crzymdups wrote:Briggs, I respect your opinion and I love reading your threads... but man, I think you are fixated on this Stein thing. There's no way Phil would take Stein over Okafor. I think Phil is kind of arrogant and dumb about this, honestly. I think he honestly thinks he'll get D'Angelo Russell now that he's at 4. Or something. I don't think the Knicks will take Stein at 4. I think they'll try to trade down to 6 or 7 to get him. I think Orlando is locked in on Porzingis at 5 now, meaning Stein would be there at 6 or 7 if say the Kings or Nuggets wanted to trade up to 4 to get Mudiay to play the point.
I understand where Briggs is coming from. Briggs is fixated on Stein because he's probably been looking at actual game clips of him and is scared shytless that we might take him.
I was just watching the Wisconsin/KU game (entire game is on YouTube) again yesterday, more to look at Kaminsky and Towns, but there were times when you did not even realize Stein was on the floor...and he was. You don't even have to look at the DraftExpress weaknesses vid to see that his basketball instincts are still terrible, for the most part. He has a few things he's been programed to do, and I do believe he can be quite good on certain teams, but his offensive instincts are simply terrible. His touch in the post is terrible in the actual games he's played in, and there are times when he looks like a talented freshman playing in his first few collegiate games.
MDA could live with him, perhaps, but he's a not suitable big in the Triangle because of a lack of consistency, and I consider him to have a low BB IQ based on the games I've watched. He is not a savvy player, not other way to put it.
He will be 22 soon- do any of you who seemingly are in love with him understand that he is one of the oldest guys being considered in the top 10 but in his final season he was still showing the lack of instinct and BB acumen that is more common with a freshman??
If we did trade down, taking him over Kaminsky would be an amazing blunder for a GM who when he was a coach who wanted intelligent two-way players.
Not sure what the Steinboy's fixation is on the guy- maybe they figure that we will have a better chance of a guy getting on a highlight clip because of a pick and roll dunk, but there is no way in hell he would take a player with Stein's limitations at #4.
Jackson should take Porzingis if he's there...if not you might have Winslow, Russell, or OK4 available.
If you saw the Berman article, by the way...interesting theory. Phil talking about OK4 not being there might be rooted in his female companion's role with the Lakers. He might know that they will take OK4, a classic post player. Then it's up to Philly.
From where I am sitting, we are guaranteed to have one of these guys available when we pick: Porzingis, Russell, OK4, and Winslow, and I would be fine with Phil taking any of them at 4 if he considered them the best player available.
EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?