[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Get Eric Bledsoe, Send Dalembert & Larkin to Phoenix
Author Thread
yellowboy90
Posts: 33942
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/23/2011
Member: #3538

6/25/2014  11:28 PM
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

It wasn't only about Tyson though. Once you start adding Felton to a deal that 1st is off the table.
AUTOADVERT
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/25/2014  11:29 PM
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/25/2014  11:31 PM
NardDogNation wrote:
nixluva wrote:Let's get one thing straight... Shane Larkin is a legit prospect. He's no Fred Jones!!! If you ever saw Larkin play you'd know that he's a much better prospect than Jones. Larkin has legit NBA talent. I wanted the Knicks to get this kid in the draft and i'm happy to see we get a chance to see if we can develop him.

RELEVANT ADVANCED STATS: 3.4% steal percentage. Impressive for a guy his size.

SB NATION BIG BOARD POSITION: No. 30.

NBA CEILING: Isaiah Thomas (the Kings' version).

NBA FLOOR: D.J. Augustin.

JONATHAN TJARKS' ANALYSIS

Shane Larkin emerged on the national scene this season, leading Miami to the highest ranking in school history. After averaging 14 points, 4.5 assists and four rebounds on 47 percent shooting, he jumped while the iron was hot as a sophomore.

Jonathan Tjarks' ranking of the top prospects in the 2013 NBA Draft
At 5'11 and 170 with a 5'11 wingspan, Larkin will be one of the smallest players in the NBA. The only way a guy with that size can make the league is if he has essentially no holes in his game. He is a high-level shooter and ball-handler who ran a ton of pick-and-roll for Miami. He will be a good offensive player, although bigger and longer defenders will take a toll on his efficiency numbers. The questions for Larkin come on defense. Nearly every guard he faces will be able to shoot over the top of his head. As a result, he may be better as a situational player coming off the bench.

The D.J. Augustin comp sticks with me when I think of Larkin. Don't let Augustin's NBA career fool you. He was a first-team All-American at Texas who had better stats than Larkin on an even better team. At their sizes, it's just hard to be a consistent player in the NBA. That may be Larkin's downfall at the next level.

IMO there have been many small PG's that have been effective on the NBA level. There's obviously more to it than size. I think this kid could be at a Jameer Nelson level with more hops.

Uh, Fred Jones was a legit prospect. It's why he went 14th in his draft, ahead of dudes like Tayshaun Prince. I'm not sold on Larkin, especially with his health having been what it is. We could easily get a PG that is as good or better in this draft in the 20's without having to take on Calderon's contract. Hell, Omer Asik's mediocre ass got a first round pick from a lottery team, the Hornets. Needless to say, Larkin doesn't get me excited about losing Tyson Chandler.

exactly!!!! I am not saying it is a horrible deal, but lets not go pumping this dude up. I much rather not have him if it meant taking on calderons deal..

the picks to me are the best thing about this trade. i would like to package those to trade up into the first round.. tyler ennis seems like a nice player the knicks are targeting, and lets say we land ennis, then what will everyone be saying about larkin... i can tell you.... "crickets"...... he will be a forgotten throw in...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
6/25/2014  11:31 PM
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Their deals are different. They are owed almost the same amount but asik counts 6 million less on the cap.

I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
martin
Posts: 76489
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/25/2014  11:33 PM
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

I don't follow Dallas at all but I am pretty sure Larkin had a broken ankle to begin the season... as a rookie. Not the best way to start an NBA career.

Also, Dallas was fighting for playoff contention, I don't see a rookie who is behind the learning curve getting time in that situation, do you?

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/25/2014  11:33 PM
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

Yes but we got an easier contract to move. We gave up junk in Felton, saved money this summer, and got back many assets. When you get rid of the most difficult contract to move, and get back the value of 1 first round pick and 2 second round picks that's great. I would rather get all that plus get rid of Felton than just get back 1 future pick for Tyson.

Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/25/2014  11:35 PM
martin wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

I don't follow Dallas at all but I am pretty sure Larkin had a broken ankle to begin the season... as a rookie. Not the best way to start an NBA career.

Also, Dallas was fighting for playoff contention, I don't see a rookie who is behind the learning curve getting time in that situation, do you?

Exactly. His lack of playing time as a rookie means nothing.

tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/25/2014  11:36 PM
CrushAlot wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Their deals are different. They are owed almost the same amount but asik counts 6 million less on the cap.

