Bonn1997 wrote:dk7th wrote:knicks1248 wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:smackeddog wrote:wargames wrote:If he gave up 10 mil and they don't win the chip he'll be the biggest idiot in the league.
And the reality is he is far more likely NOT to win a championship than win it. He could have gone ring chasing in a year or two, but it is his decision at the end of the day.
Maybe he doesn't have a black and white view of success even if some message board posters here do.
he gave up essentially $11 million..there's no justifying that.. he could have donate that to charity...he's a retard, probably one of the worse business decisions i have ever seen
my guess is that your yearly income is in the five-figure range. his has been in the seven- to eight-figure range.
instead of insulting what you clearly don't comprehend, try learning about perspective, scale and relativity, proportion, orders of magnitude, powers of ten, and last but not least: "price versus value"
+1
For all we know West has done a good job managing his money over the years, and maybe he lives a modest life.
Duncan and James have taken less money than they could have demanded during their careers for various reasons. Duncan, perhaps in his final year, took less so SA could make certain acquisitions.
D. Jordan, if he does go to Dallas, potentially gave up a lot of $$ based on contract length. What if he gets injured if he plays for Dallas, and never fully recovers. He might have wanted that extra year at $20M.
A few players also turned away from offers by the Kings to take less with another team.
There seems to be a point where the extra money does not make a difference in your life or your future life, unless you are consumed with a need to have more money than this or that player.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?