[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

That time of the year...Here is my plan to rebuild my Knicks
Author Thread
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

5/9/2014  7:33 PM
CrushAlot wrote:Pincus, Basketball Insiders suggests this trade between the Bulls and Knicks.
A package of Boozer, Dunleavy, two 2014 first-round picks (16 and 19) and perhaps a future first should be a workable package for both the Knicks and Bulls.
Read more at http://www.basketballinsiders.com/knicks-bulls-should-talk-melo-trade/#Zkh3JpVrEQ6X8T7h.99

I'd need Mirotic to consider it. It's a good start though.

AUTOADVERT
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

5/9/2014  8:43 PM
http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2055475-carmelo-anthony-must-only-choose-ny-knicks-if-he-believes-in-their-future

I'll take the Draft picks. But why would they do this when they can just amnesty Boozer, keep their picks and sign Melo?

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

5/9/2014  9:20 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2055475-carmelo-anthony-must-only-choose-ny-knicks-if-he-believes-in-their-future

I'll take the Draft picks. But why would they do this when they can just amnesty Boozer, keep their picks and sign Melo?

...because they can't actually sign Melo outright and their owner doesn't seem inclined to eat Boozer's contract.

RonRon
Posts: 25531
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/22/2002
Member: #246
5/10/2014  6:51 AM
Essentially, are the assets used to give up for CA worth 30m out of your bank account?
Some owners surely would not mind, look at Dolan and Isiah's years....
While other owners, they see it as business, so it comes down to the owner
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
5/10/2014  7:15 AM
yellowboy90 wrote:
mreinman wrote:
nixluva wrote:I saw the beginnings of STAT learning how to play inside out big man that can set up his teammates when the double comes. That's exactly the role of bigs in the Triangle and I think STAT could be successful in that role. If he starts the year and has success his expiring contract and post skills could be of use to a team looking for a big man for a playoff run at the trade deadline.

Not meaning to be snitty but how did you see that? He avg 0.5 assists this year.

The dude never ever passes. Its like putting a quarter into a broker pay phone.

He had the worst USG : AST ratio probably ever at about 5.5 : 1.

I was just about to make a similar comment when was this. I think I saw that rare winged unicorn(Amar'e ast) once every 3 weeks.

I am no sure if Amar'e was taught to pass out the double but he seems like a person that is willing to learn offensive things.

Yea um shouldn't the coach ahem Michael Woodson who is paid millions be responsible for pointing that out to him. No reason why that part of his game could t be developed. Amare has proven he will put in the work in the offseason. But I forgot Woodson gave up on Amare long ago and rather just ISO his face off

Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
5/10/2014  8:19 AM
meloshouldgo wrote:http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2055475-carmelo-anthony-must-only-choose-ny-knicks-if-he-believes-in-their-future

I'll take the Draft picks. But why would they do this when they can just amnesty Boozer, keep their picks and sign Melo?


Then they have to pay Boozer $17 mil to not play for them! If they don't get something great during free agency, then it's a terrible move.
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
5/10/2014  11:07 AM
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2055475-carmelo-anthony-must-only-choose-ny-knicks-if-he-believes-in-their-future

I'll take the Draft picks. But why would they do this when they can just amnesty Boozer, keep their picks and sign Melo?


Then they have to pay Boozer $17 mil to not play for them! If they don't get something great during free agency, then it's a terrible move.

i doubt they'd amnesty Boozer unless they knew they were signing a major piece.
NardDogNation
Posts: 27405
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 5/7/2013
Member: #5555

5/10/2014  11:20 AM
knickscity wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2055475-carmelo-anthony-must-only-choose-ny-knicks-if-he-believes-in-their-future

I'll take the Draft picks. But why would they do this when they can just amnesty Boozer, keep their picks and sign Melo?


Then they have to pay Boozer $17 mil to not play for them! If they don't get something great during free agency, then it's a terrible move.

i doubt they'd amnesty Boozer unless they knew they were signing a major piece.

The time span to amnesty a player is only a week long, from about July 9th to July 16th. Considering that free agency doesn't start until July 6th-ish, I highly doubt the Bulls will get a confirmation from Melo before that period expires. I also doubt that an owner as cheap as Reinsdorf, will eat $16 million. Expect a trade of Melo if he goes to Chicago.

knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
5/10/2014  11:40 AM
NardDogNation wrote:
knickscity wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2055475-carmelo-anthony-must-only-choose-ny-knicks-if-he-believes-in-their-future

I'll take the Draft picks. But why would they do this when they can just amnesty Boozer, keep their picks and sign Melo?


Then they have to pay Boozer $17 mil to not play for them! If they don't get something great during free agency, then it's a terrible move.

i doubt they'd amnesty Boozer unless they knew they were signing a major piece.

The time span to amnesty a player is only a week long, from about July 9th to July 16th. Considering that free agency doesn't start until July 6th-ish, I highly doubt the Bulls will get a confirmation from Melo before that period expires. I also doubt that an owner as cheap as Reinsdorf, will eat $16 million. Expect a trade of Melo if he goes to Chicago.


"When can free agents officially beginning signing with teams?
While team’s can negotiate with free agents starting July 1, they can not officially sign a contract until July 8. This is known as the “July Moratorium” and is when the league reviews the revenue from the previous season and officially sets the salary cap. "

http://www.nba.com/knicks/freeagency/faqs.html

The amnesty starts after the moratorium for that specific reason, to get rid of a salary cap holder to sign another.

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q68

meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/3/2014
Member: #5801

5/10/2014  11:44 AM
knickscity wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
knickscity wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2055475-carmelo-anthony-must-only-choose-ny-knicks-if-he-believes-in-their-future

I'll take the Draft picks. But why would they do this when they can just amnesty Boozer, keep their picks and sign Melo?


Then they have to pay Boozer $17 mil to not play for them! If they don't get something great during free agency, then it's a terrible move.

i doubt they'd amnesty Boozer unless they knew they were signing a major piece.

The time span to amnesty a player is only a week long, from about July 9th to July 16th. Considering that free agency doesn't start until July 6th-ish, I highly doubt the Bulls will get a confirmation from Melo before that period expires. I also doubt that an owner as cheap as Reinsdorf, will eat $16 million. Expect a trade of Melo if he goes to Chicago.


"When can free agents officially beginning signing with teams?
While team’s can negotiate with free agents starting July 1, they can not officially sign a contract until July 8. This is known as the “July Moratorium” and is when the league reviews the revenue from the previous season and officially sets the salary cap. "

http://www.nba.com/knicks/freeagency/faqs.html

The amnesty starts after the moratorium for that specific reason, to get rid of a salary cap holder to sign another.

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q68

Did not know about these timing constraints. Definitely puts it in perspective.

I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
5/10/2014  11:49 AM
Nice so mo walking to the Bulls and us getting nothing isn't happening
knickscity
Posts: 24533
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/2/2012
Member: #4241
USA
5/10/2014  12:06 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:
knickscity wrote:
NardDogNation wrote:
knickscity wrote:
Bonn1997 wrote:
meloshouldgo wrote:http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2055475-carmelo-anthony-must-only-choose-ny-knicks-if-he-believes-in-their-future

I'll take the Draft picks. But why would they do this when they can just amnesty Boozer, keep their picks and sign Melo?


Then they have to pay Boozer $17 mil to not play for them! If they don't get something great during free agency, then it's a terrible move.

i doubt they'd amnesty Boozer unless they knew they were signing a major piece.

The time span to amnesty a player is only a week long, from about July 9th to July 16th. Considering that free agency doesn't start until July 6th-ish, I highly doubt the Bulls will get a confirmation from Melo before that period expires. I also doubt that an owner as cheap as Reinsdorf, will eat $16 million. Expect a trade of Melo if he goes to Chicago.


"When can free agents officially beginning signing with teams?
While team’s can negotiate with free agents starting July 1, they can not officially sign a contract until July 8. This is known as the “July Moratorium” and is when the league reviews the revenue from the previous season and officially sets the salary cap. "

http://www.nba.com/knicks/freeagency/faqs.html

The amnesty starts after the moratorium for that specific reason, to get rid of a salary cap holder to sign another.

http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q68

Did not know about these timing constraints. Definitely puts it in perspective.


It's specifically designed that way, top free agents dont use a whole week to pick their teams. Once that pick is known then the amnesty would begin in Chicago's case if they try that route.

The interesting thing about it is that Boozer is actually a good player, so he'd surely get picked up and the Bulls wont be on the tab for the whole amount remaining, and they could even work out a further trade with a team on draft day for instance that they may KNOW might pick him up via amnesty....kinda how Phx picked up Scola from the Rockets and paid almost all of the money due to him.

Charlotte did the same with Dallas' Haywood, the Kings did the same with the Nets Travis outlaw.....and Boozer is certainly better than those guys and an expiring contract.

Ironically the Suns had used their own amnesty at the same time on Josh Childress.

That time of the year...Here is my plan to rebuild my Knicks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy