VCoug wrote:Uptown wrote:VCoug wrote:Oh boy, he can't be getting a max deal PLUS a no-trade clause! The only way he should be getting a no-trade is if he's taking a fairly large discount on the max, say 5 years/$100M. And unless we're somehow getting Durant in 2016, and I have no idea why he'd come here, I'm not seeing how we win 50+ games per year let alone compete for a title.
Letting Melo walk for nothing wasn't going to guarantee 'chips or 50 win seasons either.
No it wouldn't but letting him walk for nothing wouldn't hamstring us for the next 5 years either. And, again I'm repeating myself like a broken record, my preferred plan was to S&T with Chicago or another team and exchange for draft picks and/or young talent.
Right now our team is:
C: Dalembert, Aldrich
PF: Melo, Amare, Bargs
SF: Early
SG: Shump, JR, THJr, Ellington
PG: Calderon, Pablo, Larkin
Plus we have the taxpayer MLE, or possibly the full MLE if we waive Dalembert, to add another player.
Next year, our team is:
C: Aldrich?
PF: Melo
SF: Early
SG: Shump, THJr
PG: Calderon
And our cap figure will be around $36M. That doesn't include JR's $6M player option. It also doesn't include Early, our 2015 1st, or anyone we sign this year with the MLE. if you add those in we're probably talking about a cap figure of $45M.
Who are we realistically adding to that team that puts us into title contention. Or even ECF contention?
Didn't know Fished planned on playing Melo at 4. The lineups aren't contenders yet but they would look more balanced with Melo at 3, like Fish will probably go with in the triangle.