[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Carmelo Anthony team W-l record
Author Thread
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
12/26/2014  11:26 AM
F500ONE wrote:
nixluva wrote:Melo is just one player. If we're talking about adding a 1st rd draft pick and signing, at the least, one good FA this year. Those 3 will form the new core of the team. I fail to see why people are making it seem like adding better talent, that fits our needs, won't help this team move back towards winning and a better future. Some may not like Melo's game but he's not a detriment to winning that they make him out to be. You can't have it both ways. Those who say this team needs better talent, preferably 2 way players and a better mix, can't then say that if we get those players that we still can't win cuz of Melo. The more 2 way players we add to this team the better it will be. I've criticized Melo a lot of the years but he's not the reason the team has flopped the last couple of years.


Melo is a major reason the team has flopped past couple years

As we can see it wasn't Woodson nor Felton's either right going by your miscalculations


Melo doesn't provide what the 54 win team[which also lacked talent]

NO LEADERSHIP, NO HEART, LOSER MENTALITY


Im just glad Nix has gotten away from the nonsense of calling calderon a leader, and how it's impossible for Phil Fish and calderon to be worse than the previous. Now he knows. Melo is a problem and to be honest he's the main problem.

Melo begs for more scoring help when the team he was just involved with was 3rd in offensive rating (2012-13 Knicks).....so they trade for Bargs, who quite honestly hasnt even replaced Novak.

Thats besides lack of leadership, inconsistent defense, or just having an ounce of team concept.

Like I said before anyone can score if they keep shooting.

AUTOADVERT
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

12/26/2014  11:30 AM
knickscity wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
nixluva wrote:Melo is just one player. If we're talking about adding a 1st rd draft pick and signing, at the least, one good FA this year. Those 3 will form the new core of the team. I fail to see why people are making it seem like adding better talent, that fits our needs, won't help this team move back towards winning and a better future. Some may not like Melo's game but he's not a detriment to winning that they make him out to be. You can't have it both ways. Those who say this team needs better talent, preferably 2 way players and a better mix, can't then say that if we get those players that we still can't win cuz of Melo. The more 2 way players we add to this team the better it will be. I've criticized Melo a lot of the years but he's not the reason the team has flopped the last couple of years.


Melo is a major reason the team has flopped past couple years

As we can see it wasn't Woodson nor Felton's either right going by your miscalculations


Melo doesn't provide what the 54 win team[which also lacked talent]

NO LEADERSHIP, NO HEART, LOSER MENTALITY


Im just glad Nix has gotten away from the nonsense of calling calderon a leader, and how it's impossible for Phil Fish and calderon to be worse than the previous. Now he knows. Melo is a problem and to be honest he's the main problem.

Melo begs for more scoring help when the team he was just involved with was 3rd in offensive rating (2012-13 Knicks).....so they trade for Bargs, who quite honestly hasnt even replaced Novak.

Thats besides lack of leadership, inconsistent defense, or just having an ounce of team concept.

Like I said before anyone can score if they keep shooting.

agreed
knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/26/2014  12:00 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/26/2014  12:02 PM
gunsnewing wrote:The offense would have to go through OK4 a lot. That is the triangle. Will Melo be ok with not having the ball in his hands every possession? Doubt it

Pipe dream alert, He's 18 yrs old, pays in a MDA type system and there is absolutely no telling how well in will translate into NBA player, right now he's not even starter material.

If this was a contending team, you would not have had to pay melo $124 mill, he would have sign for much less. Just think whats going to happen this summer, he's going to throw boat loads of $$$ for any sub par FA much, or max out Gasol and Monroe for their contact yr numbers.

ES
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/26/2014  12:05 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/26/2014  12:05 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:The offense would have to go through OK4 a lot. That is the triangle. Will Melo be ok with not having the ball in his hands every possession? Doubt it

Pipe dream alert, He's 18 yrs old, pays in a MDA type system and there is absolutely no telling how well in will translate into NBA player, right now he's not even starter material.

If this was a contending team, you would not have had to pay melo $124 mill, he would have sign for much less. Just think whats going to happen this summer, he's going to throw boat loads of $$$ for any sub par FA much, or max out Gasol and Monroe for their contact yr numbers.

If that's the case then we are screwed for at least another 5yrs which is what I said when we re-signed Carmelo for $124mil

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/26/2014  12:10 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:I went back the previous 8 years just for you Briggs. His teams have played .575 with him and .500 in the 76 games he's missed over those seasons. Yes, he does help his teams and thus deserves a spot on an NBA roster but he doesn't help nearly enough to take up almost 2 max contracts. That .075 improvement corresponds to about 6 wins a season. Earlier, you thought Dragic alone could add 11 wins in a third of a season! So you must think that 6 wins over an entire season is barely worth the MLE.
His value is greater than zero but we're getting only a couple of dimes of production on the dollar. A trade where we get 30 cents on the dollar is much better than keeping him for 15 cents on the dollar. Keep in mind that the best run teams will not merely be breaking even but will actually be the reverse: they'll be getting dollars of production on a few dimes. With Melo's salary taking up this much room, we're in too deep a hole, and it's only going to get worse as he progresses from his thirteenth through sixteenth seasons.

We do agree that the Tyson/Calderon trade was terrible though.

Bonn this post is somewhat absurd no? "His value is greater than zero" HMMM yes his value is greater than zero. Can you go back in your NBA search and tell me which other player in the NBA avg 25-7-3 45% on a team with a winning % close to .600 for 8 straight years in the west other than Tim Duncan? I'm not saying we CANNOT trade Melo--I never said that. I said the we JUST signed him to a 125mm$ contract a few months ago. What player has been traded after signing such a lucrative deal so quickly? Im just stating facts. People are saying you cant win with melo--but facts say thats way off. Facts say that when you sign a guy to a huge contract--you dont turn around and just trade him. His long and consistent big numbers on winning teams is somewhat unique in this league. I think it would be easier to go with melo and fit him in to a niche as a scoring forward as part of a team that trading him for less. I accept this season as terrible--all teams have them--we're just bad. UNLESS we can get a perfect type deal for Melo--its best to keep him for now. He's not the reason were 5-26 the other castoffs teammates are and poor coaching are the reasons.


