A few responses. And first, this is me just taking a swing at analysis. I have to think through it some more--as well as see what our final roster looks like--before I offer an endorsement. "Letting Lin walk is the right thing to do"
in the context of this speculation is what I'm trying to pick through.
On first blush I would like a return to a more rugged brand of Knicks basketball, built on offense flowing from the blocks, aggressive rebounding and shotblocking and hard-ass Kurt Thomas fouls. I'm not sure this gets us there, but that's just my personal basketball prejudice (fueled largely from my parks-and-rec league career as a low-post player forced to watch hacks toss up terrible jumper after terrible jumper!
)
CTKnicksfan wrote:Letting Lin walk for nothing is dumb. I'm ok if he's not part of the master plan, but then at least match and trade him on Dec 15th.
The counter here is that it is extremely risky. That's two months of exposure and if Linsanity proves to be a fluke or even marginalized, you have no takers, because that back end of the contract is indeed an absolute cap-killer. We write it off because we're taxpayers anyway, but no one is going to pick up that contract if Lin proves to be merely a solid pro (and without the MDA offense as support, there's an excellent chance his numbers will come down to earth). And what if that knee blows out? Remember the MRI revealed a chronic, small meniscus tear in his knee. And if his skillset doesn't fit in the new game-plan, it doesn't fit. So you're essentially going into the new season using Lin as only a showcase for a trade, and not with the best intentions of the club at heart (again, based on the premise that this new direction is what the brass down to the coaching staff agree upon.)
Again, I don't want to be in the position bashing Lin. I'm a big fan.
EDIT: beaten by smackeddog.
VCoug wrote:Replacing him with Felton doesn't make sense since Felton has never shown he can be effective outside of MDA's fast-paced offense.
It's not apples to apples. These are two different skillsets. In the context of this new plan, you don't need a ball-dominant, penetrating point guard. You need a facilitator, a smart passer, a solid defender and someone who can hit an open three. Lin's strength is a quick first step and an ability to get in the paint and be creative. Noble attributes, but wouldn't fit with his approach.
loweyecue wrote:If by vision you mean marginalizing every one not called Melo so he can have the entire spotlight to himslef then I agree.
Don't want to make this another Melo thread, but this is exactly the opposite of what I am conjecturing. Why do you think Amare is being asked to work on his back-to-the-basket game? To be another option in the blocks. Why was Kidd brought in? To mentor Kidd or maybe to use his pedigree and stature to put Melo is the best place to succeed and call him on the times he tries to do much himself. Sorry, but any coach who publicly calls out the face of the franchise to get into better shape is not looking to make huge, landscape-changing roster moves purely to get on his Christmas card list.
loweyecue wrote:[All you talk about is slow half court offense. Good luck with Camby, Tyson and Kidd running back to defend fast breaks.
So a motion-based, pick-and-roll offense against the best team in the league at defending that won't result in fast breaks? The Knicks are thinking--as is my best guess--that a methodical, more traditional offense based on passing out of double teams and pounding the glass will take some gas out of the Heat's Blitzkrieg D. May not be as fun to watch, but that feels like the strategy here.
fishmike wrote:Glad you dont run my team
Thanks for your constructive feedback.