Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
holfresh
Posts: 38679 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/14/2006 Member: #1081 |
![]() dk7th wrote:smackeddog wrote:dk7th wrote:smackeddog wrote:CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:Really? What is this?CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:So drafting the third or fourth rated prospect at 4 equals Isiah meddling?holfresh wrote:dk7th wrote:if jackson can keep his conceitedness in check he should be seeking input and feedback from every corner before making the final decision himself and owning tat decision. that in itself would be refreshing, especially if it turns into a mistake. it is not likely that he is entertaining anything other than what has been discussed ad nauseam here and in other forums. but so far as the "isaiah factor" if the knicks draft mudiay or even russell it will be a sign of his meddling. The extent and topic area of your lack of knowledge/how wrong you are knows no bounds... http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/knicks/post/_/id/55772/isiah-thomas-ranked-best-draft-gm But the man had an eye for talent. There’s no denying that. Just look at four of the guys he drafted with the Knicks: Trevor Ariza, David Lee, Wilson Chandler, Nate Robinson (technically drafted by the Phoenix Suns but acquired by the Knicks on a draft-day deal). All solid rotation players in the NBA. So how does Thomas’ draft record stack up against other GMs? One metric, put together by ESPN.com’s Tom Haberstroh, rates Thomas as the best draft-day GM in the NBA. The evaluation is based on where Thomas selected in the draft and the value of each player he selected. For instance, if two players add the same value to a team, but one is drafted lower than the other, the GM who drafted the player with the lower pick would get more credit. So Thomas’ picks of Lee (No. 30 in 2005), Ariza (No. 43 in 2004), Chandler (No. 23 in 2007) and Robinson (No. 21 in 2005) boosted his resume. Here’s Haberstroh on Thomas: “Thomas put up an outstanding hit rate in the draft, no matter where he picked. His run of lottery picks in Toronto should be the stuff of lore. He started off by getting Damon Stoudamire with the No. 7 pick in 1995. Then with the No. 2 pick in 1996, he grabbed Defensive Player of the Year Marcus Camby. The following year in 1997, he nabbed some high schooler named Tracy McGrady at No. 9. “... Thomas' average pick was the 23rd slot, but the talent he found was more like picking at sixth every year. That's an absurdly good return. The irony is that Thomas never quite grasped the value of draft picks; he couldn't wait to get rid of them, despite his overwhelming success on draft day.” |
dk7th
Posts: 30006 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/14/2012 Member: #4228 USA |
![]() holfresh wrote:dk7th wrote:smackeddog wrote:dk7th wrote:smackeddog wrote:CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:Really? What is this?CrushAlot wrote:dk7th wrote:So drafting the third or fourth rated prospect at 4 equals Isiah meddling?holfresh wrote:dk7th wrote:if jackson can keep his conceitedness in check he should be seeking input and feedback from every corner before making the final decision himself and owning tat decision. that in itself would be refreshing, especially if it turns into a mistake. it is not likely that he is entertaining anything other than what has been discussed ad nauseam here and in other forums. but so far as the "isaiah factor" if the knicks draft mudiay or even russell it will be a sign of his meddling. you are describing a scout. i am not interested in his scouting prowess. he had no idea how to put together a TEAM, which is the job of the GM. can you really be this obtuse? i guess so. knicks win 38-43 games in 16-17. rose MUST shoot no more than 14 shots per game, defer to kp6 + melo, and have a usage rate of less than 25%
|