Author | Poll |
Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
smackeddog
Posts: 38391 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
![]() WaltLongmire wrote:Uptown wrote:mreinman wrote:GustavBahler wrote:mreinman wrote:GustavBahler wrote:nixluva wrote:GustavBahler wrote:Don't believe there is ever a good reason for Phil not to acknowledge a player on the team. Nothing Zen about that. In order to put my head in the sand over an issue, I have to actually care about it first. I don't honestly care if Melo is in a huff with Phil or not. We have no way of knowing either way- it's all guess work and conjecture based on media **** stirring (remember when they claimed there was tension between Melo and Tim Jr? Now they are claiming their is tension between Melo and Phil because he traded Tim Jr!), which you believe (and you may be right), but just because you believe something, it doesn't make it a fact. The situation had flared during the Knicks’ loss to the Nets last Tuesday when Tim Hardaway Jr. allegedly barked: “Get the rebound!” Anthony took it personally, cursing at Hardaway and threatening to beat him up after the game. http://nypost.com/2014/12/10/carmelo-threatened-to-fight-hardaway-amid-knicks-discord-report/ Compare with an article by the same writer in the same paper a few months later: Carmelo Anthony has been at a low boil since December and his temperature rose again on draft night after Phil Jackson selected European project Kristaps Porzingis and traded away Melo’s friend, Tim Hardaway Jr. http://nypost.com/2015/06/26/carmelo-feels-betrayed-by-jackson-after-porzingis-pick/ Wow it's almost like the media exaggerates stuff and manufactures drama to sell papers- who'd of thunk it! |
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
![]() smackeddog wrote: I put a lot of importance on the actual words coming from the "participants" in the Knicks' melodrama (the pun is unintentional, I assure you), unless you get the sense that they are of the "damage control" type. The Post is the most provocative paper out there in terms of the Knicks, although Isola always likes to stir things up- I look at the quotes they might include in their articles, but I'm never influenced by the spin they put on them. I may be wrong about my analyses of players, but I feel extremely confident about my ability to analyze words, texts, statements, and their nuances...assuming I have everything in front of me. Jackson has given us a lot of actual comments to chew on, and as I've said, the All-Star/Anthony injury issue seems to have been a turning point in how Phil looked at Anthony. People point to some of the things he says which they don't seem to understand and wonder if he knows what he's talking about, but he knows exactly what he is saying and why he is saying it. I've talked about this before, and probably been ignored by many around here, but Phil has gotten rid of Anthony's entire entourage with the trading of Smith, Shump, and THJ. Phil also chose to ignore Anthony's choice in the draft (Winslow) and in using THJ to get Grant, he acquired a player who he has some history with from his Bulls' days. He talked about drafting "mature" players and many thought he was only talking about physical maturity, but he wasn't- the common maturity between Grant and KP had nothing to do with their bodies, but their respective approaches to the game. Phil talked about taking players with solid family backgrounds and "support groups," and all the players he drafted come from professional basketball families, and all seem to have active support from direct family members and others. Forget the spins of guys like Berman or Isola when talking about Jackson. Just look at what Phil says and the decisions he makes, and go from there. He clearly decided at some point last year that he was going to drastically change the culture on the team- the Rosen article gives you an idea of how he was checking in with Fisher to see what the tone of the team was like- and this is validated by looking at the players he got rid of, the players he drafted, and, for the most part, the players he acquired in FA (D.Williams seems like a wildcard signing to me). Not sure there is much speculation on my part, to be honest- Phil's words and actions seem to go hand in hand. One funny thing, though...from Rosen article If we ever had the opportunity to bring in an All-Star player, I'd certainly ask Carmelo if he thought he could play with the guy. Otherwise, it's appropriate to keep him out of the loop." Now I understand that none of the guys we picked up were "All-Stars," but you would have expected Phil to talk to Anthony, his "star" player about FA, yet we now know that he never consulted with Anthony about FAs, and has also made comments about Anthony being part of a team. From Isola: Phil Jackson revealed on Monday that he hasn’t spoken with the Knicks superstar since the start of free agency and added that he isn’t concerned if Anthony is upset over the direction of the club. “Well, you know, we’re a team sport,” Jackson said. “When we’re putting a team together that’s our first priority; how do we make a team that works together? That’s the important aspect. How this all comes together is still a mystery for us. We’ve got five months to kinda get into it here. There are messages being sent to Anthony by Phil when he speaks, just like Anthony has sent "messages" to Phil in one form all another. Should be an interesting season. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
dk7th
Posts: 30006 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/14/2012 Member: #4228 USA |
![]() WaltLongmire wrote:smackeddog wrote: i agree. what is understood need not be spoken on. just kidding.... phil jackson told us exactly what he would do before he was hired when he called the knicks roster at that time "clumsy" as far back as 2012.... "They don't fit together well. (Amare) Stoudemire doesn't fit well with Carmelo (Anthony)," said Jackson, when asked to expand on "clumsy." "Stoudemire's a really good player. But he's gotta play in a certain system and a way. "Carmelo has to be a better passer. And the ball can't stop every time it hits his hands. They need to have someone come in that can kinda blend that group together." i like jackson's divide and conquer approach. i think he was coerced by dolan to retain anthiny. i think that he sent chandler away so he could get rid of felton and not have there be friction between chandler and melo, but that there were better triangle big men that he would be able to hire as well. and yes i believe that removing all of melo's low character flunkies was a tactical and practical move to isolate melo. it is also clear that jackson will not gather talent willy-nilly without that talent being a good fit for his system and without that talent being vetted for high character. knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
![]() dk7th wrote:WaltLongmire wrote:smackeddog wrote: i agree. what is understood need not be spoken on. just kidding.... phil jackson told us exactly what he would do before he was hired when he called the knicks roster at that time "clumsy" as far back as 2012.... "They don't fit together well. (Amare) Stoudemire doesn't fit well with Carmelo (Anthony)," said Jackson, when asked to expand on "clumsy." "Stoudemire's a really good player. But he's gotta play in a certain system and a way. "Carmelo has to be a better passer. And the ball can't stop every time it hits his hands. They need to have someone come in that can kinda blend that group together." i like jackson's divide and conquer approach. i think he was coerced by dolan to retain anthiny. i think that he sent chandler away so he could get rid of felton and not have there be friction between chandler and melo, but that there were better triangle big men that he would be able to hire as well. and yes i believe that removing all of melo's low character flunkies was a tactical and practical move to isolate melo. it is also clear that jackson will not gather talent willy-nilly without that talent being a good fit for his system and without that talent being vetted for high character. Phil has finally flexed his muscles...how far is he willing to go? EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|