I understand that, but when we saying back in the day when morey signed lin and asik to those poison pill deals, people were saying they were bad deals, they ket saying lin and asik were overpaid at 15 mil a year and I kept saying the salaries only count 8.3 mil to the cap and I remember you and 3g4g getting into that discussion and you kept saying morey would have a hard time moving that contract and 3g was trying to explain the cap implications..

morey could have moved asik last year to boston if he wasn't asking for two first round picks....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/25/2014  11:43 PM
martin wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

I don't follow Dallas at all but I am pretty sure Larkin had a broken ankle to begin the season... as a rookie. Not the best way to start an NBA career.

Also, Dallas was fighting for playoff contention, I don't see a rookie who is behind the learning curve getting time in that situation, do you?

considering that they were thin at guard, why not? I mean he is a pick right outside the lottery you would think he could give you something...

really that is not a good reason, larkin was healed before harris and still got less minutes.. and now he is a throw into this trade.. the 18 pick in a draft is a throw in one year later?

now I am not saying that I won't take a wait and see approach with this kid. I hope he does well, i will be rooting for him, I hope he becomes a better player than DJ augustine, but right now he isn't.. not close... with that said, he was drafted 18, didn't we have many discussions on here with draft value and how many were saying that mid to later picks had little value, and i was asking people, well where is the cut off.... well it seems the cut off for players being good is whatever pick that comes after a player the knicks get....

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/25/2014  11:46 PM
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

Yes but we got an easier contract to move. We gave up junk in Felton, saved money this summer, and got back many assets. When you get rid of the most difficult contract to move, and get back the value of 1 first round pick and 2 second round picks that's great. I would rather get all that plus get rid of Felton than just get back 1 future pick for Tyson.

I would have been happy with chandler for a later first or multiple second round picks and taking no salary, then taking on more future salary... we are taking on more than 5 mil in salary in 2015.. I mean wasn't that war cry around here... 2015 free agency?

what I find funny about this kind of reasoning now is that people justified throwing away picks to get rid of novaks 4 million dollars per year... do you now see where I am coming from? and guess what also.. the 2016 pick is higher than any pick we have gotten back so far...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
6/25/2014  11:49 PM
Knixkik wrote:
martin wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

I don't follow Dallas at all but I am pretty sure Larkin had a broken ankle to begin the season... as a rookie. Not the best way to start an NBA career.

Also, Dallas was fighting for playoff contention, I don't see a rookie who is behind the learning curve getting time in that situation, do you?

Exactly. His lack of playing time as a rookie means nothing.

ok thats fine, so if we can't talk about his lack of playing time he is a throw in.. we have more intel on ellington than this kid... and I don't hear anyone talking big about ellington.. except guns with a few hopeful words...

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
6/25/2014  11:56 PM    LAST EDITED: 6/25/2014  11:57 PM
tkf wrote:
martin wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

I don't follow Dallas at all but I am pretty sure Larkin had a broken ankle to begin the season... as a rookie. Not the best way to start an NBA career.

Also, Dallas was fighting for playoff contention, I don't see a rookie who is behind the learning curve getting time in that situation, do you?

considering that they were thin at guard, why not? I mean he is a pick right outside the lottery you would think he could give you something...

really that is not a good reason, larkin was healed before harris and still got less minutes.. and now he is a throw into this trade.. the 18 pick in a draft is a throw in one year later?

now I am not saying that I won't take a wait and see approach with this kid. I hope he does well, i will be rooting for him, I hope he becomes a better player than DJ augustine, but right now he isn't.. not close... with that said, he was drafted 18, didn't we have many discussions on here with draft value and how many were saying that mid to later picks had little value, and i was asking people, well where is the cut off.... well it seems the cut off for players being good is whatever pick that comes after a player the knicks get....

Like many coaches, many ROOKIES will not get the luxury of playing time unless they are part of the future of the franchise, they were competing for a SPOT in the WEST and Devin Harris is a veteran that understood his role, had experience the Mav's team/roster and system

Was he be better?
Will he be better, can he continue to improve/develop?

We don't know but you cannot judge his STATS when he didn't even get an opportunity to play under those cicrumstances above

You understood Lin didn't get ANY PT prior to "Linsanity"
Does that mean he wasn't better than the other PG's that played before him at the same time? NO

Tony Douglas
Iman
Baron Davis

were all ranked before Lin

now Lin also is playing behind Beverly for FIT/CHEMISTRY reasons, it necessarily make Beverly the better PG/PLAYER by any means, yet you understand this too but fail to understand Larkin's as a rookie

Bibby/Hinrich played before the developing Jeff Teague for many years, did that make them the better player EVEN AT THE TIME

All I am saying is, you cannot judge Larkin's STATs because he didn't play not saying he is or isn't better

Knixkik
Posts: 35476
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
6/26/2014  12:00 AM
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

Yes but we got an easier contract to move. We gave up junk in Felton, saved money this summer, and got back many assets. When you get rid of the most difficult contract to move, and get back the value of 1 first round pick and 2 second round picks that's great. I would rather get all that plus get rid of Felton than just get back 1 future pick for Tyson.

