[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Aleey S
Author Thread
Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

3/11/2015  10:01 AM    LAST EDITED: 3/11/2015  10:03 AM
The idea that we can blow through all of our cap space reshaping the team then exceed the cap to bring Shved back on a Bird rights deal -- that's appealing, esp. if the plan was to use up all our cap space anyway. That would be my first choice if we can swing it like that.
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/11/2015  10:09 AM
might be a breakout game. You look at his history and it looks like he's never been comfortable, and hasnt been able to put forth a stretch of good enough play to earn a regular spot and get settled.

No doubt you run him out there for 30mpg and see what he does over the last 20 games or so. This could really help our backcourt woes.

Last 5 games 16/5/3 and shooting 41% from 3

Im coming around on him. He's aggressive and has the quickness you want to see from your PG.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/11/2015  10:40 AM
fishmike wrote:might be a breakout game. You look at his history and it looks like he's never been comfortable, and hasnt been able to put forth a stretch of good enough play to earn a regular spot and get settled.

No doubt you run him out there for 30mpg and see what he does over the last 20 games or so. This could really help our backcourt woes.

Last 5 games 16/5/3 and shooting 41% from 3

Im coming around on him. He's aggressive and has the quickness you want to see from your PG.

He's always had this kind of ability but never really had a chance to put it together in a key role like this. He's only in his 3rd year. The better this guy shoots the more his value increases cuz he does everything else at a good level. He's rebounding, passing, getting to the line and as we've talked about over and over in the past we need players with a high BB IQ. The more smart players you put in this offense the better and better it works. The passes come on time and guys are in rhythm when shooting. Love his size as well. Keeping him would make Phil's job that much easier in trying to put together a good starting lineup.

blkexec
Posts: 28347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
3/11/2015  12:34 PM
I'm hearing people say he needs to add more weight. I don't mind him being skinny....It makes him less injury prone.

But what he needs to gain is more strength. Players his size have been successful in the NBA before. But when they add weight, then even more weight when they get older, all these knee injuries pop up. This might be his best basketball weight, health wise.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

3/11/2015  12:59 PM
fishmike wrote:might be a breakout game. You look at his history and it looks like he's never been comfortable, and hasnt been able to put forth a stretch of good enough play to earn a regular spot and get settled.

No doubt you run him out there for 30mpg and see what he does over the last 20 games or so. This could really help our backcourt woes.

Last 5 games 16/5/3 and shooting 41% from 3

Im coming around on him. He's aggressive and has the quickness you want to see from your PG.


Yup.

Got some decent playing time in Minnesota when Rubio was hurt, but he must have known that he could never earn a starting spot as a PG with Ricky around (There are many similarities between them, IMO). I don't think Philly or Houston ever considered keeping him.

Fisher has to give him the kind of minutes you mention, and not be afraid to give him consistent minutes even if he is going though some rough moments in a particular game.

Galloway's legs seem shot at this point, and he doesn't have the aggressiveness Schved has in the PG position. I think both of them are keepers, but giving Shved a few more MPG and added responsibility should be a priority at this point so we can see if consistency will come from his being comfortable.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

3/11/2015  1:08 PM
blkexec wrote:I'm hearing people say he needs to add more weight. I don't mind him being skinny....It makes him less injury prone.

But what he needs to gain is more strength. Players his size have been successful in the NBA before. But when they add weight, then even more weight when they get older, all these knee injuries pop up. This might be his best basketball weight, health wise.

You could be right about his "basketball" weight, and the need for added strength being more important than actual poundage.

Looking at him, I don't think this guy is every going to put on a lot of extra weight, but a little added strength, assuming his endurance is good, might help him during a physical game and could also help him when he drives to the basket.

At PG he can compensate for what seems to be a lack of strength with his length... while guarding a SG his length and footwork also help him on D.

Don't see a lot of 2s posing up these days... do we?

As skinny as he looks, I don't think we have seen him overpowered much, and he has been pretty good snatching rebounds.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
earthmansurfer
Posts: 24005
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2005
Member: #858
Germany
3/11/2015  1:10 PM
WaltLongmire wrote:
fishmike wrote:might be a breakout game. You look at his history and it looks like he's never been comfortable, and hasnt been able to put forth a stretch of good enough play to earn a regular spot and get settled.

No doubt you run him out there for 30mpg and see what he does over the last 20 games or so. This could really help our backcourt woes.

Last 5 games 16/5/3 and shooting 41% from 3

Im coming around on him. He's aggressive and has the quickness you want to see from your PG.


Yup.

Got some decent playing time in Minnesota when Rubio was hurt, but he must have known that he could never earn a starting spot as a PG with Ricky around (There are many similarities between them, IMO). I don't think Philly or Houston ever considered keeping him.

Fisher has to give him the kind of minutes you mention, and not be afraid to give him consistent minutes even if he is going though some rough moments in a particular game.

Galloway's legs seem shot at this point, and he doesn't have the aggressiveness Schved has in the PG position. I think both of them are keepers, but giving Shved a few more MPG and added responsibility should be a priority at this point so we can see if consistency will come from his being comfortable.

Well said, I'm glad the kid "fell into our lap". Ok, Phil made it happen, but it is amazing he wasn't given a chance elsewhere.
Being a professional means producing in the minutes you are given, but many players just can't find their rhythm without minutes, and I mentioned that many times before (in the hater threads).
BTW - Are you happy Netflix is carrying on your Longmire legacy? I am

The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. Albert Einstein
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/11/2015  1:21 PM
You can't fake court vision and BB IQ. Either you have it or you don't. Shved has legit PG skills and has always had them. What is different is getting a legit shot in a clear role. No he's not a superstar but we don't need him to be. He's the kind of player the Spurs and Hawks have found a lot of. They don't wow you but they're solid, skilled and smart. Shved is just a baller. He can wake up and play this way any day cuz this is who he is. He didn't have to change his game to fit into this role. All he needed to do was hit his shots at a higher %.
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

3/11/2015  4:55 PM    LAST EDITED: 3/11/2015  4:56 PM
earthmansurfer wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
fishmike wrote:might be a breakout game. You look at his history and it looks like he's never been comfortable, and hasnt been able to put forth a stretch of good enough play to earn a regular spot and get settled.

No doubt you run him out there for 30mpg and see what he does over the last 20 games or so. This could really help our backcourt woes.

Last 5 games 16/5/3 and shooting 41% from 3

Im coming around on him. He's aggressive and has the quickness you want to see from your PG.


Yup.

Got some decent playing time in Minnesota when Rubio was hurt, but he must have known that he could never earn a starting spot as a PG with Ricky around (There are many similarities between them, IMO). I don't think Philly or Houston ever considered keeping him.

Fisher has to give him the kind of minutes you mention, and not be afraid to give him consistent minutes even if he is going though some rough moments in a particular game.

Galloway's legs seem shot at this point, and he doesn't have the aggressiveness Schved has in the PG position. I think both of them are keepers, but giving Shved a few more MPG and added responsibility should be a priority at this point so we can see if consistency will come from his being comfortable.

Well said, I'm glad the kid "fell into our lap". Ok, Phil made it happen, but it is amazing he wasn't given a chance elsewhere.
Being a professional means producing in the minutes you are given, but many players just can't find their rhythm without minutes, and I mentioned that many times before (in the hater threads).
BTW - Are you happy Netflix is carrying on your Longmire legacy? I am


Got to find that elusive "comfort zone" as a player.

Fisher has seemingly allowed him to play a little more freely in his "system."

Hopefully, the good in his game remains and we see the rough edges and strange decisions decline.

He should be happy in a New York City setting, given our large Russian population. Hopefully, if he improves his consistency, he doesn't chose to cross the bridge into Brooklyn.


Great show...deserves all the accolades it gets.

Hard to believe that the lead actor is bloody Australian.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
3/12/2015  1:25 AM
WaltLongmire wrote:
blkexec wrote:I'm hearing people say he needs to add more weight. I don't mind him being skinny....It makes him less injury prone.

But what he needs to gain is more strength. Players his size have been successful in the NBA before. But when they add weight, then even more weight when they get older, all these knee injuries pop up. This might be his best basketball weight, health wise.

You could be right about his "basketball" weight, and the need for added strength being more important than actual poundage.

Looking at him, I don't think this guy is every going to put on a lot of extra weight, but a little added strength, assuming his endurance is good, might help him during a physical game and could also help him when he drives to the basket.

At PG he can compensate for what seems to be a lack of strength with his length... while guarding a SG his length and footwork also help him on D.

Don't see a lot of 2s posing up these days... do we?

As skinny as he looks, I don't think we have seen him overpowered much, and he has been pretty good snatching rebounds.

watch 4:20 of this video. he is completely over powered. He's got a lot of potential but hes also 26. He needs to work hard with a trainer even starting today for the future. Hes got great length/height and he knows how to play. To have a longer term consistent success he needs some power in his legs and upper body. I can see looking at him that with solid effort he could easily be 10 pounds heavier. My bet why he is a 36% shooter over 175 games is strength. He can be a key find for the Knicks--he should be priority 1 with this franchise right now.

RIP Crushalot😞
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

3/12/2015  2:04 AM
BRIGGS wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:
blkexec wrote:I'm hearing people say he needs to add more weight. I don't mind him being skinny....It makes him less injury prone.

But what he needs to gain is more strength. Players his size have been successful in the NBA before. But when they add weight, then even more weight when they get older, all these knee injuries pop up. This might be his best basketball weight, health wise.

You could be right about his "basketball" weight, and the need for added strength being more important than actual poundage.

Looking at him, I don't think this guy is every going to put on a lot of extra weight, but a little added strength, assuming his endurance is good, might help him during a physical game and could also help him when he drives to the basket.

At PG he can compensate for what seems to be a lack of strength with his length... while guarding a SG his length and footwork also help him on D.

Don't see a lot of 2s posing up these days... do we?

As skinny as he looks, I don't think we have seen him overpowered much, and he has been pretty good snatching rebounds.

watch 4:20 of this video. he is completely over powered. He's got a lot of potential but hes also 26. He needs to work hard with a trainer even starting today for the future. Hes got great length/height and he knows how to play. To have a longer term consistent success he needs some power in his legs and upper body. I can see looking at him that with solid effort he could easily be 10 pounds heavier. My bet why he is a 36% shooter over 175 games is strength. He can be a key find for the Knicks--he should be priority 1 with this franchise right now.


I remembered that play. He was trying to stay in front of Milsap without causing contact... I thought he made a decent play because there would have been little chance of getting a charging foul if he had been more physical, and to top it off, he had quick enough hands to knock the ball away without fouling. He might have been able to get the charging call, but seemed to back away as Milsap tried to get past him on the baseline.

Don't get me wrong- he should put on more muscle, especially if he wants to be an effective 35MPG player in the NBA, but I have seen his lack of strength as more of an issue when he goes to the basket, than on the defensive end.

Milsap is about 30lbs (at least) heavier than he is, by the way- even if Shved was to put on 10lbs of muscle, he would still be at a disadvantage against a guy like Milsap, so footwork and good positioning would still be more valuable to him on D than a little added weight and muscle. If Shved plays and guards PGs, his length and quickness should help him against most PGs, I would think. He also seems to have some quick hands on D.

Fisher was small, but pretty strong- you would hope that he convince Shved to get a little stronger.

I don't think he will ever get a better chance to be able to play himself into a starter than with this Knicks team.


Carpe Diem, Alexey.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39944
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

3/12/2015  2:13 AM
fishmike wrote:might be a breakout game. You look at his history and it looks like he's never been comfortable, and hasnt been able to put forth a stretch of good enough play to earn a regular spot and get settled.

No doubt you run him out there for 30mpg and see what he does over the last 20 games or so. This could really help our backcourt woes.

Last 5 games 16/5/3 and shooting 41% from 3

Im coming around on him. He's aggressive and has the quickness you want to see from your PG.


He might have matured. I always thought he had decent potential. This could also be Marcy Collins/Frank Williams/Toney Douglas all over again. I'd like to bring him in on a cheaper deal next season. But I would be disappointed to see this same exact backcourt in place for next season. Galloway and Sved are both solid combo guards to have, but neither one has me completely convinced that they're starters.
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
3/12/2015  2:42 AM
BigDaddyG wrote:
fishmike wrote:might be a breakout game. You look at his history and it looks like he's never been comfortable, and hasnt been able to put forth a stretch of good enough play to earn a regular spot and get settled.

No doubt you run him out there for 30mpg and see what he does over the last 20 games or so. This could really help our backcourt woes.

Last 5 games 16/5/3 and shooting 41% from 3

Im coming around on him. He's aggressive and has the quickness you want to see from your PG.


He might have matured. I always thought he had decent potential. This could also be Marcy Collins/Frank Williams/Toney Douglas all over again. I'd like to bring him in on a cheaper deal next season. But I would be disappointed to see this same exact backcourt in place for next season. Galloway and Sved are both solid combo guards to have, but neither one has me completely convinced that they're starters.

IMO things that Galloway and Shved are showing are the kind of things you want from your guards. Galloway is a rookie but is showing a real strength as a defender and he's fearless. He's not a perfect player but he's got enough talent to warrant a role in a rotation. Shved has always had real basketball skills and in this system and with a real role he's showing what he can do. It's not a fluke that he's a solid passer and can get to the basket. He's ALWAYS done those things and won't suddenly lose that ability. He has a high BB IQ and really his biggest issue was poor shooting. That problem with his shooting was strange given that he was scouted as a good shooter and his shot doesn't look broken in any way. It could just be he needed a chance to play solid minutes and get his game in top form.

I think Shved can be a starter but even if you bring him off the bench he's a good rotation player IMO. That's really good news for the Knicks moving forward. PG's with his size and skill aren't just growing on trees. We need every break we can get.

ramtour420
Posts: 26313
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
3/12/2015  9:10 AM
When it comes to Shved, I am all for keeping him for next year, he is our most skilled backcourt player not counting Jose Calderon. He is a legit backup right now and in this system he should become our starting SG or PG. Who said that ONLY big men develop late? Great job by Phil getting this young man.
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34067
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

3/12/2015  9:25 AM
Over the course of Phil Jackson's career, he had bigger guards like Shved (or DFish). I think he fits here. I don't think he's special. Just think he is a square peg and we have a square hole
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/12/2015  9:31 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:Over the course of Phil Jackson's career, he had bigger guards like Shved (or DFish). I think he fits here. I don't think he's special. Just think he is a square peg and we have a square hole
yea man totally fair... I think there is some upside there if its simply that he hasnt played his best BB in the NBA yet. Thats entirely possible. He's really really quick and Ill take that over power from my PG. He's got a really nice fluid dribble. He's got that great quickness... lets see if we can develop this guy. He could be ready to take a big step. I also would expect us to pick up his QO and offer him a deal if he plays well. We need guys. Obviously he needs to shoot better than 40% plain and simple but I really see him bringing a lot to the table.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/12/2015  9:34 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:Over the course of Phil Jackson's career, he had bigger guards like Shved (or DFish). I think he fits here. I don't think he's special. Just think he is a square peg and we have a square hole

Exactly. Like I said the other day. It's the same as Duhon & Felton flourishing under Dantoni because their specific skill sets fit SSOL like a glove. And there's nothing wrong with that. I hope Svhed keeps it up and is part of the solution in the backcourt. It helps when you can build from within which was one of Phil's goals. Now we can use our resources to finally putting an NBA front court together

Finestrg
Posts: 27296
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/1/2006
Member: #1069

3/12/2015  10:02 AM    LAST EDITED: 3/12/2015  10:04 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:Over the course of Phil Jackson's career, he had bigger guards like Shved (or DFish). I think he fits here. I don't think he's special. Just think he is a square peg and we have a square hole

Agreed. Nice player that's showing he fits well here. All I wanted was for them to throw him out there and see if he'd take the baton and run with it. He has, more than any other player basically. Definitely showing his worth now. You're right bro -- probably will never be an all-star level performer but there's a lot of positives -- he's big, versatile and skilled. Full of intangibles. He's a guy that makes other players better too, which ya gotta love. I think he'll be even more valuable once we get Melo back and some better players in here.

2 questions I have, 1 Shved-related/1 in general:

(1) Obviously I'd like to have Shved back. How do we go about doing it? Just going on what the dude that put together the Shved Utah highlight video had to say---there appears to be 2 strategies: (a) do we sign him right away for his QO which would chew up about $4mm of immediate cap room or (b) do we use up all available cap space improving the team, then once we're at or over the cap, look to resign Shved to a Bird rights extension which, as I understand it, would start at his current salary + a 7.5% increase in year 1 of the new deal? I mean this 2nd choice is immensely more appealing for us if you ask me. If there's a way for us to have our cake and eat it too, that's the way I'd like to go... We'd save about 500k in year one of the new Bird rights deal compared to his QO BUT EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, he wouldn't chew into the immediate cap room we'll have available to improve the team. Shved could come in as a bonus signing at the end of our FA shopping spree, kinda like icing on the cake. But then flip side -- with this new unprecedented salary cap increase expected the following year (summer of 2016), would Shved settle for a full Bird rights deal now or would he rather sign the $4mm QO offer, play out the year, then sign an extension the following year when FA is expected to be much more lucrative? Someone fact check me & walk me through this please -- do I have this right?

(2) General question -- say we use up all available cap space retooling this summer -- how much cap space should we expect to have the following offseason? 20-something million? Enough for a max contract?

gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
3/12/2015  10:08 AM
It's still early but shved looks like he was tailor made for the triangle. He is smart and pick it up real quick. Hopefully he continues to hit his shots
fishmike
Posts: 53866
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
3/12/2015  11:02 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
SupremeCommander wrote:Over the course of Phil Jackson's career, he had bigger guards like Shved (or DFish). I think he fits here. I don't think he's special. Just think he is a square peg and we have a square hole

Exactly. Like I said the other day. It's the same as Duhon & Felton flourishing under Dantoni because their specific skill sets fit SSOL like a glove. And there's nothing wrong with that. I hope Svhed keeps it up and is part of the solution in the backcourt. It helps when you can build from within which was one of Phil's goals. Now we can use our resources to finally putting an NBA front court together

his shooting %s scare me off a bit.. if he could get around 45% what a find. We need that kind of luck
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Aleey S

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy