holfresh wrote:Sure it does, you are asking the guy with his face on the marquee to take a pay cut and sacrifice as you and your pal is doing a money grab...

But as of now the face of the Knicks is Phil Jackson.

kerr's pay is irrelevant to Melo, and if melo thinks like you do...Melo can kick pebbles.

knickscity wrote:

holfresh wrote:Sure it does, you are asking the guy with his face on the marquee to take a pay cut and sacrifice as you and your pal is doing a money grab...

No, Melo needs to take a paycut so he can have quality teammates around him....and that wont change no matter how much the coach makes.

But as of now the face of the Knicks is Phil Jackson.

kerr's pay is irrelevant to Melo, and if melo thinks like you do...Melo can kick pebbles.

Well let's see how many wins the new face of the Knicks can get without the horses..

martin wrote:2 more words: Pat Riely. Money grab with the ownership stake in Miami team or long term smart move?

Lol, so true, Pat shook Mickey's legs I guess.

Money well spent though.

For me, Phil has proven on every level he's a winner, if he wants Kerr...pay him and get that deal done.

holfresh wrote:

martin wrote:2 more words: Pat Riely. Money grab with the ownership stake in Miami team or long term smart move?

Stupid deal for the owner...Bron isn't in Miami because of Riley..

Laughable. Go check the timelines

holfresh wrote:

knickscity wrote:

holfresh wrote:Sure it does, you are asking the guy with his face on the marquee to take a pay cut and sacrifice as you and your pal is doing a money grab...

No, Melo needs to take a paycut so he can have quality teammates around him....and that wont change no matter how much the coach makes.

But as of now the face of the Knicks is Phil Jackson.

kerr's pay is irrelevant to Melo, and if melo thinks like you do...Melo can kick pebbles.

Well let's see how many wins the new face of the Knicks can get without the horses..

holfresh wrote:

martin wrote:

holfresh wrote:Sure it does, you are asking the guy with his face on the marquee to take a pay cut and sacrifice as you and your pal is doing a money grab...

One has nothing to do with the other. 2 words: Salary cap.

It has everything to do with the message you are sending...

If anything, here's the message: culture gonna change, front office and coach on same page, players are next. The base seems to be solid enough

holfresh wrote:

martin wrote:

holfresh wrote:

martin wrote:2 more words: Pat Riely. Money grab with the ownership stake in Miami team or long term smart move?

Stupid deal for the owner...Bron isn't in Miami because of Riley..

Laughable. Go check the timelines

If Riley was in Milwaukee do you think Bron would be there too??

Dude, you are not making sense. I didn't claim that so no need to make up wild-ass scenarios. Stick with what actually happened.

holfresh wrote:

knickscity wrote:

holfresh wrote:Sure it does, you are asking the guy with his face on the marquee to take a pay cut and sacrifice as you and your pal is doing a money grab...

No, Melo needs to take a paycut so he can have quality teammates around him....and that wont change no matter how much the coach makes.

But as of now the face of the Knicks is Phil Jackson.

kerr's pay is irrelevant to Melo, and if melo thinks like you do...Melo can kick pebbles.

Well let's see how many wins the new face of the Knicks can get without the horses..

If Melo walks then we will certainly be tanking for a high pick in 2015. I think Jackson and whatever coach he hire will understand that's the best scenario.

martin wrote:

holfresh wrote:

martin wrote:

holfresh wrote:

martin wrote:2 more words: Pat Riely. Money grab with the ownership stake in Miami team or long term smart move?

Stupid deal for the owner...Bron isn't in Miami because of Riley..

Laughable. Go check the timelines

If Riley was in Milwaukee do you think Bron would be there too??

Dude, you are not making sense. I didn't claim that so no need to make up wild-ass scenarios. Stick with what actually happened.