[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Plan B: Enes Kanter, DeAndre Jordan?
Author Thread
smackeddog
Posts: 38391
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/30/2005
Member: #883
1/23/2015  11:50 AM
fishmike wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
fishmike wrote:
WaltLongmire wrote:Don't think Phil would want Jordan. No midrange game and not much of a passer, either. Has averaged 42% from the foul line.

Kanter would be more of a fit offensively in terms of his shot, but he is not much of a passer, and he rarely blocks shots, despite his size.

Not sure how anyone would want Jordan over Gasol, unless you are talking durability. He is a better defender, but is limited in so many ways.

Jordan is 4-5 years younger but also a build that looks more durable. Gasol is a plodder. He's a fractured foot away from being useless. He may play another healthy 10 years, hell Sabonis had a build like that but I prefer a guy I can anchor a defense around. Also he's a great fit if we dont get OK4 but you can play Melo next to him.

Imagine how our defense improves with
Jordan C (max)
Melo back at PF
and we draft Stanley Johnson to play the 3
overpay for Wesley Mathews at the SG (start at $12mm)
Suddenly Calderon at PG doesnt seem so bad

Just one scenario where I think Jordan is a huge pickup

Jordan max--fishmike???? Blake Griffin Chris paul--max YES Jordan is only a guy who eats off their plates. If we give max money they have to be a premium skill player. And NO way would I give Matthews 12mm--TWELEVE MILLION????? that means we just spend 100mm on Jordan and Matthews and thats our team?? By the way why do you want Stanley Johnson when we have Melo? Two guys who plays iso with the ball--watch Johnson play he dribbles the ball A LOT and his usage is only fair for the time he has the ball. Hes still young with a lot of talent--but my guess is we pass there too.

Look...if your going to land good FAs whats the lure? Who is the best defensive frontcourt player in the NBA? Its Jordan easily. I mean I would love Jimmy Butler. Its like a 2% chance. Im looking at guys who make sense and fit. At 26 years old Jordan can anchor the middle. Its a massive need. Mathews is really good... Im very high on him.

As for Stanley Johnson he's got an NBA skill set and he's a defender. Its such a wing game... you must have a physical guy who can be a stopper. He's that with the upside to be a Paul George type.

I would much rather max out Aldridge and Butler and call it a day. I dont see that as viable. We are going to pay some guys alot and some a little. You hope like hell you can find a diamond in the rough off the scrap heap.. Gilbert Arenas, Brad Miller... guys who you can find at low cost. Thats also the value of this pick.. a rotation (star?) player in a rookie deal for 4 years.

FAs? If you want 2nd tier under the radar guys OK fine... if you want higher impact guys your gonna have to shell out.

I'd say Jordan is just as, if not more, unlikely as Jimmy Butler- why wouldn't the Clips re-sign him- they have nothing else on their roster to replace him, and they would still be over the cap so they couldn't sign any free agents. Their owner is rich, they are in LA, and the cap is about to plumpen with the new tv deal.

AUTOADVERT
F500ONE
Posts: 23899
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5844

1/23/2015  11:53 AM
Would love to see this


Not sure if the Triangle would love to see it though

WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5843

1/23/2015  12:00 PM
smackeddog wrote:
Finestrg wrote:Like everyone else, I want this Jahlil Okafor in the draft, but say it doesn't work out. Say we get pick 3 in this draft and like Emmanuel Mudiay, enough to take him with the 3rd pick (who knows how high the Knicks will wind up having this kid on their draft board when the time comes. Plus, we do need a PG upgrade one way or another however we can manage it). Just thinking about our best big man options in FA, specifically at C. I think there are 2 pretty good ones: DeAndre Jordan and Enes Kanter. Two completely different players here--one's an athletic rim-protector/alley-oop converter; the other's a very nice offensive player/potential 10 rpg guy who's just starting to come into his own.

What's each guy's worth in FA? Who do you guys prefer if we went this route (a big in FA as opposed to the draft)? Who's the better buy between these two? Jordan's restricted and might be easier to get although I think I prefer Kanter--I like the youth and I think he has more upside than Jordan overall, definitely on the offensive end where it's not even close. More complete player I'm thinking, although Jordan's rim defense is elite level. Kanter's an unrestricted FA -- does Utah match a sizable offer sheet to retain him? I think either one of these guys could help us next year if we were forced into Plan B mode.

Who fits our plans better?

Thanks for posting these- I was about to do a search on youtube for his highlights. Those commentators are awful though! Enes is a weird one- I remember following his numbers a season or two, ago and he was capable of putting up some absolute monster stats- but then nothing really came of it. He's still as wildly inconsistent as he always was. Maybe you take a gamble on him and it pays off big time, but he could also be a bust- he's a risky target! I really don't know enough about him.

What's his defense like?

Not the best lateral movement- not great as a shot blocker.

If you pair him with shot blocking PF you might have a workable lineup.

My problem with Kanter is that Anthony might not be able to play D at the 3 anymore. If you have a Kanter/Anthony 5/4 combo, your defense will be in trouble, and your shot blocking numbers will be the lowest in the league. Kanter is also a poor passer, something that would annoy Jackson and Fisher, I would think.

EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
mreinman
Posts: 37827
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/14/2010
Member: #3189

1/23/2015  1:08 PM
hell no to Kanter. Why would we pay such a flawed player?
so here is what phil is thinking ....
FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/18/2010
Member: #3075

1/23/2015  6:10 PM
Finestrg wrote:Stoudemire was an older established vet when we got him who had substantial injury concerns. This kid Kanter's only 22, no injury concerns to speak of, bigger with even better offensive potential than Stoudemire (if he succeeds in fully realizing that potential -- 95% chance Kanter becomes a 20 ppg scorer in the NBA with a few more mins. per game. There's also an outside chance he could average 25 ppg -- I think he's that good of an offensive player. If I'm the Knicks and we got him, I'd go out of my way to make sure he reached his ceiling--get him his shots, feature him in the offense along with Melo etc.) and he will be a better rebounder than STAT once he gets more consistent minutes. Knowing STAT's shortcomings and injury history we still offered him $100mm over 5 years. Kanter would cost far less than that. I don't really see the comparison. If the rest of the roster was constructed properly, Melo/Kanter could definitely work.

i only made the comparison because stoudemire is just dumb on defense... we all saw it... this guy is equally as dumb... plus having your center, your last line of defense, having zero effect in the paint is a VERY tough thing to overcome... it's so tough that it almost doesn't matter if you have 4 all word defenders at the other positions... if your starting center doesn't affect shots in the paint, can't cover a pick and roll.. you will be in the bottom third in defense every year....

i can't even think of any team remotely calling themselves a contender having a center that was as bad on defense in the history of basketball...

H1AND1
Posts: 21747
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2013
Member: #5648

1/23/2015  9:24 PM
mreinman wrote:hell no to Kanter. Why would we pay such a flawed player?

No way bro imagine that bomb Monroe Kanter front court

Plan B: Enes Kanter, DeAndre Jordan?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy