TripleThreat wrote:Would you trade our pick for Cousins?
If Sacto was willing to trade Demarcus Cousins for a SINGLE top four first round draft pick in this upcoming draft, I would run, not walk, to say Yes to that deal.
It would be the Knicks trade raping the Kings to the proportion of every Knicks player since 1970 running a train on Vivek Ranadive's daughter and then Vivek himself works the scene a a towel boy and makes sandwiches for everyone afterwards.
It baffles me to the core to hear some of the trade scenarios that many of you will say Yes to, but again, that many of you will say No to, it's just truly baffling.
A young All Star pivot entering his prime years. Though if a deal like that went down, the league would openly investigate both teams ( because it would be so horribly lopsided in favor of the Knicks), Sacto would lose 90 percent of it's season ticket holders and I think Boston and Philly and Phoenix would openly revolt ( they all could offer better packages for Cousins)
98 percent of the time, you don't trade a lottery pick. This would be one of those rare cases in that vaunted 2 percent where you pull the trigger and never look back.
In the soft serve weakened Eastern Conference, Cousins could drag this Knicks team to the 5th seed by himself. The added bonus of a Cousins, though it would never happen in real life, is that Melo would freak out when Cousins would become the New King of Basketball in NY. But unlike Pringles, Chandler and Lin, Melo and Leon Rose won't be able to drive him out of town. Then Melo would demand a trade to the Lakers.
Not saying Cousin's isn't worth it but you use your on theories when you want to prove your point but ignore it when you want to
it baffles me how you suggestted that players NBA players are in physical decline from age 24-26, therefore could be overpayed in contracts after
I think we all can agree Cousins is better than the draft pick alone but in all fairness
It is the 2015 draft pick + cap space (even if King's were willing to trade Cousin's for the draft pick alone)
vs
Cousins
I said I want Draymond Green for the MAX and you said, accoriding to your studdies that he could be overpaid and in decline in the length of his contract
Then you go as far as to suggest Paul Pierce is better suited for such a role
I am sorry Paul Pierce didn't win crap before his decline, according to "your theory" of declines after the age of 24-26
It was KG who changed the dynamic of that Boston team and elevated/achored their DEFENSE along with many very good defenders and the addition of Ray Allen
They were contenders for a good 6years till their physical declines, after the age of 30 +
"BIG 3"
KG
Paul Pierce
Ray Allen
"Big 5"
Add in Rajon Rhondo and a young Perkins with KG
Very good defenders both 1v1 and TEAM, rebounders and solid role players with KG and Perkins achoring their defense especially KG who was way passed 26 with a DEEP BENCH...
Tony Allen
James Posey
Rajon Rhondo *at the time, till they drafted Avery Bradley came over to play that role"
Perkins/Glen Davis
Along those years of being competitive....
They had many other veterans and players in and out like
Delonte West
Rasheed Wallace/Jermaine Oneil/Shaq/THE BIG from Net's
Jeff Green
So troll on, post just to look to argue and bash another poster here without EVER giving an answer on what and how you would go about FA and talents
Paul Pierce
SMH