He doesn't have big numbers. He has a high PPG total. Depending on the quality of your teammates and your own production, you can be on a lot of .600 or .300 teams. You're not making any effort to figure out what his contribution to his teams' performance is. You're just stating that his teams did fairly well and he scored a lot of points (and was an average rebounder and passer). Regarding your other comment, he has the largest NBA contract in the history of the game. So of course I can't provide examples of other teams signing and then quickly trading a player on such a contract. No team has ever even given such a contract.

He doesn't have big numbers?
Than what is 10 straight years of nearly 600ball @25 ppg7reb 3 as 45%=? What other numbers do u have? I didn't give melo 125 mm but as a fan I understand that's the cards in front of me and I will work with them Instead of bitching how bad melo is I'm and I hope the team is focused on what we can do to improve. That's the key now what we can do to improve. I think we have just touched on a few ways to improve but there are many we are at an evaluation stage right now

You're actually just repeating what I said: he scored a lot of points on reasonably good teams. Then You're throwing up a lot of straw man arguments (claiming people are saying melo is bad or that the team shouldn't try to improve) while ignoring people's actual points.

knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
12/26/2014  12:19 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:The offense would have to go through OK4 a lot. That is the triangle. Will Melo be ok with not having the ball in his hands every possession? Doubt it

Pipe dream alert, He's 18 yrs old, pays in a MDA type system and there is absolutely no telling how well in will translate into NBA player, right now he's not even starter material.

If this was a contending team, you would not have had to pay melo $124 mill, he would have sign for much less. Just think whats going to happen this summer, he's going to throw boat loads of $$$ for any sub par FA much, or max out Gasol and Monroe for their contact yr numbers.

If that's the case then we are screwed for at least another 5yrs which is what I said when we re-signed Carmelo for $124mil


Very well may be. but if I had that pick okafor would NOT be my choice because of defense alone. he doesnt play any.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

12/26/2014  12:22 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/26/2014  12:24 PM
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:I went back the previous 8 years just for you Briggs. His teams have played .575 with him and .500 in the 76 games he's missed over those seasons. Yes, he does help his teams and thus deserves a spot on an NBA roster but he doesn't help nearly enough to take up almost 2 max contracts. That .075 improvement corresponds to about 6 wins a season. Earlier, you thought Dragic alone could add 11 wins in a third of a season! So you must think that 6 wins over an entire season is barely worth the MLE.
His value is greater than zero but we're getting only a couple of dimes of production on the dollar. A trade where we get 30 cents on the dollar is much better than keeping him for 15 cents on the dollar. Keep in mind that the best run teams will not merely be breaking even but will actually be the reverse: they'll be getting dollars of production on a few dimes. With Melo's salary taking up this much room, we're in too deep a hole, and it's only going to get worse as he progresses from his thirteenth through sixteenth seasons.

We do agree that the Tyson/Calderon trade was terrible though.

Bonn this post is somewhat absurd no? "His value is greater than zero" HMMM yes his value is greater than zero. Can you go back in your NBA search and tell me which other player in the NBA avg 25-7-3 45% on a team with a winning % close to .600 for 8 straight years in the west other than Tim Duncan? I'm not saying we CANNOT trade Melo--I never said that. I said the we JUST signed him to a 125mm$ contract a few months ago. What player has been traded after signing such a lucrative deal so quickly? Im just stating facts. People are saying you cant win with melo--but facts say thats way off. Facts say that when you sign a guy to a huge contract--you dont turn around and just trade him. His long and consistent big numbers on winning teams is somewhat unique in this league. I think it would be easier to go with melo and fit him in to a niche as a scoring forward as part of a team that trading him for less. I accept this season as terrible--all teams have them--we're just bad. UNLESS we can get a perfect type deal for Melo--its best to keep him for now. He's not the reason were 5-26 the other castoffs teammates are and poor coaching are the reasons.


He doesn't have big numbers. He has a high PPG total. Depending on the quality of your teammates and your own production, you can be on a lot of .600 or .300 teams. You're not making any effort to figure out what his contribution to his teams' performance is. You're just stating that his teams did fairly well and he scored a lot of points (and was an average rebounder and passer). Regarding your other comment, he has the largest NBA contract in the history of the game. So of course I can't provide examples of other teams signing and then quickly trading a player on such a contract. No team has ever even given such a contract.

He doesn't have big numbers?
Than what is 10 straight years of nearly 600ball @25 ppg7reb 3 as 45%=? What other numbers do u have? I didn't give melo 125 mm but as a fan I understand that's the cards in front of me and I will work with them Instead of bitching how bad melo is I'm and I hope the team is focused on what we can do to improve. That's the key now what we can do to improve. I think we have just touched on a few ways to improve but there are many we are at an evaluation stage right now

You're actually just repeating what I said: he scored a lot of points on reasonably good teams. Then You're throwing up a lot of straw man arguments (claiming people are saying melo is bad or that the team shouldn't try to improve) while ignoring people's actual points.

good points. I think some take for granted how good denver used to be. Some think melo carried that team which is nonsense because i they had a collection of good players. despite that they rarely got out of the first round
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
12/26/2014  12:30 PM
knickscity wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
nixluva wrote:Melo is just one player. If we're talking about adding a 1st rd draft pick and signing, at the least, one good FA this year. Those 3 will form the new core of the team. I fail to see why people are making it seem like adding better talent, that fits our needs, won't help this team move back towards winning and a better future. Some may not like Melo's game but he's not a detriment to winning that they make him out to be. You can't have it both ways. Those who say this team needs better talent, preferably 2 way players and a better mix, can't then say that if we get those players that we still can't win cuz of Melo. The more 2 way players we add to this team the better it will be. I've criticized Melo a lot of the years but he's not the reason the team has flopped the last couple of years.


Melo is a major reason the team has flopped past couple years

As we can see it wasn't Woodson nor Felton's either right going by your miscalculations


Melo doesn't provide what the 54 win team[which also lacked talent]

NO LEADERSHIP, NO HEART, LOSER MENTALITY


Im just glad Nix has gotten away from the nonsense of calling calderon a leader, and how it's impossible for Phil Fish and calderon to be worse than the previous. Now he knows. Melo is a problem and to be honest he's the main problem.

Melo begs for more scoring help when the team he was just involved with was 3rd in offensive rating (2012-13 Knicks).....so they trade for Bargs, who quite honestly hasnt even replaced Novak.

Thats besides lack of leadership, inconsistent defense, or just having an ounce of team concept.

Like I said before anyone can score if they keep shooting.


Calderon is just a little bit off of what I expected him to be. He's not where the big problem have come from. It's been the lack of production from the SG spot primarily. We had 3 SG's and should've been able to get much more out of that spot in this offense. I'm not really conceding all of the points you guys are trying to make here. Just because things didn't work out as planned doesn't mean that I feel this team couldn't have played much better if they had a healthy Jose and Bargs from the very start of the year. I never got to see the team that was expected to start the year, so why would I concede the point I was making? Accepting the current situation is not the same as admitting I was wrong about the team.

I've made this point over and over again that this team was 3-16 in games where they were within 5pts with 5 minutes to go. We didn't get what I expected to get from JR and THJ. I thought Shump looked good but for this to work everyone would have to not only "buy in" but be productive. Once things started to go bad it spiraled. I think it could've gone the other way with a much better start.

None of that really matters now. It's up to Phil to decide if he's going to push the tank button or still try to improve this years team. Since there's a very realistic chance at the #1 pick it makes more sense now to actually tank and start the process of the rebuild that was going to happen anyway. Only now with a higher pick. If Phil embraces the idea of tanking then he will have to make some kind of move because there is still the danger that this team could start playing just a little better. It wouldn't take much to move up and out of the top lottery picks. Sixers have started playing better and that could also happen to the Knicks despite how bad they may have looked so far.

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/26/2014  12:35 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:The offense would have to go through OK4 a lot. That is the triangle. Will Melo be ok with not having the ball in his hands every possession? Doubt it

Pipe dream alert, He's 18 yrs old, pays in a MDA type system and there is absolutely no telling how well in will translate into NBA player, right now he's not even starter material.

If this was a contending team, you would not have had to pay melo $124 mill, he would have sign for much less. Just think whats going to happen this summer, he's going to throw boat loads of $$$ for any sub par FA much, or max out Gasol and Monroe for their contact yr numbers.

If that's the case then we are screwed for at least another 5yrs which is what I said when we re-signed Carmelo for $124mil

Thats why losing should never be an option, every time you lose, you cost your team money(re-signing FA, and picking up prime FA), but most here think about draft position, then get bent out of shape when we max out players that shouldn't be max out, or we draft some (all of a sudden) injury prone player.

Maybe some of you forgot phils last yr in LA, they barely made the playoffs, and got swept in the 1st round, the triangle was getting old then.

It's easy for 1 or 2 new players to step right into the triangle when majority or his teammates have it down. But when the entire roster never played in it, and are a customed to heavy ISO's, PnR, are young with LOW IQ's, and have a coach who's clueless. It's a disaster waiting.

ES
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

12/26/2014  12:36 PM
nixluva wrote:
knickscity wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
nixluva wrote:Melo is just one player. If we're talking about adding a 1st rd draft pick and signing, at the least, one good FA this year. Those 3 will form the new core of the team. I fail to see why people are making it seem like adding better talent, that fits our needs, won't help this team move back towards winning and a better future. Some may not like Melo's game but he's not a detriment to winning that they make him out to be. You can't have it both ways. Those who say this team needs better talent, preferably 2 way players and a better mix, can't then say that if we get those players that we still can't win cuz of Melo. The more 2 way players we add to this team the better it will be. I've criticized Melo a lot of the years but he's not the reason the team has flopped the last couple of years.


Melo is a major reason the team has flopped past couple years

As we can see it wasn't Woodson nor Felton's either right going by your miscalculations


Melo doesn't provide what the 54 win team[which also lacked talent]

NO LEADERSHIP, NO HEART, LOSER MENTALITY


Im just glad Nix has gotten away from the nonsense of calling calderon a leader, and how it's impossible for Phil Fish and calderon to be worse than the previous. Now he knows. Melo is a problem and to be honest he's the main problem.

Melo begs for more scoring help when the team he was just involved with was 3rd in offensive rating (2012-13 Knicks).....so they trade for Bargs, who quite honestly hasnt even replaced Novak.

Thats besides lack of leadership, inconsistent defense, or just having an ounce of team concept.

Like I said before anyone can score if they keep shooting.


Calderon is just a little bit off of what I expected him to be. He's not where the big problem have come from. It's been the lack of production from the SG spot primarily. We had 3 SG's and should've been able to get much more out of that spot in this offense. I'm not really conceding all of the points you guys are trying to make here. Just because things didn't work out as planned doesn't mean that I feel this team couldn't have played much better if they had a healthy Jose and Bargs from the very start of the year. I never got to see the team that was expected to start the year, so why would I concede the point I was making? Accepting the current situation is not the same as admitting I was wrong about the team.