I would have been happy with chandler for a later first or multiple second round picks and taking no salary, then taking on more future salary... we are taking on more than 5 mil in salary in 2015.. I mean wasn't that war cry around here... 2015 free agency?

what I find funny about this kind of reasoning now is that people justified throwing away picks to get rid of novaks 4 million dollars per year... do you now see where I am coming from? and guess what also.. the 2016 pick is higher than any pick we have gotten back so far...

No difference is the players. Novak and Felton are tough to trade. You have to include assets to get rid of those types of players when needed. Calderon can be flipped easy if needed. That is the component you are missing.

martin
Posts: 76489
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/26/2014  12:11 AM
tkf wrote:
martin wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

I don't follow Dallas at all but I am pretty sure Larkin had a broken ankle to begin the season... as a rookie. Not the best way to start an NBA career.

Also, Dallas was fighting for playoff contention, I don't see a rookie who is behind the learning curve getting time in that situation, do you?

considering that they were thin at guard, why not? I mean he is a pick right outside the lottery you would think he could give you something...

really that is not a good reason, larkin was healed before harris and still got less minutes.. and now he is a throw into this trade.. the 18 pick in a draft is a throw in one year later?

now I am not saying that I won't take a wait and see approach with this kid. I hope he does well, i will be rooting for him, I hope he becomes a better player than DJ augustine, but right now he isn't.. not close... with that said, he was drafted 18, didn't we have many discussions on here with draft value and how many were saying that mid to later picks had little value, and i was asking people, well where is the cut off.... well it seems the cut off for players being good is whatever pick that comes after a player the knicks get....

yeah you don't much about the Mavs. Larkin, Jose, Monta, Mekel, Vince. They are not thin at the guard spot.

You expect a rookie who misses the whole summer (and I have no idea if he missed training camp or not either) to come in a fill minutes at the beginning of season on a vet team who needs to make playoffs. Good luck with that

Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/26/2014  1:08 AM
Actually, IIRC, Fred Jones wasn't even projected to be a first rounder. The fact he went #14 was a shock.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
STATMELO
Posts: 20199
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/10/2011
Member: #3637

6/26/2014  2:07 AM
NardDogNation wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Phoenix is desperate for a Center. Netting Dalembert is pretty good. Hell of a lot cheaper and more productive than Tyson.

Phoenix gets out of paying Bledsoe when they already have dragic
& Get their starting center

...so productive that the Mavericks just traded him for Tyson to have the right to have the right to pay Raymond Felton? I think not.

Samuel Dalembert is a fringe ball player at this point in his career, which is why he's been bouncing around the league for little more than a fraction of the midlevel exception. In contrast, Kendrick Perkins is due to make $9 million this season and I'm a better 5 man than he is. The Suns are not doing this trade.


Clearly you haven't seen many Mavericks games, Dalembert is a productive player at this point he's better than Tyson Chandler on both ends. Only reason Mavericks traded him is because they are so hell-bent on getting Tyson back. Tyson still has the reputation of an elite defensive anchor when he hasn't been that in years.

In fact Josh Smith, Kevin Garnett, LeBron James among others had cases for DPoY in '12 over Tyson.

BigDaddyG
Posts: 39943
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049

6/26/2014  2:28 AM
STATMELO wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
gunsnewing wrote:Phoenix is desperate for a Center. Netting Dalembert is pretty good. Hell of a lot cheaper and more productive than Tyson.

Phoenix gets out of paying Bledsoe when they already have dragic
& Get their starting center

...so productive that the Mavericks just traded him for Tyson to have the right to have the right to pay Raymond Felton? I think not.

Samuel Dalembert is a fringe ball player at this point in his career, which is why he's been bouncing around the league for little more than a fraction of the midlevel exception. In contrast, Kendrick Perkins is due to make $9 million this season and I'm a better 5 man than he is. The Suns are not doing this trade.


Clearly you haven't seen many Mavericks games, Dalembert is a productive player at this point he's better than Tyson Chandler on both ends. Only reason Mavericks traded him is because they are so hell-bent on getting Tyson back. Tyson still has the reputation of an elite defensive anchor when he hasn't been that in years.

In fact Josh Smith, Kevin Garnett, LeBron James among others had cases for DPoY in '12 over Tyson.

I've seen enough of Samuel Dalembert to know that he isn't better than Tyson. Bad hands, foul prone, lack of defensive awareness etc. Tyson's court awareness alone makes him an upgrade over Dalembert. Phoenix isn't desperate enough to get rid of Bledsoe for Dalembert/Larkin pavkage when they already plumlee and len.

Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
6/26/2014  5:18 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/26/2014  8:49 AM
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

Yes but we got an easier contract to move. We gave up junk in Felton, saved money this summer, and got back many assets. When you get rid of the most difficult contract to move, and get back the value of 1 first round pick and 2 second round picks that's great. I would rather get all that plus get rid of Felton than just get back 1 future pick for Tyson.

I would have been happy with chandler for a later first or multiple second round picks and taking no salary, then taking on more future salary... we are taking on more than 5 mil in salary in 2015.. I mean wasn't that war cry around here... 2015 free agency?

what I find funny about this kind of reasoning now is that people justified throwing away picks to get rid of novaks 4 million dollars per year... do you now see where I am coming from? and guess what also.. the 2016 pick is higher than any pick we have gotten back so far...

Haha I know what you mean. I'm allowed to enjoy the 2 picks because I also predicted the same thing about how quickly the tune will change lol

newyorknewyork
Posts: 30167
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
6/26/2014  5:48 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

Yes but we got an easier contract to move. We gave up junk in Felton, saved money this summer, and got back many assets. When you get rid of the most difficult contract to move, and get back the value of 1 first round pick and 2 second round picks that's great. I would rather get all that plus get rid of Felton than just get back 1 future pick for Tyson.

I would have been happy with chandler for a later first or multiple second round picks and taking no salary, then taking on more future salary... we are taking on more than 5 mil in salary in 2015.. I mean wasn't that war cry around here... 2015 free agency?

what I find funny about this kind of reasoning now is that people justified throwing away picks to get rid of novaks 4 million dollars per year... do you now see where I am coming from? and guess what also.. the 2016 pick is higher than any pick we have gotten back so far...

Haha I know what you mean. I'm allowed to enjoy the two second era because I also predicted the same thing about how quickly the tune will change lol

Not many people like the fact that Calderon's contract runs into 2015 free agency. But at the same time Phil Jackson is running the ship now. A lot of people view Jose Calderon as absolutely perfect for the triangle offense. Calderon might have been a player Jackson wanted regardless of the 2015 cap space which Raymond Felton was going to eat 4.2 mil out of anyway.

https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/28/2012
Member: #4451

6/26/2014  8:47 AM    LAST EDITED: 6/26/2014  8:47 AM
gunsnewing wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:
Knixkik wrote:
tkf wrote:what I do find amazing is that tyson and asik had similar contracts.. yet the pelicans got a first round pick for asik... Perceived value I guess... wow

Larkin is the value of a 1st round pick. Plus we got 2 other picks. And replaced Felton with Calderon who's a better player and on a better contract relative to his production. I think we got way more for chandler than they did for Asik.

Unless I read your statement wrong. Did you mean you are surprised they got 'only' a first round pick? Because we got way more than that.

the rockets got a first round pick and didn't have to take any junk back.. that is a more value deal.. they got rid of huge contract and got a pick..remember how people wee saying those poison pill deals would be hard to move? more is a beast, dude knows how to deal..

Larkin could not get playing time behind calderon and devin harris who broke his toe...

we didn't get more because we had to eat into our 2015 and beyond salary...

Yes but we got an easier contract to move. We gave up junk in Felton, saved money this summer, and got back many assets. When you get rid of the most difficult contract to move, and get back the value of 1 first round pick and 2 second round picks that's great. I would rather get all that plus get rid of Felton than just get back 1 future pick for Tyson.

I would have been happy with chandler for a later first or multiple second round picks and taking no salary, then taking on more future salary... we are taking on more than 5 mil in salary in 2015.. I mean wasn't that war cry around here... 2015 free agency?

what I find funny about this kind of reasoning now is that people justified throwing away picks to get rid of novaks 4 million dollars per year... do you now see where I am coming from? and guess what also.. the 2016 pick is higher than any pick we have gotten back so far...

Haha I know what you mean. I'm allowed to enjoy the two second era because I also predicted the same thing about how quickly the tune will change lol

I think everybody that is upset about calderon's contract is going overboard. Yes I dont love teh contract but its not like he makes amare/bargs money. We will still have plenty of cap space
Get Eric Bledsoe, Send Dalembert & Larkin to Phoenix

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy