Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
F500ONE
Posts: 23899 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5844 |
![]() Would love to see this
|
mreinman
Posts: 37827 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/14/2010 Member: #3189 |
![]() hell no to Kanter. Why would we pay such a flawed player?
so here is what phil is thinking ....
|
FistOfOakley
Posts: 21079 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 2/18/2010 Member: #3075 |
![]() Finestrg wrote:Stoudemire was an older established vet when we got him who had substantial injury concerns. This kid Kanter's only 22, no injury concerns to speak of, bigger with even better offensive potential than Stoudemire (if he succeeds in fully realizing that potential -- 95% chance Kanter becomes a 20 ppg scorer in the NBA with a few more mins. per game. There's also an outside chance he could average 25 ppg -- I think he's that good of an offensive player. If I'm the Knicks and we got him, I'd go out of my way to make sure he reached his ceiling--get him his shots, feature him in the offense along with Melo etc.) and he will be a better rebounder than STAT once he gets more consistent minutes. Knowing STAT's shortcomings and injury history we still offered him $100mm over 5 years. Kanter would cost far less than that. I don't really see the comparison. If the rest of the roster was constructed properly, Melo/Kanter could definitely work. i only made the comparison because stoudemire is just dumb on defense... we all saw it... this guy is equally as dumb... plus having your center, your last line of defense, having zero effect in the paint is a VERY tough thing to overcome... it's so tough that it almost doesn't matter if you have 4 all word defenders at the other positions... if your starting center doesn't affect shots in the paint, can't cover a pick and roll.. you will be in the bottom third in defense every year.... i can't even think of any team remotely calling themselves a contender having a center that was as bad on defense in the history of basketball... |
H1AND1
Posts: 21747 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 9/9/2013 Member: #5648 |
![]() mreinman wrote:hell no to Kanter. Why would we pay such a flawed player? No way bro imagine that bomb Monroe Kanter front court |