NardDogNation wrote:Bonn1997 wrote:NardDogNation wrote:tkf wrote:Caseloads wrote:tkf wrote:I like shumpert a lot.. but he is nothing like paul george...or in that class.. may never be...
Paul George is stinking it up this game. And is not coming off an ACL injury. Shumpert we TRUST
do you realize how ridiculous it is to point to one game to try to prove your point.. Ok, so what about games one and two? should we say shumpert will be the next paul george every time he has a bad game? come on man.. HE is nothing like paul george, doesn't have the game, height or length.. and shumpert can't help this... and coming off an ACL injury is irrelevant...really why must knick fans grab hold to something, blow it through the roof and try to justify it at all cost? It is ok if shumpert won't be as good as paul George, not many players in the league will be very soon...
Do you know how ridiculous it is to point to a playoff series to anoint a player as being better than a 9 year vet who eclipsed him in nearly every relevant metric?
Actually, George eclipsed Melo in every metric other than total points.
Melo also rebounded better
How is 6.9 rbs/a game at PF better than 7.6 at SF? Note that I'm look at #s for the full season since you, correctly, pointed out that it's ridiculous to look at just one playoff series. Even if you just look at the post-season series, George still rebounds much better for his position than Melo does, though.
shot the ball better from the field and free throw line
That's incorporated in total points, which I acknowledged was a sizable advantage for Melo.
fewer turnovers per game
Melo averages more turnovers and fewer assists.
Melo has a meaningful and sizable scoring advantage but George is better at everything else.