I've made this point over and over again that this team was 3-16 in games where they were within 5pts with 5 minutes to go. We didn't get what I expected to get from JR and THJ. I thought Shump looked good but for this to work everyone would have to not only "buy in" but be productive. Once things started to go bad it spiraled. I think it could've gone the other way with a much better start.

None of that really matters now. It's up to Phil to decide if he's going to push the tank button or still try to improve this years team. Since there's a very realistic chance at the #1 pick it makes more sense now to actually tank and start the process of the rebuild that was going to happen anyway. Only now with a higher pick. If Phil embraces the idea of tanking then he will have to make some kind of move because there is still the danger that this team could start playing just a little better. It wouldn't take much to move up and out of the top lottery picks. Sixers have started playing better and that could also happen to the Knicks despite how bad they may have looked so far.

calderon isnt good. He can shoot but thats about it. His defense may be worse than felton which is scary and he cant really run an offense.
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

12/26/2014  12:38 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:The offense would have to go through OK4 a lot. That is the triangle. Will Melo be ok with not having the ball in his hands every possession? Doubt it

Pipe dream alert, He's 18 yrs old, pays in a MDA type system and there is absolutely no telling how well in will translate into NBA player, right now he's not even starter material.

If this was a contending team, you would not have had to pay melo $124 mill, he would have sign for much less. Just think whats going to happen this summer, he's going to throw boat loads of $$$ for any sub par FA much, or max out Gasol and Monroe for their contact yr numbers.

It is merely desperation that drives people to say things like drafting OK4 + good FA signings = good team. Nobody knows how drafted players will pan out, but particularly very young ones who have not matured yet. OK4 is still basically a child in a man's body. For every Lebron, there are plenty of high school phenoms and 1 year college players who are considered sure things who are complete washouts in the NBA.

Plus, if you did draft a guy like OK4 and all he can do is score, then the fantasy of teaming him with Melo is already a failure of the imagination. Just throwing scorers together will produce one butt ugly team that will go nowhere in particular.

Literally EVERYTHING must go perfectly for this franchise to field a contender while Melo is still physically capable. Expecting perfect execution from one of the worst franchises in professional sports is asking for a whole lot.

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

12/26/2014  12:39 PM
nixluva wrote:
knickscity wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
nixluva wrote:Melo is just one player. If we're talking about adding a 1st rd draft pick and signing, at the least, one good FA this year. Those 3 will form the new core of the team. I fail to see why people are making it seem like adding better talent, that fits our needs, won't help this team move back towards winning and a better future. Some may not like Melo's game but he's not a detriment to winning that they make him out to be. You can't have it both ways. Those who say this team needs better talent, preferably 2 way players and a better mix, can't then say that if we get those players that we still can't win cuz of Melo. The more 2 way players we add to this team the better it will be. I've criticized Melo a lot of the years but he's not the reason the team has flopped the last couple of years.


Melo is a major reason the team has flopped past couple years

As we can see it wasn't Woodson nor Felton's either right going by your miscalculations


Melo doesn't provide what the 54 win team[which also lacked talent]

NO LEADERSHIP, NO HEART, LOSER MENTALITY


Im just glad Nix has gotten away from the nonsense of calling calderon a leader, and how it's impossible for Phil Fish and calderon to be worse than the previous. Now he knows. Melo is a problem and to be honest he's the main problem.

Melo begs for more scoring help when the team he was just involved with was 3rd in offensive rating (2012-13 Knicks).....so they trade for Bargs, who quite honestly hasnt even replaced Novak.

Thats besides lack of leadership, inconsistent defense, or just having an ounce of team concept.

Like I said before anyone can score if they keep shooting.


Calderon is just a little bit off of what I expected him to be. He's not where the big problem have come from. It's been the lack of production from the SG spot primarily. We had 3 SG's and should've been able to get much more out of that spot in this offense. I'm not really conceding all of the points you guys are trying to make here. Just because things didn't work out as planned doesn't mean that I feel this team couldn't have played much better if they had a healthy Jose and Bargs from the very start of the year. I never got to see the team that was expected to start the year, so why would I concede the point I was making? Accepting the current situation is not the same as admitting I was wrong about the team.

I've made this point over and over again that this team was 3-16 in games where they were within 5pts with 5 minutes to go. We didn't get what I expected to get from JR and THJ. I thought Shump looked good but for this to work everyone would have to not only "buy in" but be productive. Once things started to go bad it spiraled. I think it could've gone the other way with a much better start.

None of that really matters now. It's up to Phil to decide if he's going to push the tank button or still try to improve this years team. Since there's a very realistic chance at the #1 pick it makes more sense now to actually tank and start the process of the rebuild that was going to happen anyway. Only now with a higher pick. If Phil embraces the idea of tanking then he will have to make some kind of move because there is still the danger that this team could start playing just a little better. It wouldn't take much to move up and out of the top lottery picks. Sixers have started playing better and that could also happen to the Knicks despite how bad they may have looked so far.

Will you stop peddling BS please?

Jose is not what you claim he is. The impact you predicted has been proven false. Your constant bargaining for more time for your weak hypotheses to be borne out is really weak.

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

12/26/2014  1:00 PM
Splat wrote:
nixluva wrote:
knickscity wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
nixluva wrote:Melo is just one player. If we're talking about adding a 1st rd draft pick and signing, at the least, one good FA this year. Those 3 will form the new core of the team. I fail to see why people are making it seem like adding better talent, that fits our needs, won't help this team move back towards winning and a better future. Some may not like Melo's game but he's not a detriment to winning that they make him out to be. You can't have it both ways. Those who say this team needs better talent, preferably 2 way players and a better mix, can't then say that if we get those players that we still can't win cuz of Melo. The more 2 way players we add to this team the better it will be. I've criticized Melo a lot of the years but he's not the reason the team has flopped the last couple of years.


Melo is a major reason the team has flopped past couple years

As we can see it wasn't Woodson nor Felton's either right going by your miscalculations


Melo doesn't provide what the 54 win team[which also lacked talent]

NO LEADERSHIP, NO HEART, LOSER MENTALITY


Im just glad Nix has gotten away from the nonsense of calling calderon a leader, and how it's impossible for Phil Fish and calderon to be worse than the previous. Now he knows. Melo is a problem and to be honest he's the main problem.

Melo begs for more scoring help when the team he was just involved with was 3rd in offensive rating (2012-13 Knicks).....so they trade for Bargs, who quite honestly hasnt even replaced Novak.

Thats besides lack of leadership, inconsistent defense, or just having an ounce of team concept.

Like I said before anyone can score if they keep shooting.


Calderon is just a little bit off of what I expected him to be. He's not where the big problem have come from. It's been the lack of production from the SG spot primarily. We had 3 SG's and should've been able to get much more out of that spot in this offense. I'm not really conceding all of the points you guys are trying to make here. Just because things didn't work out as planned doesn't mean that I feel this team couldn't have played much better if they had a healthy Jose and Bargs from the very start of the year. I never got to see the team that was expected to start the year, so why would I concede the point I was making? Accepting the current situation is not the same as admitting I was wrong about the team.

I've made this point over and over again that this team was 3-16 in games where they were within 5pts with 5 minutes to go. We didn't get what I expected to get from JR and THJ. I thought Shump looked good but for this to work everyone would have to not only "buy in" but be productive. Once things started to go bad it spiraled. I think it could've gone the other way with a much better start.

None of that really matters now. It's up to Phil to decide if he's going to push the tank button or still try to improve this years team. Since there's a very realistic chance at the #1 pick it makes more sense now to actually tank and start the process of the rebuild that was going to happen anyway. Only now with a higher pick. If Phil embraces the idea of tanking then he will have to make some kind of move because there is still the danger that this team could start playing just a little better. It wouldn't take much to move up and out of the top lottery picks. Sixers have started playing better and that could also happen to the Knicks despite how bad they may have looked so far.

Will you stop peddling BS please?

Jose is not what you claim he is. The impact you predicted has been proven false. Your constant bargaining for more time for your weak hypotheses to be borne out is really weak.

exactly its cool to have a positive outlook on a player but jose just isnt good which is why dallas wanted him gone so quickly
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
12/26/2014  1:02 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:I went back the previous 8 years just for you Briggs. His teams have played .575 with him and .500 in the 76 games he's missed over those seasons. Yes, he does help his teams and thus deserves a spot on an NBA roster but he doesn't help nearly enough to take up almost 2 max contracts. That .075 improvement corresponds to about 6 wins a season. Earlier, you thought Dragic alone could add 11 wins in a third of a season! So you must think that 6 wins over an entire season is barely worth the MLE.
His value is greater than zero but we're getting only a couple of dimes of production on the dollar. A trade where we get 30 cents on the dollar is much better than keeping him for 15 cents on the dollar. Keep in mind that the best run teams will not merely be breaking even but will actually be the reverse: they'll be getting dollars of production on a few dimes. With Melo's salary taking up this much room, we're in too deep a hole, and it's only going to get worse as he progresses from his thirteenth through sixteenth seasons.

We do agree that the Tyson/Calderon trade was terrible though.

Bonn this post is somewhat absurd no? "His value is greater than zero" HMMM yes his value is greater than zero. Can you go back in your NBA search and tell me which other player in the NBA avg 25-7-3 45% on a team with a winning % close to .600 for 8 straight years in the west other than Tim Duncan? I'm not saying we CANNOT trade Melo--I never said that. I said the we JUST signed him to a 125mm$ contract a few months ago. What player has been traded after signing such a lucrative deal so quickly? Im just stating facts. People are saying you cant win with melo--but facts say thats way off. Facts say that when you sign a guy to a huge contract--you dont turn around and just trade him. His long and consistent big numbers on winning teams is somewhat unique in this league. I think it would be easier to go with melo and fit him in to a niche as a scoring forward as part of a team that trading him for less. I accept this season as terrible--all teams have them--we're just bad. UNLESS we can get a perfect type deal for Melo--its best to keep him for now. He's not the reason were 5-26 the other castoffs teammates are and poor coaching are the reasons.


He doesn't have big numbers. He has a high PPG total. Depending on the quality of your teammates and your own production, you can be on a lot of .600 or .300 teams. You're not making any effort to figure out what his contribution to his teams' performance is. You're just stating that his teams did fairly well and he scored a lot of points (and was an average rebounder and passer). Regarding your other comment, he has the largest NBA contract in the history of the game. So of course I can't provide examples of other teams signing and then quickly trading a player on such a contract. No team has ever even given such a contract.

He doesn't have big numbers?
Than what is 10 straight years of nearly 600ball @25 ppg7reb 3 as 45%=? What other numbers do u have? I didn't give melo 125 mm but as a fan I understand that's the cards in front of me and I will work with them Instead of bitching how bad melo is I'm and I hope the team is focused on what we can do to improve. That's the key now what we can do to improve. I think we have just touched on a few ways to improve but there are many we are at an evaluation stage right now

You're actually just repeating what I said: he scored a lot of points on reasonably good teams. Then You're throwing up a lot of straw man arguments (claiming people are saying melo is bad or that the team shouldn't try to improve) while ignoring people's actual points.

good points. I think some take for granted how good denver used to be. Some think melo carried that team which is nonsense because i they had a collection of good players. despite that they rarely got out of the first round

Melo had a reasonable contract in Denver. Of course they were able to put a better team around him. Ultimately it wasn't enough to have Melo as their Big Kahuna. They would've fared better had Melo been relegated to 2nd or 3rd option not #1. Once they realized this they had no problem moving on from Melo and trading him for multiple assets instead of giving him a new make contract worth $20-25mil per

This is where the starphuching Knicks come in

knicks1248
Posts: 42059
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #582
12/26/2014  1:02 PM
Splat wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:The offense would have to go through OK4 a lot. That is the triangle. Will Melo be ok with not having the ball in his hands every possession? Doubt it

Pipe dream alert, He's 18 yrs old, pays in a MDA type system and there is absolutely no telling how well in will translate into NBA player, right now he's not even starter material.

If this was a contending team, you would not have had to pay melo $124 mill, he would have sign for much less. Just think whats going to happen this summer, he's going to throw boat loads of $$$ for any sub par FA much, or max out Gasol and Monroe for their contact yr numbers.

It is merely desperation that drives people to say things like drafting OK4 + good FA signings = good team. Nobody knows how drafted players will pan out, but particularly very young ones who have not matured yet. OK4 is still basically a child in a man's body. For every Lebron, there are plenty of high school phenoms and 1 year college players who are considered sure things who are complete washouts in the NBA.

Plus, if you did draft a guy like OK4 and all he can do is score, then the fantasy of teaming him with Melo is already a failure of the imagination. Just throwing scorers together will produce one butt ugly team that will go nowhere in particular.

Literally EVERYTHING must go perfectly for this franchise to field a contender while Melo is still physically capable. Expecting perfect execution from one of the worst franchises in professional sports is asking for a whole lot.

100% agree,

At this point, I could never bank on FA and a draft to right the ship. I remember phil making it seem like he couldn't careless weather melo re-sign or not, "we would be fine" was his words, he also thought once he got melo on board, pau would be a mere phone call away, especially with calderon on ready on the squad.

But the way the GODS work around MSG, the knicks will go on some type of late season run, miss the playoffs by a game or 2, then be force to resign Bargi in Amare for 3 reasons

1)They fit well into what he's trying to build

2)You won't have nearly the options you thought you would have had

3)Trying to keep the core intact so you're not bringing in 9 new players and have to go through another identity crisis

ES
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

12/26/2014  1:05 PM
gunsnewing wrote:
StarksEwing1 wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
BRIGGS wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:I went back the previous 8 years just for you Briggs. His teams have played .575 with him and .500 in the 76 games he's missed over those seasons. Yes, he does help his teams and thus deserves a spot on an NBA roster but he doesn't help nearly enough to take up almost 2 max contracts. That .075 improvement corresponds to about 6 wins a season. Earlier, you thought Dragic alone could add 11 wins in a third of a season! So you must think that 6 wins over an entire season is barely worth the MLE.
His value is greater than zero but we're getting only a couple of dimes of production on the dollar. A trade where we get 30 cents on the dollar is much better than keeping him for 15 cents on the dollar. Keep in mind that the best run teams will not merely be breaking even but will actually be the reverse: they'll be getting dollars of production on a few dimes. With Melo's salary taking up this much room, we're in too deep a hole, and it's only going to get worse as he progresses from his thirteenth through sixteenth seasons.

We do agree that the Tyson/Calderon trade was terrible though.

Bonn this post is somewhat absurd no? "His value is greater than zero" HMMM yes his value is greater than zero. Can you go back in your NBA search and tell me which other player in the NBA avg 25-7-3 45% on a team with a winning % close to .600 for 8 straight years in the west other than Tim Duncan? I'm not saying we CANNOT trade Melo--I never said that. I said the we JUST signed him to a 125mm$ contract a few months ago. What player has been traded after signing such a lucrative deal so quickly? Im just stating facts. People are saying you cant win with melo--but facts say thats way off. Facts say that when you sign a guy to a huge contract--you dont turn around and just trade him. His long and consistent big numbers on winning teams is somewhat unique in this league. I think it would be easier to go with melo and fit him in to a niche as a scoring forward as part of a team that trading him for less. I accept this season as terrible--all teams have them--we're just bad. UNLESS we can get a perfect type deal for Melo--its best to keep him for now. He's not the reason were 5-26 the other castoffs teammates are and poor coaching are the reasons.


He doesn't have big numbers. He has a high PPG total. Depending on the quality of your teammates and your own production, you can be on a lot of .600 or .300 teams. You're not making any effort to figure out what his contribution to his teams' performance is. You're just stating that his teams did fairly well and he scored a lot of points (and was an average rebounder and passer). Regarding your other comment, he has the largest NBA contract in the history of the game. So of course I can't provide examples of other teams signing and then quickly trading a player on such a contract. No team has ever even given such a contract.

He doesn't have big numbers?
Than what is 10 straight years of nearly 600ball @25 ppg7reb 3 as 45%=? What other numbers do u have? I didn't give melo 125 mm but as a fan I understand that's the cards in front of me and I will work with them Instead of bitching how bad melo is I'm and I hope the team is focused on what we can do to improve. That's the key now what we can do to improve. I think we have just touched on a few ways to improve but there are many we are at an evaluation stage right now

You're actually just repeating what I said: he scored a lot of points on reasonably good teams. Then You're throwing up a lot of straw man arguments (claiming people are saying melo is bad or that the team shouldn't try to improve) while ignoring people's actual points.

good points. I think some take for granted how good denver used to be. Some think melo carried that team which is nonsense because i they had a collection of good players. despite that they rarely got out of the first round

Melo had a reasonable contract in Denver. Of course they were able to put a better team around him. Ultimately it wasn't enough to have Melo as their Big Kahuna. They would've fared better had Melo been relegated to 2nd or 3rd option not #1. Once they realized this they had no problem moving on from Melo and trading him for multiple assets instead of giving him a new make contract worth $20-25mil per

This is where the starphuching Knicks come in

i think if melo bought in more in denver they might have went further but i agree he fits better as the 2nd guy
F500ONE
Posts: 23899
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/28/2014
Member: #5844

12/26/2014  1:17 PM
Splat wrote:
nixluva wrote:
knickscity wrote:
F500ONE wrote:
nixluva wrote:Melo is just one player. If we're talking about adding a 1st rd draft pick and signing, at the least, one good FA this year. Those 3 will form the new core of the team. I fail to see why people are making it seem like adding better talent, that fits our needs, won't help this team move back towards winning and a better future. Some may not like Melo's game but he's not a detriment to winning that they make him out to be. You can't have it both ways. Those who say this team needs better talent, preferably 2 way players and a better mix, can't then say that if we get those players that we still can't win cuz of Melo. The more 2 way players we add to this team the better it will be. I've criticized Melo a lot of the years but he's not the reason the team has flopped the last couple of years.


Melo is a major reason the team has flopped past couple years

As we can see it wasn't Woodson nor Felton's either right going by your miscalculations


Melo doesn't provide what the 54 win team[which also lacked talent]

NO LEADERSHIP, NO HEART, LOSER MENTALITY


Im just glad Nix has gotten away from the nonsense of calling calderon a leader, and how it's impossible for Phil Fish and calderon to be worse than the previous. Now he knows. Melo is a problem and to be honest he's the main problem.

Melo begs for more scoring help when the team he was just involved with was 3rd in offensive rating (2012-13 Knicks).....so they trade for Bargs, who quite honestly hasnt even replaced Novak.

Thats besides lack of leadership, inconsistent defense, or just having an ounce of team concept.

Like I said before anyone can score if they keep shooting.


Calderon is just a little bit off of what I expected him to be. He's not where the big problem have come from. It's been the lack of production from the SG spot primarily. We had 3 SG's and should've been able to get much more out of that spot in this offense. I'm not really conceding all of the points you guys are trying to make here. Just because things didn't work out as planned doesn't mean that I feel this team couldn't have played much better if they had a healthy Jose and Bargs from the very start of the year. I never got to see the team that was expected to start the year, so why would I concede the point I was making? Accepting the current situation is not the same as admitting I was wrong about the team.

I've made this point over and over again that this team was 3-16 in games where they were within 5pts with 5 minutes to go. We didn't get what I expected to get from JR and THJ. I thought Shump looked good but for this to work everyone would have to not only "buy in" but be productive. Once things started to go bad it spiraled. I think it could've gone the other way with a much better start.

None of that really matters now. It's up to Phil to decide if he's going to push the tank button or still try to improve this years team. Since there's a very realistic chance at the #1 pick it makes more sense now to actually tank and start the process of the rebuild that was going to happen anyway. Only now with a higher pick. If Phil embraces the idea of tanking then he will have to make some kind of move because there is still the danger that this team could start playing just a little better. It wouldn't take much to move up and out of the top lottery picks. Sixers have started playing better and that could also happen to the Knicks despite how bad they may have looked so far.

Will you stop peddling BS please?

Jose is not what you claim he is. The impact you predicted has been proven false. Your constant bargaining for more time for your weak hypotheses to be borne out is really weak.

No one borrows time better than this guy

The Pollyanish Rhetoric

"no one could have anticipated"

"we've been in so many close games"

"our guards haven't stepped up"

"we're closer than fans want to give credit"

"we needed Bargs healthy from the start"

"I didn't get to see a full strength team"

"Jose for the most part is what I thought he'd be"

Then posting timelines leading up to next year

So he can rape his replay button when all teams records are 0-0

Instead of just saying "I was wrong and looking forward to change however it may come"

Splat
Posts: 23774
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2014
Member: #5862

12/26/2014  1:19 PM
knicks1248 wrote:
Splat wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:The offense would have to go through OK4 a lot. That is the triangle. Will Melo be ok with not having the ball in his hands every possession? Doubt it

Pipe dream alert, He's 18 yrs old, pays in a MDA type system and there is absolutely no telling how well in will translate into NBA player, right now he's not even starter material.

If this was a contending team, you would not have had to pay melo $124 mill, he would have sign for much less. Just think whats going to happen this summer, he's going to throw boat loads of $$$ for any sub par FA much, or max out Gasol and Monroe for their contact yr numbers.

It is merely desperation that drives people to say things like drafting OK4 + good FA signings = good team. Nobody knows how drafted players will pan out, but particularly very young ones who have not matured yet. OK4 is still basically a child in a man's body. For every Lebron, there are plenty of high school phenoms and 1 year college players who are considered sure things who are complete washouts in the NBA.

Plus, if you did draft a guy like OK4 and all he can do is score, then the fantasy of teaming him with Melo is already a failure of the imagination. Just throwing scorers together will produce one butt ugly team that will go nowhere in particular.

Literally EVERYTHING must go perfectly for this franchise to field a contender while Melo is still physically capable. Expecting perfect execution from one of the worst franchises in professional sports is asking for a whole lot.

100% agree,

At this point, I could never bank on FA and a draft to right the ship. I remember phil making it seem like he couldn't careless weather melo re-sign or not, "we would be fine" was his words, he also thought once he got melo on board, pau would be a mere phone call away, especially with calderon on ready on the squad.

But the way the GODS work around MSG, the knicks will go on some type of late season run, miss the playoffs by a game or 2, then be force to resign Bargi in Amare for 3 reasons

1)They fit well into what he's trying to build

2)You won't have nearly the options you thought you would have had

3)Trying to keep the core intact so you're not bringing in 9 new players and have to go through another identity crisis

Per bold above, that was Phil thinking his vulcan mind juju rules all planets and if he says it will work out either way, that was probably what the vanity of his prior success led him to believe. But it was mostly him thinking his mind games would work magic on Melo and that was phase one of re-inventing Melo in his image. Phil's god complex is not working out. He may not have much to fall back on.

Per underlined above, not having much to fall back on is related to his early insistence on build the Triangle Club at MSG. Wanting people he could trust is understandable, but he was hawking kool-aid and he had a limited pool of past drinkers to recruit from. He expended that quickly and ended up settling on Fisher.

Phil has already failed basically. The "Give It More Time" crowd will raise their puny fists to almighty yahweh and protest mightily, but the core premises of Phil's bamboozlement have come up shooting blanks.

The Triangle Theology is a robust failure. A book could be written on this failed premise, but the core failure is this: If you are going to blab about building a new culture around Triangles, then overpaying the anti-Triangle player says you're full of chit.

If you're going to build that culture and use the Triangle, then proceed as if you mean it. Instead, we were sold a pile of steaming chit and led on to believe there was an actual plan to execute on the promise.

Phil cashed in on his reputation because he found the one starphucker who would reward him: James Dolan.

And that is why this will fail.

Phil is no savior.

Only suckers believe that now.

I've got a fever and the only prescription is more cowbell!
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
12/26/2014  1:20 PM
BRIGGS wrote:
Vmart wrote:It's a tank year. There is talent on the team, enough to make the playoffs as a 8th seed or miss it with 30 wins none of that really does good for the team. Take the losing with a grain of salt and move on. To place blame on anyone when the plan is being executed to near perfection is crazy. We shouldn't be looking to blame the players or coaches they are doing the necessary something that should have been done many years ago.

Vm art. While this was not "the original plan" it is now and we should be thankful and embrace it. This time do land stupidity worked out well for the fans

If this wasn't the plan I think they would have started to make moves after the first 15 games. I do believe the agenda is in and if it wasn't plan A then plan B is a very good move. I don't think the fans should get work up to much. Someone has to do this and we have always harped that to be the best in the NBA you have to lose before getting good. The quick fixes for playoffs are not going to work that method didn't yield anything for the Knicks.

I'm really liking the prospect of adding a top draft pick. Just imagine adding Ok4 in the draft then adding Dragic to go with him. And there is still room to play for other players. A trade here and there all do a sudden the prospects start looking better and better. There is something to be said about rock bottom you know there is only way to go and that is up. If the Knicks manage to get the worst record they may well walk away with top pick of the first round and the top pick of second round.

CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
12/26/2014  1:21 PM
Splat wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
Splat wrote:
knicks1248 wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:The offense would have to go through OK4 a lot. That is the triangle. Will Melo be ok with not having the ball in his hands every possession? Doubt it

Pipe dream alert, He's 18 yrs old, pays in a MDA type system and there is absolutely no telling how well in will translate into NBA player, right now he's not even starter material.

If this was a contending team, you would not have had to pay melo $124 mill, he would have sign for much less. Just think whats going to happen this summer, he's going to throw boat loads of $$$ for any sub par FA much, or max out Gasol and Monroe for their contact yr numbers.

It is merely desperation that drives people to say things like drafting OK4 + good FA signings = good team. Nobody knows how drafted players will pan out, but particularly very young ones who have not matured yet. OK4 is still basically a child in a man's body. For every Lebron, there are plenty of high school phenoms and 1 year college players who are considered sure things who are complete washouts in the NBA.

Plus, if you did draft a guy like OK4 and all he can do is score, then the fantasy of teaming him with Melo is already a failure of the imagination. Just throwing scorers together will produce one butt ugly team that will go nowhere in particular.

Literally EVERYTHING must go perfectly for this franchise to field a contender while Melo is still physically capable. Expecting perfect execution from one of the worst franchises in professional sports is asking for a whole lot.

100% agree,

At this point, I could never bank on FA and a draft to right the ship. I remember phil making it seem like he couldn't careless weather melo re-sign or not, "we would be fine" was his words, he also thought once he got melo on board, pau would be a mere phone call away, especially with calderon on ready on the squad.

But the way the GODS work around MSG, the knicks will go on some type of late season run, miss the playoffs by a game or 2, then be force to resign Bargi in Amare for 3 reasons

1)They fit well into what he's trying to build

2)You won't have nearly the options you thought you would have had

3)Trying to keep the core intact so you're not bringing in 9 new players and have to go through another identity crisis

Per bold above, that was Phil thinking his vulcan mind juju rules all planets and if he says it will work out either way, that was probably what the vanity of his prior success led him to believe. But it was mostly him thinking his mind games would work magic on Melo and that was phase one of re-inventing Melo in his image. Phil's god complex is not working out. He may not have much to fall back on.

Per underlined above, not having much to fall back on is related to his early insistence on build the Triangle Club at MSG. Wanting people he could trust is understandable, but he was hawking kool-aid and he had a limited pool of past drinkers to recruit from. He expended that quickly and ended up settling on Fisher.

Phil has already failed basically. The "Give It More Time" crowd will raise their puny fists to almighty yahweh and protest mightily, but the core premises of Phil's bamboozlement have come up shooting blanks.

The Triangle Theology is a robust failure. A book could be written on this failed premise, but the core failure is this: If you are going to blab about building a new culture around Triangles, then overpaying the anti-Triangle player says you're full of chit.

If you're going to build that culture and use the Triangle, then proceed as if you mean it. Instead, we were sold a pile of steaming chit and led on to believe there was an actual plan to execute on the promise.

Phil cashed in on his reputation because he found the one starphucker who would reward him: James Dolan.

And that is why this will fail.

Phil is no savior.

Only suckers believe that now.

This is getting annoying. The all things are hopeless because Melo was resigned talking points don't add anything to the forum.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Carmelo Anthony team W-l record

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy