008 season on, a better all around player than Me7o, for reasons stated in the previous posts.

No matter who they brought in, you still have to play the games.

Kobe had Dwight and Nash before that experiment failed. Barkley went to Houston with Pippen even. No matter what players come in, you have to make it work and Pierce made it harmoniously so, after averaging 25-26 pts/game for his Boston career. He could've easily said, this is my team, you guys make sure I average my 25, but he sacrificed.

again ...

melo never had years like PP did in 2005 and 2006

Celtics won 33 games in 06.

and?

So its possible I guess to have efficient stats with shytty teammates.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
8/11/2015  10:46 AM
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Gross....comparing Me7o to The Truth who won a NBA Finals MVP and made it to 2 NBA Finals.

Disgusting comparison.

Look at them as individual talents. Remember, his championship and finals mvp aren't possible without Garnett and Allen. 2 stars. Prior to the celtics adding those 2 players, their careers were very comparable, even with Melo possibly having a slight advantage (to age 31). Remember, there were years Pierce missed the playoffs in the east. But Pierce has had a better career, for the reasons you stated.

Agreed, they were comparable, pre big 3(4).

Pierce 2007-2008 season on, a better all around player than Me7o, for reasons stated in the previous posts.

No matter who they brought in, you still have to play the games.

Kobe had Dwight and Nash before that experiment failed. Barkley went to Houston with Pippen even. No matter what players come in, you have to make it work and Pierce made it harmoniously so, after averaging 25-26 pts/game for his Boston career. He could've easily said, this is my team, you guys make sure I average my 25, but he sacrificed.

again ...

melo never had years like PP did in 2005 and 2006

Celtics won 33 games in 06.

and?

So its possible I guess to have efficient stats with shytty teammates.

Thought the goal was to win. Usually team success is the focus. Wasn't Doc almost fired after that season?
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

8/11/2015  10:48 AM
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
mreinman wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Gross....comparing Me7o to The Truth who won a NBA Finals MVP and made it to 2 NBA Finals.

Disgusting comparison.

Look at them as individual talents. Remember, his championship and finals mvp aren't possible without Garnett and Allen. 2 stars. Prior to the celtics adding those 2 players, their careers were very comparable, even with Melo possibly having a slight advantage (to age 31). Remember, there were years Pierce missed the playoffs in the east. But Pierce has had a better career, for the reasons you stated.

Agreed, they were comparable, pre big 3(4).

Pierce 2007-2008 season on, a better all around player than Me7o, for reasons stated in the previous posts.

No matter who they brought in, you still have to play the games.

Kobe had Dwight and Nash before that experiment failed. Barkley went to Houston with Pippen even. No matter what players come in, you have to make it work and Pierce made it harmoniously so, after averaging 25-26 pts/game for his Boston career. He could've easily said, this is my team, you guys make sure I average my 25, but he sacrificed.

again ...

melo never had years like PP did in 2005 and 2006

Celtics won 33 games in 06.

and?

So its possible I guess to have efficient stats with shytty teammates.

Thought the goal was to win. Usually team success is the focus. Wasn't Doc almost fired after that season?

still have no idea how this is relevant. Your team sucks who cares ... play smart and not like a dumb pig.

Didn't melo win 17 games last year? Not really relevant. You are as good as your team is.

so here is what phil is thinking ....
dk7th
Posts: 30006
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/14/2012
Member: #4228
USA
8/11/2015  11:17 AM
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Anybody that says Me7o's NBA career is in anyway more accomplished than Paul Pierce is just being a biased homer.

The Truth career actually had 2 stanzas, began his career similar to Me7o as a numbers gunner. Out for self, and buckets, in the 'Toine Walker days.

Once Doc, KG, Jesus, and Rondo came aboard, he sacrificed his offensive game, switched to small forward from 2 guard, became a better facilitator, played much better defense and just became a great teammate overall. He saved his bucket making for clutch time in the 4th quarters of close games. True Knicks fans know this.

There is really no comparison between the 2...maybe young Pierce, but not Paul Pierce from 2008 on.

2008...when Pierce was 31 and playing alongside KG and Ray? He was also the second best player on his team those years.

30 years old. He actually changed who he was as a player. Bought in completely to teamball.

Season       Age  Tm  Lg Pos    G   GS   MP  FG  FGA  FG%  3P 3PA  3P%  2P  2PA  2P% eFG%  FT  FTA  FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV  PF  PTS
2006-07 29 BOS NBA SG 47 46 37.0 7.9 18.1 .439 2.3 5.9 .389 5.7 12.2 .463 .502 6.8 8.6 .796 0.8 5.1 5.9 4.1 1.0 0.3 3.2 2.6 25.0
2007-08 30 BOS NBA SF 80 80 35.9 6.4 13.7 .464 1.8 4.6 .392 4.6 9.2 .499 .529 5.1 6.1 .843 0.7 4.5 5.1 4.5 1.3 0.5 2.8 2.5 19.6

Just became a more efficient player, took less shots, higher percentage shots, less turnovers, and the numbers reflect this buying into Doc's system.

My mistake, be didn't turn 31 until that October. I have to imagine playing with 2 HOF can go a long way towards improving your efficiency. Going forward he also had Rondo playing into an all star.

This isn't to build up Melo, I don't actually care about the comparison. This about that half court bowing, fake Willis Reed mother****er that has both Celtic and Net checked off on my hate list (going to flop city doesn't help either). Him and KG easily my most hated players.

you hate them for the right reason, ie you fear them. you fear them and what they have done to the knicks. meantime i love them both because they play the game the right way, regardless of how they have destroyed the knicks.

knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

8/11/2015  11:17 AM
TPercy wrote:
holfresh wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
CrushAlot wrote:
dk7th wrote:
Knixkik wrote:Shows how much phil really does love Melo.

golly does it really though?

Yes!
"Like Q, Melo is a leader by example, not by exhorting his teammates. He's also very into the triangle, and with a better supporting cast he has every chance to be the MJ and Kobe of our offense."

i see nothing but neutral statements from jackson on melo. the enthusiasm that comes with love is not there. "leader by example" is code for "not a good leader"-- "very into the triangle" yes, well... we'll shall see. melo his entire career has not had to adhere to a system. he can TRY to adhere, but is anybody going to say with a straight face "melo has the potential to be a playmaker to the same degree as jordan and bryant?!? the answer is a definitive "no." it's an inarguable fact.

hence,

the statement "he has EVERY CHANCE TO BE" is not the same as him saying "he WILL BE." two different statements.

moreover,

he is challenging melo by saying the "supporting cast" is "better," which actually puts the onus on melo to produce real, tangible results.

as i said, if melo doesn't cooperate and shows below-average ability in the triangle then he will be exposed for a fraud once and for all. but if he DOES cooperate and DOES excel and the team reaches the playoffs then he will have redeemed himself to all but 5% of the fan base.

another factor to weigh here is the amount of FU money he has. it's a character-check season for melo.

agreed?


So if the Knicks make the playoffs Melo will have redeemed himself in your eyes?

well i hesitate because (1) i just don't like his game, never have. i like pierce, ginobili, paul george, kahwi leonard, durant players. you think his numbers can be 27 5 3 which is just not good enough for winning-- he's been putting those numbers up on inefficient shooting, bitch rebounds and his offensive boarding is usually following his own poorly-considered first shot, all bullyball with no feint or guile. he needs a pierce-like stat line.

redeemed? nah he is too deeply in debt to the fanbase to be redeemed with a mere first round appearance. heck he's been reaching that tremendous goal most of his career, except the last two years. as you may recall the knicks went from 54 to 37 wins in the absence of leadership. gotta love the hard english on that cue ball that jackson sent spinning out there about the good old "lead by example" canard.

here how and when he redeems himself in my eyes, mmkay? i'll take two hard-fought game 6s in the eastern conference finals in the final two years of his contract.... most likely as a 6th man by the last year.

I hope you know Paul Pierce is now a sixth man or maybe 7th man...Melo's rebounds are closer to 7 per game than 5 per..Nothing bitchy about that..Melo is a better career rebounder than Pierce, better career percentage shooter than Pierce..Better career free throws..Since becoming Knick, his stats across the board were better than Pierce..Swap out Pierce and Melo on the Boston squad and I say they win at least two Finals and compete in three...Pierce has been on better teams, with better coaches and in a better organization..

Is this a joke?
Paul pierce was never a sixth man, he started every single game for the Wizards last season even in his very old age at 37.

Ill give you rebounding, although take into account that melo has featured 76% of all his games as a Sf and twenty two percent as a power forward; in contrast, Paul pierce has featured 70% of all his games as a SF and 26% of all his games as a SG.

Paul pierce has been a way way better shooter than Melo. Pierce has averaged a career 57% TS and has cracked above 60% two seasons consecutively. Meanwhile your mans Melo has a somewhat decent 54% .

Melo would never even make a single final if he was on Boston. He is not the kind of impact player Paul Pierce is at all.

No, it's not a joke..You don't have to give anything, the stats speak for themselves..TS% is heavily geared toward the three point shot. Melo career wise has better FG and FT playing with lessor players..Pierce played with 3 all stars..Rondo, Allen and KG..His FG% increased after those players were added to the team...To get to the Finals you need a team..Please tell me what player Carmelo ever player with who were better than Rondo, KG or Allen, much less a combination of all three...

holfresh
Posts: 38679
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2006
Member: #1081

8/11/2015  11:18 AM
ChuckBuck wrote:
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Anybody that says Me7o's NBA career is in anyway more accomplished than Paul Pierce is just being a biased homer.

The Truth career actually had 2 stanzas, began his career similar to Me7o as a numbers gunner. Out for self, and buckets, in the 'Toine Walker days.

Once Doc, KG, Jesus, and Rondo came aboard, he sacrificed his offensive game, switched to small forward from 2 guard, became a better facilitator, played much better defense and just became a great teammate overall. He saved his bucket making for clutch time in the 4th quarters of close games. True Knicks fans know this.

There is really no comparison between the 2...maybe young Pierce, but not Paul Pierce from 2008 on.

2008...when Pierce was 31 and playing alongside KG and Ray? He was also the second best player on his team those years.

30 years old. He actually changed who he was as a player. Bought in completely to teamball.

Season       Age  Tm  Lg Pos    G   GS   MP  FG  FGA  FG%  3P 3PA  3P%  2P  2PA  2P% eFG%  FT  FTA  FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV  PF  PTS
2006-07 29 BOS NBA SG 47 46 37.0 7.9 18.1 .439 2.3 5.9 .389 5.7 12.2 .463 .502 6.8 8.6 .796 0.8 5.1 5.9 4.1 1.0 0.3 3.2 2.6 25.0
2007-08 30 BOS NBA SF 80 80 35.9 6.4 13.7 .464 1.8 4.6 .392 4.6 9.2 .499 .529 5.1 6.1 .843 0.7 4.5 5.1 4.5 1.3 0.5 2.8 2.5 19.6

Just became a more efficient player, took less shots, higher percentage shots, less turnovers, and the numbers reflect this buying into Doc's system.

Yeah he changed because he was playing amongst three all stars...

ChuckBuck
Posts: 28851
Alba Posts: 11
Joined: 1/3/2012
Member: #3806
USA
8/11/2015  11:26 AM
Holfresh with the predictable lame rebuttal.

Pierce averaged over 4 assists a game for 5 whole seasons before Doc and company arrived.

Better career and better all around player than Me7o ever wishes he could be.

#Factonly

mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

8/11/2015  11:28 AM
holfresh wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:
MaTT4281 wrote:
ChuckBuck wrote:Anybody that says Me7o's NBA career is in anyway more accomplished than Paul Pierce is just being a biased homer.

The Truth career actually had 2 stanzas, began his career similar to Me7o as a numbers gunner. Out for self, and buckets, in the 'Toine Walker days.

Once Doc, KG, Jesus, and Rondo came aboard, he sacrificed his offensive game, switched to small forward from 2 guard, became a better facilitator, played much better defense and just became a great teammate overall. He saved his bucket making for clutch time in the 4th quarters of close games. True Knicks fans know this.

There is really no comparison between the 2...maybe young Pierce, but not Paul Pierce from 2008 on.

2008...when Pierce was 31 and playing alongside KG and Ray? He was also the second best player on his team those years.

30 years old. He actually changed who he was as a player. Bought in completely to teamball.

Season       Age  Tm  Lg Pos    G   GS   MP  FG  FGA  FG%  3P 3PA  3P%  2P  2PA  2P% eFG%  FT  FTA  FT% ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV  PF  PTS
2006-07 29 BOS NBA SG 47 46 37.0 7.9 18.1 .439 2.3 5.9 .389 5.7 12.2 .463 .502 6.8 8.6 .796 0.8 5.1 5.9 4.1 1.0 0.3 3.2 2.6 25.0
2007-08 30 BOS NBA SF 80 80 35.9 6.4 13.7 .464 1.8 4.6 .392 4.6 9.2 .499 .529 5.1 6.1 .843 0.7 4.5 5.1 4.5 1.3 0.5 2.8 2.5 19.6

Just became a more efficient player, took less shots, higher percentage shots, less turnovers, and the numbers reflect this buying into Doc's system.

Yeah he changed because he was playing amongst three all stars...

uh ... he didnt change. He sacrificed points not smarts. Even you can't spin how melo the player that PP was.

And, TS of course gives more weight to 3 point shots. Can you figure out why?

so here is what phil is thinking ....
The Phil Files Part 7

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy