would you trade (on draft night for the ******* that's going to say "we can't trade the pick")

Our #1 and Calderon for al Jefferson and Lance Stevenson?

Our starting lineup could be:
Jefferson
Melo
Bargnani
alexey
Stevenson

Charlotte could then possibly get towns and stein back together in Charlotte on the pro team.

Laugh all you want but I'm adjusting my nba 2k15 roster as we speak

a Chicgo late first rounder, Butler and Pau for the no. 1 pick? The cap relief for chicago should be incentive.

Make no bones about it, if a team wants to make a big offer then have at it.

Any trade will be based on where the ping pong balls fall. No sense in any heated debates or Wron Wron Manifesto's to outline all the angles.

a Chicgo late first rounder, Butler and Pau for the no. 1 pick? The cap relief for chicago should be incentive.

Make no bones about it, if a team wants to make a big offer then have at it.

Any trade will be based on where the ping pong balls fall. No sense in any heated debates or Wron Wron Manifesto's to outline all the angles.

Nalod wrote:Due diligence should include all scenarios.

a Chicgo late first rounder, Butler and Pau for the no. 1 pick? The cap relief for chicago should be incentive.

Make no bones about it, if a team wants to make a big offer then have at it.

Any trade will be based on where the ping pong balls fall. No sense in any heated debates or Wron Wron Manifesto's to outline all the angles.

Come again?

CrushAlot wrote:^^^so nice he had to post it thrice.

and nary a feminine napkin reference to be found among all three

BRIGGS wrote:I would not trade pick1 or 2 under any circumstance zero no trade. 3 and 4. I'd consider the 76 ERS giving me embiid pi k 10 32 35 and a future 1. The value I need to get out of a top 4 pick has to be monumental. No I would not trade for butler gasp and pick 29 no fargin way. This is a unique opportunity. I have 35 mm in free agency for vets. With our holes we need a young impact player. I would put the odds of trading the pick at miniscule

this

mreinman wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:I would not trade pick1 or 2 under any circumstance zero no trade. 3 and 4. I'd consider the 76 ERS giving me embiid pi k 10 32 35 and a future 1. The value I need to get out of a top 4 pick has to be monumental. No I would not trade for butler gasp and pick 29 no fargin way. This is a unique opportunity. I have 35 mm in free agency for vets. With our holes we need a young impact player. I would Tdds of trading the pick at miniscule

so you would trade number 3?

You compared OK4 to Tim Duncan

You compared Russel to Clyde

You now have Towns as your number 1.

I am very confused.

If embiid was healthy and the Sixer's were willing to give !e him picks 10. 32. 35 and a 2016 1st rounder. I'd consider it for pick 3

Hector wrote:haha, I just did this mock lottery slot machine deal - Phila got Okafor at #1

Knicks had #2 & took....Mudiay (Towns went 3 to The Lakers.)

http://espn.go.com/nba/lottery2015/mockdraft

I played it like maybe 10 times and Knicks got #1 4 out of 10.

Also, every team that got the 1st pick all selected Okafor. I guess ESPN loves Okafor.

mreinman wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:

mreinman wrote:

BRIGGS wrote:I would not trade pick1 or 2 under any circumstance zero no trade. 3 and 4. I'd consider the 76 ERS giving me embiid pi k 10 32 35 and a future 1. The value I need to get out of a top 4 pick has to be monumental. No I would not trade for butler gasp and pick 29 no fargin way. This is a unique opportunity. I have 35 mm in free agency for vets. With our holes we need a young impact player. I would Tdds of trading the pick at miniscule

so you would trade number 3?

You compared OK4 to Tim Duncan

You compared Russel to Clyde

You now have Towns as your number 1.

I am very confused.

If embiid was healthy and the Sixer's were willing to give !e him picks 10. 32. 35 and a 2016 1st rounder. I'd consider it

Russell?

I wouldn't trade the pick for kevin durant.

I WANT TO HAVE MY OWN DAMN BABY AND I HAVE NO INTEREST IN ADOPTION!

HA HA HA HA!!!!

CLASSIC!

Nalod wrote:

Hector wrote:

Nalod wrote:Due diligence should include all scenarios.

a Chicgo late first rounder, Butler and Pau for the no. 1 pick? The cap relief for chicago should be incentive.

Make no bones about it, if a team wants to make a big offer then have at it.

Any trade will be based on where the ping pong balls fall. No sense in any heated debates or Wron Wron Manifesto's to outline all the angles.

Come again?

Due diligence is not just seek out the best player, but seek out the options.

I don't think we should but, at some point an offer one can't refuse?

The pick is more valuable as no. 1, lessor at number 4. Duh.

Wron Wron writes long stuff.

I was just cracking on your triple post. However, I want this baby also, no one else kids.

Keep the pick & hope we don't win enough games where we can fall to 5!

Nalod wrote:

Hector wrote:

Nalod wrote:

Hector wrote:

Nalod wrote:Due diligence should include all scenarios.

a Chicgo late first rounder, Butler and Pau for the no. 1 pick? The cap relief for chicago should be incentive.

Make no bones about it, if a team wants to make a big offer then have at it.

Any trade will be based on where the ping pong balls fall. No sense in any heated debates or Wron Wron Manifesto's to outline all the angles.

Come again?

Due diligence is not just seek out the best player, but seek out the options.

I don't think we should but, at some point an offer one can't refuse?

The pick is more valuable as no. 1, lessor at number 4. Duh.

Wron Wron writes long stuff.

I was just cracking on your triple post. However, I want this baby also, no one else kids.

Keep the pick & hope we don't win enough games where we can fall to 5!

Never saw the triple. Funky Wifi where Im staying.

The No Trade Motel?